| Not a lot of anime I find hilarious as this, and I get that people have different tastes in humour. But I want to know why people in general didn't like it (according to its score). Is it because they are offended by the sexual comedy or... Cause lets say if it was the same level of comedy but not sexual would it be rated higher? Not that I care about ratings... >.> |
| no it just sucks |
an egomaniac and a fool |
| It's rated low because it's terrible. |
 |
| Different humor taste, that is all. I personally enjoyed watching it. |
 |
| its rated low because of majority votes. Many of us prefer to watch full 23 min of anime. Although score of 7 is not that bad for a 10min anime and this anime does not really have any character development. just humor. A lot of people like character development sort of anime. Or action/drama. which is why top anime that are listed on mal are Clannad, full metal alchemist, steins gate, etc. |
 |
| I probably didn't rate it higher than 7 in part because of the sheer amount of ecchi-ness. Not really my cup of tea. Mostly watched because I like shorter anime, though many complain about that, as mentioned above. But my default rating for most things is a 7, that's "Good," better than just average or actively bad. Honestly, Bleach-the manga, not the anime-is my measuring bar. It has had some very good parts, and some very annoying and stupid parts, and for me levels out to a 7: not bad, somewhat above average, but nothing special. This anime, to me at least, was also not bad, but nothing special |
| Butterflies don't belong in nets. |
| Its rated the way it is because of peoples taste, it does contain alot of eechi. But whatever I gave it a higher score because this show made my day better, it was too damn funny. |
| I'm done chasing my dreams because I know I'll only wake up to reality. That reality will soon become my dreams. |
| How can a score of 7.46 be considered low? For me it got even a higher score than it deserved, and I personally enjoyed it. The humour was quite right, I laughed, but sometimes it got too much exaggerated and terrible, in 2 or 3 middle episodes, like when he cross-dress or when he milks Sena.. man, that type of things were not funny, were terrible. |
| Low for 7.46 ? LOL ! It's really good. |
 |
| I see, so people rate short anime lower and the combination of that and people are a-sexual or something so they hate sexual humour or something... and it's pure comedy without much character development. I get the score now. |
| I don't get how a 7.49 is considered "low" ... it's like people don't understand how a 1-10 rating system works... but given most of the scores on this site that's probably the reason |
 |
Liquidacid said: I don't get how a 7.49 is considered "low" ... it's like people don't understand how a 1-10 rating system works... but given most of the scores on this site that's probably the reason Yes, an individual score of 7.5 to me is "good", but as an aggregate score on this site it's bad. It's ranked #1545 which is low. Most shows that have below 7.70 score usually are not too enjoyable. That's why I'm surprised when this has below that. I expected at least 7.75 cause Seitokai Yakuindomo has more than that and it still uses sexual humour, only the jokes get a bit stale after a while, unlike in this show where it keeps fresh. |
| You could say its rated low but really, its kinda decent for an anime like this. A 7.46 is usually like a 6 - 6.4 in imDB. So at best, its decent to good but not bad. Just enough for someone to watch it and get by. But hey, at least its not below 7. Otherwise its shit, as it goes around the 5's area in imDB which is also shit. |
| I wouldn't call this show terrible, but it sure as hell isnt great. I didnt have to force myself to watch it, but I wont miss it now that its gone. |
| I really loved Doujin Work (manga, not anime), but this one... it is just not funny at all. |
| 日本人はイッちゃってるよ あいつら未来に生きてんな |
| I enjoyed it a lot, and it's kind of sad how so many don't seem to. |
| Oppinions. There are people with no sense of humour so they will say it sucks. Personally I really liked it. I like good comedies with romance and when they have ecchi + harem added it makes it even better :3 The drawing style is gorgeous. The only thing I did not like too much was the length, it was too short :( Tho "Plastic nee-san" is like 2 mins per episode and I totally loved that :) |
 |
| Looks like a decent score for short anime. |
| Sieg Zeon! |
| Because of the 13 minute episode length. Same reason ovas and specials tend to get low ratings no matter how good they are. |
| For a short anime the rating is really good :) |
| No, is rated low because it sucks. |
 |
| Yes, but also because episode lenght is 10 minutes instead of 20 (people give lower ratings to anime with short episodes) and because it's an harem (same reason). They rate this kind of anime lower to seem somewhat knowledgeable and with a fine/elite taste, usually they also wander around in forums bragging about their "good taste" and criticizing other people. Just compare this with "Gekkan Shoujo Nozaki-kun": same setting, different type of comedy, +0.97 rating -_- That's why you can't trust anime rankings... |
| Humans are suspicious and jealous creatures. When they see something perfect, they wanna find a flaw. Ratohnhaketon said: You have much to learn if you have not joined the witch hunt to down vote every anime that rises above our underrated favorites. I am currently on a campaign to get Training with Hinako into the top 12. Shit taste is hard to fight though, it's like trying to talk sense to an army of hallucinating loonies. Ty-Ki said: It's hilarious to see morons wasting more time with the series they hate so much than the fans of it. |
| Golden Boy is much more perverted and is rated 8.08 Then again Golden Boy was also much funnier. |
| I've read the manga for some reason because I'm crazy, and it's a cesspool of perverted humor. It can be funny, and he's a pretty good artist, but it gets stale fast. I didn't feel motivated to watch the anime because of my lukewarm at best reception to the manga. Incidentally, the mangaka's newer manga, Aho Girl, cuts back on it slightly but is significantly better compared to this (although that's not a high bar). |
| Well first of all, it's only 13 min. per episode so that instantly makes it lower than your average 24 minute show. Second of all, there's no develop to make this a "great" show for people who watch for a reason other than boobs and jokes. Thirdly, the comedy is very hit or miss (Its my type of comedy sometimes tho) |
| I think its rated low because its short. If you look for hilarious, perverted humor then it is amazing anime, if you are looking for anything more then you are on wrong place. |
 |
| Nah its just very shit |
 |
| "Humor" implies it's funny. IMHO this is just the same tired harem comedy tropes for the 100th time, except even more pathetic because the MC doesn't even have the excuse of being a teenager. |
 |
More topics from this board
Poll: » Mangaka-san to Assistant-san to The Animation Episode 7 Discussion ( 1 2 )Stark700 - May 19, 2014 |
91 |
by Netbug
»»
Dec 9, 2023 9:32 AM |
|
Poll: » Mangaka-san to Assistant-san to The Animation Episode 5 Discussion ( 1 2 )Stark700 - May 5, 2014 |
65 |
by Netbug
»»
Oct 4, 2023 2:12 PM |
|
Poll: » Mangaka-san to Assistant-san to The Animation Episode 2 Discussion ( 1 2 3 )tsubasalover - Apr 14, 2014 |
106 |
by AmirLK
»»
Sep 16, 2023 6:30 AM |
|
Poll: » Mangaka-san to Assistant-san to The Animation Episode 12 Discussion ( 1 2 3 4 )Stark700 - Jun 23, 2014 |
183 |
by Alfredo-Sauce
»»
Mar 11, 2023 2:28 PM |
|
Poll: » Mangaka-san to Assistant-san to The Animation Episode 1 Discussion ( 1 2 3 4 5 )Stark700 - Apr 7, 2014 |
202 |
by Alfredo-Sauce
»»
Feb 17, 2023 12:07 AM |