New
What did you think of this episode?
DO NOT discuss the source material beyond this episode. If you want to discuss future events or theories, please use separate threads.
DO NOT ask where to watch/download this episode or give links to copyrighted, non-fair use material.
DO NOT troll/bait/harass/abuse other users for liking or disliking the series/characters.
DO read the Anime Discussion Rules and Site & Forum Guidelines.
DO NOT ask where to watch/download this episode or give links to copyrighted, non-fair use material.
DO NOT troll/bait/harass/abuse other users for liking or disliking the series/characters.
DO read the Anime Discussion Rules and Site & Forum Guidelines.
Dec 12, 2009 11:19 AM
#201
June_1983 said: I can't believe there's no Worldenddominator though. They used it multiple times and I did like the remix. We really do need an ost thread :D :D :D Then you should make an Umineko Music Discussion Thread And there might be another OST since there's a lot of music missing from this one. Darklight0303 said: Woah track 24 I can't remember when that plays in the anime but I LOVE it @_@ It was used at the end of episode 23. |
Dec 12, 2009 5:04 PM
#202
hirahira said: I noticed those too, I find especially the one of Kinzo's name really interesting cause I never thought about it myself, but when Battler mentioned it, I realized that "Goldsmith" is actually some kind of literal translation of Kinzo's own name (just like Battler himself's).Darklight0303 said: Denwa said: Just keep reading it, it gets better. Like I've said before, the first episode is the least entertaining to most. Though, keep your eyes open for things that where mentioned in later episodes. I heard ALOT was foreshadowed in earlier episodes. Heck the goats were foreshadowed even if it was just a joking thought of battler's IT STILL CAME TRUE XDDD And Battler also called Kinzo Goldsmith in EP1 and Kyrie mentions "The North Wind and The Sun" And there's some foreshadowing for EP5 stuff too But the most heavily hinted thing in EP1 i think has to be something about Kyrie, cause it keeps telling us how Battler's mom died at the (somewhat) same time as Kyrie became his mother. Not that I personally really doubt about Kyrie, but theres seems to be really something about her and Rudolf~ And she is definitive the most intelligent person on that island. I always thoguht Eva was quite cunning as well, but after reading VN, i think she was only more or less relying on her instinct... |
Dec 12, 2009 6:03 PM
#203
Dec 12, 2009 7:22 PM
#204
MarthX said: I get the feeling this is going to be one of the episodes where the VN fans hate it and people who haven't read the VN will love it. Nope, I haven't read the VN but I'm not impressed by the episode....still too many unknowns to start a "logical" deduction...and stuffs happening at random... plot holes that should have existed... |
bla bla bla The endless debate between fans and haters. At one point, after spending a lot of time on MAL, you just realize it's totally pointless.Niko-kun said: On MAL, everyone who has used the lame rating system becomes a critic and an intellectual by default, haven't you heard? |
Dec 12, 2009 7:45 PM
#205
wakka9ca said: MarthX said: I get the feeling this is going to be one of the episodes where the VN fans hate it and people who haven't read the VN will love it. Nope, I haven't read the VN but I'm not impressed by the episode....still too many unknowns to start a "logical" deduction...and stuffs happening at random... plot holes that should have existed... It's not supposed to be easy. And there aren't any plot holes. If there's inconsistencies, then they're inconsistent for a reason. If a detective has some clues but decides it's not enough and doesn't even try to work with what he's given, then he's a lousy detective. |
LunarEmeraldDec 12, 2009 7:49 PM
Dec 13, 2009 8:38 AM
#206
MarthX said: wakka9ca said: MarthX said: I get the feeling this is going to be one of the episodes where the VN fans hate it and people who haven't read the VN will love it. Nope, I haven't read the VN but I'm not impressed by the episode....still too many unknowns to start a "logical" deduction...and stuffs happening at random... plot holes that should have existed... It's not supposed to be easy. And there aren't any plot holes. If there's inconsistencies, then they're inconsistent for a reason. If a detective has some clues but decides it's not enough and doesn't even try to work with what he's given, then he's a lousy detective. By reading the forums, I have the impression that DEEN really missed some important subtleties.....and please don't talk about logical deduction when what you're seeing can be dismissed as illusion by some....And yes, I don't care and I don't want to work it out. Unfortunately, I do not have the luxury (time) to do that. I just simply don't care about who wins at the end (to me, they are both valid point of view). It's the process and the fun that comes with it that matters. |
bla bla bla The endless debate between fans and haters. At one point, after spending a lot of time on MAL, you just realize it's totally pointless.Niko-kun said: On MAL, everyone who has used the lame rating system becomes a critic and an intellectual by default, haven't you heard? |
Dec 13, 2009 10:23 AM
#207
Really missed some important subtleties might be putting it lightly ;) But yes. You may want to just read the novels if you have the time that is. --- as for wanting it to end , I do to... if only so I dont see the series butchered any further. I can only hope they dont screw up Ange's death or the blue truth battle .. |
Dec 13, 2009 10:25 AM
#208
GAPGAPGAPGAPGAPGAPGAP Well, being a half SN reader I couldn't really say I found this episode quite enjoyable and ain't not really satisfied about it, but if we're talking on the anime-only way this episode was pretty good. (plus, art of anime >>>> art of SN, but I've already said that in another ep. discussion.) The music was really good in the first part of this episode, especially that part where the three adults started running away and where Kyrie was on the telephone with Battler. Also lol @ Gaap's freezing, I was probably the only one who laughed at that part. XD And yay, Lambda and Bern made their appearances! About time that that was happening again! I didn't read that much of EP4 to be honest and know only a little about EP5, but the ending of this episode made me think of Maria's theory again that TackyAnimationsX3 made up in a YouTube video. For those who don't know the theory I'll post it: This is going to be a COMPLETE shot in the dark, but I'm just going to say it. I think MARIA is the culprit behind ALL OF THIS. If you pay attention to the Sakutaro incident, he was created of ZERO. She is the witch who can create something out of nothing. I think that Maria created Beatrice and all the witches, so her family will believe in her magic, and take her seriously. Being that NONE OF THEM actually believe in her nor her magic. SHE is Beatrice. VERY good guess, but Im not sure if thats true. Maria was a human. She met beatrice, and Beato and Virgilia made her a witch. Then..Was Maria a fake witch..? IDK. yeah..it's a very cloudy, unclear guess. But this CONSTANT theme with Maria just keeps poping up far too often. the 'Happy halloween Maria' death is one. Not to mention, the Siestas for example, HIGHLY resemble that of her bunny ceramic figures. And they have HIGH respect for Maria, and carry out orders for her. It's far too fishy. Obviously she's in on a pact with Beatrice, OR she's the main person in charge of this forever tormenting 'game'. What do you guys think about it? |
Dec 13, 2009 10:30 AM
#209
Even if it lacks absolute coherence, it's my favorite theory thus far. It would be absolutely hilarious if it were true, and it would at least give a lot of validity to DEENs decision to put Higurashi face all over her during the show. |
Dec 13, 2009 12:31 PM
#210
Zonak said: What do you guys think about it? Anything is possible, I don't think she's the one that started all this, but contributed to it in one way or another. You might want to read Lambdadelta's Diary. The information written there is safe for up to third arc. The girls Lambda meets with are never mentioned by their name, but the things that they wish for give a strong hint to who they are in the Higurashi/Umineko universe. What Lambda threatens Beato with in the last tea party matches with the last girl's wish. And the attitude that girl approaches Lambda with doesn't seem to fit with Maria's. |
Dec 13, 2009 1:31 PM
#211
An interesting theory. "But this also opens another interesting trail of thought : what happened to Asumu's son, the "real" Battler ? What if he didn't die, and was still around somewhere ? This guy would carry the mother of all grudges against Battler first, and the Ushiromiya family as a whole second, wouldn't he ? It's too bad we don't have on the island a young man, about 18, conveniently an orphan, refusing to tell his real name to anyone, whose whereabouts are suspect in nearly every scenario, and who seems to despise the whole Ushiromiya family apart from the two girls who might be "Beatrice" (ie, in a situation similar to his own)... Oh, wait." |
Dec 13, 2009 3:12 PM
#212
Zonak said: might as well stop making theory~What do you guys think about it? MarthX said: my first thought was it cant be, but thinking about it for a sec, I realize I have no obvious argument to counter it and Kanon indeed has no alibi anywhere if the problem about his name is to be considered... further more the theory makes sense: orphanage, his age, his character etc... But have to say I still dont like it~ yeah, I dont like the theory doubting his "fake" name to begin with and I dont like how Jessica or Shanon have died but that could apply to anyone else (but indeed only in arc 2 or arc1) An interesting theory. "But this also opens another interesting trail of thought : what happened to Asumu's son, the "real" Battler ? What if he didn't die, and was still around somewhere ? This guy would carry the mother of all grudges against Battler first, and the Ushiromiya family as a whole second, wouldn't he ? It's too bad we don't have on the island a young man, about 18, conveniently an orphan, refusing to tell his real name to anyone, whose whereabouts are suspect in nearly every scenario, and who seems to despise the whole Ushiromiya family apart from the two girls who might be "Beatrice" (ie, in a situation similar to his own)... Oh, wait." anyway, would be a real surprise for me if that turns out to be true and its indeed interesting~ Edit: just realize a question: does anyone still know if the human Beatrice still showed up somewhere after Jessica died in arc2? (not that Im really into that theory -_-') |
vinesageDec 13, 2009 3:26 PM
Dec 13, 2009 3:29 PM
#213
vinesage said: Zonak said: might as well stop making theory~What do you guys think about it? MarthX said: my first thought was it cant be, but thinking about it for a sec, I realize I have no obvious argument to counter it and Kanon indeed has no alibi anywhere if the problem about his name is to be considered... further more the theory makes sense: orphanage, his age, his character etc... But have to say I still dont like it~ yeah, I dont like the theory doubting his "fake" name to begin with and I dont like how Jessica or Shanon have died but that could apply to anyone else (but indeed only in arc 2 or arc1) An interesting theory. "But this also opens another interesting trail of thought : what happened to Asumu's son, the "real" Battler ? What if he didn't die, and was still around somewhere ? This guy would carry the mother of all grudges against Battler first, and the Ushiromiya family as a whole second, wouldn't he ? It's too bad we don't have on the island a young man, about 18, conveniently an orphan, refusing to tell his real name to anyone, whose whereabouts are suspect in nearly every scenario, and who seems to despise the whole Ushiromiya family apart from the two girls who might be "Beatrice" (ie, in a situation similar to his own)... Oh, wait." anyway, would be a real surprise for me if that turns out to be true and its indeed interesting~ Edit: just realize a question: does anyone still know if the human Beatrice still showed up somewhere after Jessica died in arc2? (not that Im really into that theory -_-') Kanon is confirmed DEAD by the RED every time though so he can't be the culprit. He might be an accomplice though >_> you mean apart from when she pops up in Kinzo's study and calls Battler over to accept his defeat? |
Dec 13, 2009 3:34 PM
#214
Can't that be side-stepped by saying, "The person known as Kanon is dead, as he then took the mantle of Ushiromiya Battler, head of the family"? |
Dec 13, 2009 3:39 PM
#215
Darklight0303 said: I am thinking about the theory that some many seem to have: Kanon is not his real name just like Shanon isnt. Shanon is called Sayo or so~Kanon is confirmed DEAD by the RED every time though so he can't be the culprit. He might be an accomplice though >_> you mean apart from when she pops up in Kinzo's study and calls Battler over to accept his defeat? ok, thx for that info :-) noteDhero said: When Beatrice says in red "this person" is dead, then he is dead. No way around. Point. but theres also the theory saying that Beatrice never really refers to the Kanon we know cause that name is not his real name. and thats about the same theory when people doubting about the time point of death when a dead is named in red.Can't that be side-stepped by saying, "The person known as Kanon is dead, as he then took the mantle of Ushiromiya Battler, head of the family"? But...if you ask me, i dont like that theory at all. |
vinesageDec 13, 2009 3:45 PM
Dec 13, 2009 3:42 PM
#216
vinesage said: Episode 26 spoiler (I think) Edit: just realize a question: does anyone still know if the human Beatrice still showed up somewhere after Jessica died in arc2? (not that Im really into that theory -_-') vinesage said: ^´don't wanna read your spoiler~ -_-' Spoiler deleted :p To answer your question without spoilers: yes, at least 1 person does know that |
moldy_tomatoDec 13, 2009 3:57 PM
Dec 13, 2009 3:48 PM
#218
vinesage said: Darklight0303 said: I am thinking about the theory that some many seem to have: Kanon is not his real name just like Shanon isnt. Shanon is called Sayo or so~Kanon is confirmed DEAD by the RED every time though so he can't be the culprit. He might be an accomplice though >_> you mean apart from when she pops up in Kinzo's study and calls Battler over to accept his defeat? ok, thx for that info :-) noteDhero said: When Beatrice says in red "this person" is dead, then he is dead. No way around. Point. but theres also the theory saying that Beatrice never really refers to the Kanon we know cause that name is not his real name. and thats about the same theory when people doubting about the time point of death when a dead is named in red.Can't that be side-stepped by saying, "The person known as Kanon is dead, as he then took the mantle of Ushiromiya Battler, head of the family"? But...if you ask me, i dont like that theory at all. I'm not sure if Bern and Lambda's talk will be animated however I'm spoiler tagging it anyway during that talk Lambda says that there is only one person with the name Kanon. It's not a title like in Kinzo's case. She says this in RED. as well as dismantling several other theories >_> not to mention that Kanon lacks the mentality of a culprit from what we've seen. The constant "I am furniture" line that he tosses in every time. Plus Kanon was raised in an orphanage RUN BY KINZO. I think he'd know all there is to know about those kids given what he's changed them into >_> |
Darklight0303Dec 13, 2009 3:53 PM
Dec 13, 2009 3:58 PM
#219
Dec 13, 2009 4:05 PM
#220
There's also another thing. Who would tell Kanon that he is a member of the Ushiromya? @,@ He's supposedly an orphan that was taken in at Kinzo's oprhanage |
Dec 13, 2009 4:14 PM
#221
Darklight0303 said: There's also another thing. Who would tell Kanon that he is a member of the Ushiromya? @,@ He's supposedly an orphan that was taken in at Kinzo's oprhanage Well it's made by Ryukishi07 so I'm expecting some crazy plot twist that seems unlikely but ultimately can be backed up by small information gathered throughout the story. Personally I think Kanon is the culprit (especially because of EP1) and that as NoteDhero says he forsakes his name "Kanon" partway through the story and becomes "Battler". That way the person known as "Kanon" is dead because he is now "Battler" (can easily explain EP3 Nanjo's murder too). |
Dec 13, 2009 4:15 PM
#222
vinesage said: about the same theory when people doubting about the time point of death when a dead is named in red. That's what the problem was in the last arc. Remember Nanjo is the one doing the autopsies, there's a chance he could be an accomplice and lie. He's said before that there maybe a misdiagnosis because he lacks the proper tools or he could just make a mistake. |
Dec 13, 2009 4:17 PM
#223
Dark_Requiem said: Darklight0303 said: There's also another thing. Who would tell Kanon that he is a member of the Ushiromya? @,@ He's supposedly an orphan that was taken in at Kinzo's oprhanage Well it's made by Ryukishi07 so I'm expecting some crazy plot twist that seems unlikely but ultimately can be backed up by small information gathered throughout the story. Personally I think Kanon is the culprit (especially because of EP1) and that as NoteDhero says he forsakes his name "Kanon" partway through the story and becomes "Battler". That way the person known as "Kanon" is dead because he is now "Battler" (can easily explain EP3 Nanjo's murder too). in episode 1 it's unlikely. Remember Shanon dies. Yes she IS the real once since only half her face is smashed off so no body double Also no if that were true then a piece of the Red text would not work. the part with Battler not being a murderer and how he was keeping an eye on Eva |
Darklight0303Dec 13, 2009 4:23 PM
Dec 13, 2009 4:24 PM
#224
Darklight0303 said: Dark_Requiem said: Darklight0303 said: There's also another thing. Who would tell Kanon that he is a member of the Ushiromya? @,@ He's supposedly an orphan that was taken in at Kinzo's oprhanage Well it's made by Ryukishi07 so I'm expecting some crazy plot twist that seems unlikely but ultimately can be backed up by small information gathered throughout the story. Personally I think Kanon is the culprit (especially because of EP1) and that as NoteDhero says he forsakes his name "Kanon" partway through the story and becomes "Battler". That way the person known as "Kanon" is dead because he is now "Battler" (can easily explain EP3 Nanjo's murder too). in episode 1 it's unlikely. Remember Shanon dies. Yes she IS the real once since only half her face is smashed off so no body double Ok well I'm not a Shannon=Kanon theorist but in response to that... Shannon's body is seen by only Nanjo and Hideyoshi. And the red text says The identities of all UNKNOWN corpses are guaranteed and think back on how Kanon died, the placement of the stake, and if you read the VN the red text. |
Dec 13, 2009 4:25 PM
#225
Enchant said: I dont see problem with any murder in arc3 except the one of Nanjo, that was a real problem. So I cant see why you think Nanjo's diagnosis is particularly important there. (personally I think his diagnosis changes a lot more in arc 1 and 2)vinesage said: about the same theory when people doubting about the time point of death when a dead is named in red. That's what the problem was in the last arc. Remember Nanjo is the one doing the autopsies, there's a chance he could be an accomplice and lie. He's said before that there maybe a misdiagnosis because he lacks the proper tools or he could just make a mistake. Dark_Requiem said: While thats indeed true, and we can doubt about Nanjo, but i see absolute no reason to doubt Hideyoshi but I guess I just excluded Eva and Hideyoshi too early from the suspect list....Shannon's body is seen by only Nanjo and Hideyoshi. And the red text says The identities of all UNKNOWN corpses are guaranteed and think back on how Kanon died, the placement of the stake, and if you read the VN the red text. |
vinesageDec 13, 2009 4:29 PM
Dec 13, 2009 4:32 PM
#226
The placement of the stake? It was right in the middle of his chest perforating his lungs. That's a killing move. >_> The way I see it he was an accomplice. Remember his monologue before he died. How he didn't care about their game but that he made a promise that if Shanon died he would smash the roulette. That sounds like something along the lines that he worked with the real culprit as long as Shanon remained alive and well |
Darklight0303Dec 13, 2009 4:38 PM
Dec 13, 2009 4:34 PM
#227
Remember, Kanon wasn't dead when they took him out of the boiler room. Battler never saw Kanon die. Darklight0303 said: The way I see it he was an accomplice. Rember his monologue before he died. How he didn't care about their game but that he made a promise that if Shanon died he would smash the roulette. That sounds like something along the lines that he worked with the real culprit as long as Shanon remained alive and well I think he's an accomplice too |
hirahiraDec 13, 2009 4:43 PM
Dec 13, 2009 4:46 PM
#228
Ok. So we know that Nanjo worked with Goldsmith in the past, and he mentioned "what we did here" when they were in the underground jail. I said before that it might have psychological programming of his children, but what if it has to do with the real Battler, and trying to create the perfect heir? |
Dec 13, 2009 4:50 PM
#229
if that were true Eva would not have survived in episode 3 since she virtually became the heir |
Dec 13, 2009 4:50 PM
#230
Darklight0303 said: The placement of the stake? It was right in the middle of his chest perforating his lungs. That's a killing move. >_> The way I see it he was an accomplice. Remember his monologue before he died. How he didn't care about their game but that he made a promise that if Shanon died he would smash the roulette. That sounds like something along the lines that he worked with the real culprit as long as Shanon remained alive and well (placement of the stake when Battler and the others see him) Plus his dead body is NEVER seen by Battler |
Dec 13, 2009 4:52 PM
#231
vinesage said: I dont see problem with any murder in arc3 except the one of Nanjo, that was a real problem. So I cant see why you think Nanjo's diagnosis is particularly important there. (personally I think his diagnosis changes a lot more in arc 1 and 2) If we can trust piece-Battler's perspective, what he sees and investigates is the truth, unless he's drunk. The family seems to put their utmost trust in Nanjo and don't seem to investigate the corpses themselves and come into physical contact with them unless they're mourning. So if Nanjo says that Kyrie is dead and no one else bothers to check, they believe him. But even if they do, it isn't to say that they won't make the same error or lie. Some injuries aren't fatal. The area of the body, the type of wound, time of death and possible murder weapon used are important. In the hallway of the mansion, Hideyoshi was staked in the chest, Rudolf was staked in the head and Kyrie was staked in the stomach. What we saw, were the Siesta's killing them with 'golden threads', but stakes are now in those wounds. Episode 17: ![]() Battler asks Ronove to confirm something: ![]() ![]() Ronove never answered in red and this was later forgotten by Battler. |
SaraiiDec 13, 2009 5:10 PM
Dec 13, 2009 4:55 PM
#232
Darklight0303 said: if that were true Eva would not have survived in episode 3 since she virtually became the heir Well this goes by my other thought a while ago that there were different factions. At first, I was saying Rosa and Eva, but I guess now it could be this mysterious person and Eva. After all the crap on the island...in the case of the board where Eva remains, she managed to kill Kanon/Battler or at least survive the horrors alone. |
Dec 13, 2009 4:58 PM
#233
Sounds like a bloody mexican standoff XDD but it's possible I won't say it isn't. Still I don't see the servants as anything more than accomplices at most. |
Dec 13, 2009 5:03 PM
#234
Yeah, that's the way I saw it: they're all accomplices. Also, it's interesting to note that even though we now know that Battler isn't of blood relation, Beatrice mentions how similar he is to Kinzo. |
Dec 13, 2009 5:07 PM
#235
actually she never stated that he has no blood relation outright. she just pointed out that he wasn't born from Asumu. |
Dec 13, 2009 5:13 PM
#236
If that's the case, then I don't think it's that important, if he's still whatever-his-dad's-name-is' son. Hell, he could even be Kyrie's real son in some strange attempt to keep that relationship on the hush by Kinzo. Then, I suppose she would have motive. Whatever. |
Dec 13, 2009 5:59 PM
#237
Darklight0303 said: Dark_Requiem said: Darklight0303 said: There's also another thing. Who would tell Kanon that he is a member of the Ushiromya? @,@ He's supposedly an orphan that was taken in at Kinzo's oprhanage Well it's made by Ryukishi07 so I'm expecting some crazy plot twist that seems unlikely but ultimately can be backed up by small information gathered throughout the story. Personally I think Kanon is the culprit (especially because of EP1) and that as NoteDhero says he forsakes his name "Kanon" partway through the story and becomes "Battler". That way the person known as "Kanon" is dead because he is now "Battler" (can easily explain EP3 Nanjo's murder too). in episode 1 it's unlikely. Remember Shanon dies. Yes she IS the real once since only half her face is smashed off so no body double Also no if that were true then a piece of the Red text would not work. the part with Battler not being a murderer and how he was keeping an eye on Eva None of the 6 victims in the first twilight of game 1 have been confirmed in red. The only people who saw Shannon's corpse were Nanjo (maybe), Hideyoshi and Kanon. If for some reason, they're lying then you have absolutely no proof that Shannon was killed. |
Dec 13, 2009 6:00 PM
#238
I really hope Kanon isn't the "real Battler" (the one involved in the red phrase that could be said about Asumu)... ...nor Amakusa, for that matter. While we are on this talk, I will repeat myself that "Kyrie" is just too suspicious and if she isn't directly involved in ANY of the murders I will call shananigans; for God's sake, her couple is almost always one of the first to die as well. If she isn't a Takano expy on purpose, Ryukishi is a hack. Whoops forgot the "s. |
OmegaDenmadDec 13, 2009 7:54 PM
![]() |
Dec 14, 2009 12:07 AM
#239
MarthX said: Darklight0303 said: Dark_Requiem said: Darklight0303 said: There's also another thing. Who would tell Kanon that he is a member of the Ushiromya? @,@ He's supposedly an orphan that was taken in at Kinzo's oprhanage Well it's made by Ryukishi07 so I'm expecting some crazy plot twist that seems unlikely but ultimately can be backed up by small information gathered throughout the story. Personally I think Kanon is the culprit (especially because of EP1) and that as NoteDhero says he forsakes his name "Kanon" partway through the story and becomes "Battler". That way the person known as "Kanon" is dead because he is now "Battler" (can easily explain EP3 Nanjo's murder too). in episode 1 it's unlikely. Remember Shanon dies. Yes she IS the real once since only half her face is smashed off so no body double Also no if that were true then a piece of the Red text would not work. the part with Battler not being a murderer and how he was keeping an eye on Eva None of the 6 victims in the first twilight of game 1 have been confirmed in red. The only people who saw Shannon's corpse were Nanjo (maybe), Hideyoshi and Kanon. If for some reason, they're lying then you have absolutely no proof that Shannon was killed. Hmmm a good point. Still the whole smash only half of the head so that the identity can be confirmed and it's an instant kill at the same time like Gaap said. Also if the "Kanon was a accomplice as long as Shanon remained alive" theory is true then yes she would be dead given his small rebellion in the boiler room |
Darklight0303Dec 14, 2009 2:37 AM
Dec 14, 2009 12:12 PM
#240
Enchant said: Thats what I thought in ep 16 as well:vinesage said: I dont see problem with any murder in arc3 except the one of Nanjo, that was a real problem. So I cant see why you think Nanjo's diagnosis is particularly important there. (personally I think his diagnosis changes a lot more in arc 1 and 2) If we can trust piece-Battler's perspective, what he sees and investigates is the truth, unless he's drunk. The family seems to put their utmost trust in Nanjo and don't seem to investigate the corpses themselves and come into physical contact with them unless they're mourning. So if Nanjo says that Kyrie is dead and no one else bothers to check, they believe him. But even if they do, it isn't to say that they won't make the same error or lie. Some injuries aren't fatal. The area of the body, the type of wound, time of death and possible murder weapon used are important. In the hallway of the mansion, Hideyoshi was staked in the chest, Rudolf was staked in the head and Kyrie was staked in the stomach. What we saw, were the Siesta's killing them with 'golden threads', but stakes are now in those wounds. Episode 17: ![]() Battler asks Ronove to confirm something: ![]() ![]() Ronove never answered in red and this was later forgotten by Battler. vinesage said: But, i never really believed it, cause i find it fairly impossible to do anything with such a wound in the stomach even if we assume she survived (which isnt very likely at first place~)....And if anyone survived, I would think it was Kyrie. I think she was shot and stabbd in the belly, while the other 2 are stab in the heart and head.... Anyway, I waiting for the tea party to try to make a final theory for this arc, and maybe for the other arcs well. (while currently reading EP2, the fact strikes me again that VERY single murder in EP2 appears to be close room mystery, which isnt the case at all in ep1 or arc3/4~) |
vinesageDec 14, 2009 12:22 PM
Dec 14, 2009 7:07 PM
#241
Gaap and Ronove, you have my respect for being master trolls. |
Dec 16, 2009 4:58 AM
#242
Alexstratz said: Gaap and Ronove, you have my respect for being master trolls. LOL i agree |
<img src="http://i306.photobucket.com/albums/nn274/thethorndog/Narutosiggy-1.jpg" border="0" /> |
Dec 16, 2009 7:11 AM
#243
Well Ronove DID warn Jessica |
Dec 16, 2009 9:12 AM
#244
Oh wow. Judging by the pictures on 2chan, episode 26 will have extremely horrible pacing. Seriously, why would they make an entire episode just for that part? It makes no sense. |
DenwaDec 16, 2009 9:19 AM
Dec 16, 2009 9:32 AM
#245
They made the entire episode the visit to Rokkenjima then? @,@ LOL I KNEW IT |
Dec 16, 2009 9:33 AM
#246
oh God...DEEN how can you fail so hard at everything? |
Dec 16, 2009 9:38 AM
#247
At least there's a pretty good fan animated ending. ;_; |
Dec 16, 2009 9:44 AM
#248
if only it was longer since that vid is the VERY ending. still it's incredibly well done so I have no right to gripe :P |
Dec 16, 2009 10:15 AM
#249
May we hope for an 1h-epi? ._. ...I doubt DEEN would do that, though D: |
Dec 18, 2009 9:09 AM
#250
Pretty confusing, especially since I've had to catch up with about eight episodes due to college. However, I feel it will all come together nicely, like most of the other works in the "series." |
Dead Account Please Delete |
More topics from this board
» I want to watch it but...cvbnm07 - Oct 12, 2024 |
12 |
by Harsh_Kumar643
»»
Feb 20, 2:08 PM |
|
Poll: » Umineko no Naku Koro ni Episode 2 Discussion ( 1 2 3 4 5 ... Last Page )Sii_Kei - Jul 8, 2009 |
313 |
by luxarking7
»»
Dec 8, 2024 4:42 AM |
|
» A(No-Other) Psychoanalytic Take on Umineko no Naku Koro niAerghlis - Oct 13, 2024 |
0 |
by Aerghlis
»»
Oct 13, 2024 7:06 PM |
|
» What is this and why do people say this is a sequel to Higurashi?Asudox - Nov 26, 2023 |
13 |
by Asudox
»»
Oct 10, 2024 12:57 PM |
|
Poll: » Umineko no Naku Koro ni Episode 3 Discussion ( 1 2 3 4 5 )antidentite - Jul 15, 2009 |
215 |
by BlackStar_24
»»
Sep 29, 2024 4:25 PM |