It's crystal clear that when I made my way to this discussion page, I am expecting to see a presentation or a series of discussion that preferably arose from the premises the anime was trying to present since it is an EPISODE 1 discussion.
Mind you, majority of MAL users, does it hurt getting preemptively cognitive and perhaps start the subject of discussion by suggesting whether Terra Formars anime is either a plot-driven show, a character-driven show, or a hybrid between those two?
Since it is a discussion page, and a free-discussion page I suppose so, does it mean everything has to be thrown out all over the place whatever gets on your boat? Many didn't even consider putting a delineating aspect of when they're actually trying to mention an exterior problem (animation quality, censorship, etc) and it just goes allover the place with the inherent aspects of the anime itself, the plot, the characters, and the execution and pacing, of course.
Just bitch whatever it takes so, as soon as you feel like thinking "wow, this is bad.." you will actually try to persuade and create an effect in such a way the readers will decide in bias terms? Because that's what most of you did. Even more annoying..
Line 1 of the posted comment: IT'S BLAH BLAH BLAH
Line 2 of the posted comment: DROPPED
Pardon? I don't know but reading something like this, it's grandiosely annoying. Might as well save those space for those comments that will be "slightly more critical in approach" but no, you really did and hogged up the space so I can hear your bitchings with no deemable foundation and more like "mood swings". Unreliable, as hell.
Also, are discussions supposed to be COMPARISONS? TG? AGK? The organization of this thread is bad enough, not even the simple "likability factor" of the characters was mentioned, the're just bypassed, while everyone goes on to say "this is like the case of... without pondering much thought into it". Annoying!
Lastly, though some were able to stretch out their nerve cells a little bit and expressed their appreciation of the setting, the scripts, and spectacles that the series is trying to deliver to its viewers, should it be the case that no one even JUXTAPOSES THE TIME FRAME OF A FUTURISTIC SETTING based on our current mentality/mind setting? Or perhaps, we could delve deeper on anticipating and creating assumptions on the juncture point the anime supplied to us, that at first it may be cockroaches, what others natural things them would be interestingly capable of creating a visual project known as an anime? Like, I'm sure some of you should have reliably noticed, although meditation is subject to varying degrees, why the hell MUST BE THE CENSORSHIP BE THE DEFINING PREMISE OF THE SERIES' DISCUSSION?
You guys badly crave for a motto something like, "simplicity is the best". right? No, just no, I though MAL should be a fun place and very much engaging in atmosphere, but no, most on posts on these thread were lacking in vitality and ingenuity to produce a critical impression of a first episode of a series, was clogged up with dull impressions, and more like expressions of anger, boredness (name that emotion) that most people won't even care about, since YOU ARE SUPPOSE TO DISCUSS THE ELEMENTS THAT COMES WITH THE SERIES, be it may the inside or outside peripheries of it, but monotonous bitchings and lazy comments.. crap as hell, don't even try to make an endeavor of becoming helpful by supplying some critical insights.
I figured out I want to discuss "something intrinsic" to the series but now I kinda.. nevermind. I'll think twice before visiting discussion page again. |