New
Is rewrite AOTY ALREADY??
Yes
27.9%
12
Hell yes
48.8%
21
yes.
23.3%
10
43 votes
Jan 15, 2017 12:22 PM
#1
This is without a doubt the best anime of 2017. (For the people who have READ rewrite) |
Takamura-samaJan 16, 2017 12:23 PM
In the name of Allah, the Gracious, the Merciful. | You know what I hate the most? People who aren't free. They're no more than cattle. |
Jan 15, 2017 12:24 PM
#2
Jan 15, 2017 1:52 PM
#4
proper place for your comment |
In the name of Allah, the Gracious, the Merciful. | You know what I hate the most? People who aren't free. They're no more than cattle. |
Jan 15, 2017 1:56 PM
#5
OMG YOU MADE MY DAY, HAHAHAHAHA On topic: HELL NO |
Jan 15, 2017 2:10 PM
#6
Why not? Moon and Terra routes are epic in the visual novel and the first episode was really promising. Just saying it has the potential to be one of the best. The "8bit is shit" meme isn't funny anymore. |
Jan 15, 2017 2:13 PM
#7
Murasa22 said: Why not? Moon and Terra routes are epic in the visual novel and the first episode was really promising. Just saying it has the potential to be one of the best. The "8bit is shit" meme isn't funny anymore. Yeah ;) I agree, this COULD be the best anime for me at least. I love rewrite. |
In the name of Allah, the Gracious, the Merciful. | You know what I hate the most? People who aren't free. They're no more than cattle. |
Jan 15, 2017 3:02 PM
#8
First season was shit tho |
Jan 15, 2017 3:29 PM
#9
This isn't even funny. The poll choices being intentionally rigged doesn't help. And "AOFTY"? What does that even abbreviate to? And please don't to resort to memeing or flamebaiting. Anyway, the first season was stupid and made no sense, not to mention it was horribly boring at times. The new season doesn't seem to offer anything new to the table as of now. And the way they made the first season entirely irrelevant with this first episode alone means I have even less shit to give. |
Jan 15, 2017 3:48 PM
#10
If I were to agree with that, it would be the same as for me saying that anime is a proper adaptation, but it's not. S2 episode 1 looks slightly better, but it's not enough yet. |
Jan 15, 2017 4:05 PM
#11
Arikado- said: If I were to agree with that, it would be the same as for me saying that anime is a proper adaptation, but it's not. S2 episode 1 looks slightly better, but it's not enough yet. Season 1 wasn't really an "adaptation" after episode 7 because, you know, new route/branch and stuff. I agree that it was rushed sometimes but i don't think it was "garbage" or "trash" like some people like to say. And be glad that Rewrite is getting an anime because its probably one of the most hardest materials to adapt into anime format. But anyway, episode 14 was literally 1:1 with the VN besides the harvest festa memories from Lucia's route, everything else was the same as i remember (i played Moon again a few weeks ago). So i don't get the "proper adaptation", only different thing that would change if it was handed to another studio would be the animation. The direction on this episode was good too. Of course we can't tell what the future might bring, but my point is that if they keep this same pace and quality it will be a proper adaptation of Moon/Terra. |
Jan 15, 2017 4:57 PM
#12
Season episode 1 till half were interesting, so having read Rewrite or not is irrelevant cause the rest of season 2 can still go to shit like season 1. Being optimistic about anime is good but being realistic is a safer choice, it might be the best arc in the world, but if the studio chooses the same approach as season one just for the sake of milking as much in season 1, we are screwed. |
Jan 15, 2017 5:04 PM
#13
That automatically implies that the anime fails as a stand-alone and this is precisely what it does. You must realize that something that is only good when you have read the corresponding novel is pretty much by default a bad adaption, a shitty stand-alone, badly established and terribly executed. An anime that doesn't work on its own is pretty bad just from that alone, so while you might enjoy seeing parts of your favorite novel animated, please consider what good things the anime actually did on its own and what parts of your apparently positive experience with it stem from the anime itself and not just from your love of the novel instead. |
Jan 15, 2017 5:17 PM
#14
I died laughing at this because it is so true (because note: Gotrys never adds anything to the topic other than to whine and bitch 24/7 like a kid that didn't got his favorite ice cream) I say not yet honestly. There's some solid competition around this season (Gintama 2017, KonoSuba S2, Gabriel DropOut, etc, at least for me). Repeat_it_in_red said: That automatically implies that the anime fails as a stand-alone and this is precisely what it does. You must realize that something that is only good when you have read the corresponding novel is pretty much by default a bad adaption, a shitty stand-alone, badly established and terribly executed. An anime that doesn't work on its own is pretty bad just from that alone, so while you might enjoy seeing parts of your favorite novel animated, please consider what good things the anime actually did on its own and what parts of your apparently positive experience with it stem from the anime itself and not just from your love of the novel instead. I can actually agree with this a lot when it comes to anime doing as a stand-alone... but... I can actually argue a bit with that but while the anime has its own faults it did somethings that I did liked and made the experience for me with Season 2 better. I don't know if this will count but in the Original VN, Kagari is known as a interesting character, but without going into spoiler territory for further, the entire resolution to her character in terms of the original novel wasn't all that great, moreso making her feel just there when it comes to likability to her character. While I think the anime did better for me to like Kagari and get attached to her further than the original Novel, while yeah you can argue it takes away the point of the character, you do need some characterization before liking a character, Kagari in the novel at least for the heroine routes, until the point, has been treated as the device imo, until Moon, which you'll see later on what I mean. It doesn't help much that in the end while everything was resolved, somethings for me were actually empty. So in the anime format, as much as it is as a inferior version of the original VN, I think it did itself on its own right good in few aspects for me, characterizing at least Kagari a bit more, and not to mention a message that was more subtle and not that apparent, it's easy to notice around, at least for the anime's standpoint imo. This is just how I personally look at the anime, as much as it does not go well as a standalone, it did do somethings better than the VN as a standalone product, if that even makes sense, if not then I can try to explain further. Maybe this might sound a bit biased but that's just how I personally see it. |
Jan 15, 2017 5:30 PM
#15
rw fans are crazy. However, it's impossible for rw to be best anime in 2017 |
Jan 15, 2017 5:30 PM
#16
Symphyon said: I say not yet honestly. There's some solid competition around this season (Gintama 2017, KonoSuba S2, Gabriel DropOut, etc, at least for me). Wait what? No offense but are you really comparing Moon and Terra's plot with Konosuba (which the first episode was really weak honestly) and Gabriel DropOut? really? moe comedy shows? The only shows competing with Rewrite this season for me is Chaos;Child and Kuzu no Honkai. Don't even mention Little Witch Academia cause even if it has some production quality, its basically a kid's show (I'm not hating or anything cause im also watching) But come on.. |
Jan 15, 2017 5:51 PM
#17
Murasa22 said: Symphyon said: I say not yet honestly. There's some solid competition around this season (Gintama 2017, KonoSuba S2, Gabriel DropOut, etc, at least for me). Wait what? No offense but are you really comparing Moon and Terra's plot with Konosuba (which the first episode was really weak honestly) and Gabriel DropOut? really? moe comedy shows? The only shows competing with Rewrite this season for me is Chaos;Child and Kuzu no Honkai. Don't even mention Little Witch Academia cause even if it has some production quality, its basically a kid's show (I'm not hating or anything cause im also watching) But come on.. Well, if you look at the watching list I'm not watching Chaos;Child (because I was warned by a friend of mine to not watch this despite me watching Chaos;Head), and I haven't seen Kuzu no Honkai because I heard a mixed reception in my end. So I decided to leave it to wait until it ends. Tho that argument is a bit eh to me. Not every show has to be a contender for AOTS for deep stories nor complexities honestly, even the most simplest shows can be satisfying in the end enough to be on that position for me. It all goes to how it goes and how it is delivered, which its going to go in an end result. |
Jan 15, 2017 6:16 PM
#18
Symphyon said: characterizing at least Kagari a bit more I'd strongly disagree with that. Throughout the whole show I can assign two roles to Kagari. 1. The Plot Device: Spending most of the time of the animes earlier parts with randomly appearing only when the writer needs her to do so, acting inconsistently, sometimes supportive and sometimes offensive, and then pushing the whole plot through her role of being the "key" (what that actually means...hey, that was never elaboated on...in the same manner as there never was elaborated on the whole universe, the larger story and context and basically why everything even happened the way it did...) we witness Kagari as the typical plot device: only appearing when the writer needs her 2. The Loli Waifu Bait: Randomly strolling around without a clear personality, objective or motive we witness Kagari associating with the mc for plot reasons (aka badly written plot convenience) and whilst doing that over multiple episodes exhibiting nothing but generic antics supposed to make her cute (the word "feecof" triggers my ptsd) without any worthwhile characterization and in the end Kagari was nothing but bland loli waifu bait, because she literally had nothing else going for her. Murasa22 said: No offense but are you really comparing Moon and Terra's plot with Konosuba (which the first episode was really weak honestly) and Gabriel DropOut? really? moe comedy shows? The only shows competing with Rewrite this season for me is Chaos;Child and Kuzu no Honkai. Don't even mention Little Witch Academia cause even if it has some production quality, its basically a kid's show (I'm not hating or anything cause im also watching 1. Rewrite's and KonoSuba's plot are hardly comparable, but it's a mistake to boild that statement down to plot. Symphyon sakd that KonoSuba is - in his opinion - around as good as Rewrite, so basically you are saying that the plot is the only deciding factor for quality, which is absurd. 2. This is a matter of debate, but I'd say the first episode of KonoSuba did a pretty good job. They did a good job of structuring the episode (in terms of presenting a climax and progression), reenacting all the characters which made the viewer get invested in the cast again, reference the s1 plot to get the viewer back into the universe and, on top of that, establishing the premise for the upcoming plot. 3. I'd argue that KonoSuba isn't a "moe comedy" per se. Of course you could argue about whether the characters fall into that type, but given nowadays standards they hardly do, more so, the comedy is never focused on anything related to moe, so it would - at best - be a "comedy with moe" and seeing that you use moe with such an obviously negative connotation this whole sentence just really bugs me. 4. Well, you say you aren't hating, but how should I take this then. Clearly you are trying to discredit LWA for being "kid's show", but that is untenable. The fact that you can consume entertainment which is "more" than "just" kid's shows doesn't mean those don't hold their full worth anymore. It is a matter of execution and LWA does a splendid job at capturing it's characters, vivid world and atmosphere, so why can't it be a contender for AOTY. (judging kid's shows for being kid's shows is borderline-elitism) 5. Chaos;Child is still better than Rewrite, but by far not a good show. All we got out of the introductory episode, which is important for setting a tone and etablishing the setting, was a reenactment of a crime series akin to Chaos;Head, but, compared to that, lacking any further material, dragged down by it's bland school setting, which made it even more harem-like, and a mix of unestablished characters acting strange and inconsistent while being slightly mysterious; it basically was a wannabe-mystery, but stupidly bland, unengaging and worse than the recap of C;H that aired before. The problem at hand though isn't that you're not giving these previous series enough credit, but that you give Rewrite a shitload of credit that it does not deserve. |
Jan 15, 2017 6:30 PM
#19
My mate, I would agree with you right now, if only a ; monster would not impend with its new creation. A new, fiery contender in the flesh of Chaos;Child has many earnests to be on the same level of ingenuity as Rewrite(if not even higher). But yes, Rewrite shall be at least second best anime of the season |
Hentai_conjurerJan 15, 2017 6:41 PM
In time, you will know the tragic extent of my fapping's... |
Jan 15, 2017 6:37 PM
#20
Repeat_it_in_red said: Symphyon said: characterizing at least Kagari a bit more I'd strongly disagree with that. Throughout the whole show I can assign two roles to Kagari. 1. The Plot Device: Spending most of the time of the animes earlier parts with randomly appearing only when the writer needs her to do so, acting inconsistently, sometimes supportive and sometimes offensive, and then pushing the whole plot through her role of being the "key" (what that actually means...hey, that was never elaboated on...in the same manner as there never was elaborated on the whole universe, the larger story and context and basically why everything even happened the way it did...) we witness Kagari as the typical plot device: only appearing when the writer needs her 2. The Loli Waifu Bait: Randomly strolling around without a clear personality, objective or motive we witness Kagari associating with the mc for plot reasons (aka badly written plot convenience) and whilst doing that over multiple episodes exhibiting nothing but generic antics supposed to make her cute (the word "feecof" triggers my ptsd) without any worthwhile characterization and in the end Kagari was nothing but bland loli waifu bait, because she literally had nothing else going for her. Murasa22 said: No offense but are you really comparing Moon and Terra's plot with Konosuba (which the first episode was really weak honestly) and Gabriel DropOut? really? moe comedy shows? The only shows competing with Rewrite this season for me is Chaos;Child and Kuzu no Honkai. Don't even mention Little Witch Academia cause even if it has some production quality, its basically a kid's show (I'm not hating or anything cause im also watching 1. Rewrite's and KonoSuba's plot are hardly comparable, but it's a mistake to boild that statement down to plot. Symphyon sakd that KonoSuba is - in his opinion - around as good as Rewrite, so basically you are saying that the plot is the only deciding factor for quality, which is absurd. 2. This is a matter of debate, but I'd say the first episode of KonoSuba did a pretty good job. They did a good job of structuring the episode (in terms of presenting a climax and progression), reenacting all the characters which made the viewer get invested in the cast again, reference the s1 plot to get the viewer back into the universe and, on top of that, establishing the premise for the upcoming plot. 3. I'd argue that KonoSuba isn't a "moe comedy" per se. Of course you could argue about whether the characters fall into that type, but given nowadays standards they hardly do, more so, the comedy is never focused on anything related to moe, so it would - at best - be a "comedy with moe" and seeing that you use moe with such an obviously negative connotation this whole sentence just really bugs me. 4. Well, you say you aren't hating, but how should I take this then. Clearly you are trying to discredit LWA for being "kid's show", but that is untenable. The fact that you can consume entertainment which is "more" than "just" kid's shows doesn't mean those don't hold their full worth anymore. It is a matter of execution and LWA does a splendid job at capturing it's characters, vivid world and atmosphere, so why can't it be a contender for AOTY. (judging kid's shows for being kid's shows is borderline-elitism) 5. Chaos;Child is still better than Rewrite, but by far not a good show. All we got out of the introductory episode, which is important for setting a tone and etablishing the setting, was a reenactment of a crime series akin to Chaos;Head, but, compared to that, lacking any further material, dragged down by it's bland school setting, which made it even more harem-like, and a mix of unestablished characters acting strange and inconsistent while being slightly mysterious; it basically was a wannabe-mystery, but stupidly bland, unengaging and worse than the recap of C;H that aired before. The problem at hand though isn't that you're not giving these previous series enough credit, but that you give Rewrite a shitload of credit that it does not deserve. Holy shit you are copious |
In time, you will know the tragic extent of my fapping's... |
Jan 15, 2017 6:49 PM
#21
Repeat_it_in_red said: The problem at hand though isn't that you're not giving these previous series enough credit, but that you give Rewrite a shitload of credit that it does not deserve. And don't even say that "score doesn't matter" or compare with MAL's system because finishing a visual novel takes a lot more time and effort than watching a 11-24 episode anime. So yes, Rewrite deserves a lot of credit for being one of the best of its genre. I don't even need to say that Key is very well-know for making really good VNs. So its very likely that people who played the visual novel will give more credit to Rewrite or S;G for example than something like Gabriel DropOut or Little Witch Academia. I know they might be good shows but you can't really compare them, its like comparing The Hangover with something like Inception or Shutter Island. I'm sorry, but Konosuba its just another Isekai anime/LN with good comedy (atleast the first season has). You know how these type of thing gets popular nowadays, lets be real here. Chaos;Child better than Rewrite? well, im not familiar with the source material so i can't say that for now, but i would say that you are not familiar with Rewrite as well to say that right of the bat. And im not trying to discredit LWA, I'm just saying its a simple show with a simple premise, while Rewrite has way more depth and world building that should be seeing with other eyes. |
Murasa22Jan 15, 2017 7:30 PM
Jan 15, 2017 6:49 PM
#22
Repeat_it_in_red said: Symphyon said: characterizing at least Kagari a bit more I'd strongly disagree with that. Throughout the whole show I can assign two roles to Kagari. 1. The Plot Device: Spending most of the time of the animes earlier parts with randomly appearing only when the writer needs her to do so, acting inconsistently, sometimes supportive and sometimes offensive, and then pushing the whole plot through her role of being the "key" (what that actually means...hey, that was never elaboated on...in the same manner as there never was elaborated on the whole universe, the larger story and context and basically why everything even happened the way it did...) we witness Kagari as the typical plot device: only appearing when the writer needs her 2. The Loli Waifu Bait: Randomly strolling around without a clear personality, objective or motive we witness Kagari associating with the mc for plot reasons (aka badly written plot convenience) and whilst doing that over multiple episodes exhibiting nothing but generic antics supposed to make her cute (the word "feecof" triggers my ptsd) without any worthwhile characterization and in the end Kagari was nothing but bland loli waifu bait, because she literally had nothing else going for her. Murasa22 said: No offense but are you really comparing Moon and Terra's plot with Konosuba (which the first episode was really weak honestly) and Gabriel DropOut? really? moe comedy shows? The only shows competing with Rewrite this season for me is Chaos;Child and Kuzu no Honkai. Don't even mention Little Witch Academia cause even if it has some production quality, its basically a kid's show (I'm not hating or anything cause im also watching 1. Rewrite's and KonoSuba's plot are hardly comparable, but it's a mistake to boild that statement down to plot. Symphyon sakd that KonoSuba is - in his opinion - around as good as Rewrite, so basically you are saying that the plot is the only deciding factor for quality, which is absurd. 2. This is a matter of debate, but I'd say the first episode of KonoSuba did a pretty good job. They did a good job of structuring the episode (in terms of presenting a climax and progression), reenacting all the characters which made the viewer get invested in the cast again, reference the s1 plot to get the viewer back into the universe and, on top of that, establishing the premise for the upcoming plot. 3. I'd argue that KonoSuba isn't a "moe comedy" per se. Of course you could argue about whether the characters fall into that type, but given nowadays standards they hardly do, more so, the comedy is never focused on anything related to moe, so it would - at best - be a "comedy with moe" and seeing that you use moe with such an obviously negative connotation this whole sentence just really bugs me. 4. Well, you say you aren't hating, but how should I take this then. Clearly you are trying to discredit LWA for being "kid's show", but that is untenable. The fact that you can consume entertainment which is "more" than "just" kid's shows doesn't mean those don't hold their full worth anymore. It is a matter of execution and LWA does a splendid job at capturing it's characters, vivid world and atmosphere, so why can't it be a contender for AOTY. (judging kid's shows for being kid's shows is borderline-elitism) 5. Chaos;Child is still better than Rewrite, but by far not a good show. All we got out of the introductory episode, which is important for setting a tone and etablishing the setting, was a reenactment of a crime series akin to Chaos;Head, but, compared to that, lacking any further material, dragged down by it's bland school setting, which made it even more harem-like, and a mix of unestablished characters acting strange and inconsistent while being slightly mysterious; it basically was a wannabe-mystery, but stupidly bland, unengaging and worse than the recap of C;H that aired before. The problem at hand though isn't that you're not giving these previous series enough credit, but that you give Rewrite a shitload of credit that it does not deserve. Now as I have said with the first quote now, you elaborated that very well with it, of course at least to me I guess when it came down to the Kagari sense, perhaps I'm more feeling a bit attached to her in the anime? But then again, as you said, you can pretty much put her in the 2nd category from you might see from my standpoint. Now at the same time... if I can be clear as I said, perhaps a personal bias, perhaps I felt like Kagari needed more character to the VN as well with the anime but I slight felt a liking for her in the anime, but I do see the issues. Although writing wise, the VN is better when it comes to that stance. At least you (may, perhaps), not deny my second point though, at least to the meaning the series conveyed which is about the faith and destiny, the anime made it even more apparent, or more noticeable, which is pretty nice, while the VN had it pretty much subtle but... how to say this? They didn't made it very apparent to it, or at least demonstrating everyone's connections at the same time, if that makes sense. As I quoted before on another area: "Uh... Not every show has to be an AOTS contender for being complex or very well written. Sometimes, anime series can be a contender for those seasons either for how it is delivered, and how it pretty much goes to preferences, which then reflects on the result by the end of it." In other words, complex story-line and well written shows aren't EVERYTHING in what an anime needs alone. For me for a show to be considered an AOTY or AOTS contender, it has to be a show that I love throughout, at the same time, it has to be a show that delivers what I was expecting to get or beyond what I was actually expecting, mostly when it comes to my personal eyes. If a series makes me happy and makes me laugh, or at least brings a smile on my face (that's more on a subjective perspective which invalidates my argument perhaps) then it's all well for me. If a series has good characters despite the most simple synopsis, then that's all good for me. Heck, Rakudai has one of the more generic premises when it comes to the industry (LN School Fantasy Action Animes), and while the premise was generic as fuck, the way it was delivered was pretty good by itself. I loved it from start to finish, and it was a good ride from there. So I really don't get that argument a lot from Murasa's end. |
Jan 15, 2017 7:10 PM
#23
Murasa22 said: Season 1 wasn't really an "adaptation" after episode 7 because, you know, new route/branch and stuff. Agree, but should have been an adaptation since it carry Rewrite name. I wouldn't complain about the new route, if it were at least good (why the hell changed Kagari's behavior so drastically, and why hit by a random rock, that lazy script ... Now try to explain for anime-onlies that Kagari from "moon and terra" route is really how Kagari should be) Murasa22 said: I agree that it was rushed sometimes but i don't think it was "garbage" or "trash" like some people like to say. And be glad that Rewrite is getting an anime because its probably one of the most hardest materials to adapt into anime format. Indeed, It can be harder with low budget/few episodes. Murasa22 said: But anyway, episode 14 was literally 1:1 with the VN besides the harvest festa memories from Lucia's route, everything else was the same as i remember (i played Moon again a few weeks ago). So i don't get the "proper adaptation", only different thing that would change if it was handed to another studio would be the animation. The direction on this episode was good too. I said that S2 episode 1 is better, I think some things should be different like ... Kotarou shouldn't be able to understand Kagari saying her name yet, but okay, it's some small issue. Anyway, considering that episode is the episode 14 instead of episode 1 (S2), so S1 will be a burden that "S2" has to hold. Murasa22 said: Of course we can't tell what the future might bring, but my point is that if they keep this same pace and quality it will be a proper adaptation of Moon/Terra. Agree and hope so, although IMO "S2" enjoyment (think as 2 seasons again) will be affected by S1, why ppl (mainly anime-onlies) have weak emotional investment thanks to the S1 (and others don't know whatafck is happening at all, but maybe it's their own fault). |
Arikado-Jan 15, 2017 7:14 PM
Jan 15, 2017 7:22 PM
#24
Arikado- said: I said that S2 episode 1 is better, I think some things should be different like ... Kotarou shouldn't be able to understand Kagari saying her name yet, but okay, it's some small issue. Anyway, considering that episode is the episode 14 instead of episode 1 (S2), so S1 will be a burden that "S2" has to hold. No, its not a small issue. That happens in the VN on the exactly moment when Kotarou asks who Kagari is. Arikado- said: Agree, but should have been an adaptation since it carry Rewrite name. I wouldn't complain about the new route, if it were at least good (why the hell changed Kagari's behavior so drastically, and why hit by a random rock, that lazy script ... Now try to explain for anime-onlies that Kagari from "moon and terra" route is really how Kagari should be) I can agree at some point about the anime Kagari, but thats not anime original as well. They used her personality from Harvest Festa's branch/worldline which makes sense since its a "Kagari Route". About the rock: Its a theory but i still think that Moon Kagari did that to her twin |
Jan 15, 2017 8:31 PM
#25
Murasa22 said: Arikado- said: I said that S2 episode 1 is better, I think some things should be different like ... Kotarou shouldn't be able to understand Kagari saying her name yet, but okay, it's some small issue. Anyway, considering that episode is the episode 14 instead of episode 1 (S2), so S1 will be a burden that "S2" has to hold. No, its not a small issue. That happens in the VN on the exactly moment when Kotarou asks who Kagari is. Arikado- said: Agree, but should have been an adaptation since it carry Rewrite name. I wouldn't complain about the new route, if it were at least good (why the hell changed Kagari's behavior so drastically, and why hit by a random rock, that lazy script ... Now try to explain for anime-onlies that Kagari from "moon and terra" route is really how Kagari should be) I can agree at some point about the anime Kagari, but thats not anime original as well. They used her personality from Harvest Festa's branch/worldline which makes sense since its a "Kagari Route". About the rock: Its a theory but i still think that Moon Kagari did that to her twin I played again skipping to make sure, you are right, just the anime scene was so simple that I thought there something wrong based on when Kotarou was not able to understand her (because I didn't remember this good), and he doesn't shown any effort to do so. But okay, I will not make a big problem on this. This theory ... I don't know, why would her thrown a rock to begin with? Reason/objective. Better saying, a fking meteor that happens to become a meteorite before hit the ground. When this episode starts, there a scene that is almost saying "if there a lot of possibilities, random things can happens" Episode 8 both images But it's my Theory.However, it's lazy. |
Arikado-Jan 15, 2017 10:47 PM
Jan 15, 2017 11:56 PM
#26
Arikado- said: Murasa22 said: Arikado- said: I said that S2 episode 1 is better, I think some things should be different like ... Kotarou shouldn't be able to understand Kagari saying her name yet, but okay, it's some small issue. Anyway, considering that episode is the episode 14 instead of episode 1 (S2), so S1 will be a burden that "S2" has to hold. No, its not a small issue. That happens in the VN on the exactly moment when Kotarou asks who Kagari is. Arikado- said: Agree, but should have been an adaptation since it carry Rewrite name. I wouldn't complain about the new route, if it were at least good (why the hell changed Kagari's behavior so drastically, and why hit by a random rock, that lazy script ... Now try to explain for anime-onlies that Kagari from "moon and terra" route is really how Kagari should be) I can agree at some point about the anime Kagari, but thats not anime original as well. They used her personality from Harvest Festa's branch/worldline which makes sense since its a "Kagari Route". About the rock: Its a theory but i still think that Moon Kagari did that to her twin I played again skipping to make sure, you are right, just the anime scene was so simple that I thought there something wrong based on when Kotarou was not able to understand her (because I didn't remember this good), and he doesn't shown any effort to do so. But okay, I will not make a big problem on this. This theory ... I don't know, why would her thrown a rock to begin with? Reason/objective. Better saying, a fking meteor that happens to become a meteorite before hit the ground. When this episode starts, there a scene that is almost saying "if there a lot of possibilities, random things can happens" Episode 8 both images But it's my Theory.However, it's lazy. Guys, could you do this in private? |
In the name of Allah, the Gracious, the Merciful. | You know what I hate the most? People who aren't free. They're no more than cattle. |
Jan 16, 2017 4:28 AM
#27
Murasa22 said: Symphyon said: I say not yet honestly. There's some solid competition around this season (Gintama 2017, KonoSuba S2, Gabriel DropOut, etc, at least for me). Wait what? No offense but are you really comparing Moon and Terra's plot with Konosuba (which the first episode was really weak honestly) and Gabriel DropOut? really? moe comedy shows? The only shows competing with Rewrite this season for me is Chaos;Child and Kuzu no Honkai. Don't even mention Little Witch Academia cause even if it has some production quality, its basically a kid's show (I'm not hating or anything cause im also watching) But come on.. Wow. I wholeheartedly agree with him here. No offense Symphon... Sympyo... Symphyon, but your anime taste is shit lately. |
Jan 16, 2017 4:45 AM
#28
Symphyon said: I died laughing at this because it is so true (because note: Gotrys never adds anything to the topic other than to whine and bitch 24/7 like a kid that didn't got his favorite ice cream) I say not yet honestly. There's some solid competition around this season (Gintama 2017, KonoSuba S2, Gabriel DropOut, etc, at least for me). Repeat_it_in_red said: That automatically implies that the anime fails as a stand-alone and this is precisely what it does. You must realize that something that is only good when you have read the corresponding novel is pretty much by default a bad adaption, a shitty stand-alone, badly established and terribly executed. An anime that doesn't work on its own is pretty bad just from that alone, so while you might enjoy seeing parts of your favorite novel animated, please consider what good things the anime actually did on its own and what parts of your apparently positive experience with it stem from the anime itself and not just from your love of the novel instead. I can actually agree with this a lot when it comes to anime doing as a stand-alone... but... I can actually argue a bit with that but while the anime has its own faults it did somethings that I did liked and made the experience for me with Season 2 better. I don't know if this will count but in the Original VN, Kagari is known as a interesting character, but without going into spoiler territory for further, the entire resolution to her character in terms of the original novel wasn't all that great, moreso making her feel just there when it comes to likability to her character. While I think the anime did better for me to like Kagari and get attached to her further than the original Novel, while yeah you can argue it takes away the point of the character, you do need some characterization before liking a character, Kagari in the novel at least for the heroine routes, until the point, has been treated as the device imo, until Moon, which you'll see later on what I mean. It doesn't help much that in the end while everything was resolved, somethings for me were actually empty. So in the anime format, as much as it is as a inferior version of the original VN, I think it did itself on its own right good in few aspects for me, characterizing at least Kagari a bit more, and not to mention a message that was more subtle and not that apparent, it's easy to notice around, at least for the anime's standpoint imo. This is just how I personally look at the anime, as much as it does not go well as a standalone, it did do somethings better than the VN as a standalone product, if that even makes sense, if not then I can try to explain further. Maybe this might sound a bit biased but that's just how I personally see it. So this noob just crtl c/crtl v my elaborate post and that was funny to you? No offense Symphony, but your sense of humor is shit lately too. |
Jan 16, 2017 5:57 AM
#29
Hope it'll be good, enough so that I could watch both seasons. Well if not then 8bit needs to burn down |
Jan 16, 2017 6:14 AM
#30
Um, Gintama? .............................. |
"How am I supposed to face the problem when the problem is my face?" - W.Lui "A real man forgives a woman for her lies." - Sanji "First comes love, then comes marriage, then comes adults flying through a portal in the sky." - NettoSaito "I'm not a newbie it's just that I only registered a few days ago." - A newbie |
Jan 16, 2017 6:17 AM
#31
Murasa22 said: Repeat_it_in_red said: The problem at hand though isn't that you're not giving these previous series enough credit, but that you give Rewrite a shitload of credit that it does not deserve. And don't even say that "score doesn't matter" or compare with MAL's system because finishing a visual novel takes a lot more time and effort than watching a 11-24 episode anime. So yes, Rewrite deserves a lot of credit for being one of the best of its genre. I don't even need to say that Key is very well-know for making really good VNs. So its very likely that people who played the visual novel will give more credit to Rewrite or S;G for example than something like Gabriel DropOut or Little Witch Academia. I know they might be good shows but you can't really compare them, its like comparing The Hangover with something like Inception or Shutter Island. I'm sorry, but Konosuba its just another Isekai anime/LN with good comedy (atleast the first season has). You know how these type of thing gets popular nowadays, lets be real here. Chaos;Child better than Rewrite? well, im not familiar with the source material so i can't say that for now, but i would say that you are not familiar with Rewrite as well to say that right of the bat. And im not trying to discredit LWA, I'm just saying its a simple show with a simple premise, while Rewrite has way more depth and world building that should be seeing with other eyes. Rewrite the VN is the best. No discussion, no pushing nothing. it's just the best. |
In the name of Allah, the Gracious, the Merciful. | You know what I hate the most? People who aren't free. They're no more than cattle. |
Jan 16, 2017 6:22 AM
#32
1 episode and you are already calling it the best...do you remember Erased from last year? You know the show that started out strong but became a hilarious trainwreck halfway in? The one that people called AOTY after 1 ep? Yeah. Also so long Gintama is airing, Rewrite will at best be 2nd |
Jan 16, 2017 7:28 AM
#34
Gintama is garbage |
Jan 16, 2017 7:30 AM
#35
SPOT ON! Overhyped, overrated, boring, unfunny garbage without any artistic value whatsoever. |
Jan 16, 2017 8:26 AM
#36
Even if second ep will be a masterpiece, high chances that 3rd episode (probably CGI battle) may completely destroy everything. |
Jan 16, 2017 9:21 AM
#37
You are aware that I've been talking about the rewrite anime the whole time. How good people deem the novel to be and how popular it is has nothing to do with the quality of the anime at all. Murasa22 said: And don't even say that "score doesn't matter" or compare with MAL's system because finishing a visual novel takes a lot more time and effort than watching a 11-24 episode anime. It is kinda like that though. This is a fallacious argument known as ad populum. Humans can be mistaken and so can a large number of humans be. No matter how many people think Rewrite is good this alone doesn't mean that it is. In an actual debate an argument like this holds 0 merit. And also: Finishing a VN takes more time and effort than finishing an anime and that means an opinion on a VN holds more worth or what? A person can be mistaken and an amount of effort does not make one "more right" or anything, where that rating lies makes no difference. (And just to make counterexamples: There are many VN that fall under the range of <10 hours and hence are shorter than two-cour anime and while there are many VN in the range of 20 hours+ there also are many longer anime in the 50+ range (especially older ones) and some anime like Detective Conan, One Piece or the entirety of Naruto are longer than any VN, so you cant even say VN are longer per se) Murasa22 said: So yes, Rewrite deserves a lot of credit for being one of the best of its genre. I don't even need to say that Key is very well-know for making really good VNs. So its very likely that people who played the visual novel will give more credit to Rewrite or S;G for example than something like Gabriel DropOut or Little Witch Academia. I know they might be good shows but you can't really compare them, its like comparing The Hangover with something like Inception or Shutter Island. "one of the best of its genre" as you sufficiently proved by showing that it's popular? That is not how it works... And Key is well-known for making good VN? That is the same fallacious argument as before, but even more vague and, on top of that, even more wrong, because a studio as a whole is never consistent at any time. Even if most VN by Key were good, that wouldn't mean all are good. There's always flops, ergo this argument is really pointless. And then you are going back to the other argument again: The VN has nothing to do with the anime's quality and that is the current topic. People who like the VN will automatically fanboy over the anime (like seen in this thread) and that validates it? Now that argument is pretty dismissive... And why can't you compare them? Cause they aren't VN's? or cause they aren't as popular? (Oh wait, there are more people watching LWA this season than people who completed Rewrite S1 and that is already half a year old.) You're giving no apparent reason why I can't compare them and while I'm not particularly fond of Gabriel Dropout it still didn't do nearly as much things wrong as Rewrite S2 did. Murasa22 said: I'm sorry, but Konosuba its just another Isekai anime/LN with good comedy (atleast the first season has). You know how these type of thing gets popular nowadays, lets be real here. Well, yes, but KonoSuba actually focuses on a comedic aspect and spoofs the normally generic Isekai anime instead of being just another dumb power fantasy itself. It is by no means the best show in existence, but it is witty and funny (you're even acknowledging that yourself...) and like I pointed out before the first episode of S2 did a very good job at being the introductory episode in terms of structure and such (and now look at the incoherent mess that Rewrite's ep. 1 was). There's another funny thing here though: According to you, Rewrite is good, because many people think that it is, but KonoSuba's popularity doesn't mean anything, cause "that gets popular nowadays"? That, dear user, is hypocrisy at its finest. Murasa22 said: Chaos;Child better than Rewrite? well, im not familiar with the source material so i can't say that for now, but i would say that you are not familiar with Rewrite as well to say that right of the bat. I like the formulation "less worse" more than "better" in this context, but let's roll with it. Well, it might be that I'm not familiar with Rewrite, but guess what... I'm not to blame for wanting to watch an anime and that anime alone. You are pretty much confirming that the anime is not elaborating on anything. The VN might be good and you can feel free to believe so, but the anime didn't do a job at being as good and complex as you claim the novel to be, so it isn't. You also don't need to be familiar with Chaos;Child to say something; the quality of source material holds no merit for the quality of the anime! (but it looks like you consider being familiar with the source material an actual criteria...) Murasa22 said: And im not trying to discredit LWA, I'm just saying its a simple show with a simple premise, while Rewrite has way more depth and world building that should be seeing with other eyes. See above: World building and depth are not present in the anime which is just an accumulation of a thousands of flaws. Being simple isn't anything bad, pretentious and supposed "complexity" isn't the only thing you should attribute worth tho. Execution is a major aspect of making good shows and neither is "complexity" a substitute for "good plot" (cause, guess what, that comes down to execution) nor is "good plot" a substitute to "good quality overall". Your argument of Simplicity vs. Complexity doesn't hold much merit, because it only describes a quantity and not even a quality. TL;DR: I don't give a crap about how good the novel is, the anime sucks period Symphyon said: Now as I have said with the first quote now, you elaborated that very well with it, of course at least to me I guess when it came down to the Kagari sense, perhaps I'm more feeling a bit attached to her in the anime? But then again, as you said, you can pretty much put her in the 2nd category from you might see from my standpoint. Now at the same time... if I can be clear as I said, perhaps a personal bias, perhaps I felt like Kagari needed more character to the VN as well with the anime but I slight felt a liking for her in the anime, but I do see the issues. Although writing wise, the VN is better when it comes to that stance. Fair enough; I'm simply advocating against calling Kagari a good or even characterized character, but that's indifferent to a comparison between anime and novel as well as to your personal attachment to a character (except if you want to narrow your attachment down to certain execution aspects and claim the anime doing a good job based on that). Symphyon said: At least you (may, perhaps), not deny my second point though, at least to the meaning the series conveyed which is about the faith and destiny, the anime made it even more apparent, or more noticeable, which is pretty nice, while the VN had it pretty much subtle but... how to say this? They didn't made it very apparent to it, or at least demonstrating everyone's connections at the same time, if that makes sense. Welp, I simply can't be arsed to look into some "message" or "meaning" when the work itself isn't working on any level of story, subtlety, consistency, coherency, world building, explanations, plot and even characters. No matter any intended message the simply absence of a working base to ground that on pretty much invalidates that. The VN may have had such messages, I'm not doubting that, but that can't come across in the anime when the anime doesn't even manage to bring way more substantial points across, so basically there can't be meaning behind something that isn't even something per se. Symphyon said: "Uh... Not every show has to be an AOTS contender for being complex or very well written. Sometimes, anime series can be a contender for those seasons either for how it is delivered, and how it pretty much goes to preferences, which then reflects on the result by the end of it." In other words, complex story-line and well written shows aren't EVERYTHING in what an anime needs alone. For me for a show to be considered an AOTY or AOTS contender, it has to be a show that I love throughout, at the same time, it has to be a show that delivers what I was expecting to get or beyond what I was actually expecting, mostly when it comes to my personal eyes. If a series makes me happy and makes me laugh, or at least brings a smile on my face (that's more on a subjective perspective which invalidates my argument perhaps) then it's all well for me. If a series has good characters despite the most simple synopsis, then that's all good for me. Basically, yes. Execution is the most important element of any anime and also the part which requires the greatest skill in handling the show. You can make anything that only includes a concept good by making assumptions, you can make any resemblance of character or character conflict good by making assumptions and you can turn any story that attempts a large scale good by making assumptions. You can think of everything as good if you only think of something to make out of what is in front of you, but the way the show handles itself and presents itself is what actually determines how self-aware of its strength the show is and that is what creates good shows. Flashing out its own strengths with well-paced presentation, that is. "Complexity" and "Intelligence" is not universal, but execution is and in the end that is the sole consistent element that can define and bind all anime, because it is all encompassing. |
Jan 16, 2017 10:20 AM
#38
Repeat_it_in_red said: You are aware that I've been talking about the rewrite anime the whole time. How good people deem the novel to be and how popular it is has nothing to do with the quality of the anime at all. Murasa22 said: And don't even say that "score doesn't matter" or compare with MAL's system because finishing a visual novel takes a lot more time and effort than watching a 11-24 episode anime. It is kinda like that though. This is a fallacious argument known as ad populum. Humans can be mistaken and so can a large number of humans be. No matter how many people think Rewrite is good this alone doesn't mean that it is. In an actual debate an argument like this holds 0 merit. And also: Finishing a VN takes more time and effort than finishing an anime and that means an opinion on a VN holds more worth or what? A person can be mistaken and an amount of effort does not make one "more right" or anything, where that rating lies makes no difference. (And just to make counterexamples: There are many VN that fall under the range of <10 hours and hence are shorter than two-cour anime and while there are many VN in the range of 20 hours+ there also are many longer anime in the 50+ range (especially older ones) and some anime like Detective Conan, One Piece or the entirety of Naruto are longer than any VN, so you cant even say VN are longer per se) Murasa22 said: So yes, Rewrite deserves a lot of credit for being one of the best of its genre. I don't even need to say that Key is very well-know for making really good VNs. So its very likely that people who played the visual novel will give more credit to Rewrite or S;G for example than something like Gabriel DropOut or Little Witch Academia. I know they might be good shows but you can't really compare them, its like comparing The Hangover with something like Inception or Shutter Island. "one of the best of its genre" as you sufficiently proved by showing that it's popular? That is not how it works... And Key is well-known for making good VN? That is the same fallacious argument as before, but even more vague and, on top of that, even more wrong, because a studio as a whole is never consistent at any time. Even if most VN by Key were good, that wouldn't mean all are good. There's always flops, ergo this argument is really pointless. And then you are going back to the other argument again: The VN has nothing to do with the anime's quality and that is the current topic. People who like the VN will automatically fanboy over the anime (like seen in this thread) and that validates it? Now that argument is pretty dismissive... And why can't you compare them? Cause they aren't VN's? or cause they aren't as popular? (Oh wait, there are more people watching LWA this season than people who completed Rewrite S1 and that is already half a year old.) You're giving no apparent reason why I can't compare them and while I'm not particularly fond of Gabriel Dropout it still didn't do nearly as much things wrong as Rewrite S2 did. Murasa22 said: I'm sorry, but Konosuba its just another Isekai anime/LN with good comedy (atleast the first season has). You know how these type of thing gets popular nowadays, lets be real here. Well, yes, but KonoSuba actually focuses on a comedic aspect and spoofs the normally generic Isekai anime instead of being just another dumb power fantasy itself. It is by no means the best show in existence, but it is witty and funny (you're even acknowledging that yourself...) and like I pointed out before the first episode of S2 did a very good job at being the introductory episode in terms of structure and such (and now look at the incoherent mess that Rewrite's ep. 1 was). There's another funny thing here though: According to you, Rewrite is good, because many people think that it is, but KonoSuba's popularity doesn't mean anything, cause "that gets popular nowadays"? That, dear user, is hypocrisy at its finest. Murasa22 said: Chaos;Child better than Rewrite? well, im not familiar with the source material so i can't say that for now, but i would say that you are not familiar with Rewrite as well to say that right of the bat. I like the formulation "less worse" more than "better" in this context, but let's roll with it. Well, it might be that I'm not familiar with Rewrite, but guess what... I'm not to blame for wanting to watch an anime and that anime alone. You are pretty much confirming that the anime is not elaborating on anything. The VN might be good and you can feel free to believe so, but the anime didn't do a job at being as good and complex as you claim the novel to be, so it isn't. You also don't need to be familiar with Chaos;Child to say something; the quality of source material holds no merit for the quality of the anime! (but it looks like you consider being familiar with the source material an actual criteria...) Murasa22 said: And im not trying to discredit LWA, I'm just saying its a simple show with a simple premise, while Rewrite has way more depth and world building that should be seeing with other eyes. See above: World building and depth are not present in the anime which is just an accumulation of a thousands of flaws. Being simple isn't anything bad, pretentious and supposed "complexity" isn't the only thing you should attribute worth tho. Execution is a major aspect of making good shows and neither is "complexity" a substitute for "good plot" (cause, guess what, that comes down to execution) nor is "good plot" a substitute to "good quality overall". Your argument of Simplicity vs. Complexity doesn't hold much merit, because it only describes a quantity and not even a quality. TL;DR: I don't give a crap about how good the novel is, the anime sucks period Symphyon said: Now as I have said with the first quote now, you elaborated that very well with it, of course at least to me I guess when it came down to the Kagari sense, perhaps I'm more feeling a bit attached to her in the anime? But then again, as you said, you can pretty much put her in the 2nd category from you might see from my standpoint. Now at the same time... if I can be clear as I said, perhaps a personal bias, perhaps I felt like Kagari needed more character to the VN as well with the anime but I slight felt a liking for her in the anime, but I do see the issues. Although writing wise, the VN is better when it comes to that stance. Fair enough; I'm simply advocating against calling Kagari a good or even characterized character, but that's indifferent to a comparison between anime and novel as well as to your personal attachment to a character (except if you want to narrow your attachment down to certain execution aspects and claim the anime doing a good job based on that). Symphyon said: At least you (may, perhaps), not deny my second point though, at least to the meaning the series conveyed which is about the faith and destiny, the anime made it even more apparent, or more noticeable, which is pretty nice, while the VN had it pretty much subtle but... how to say this? They didn't made it very apparent to it, or at least demonstrating everyone's connections at the same time, if that makes sense. Welp, I simply can't be arsed to look into some "message" or "meaning" when the work itself isn't working on any level of story, subtlety, consistency, coherency, world building, explanations, plot and even characters. No matter any intended message the simply absence of a working base to ground that on pretty much invalidates that. The VN may have had such messages, I'm not doubting that, but that can't come across in the anime when the anime doesn't even manage to bring way more substantial points across, so basically there can't be meaning behind something that isn't even something per se. Symphyon said: "Uh... Not every show has to be an AOTS contender for being complex or very well written. Sometimes, anime series can be a contender for those seasons either for how it is delivered, and how it pretty much goes to preferences, which then reflects on the result by the end of it." In other words, complex story-line and well written shows aren't EVERYTHING in what an anime needs alone. For me for a show to be considered an AOTY or AOTS contender, it has to be a show that I love throughout, at the same time, it has to be a show that delivers what I was expecting to get or beyond what I was actually expecting, mostly when it comes to my personal eyes. If a series makes me happy and makes me laugh, or at least brings a smile on my face (that's more on a subjective perspective which invalidates my argument perhaps) then it's all well for me. If a series has good characters despite the most simple synopsis, then that's all good for me. Basically, yes. Execution is the most important element of any anime and also the part which requires the greatest skill in handling the show. You can make anything that only includes a concept good by making assumptions, you can make any resemblance of character or character conflict good by making assumptions and you can turn any story that attempts a large scale good by making assumptions. You can think of everything as good if you only think of something to make out of what is in front of you, but the way the show handles itself and presents itself is what actually determines how self-aware of its strength the show is and that is what creates good shows. Flashing out its own strengths with well-paced presentation, that is. "Complexity" and "Intelligence" is not universal, but execution is and in the end that is the sole consistent element that can define and bind all anime, because it is all encompassing. Somebody chill this guy; he discerns fallacious arguments in the anime discussion |
In time, you will know the tragic extent of my fapping's... |
Jan 16, 2017 10:36 AM
#39
Repeat_it_in_red said: You're giving no apparent reason why I can't compare them and while I'm not particularly fond of Gabriel Dropout it still didn't do nearly as much things wrong as Rewrite S2 did. Wait, are you assuming things that hadn't even happened yet? Rewrite S2 did nothing wrong and its first episode adapted faithfully the first bits of Moon route and connected everything that happened in the first season/other routes, so i don't see your point here. Are you confused? well, thats normal, cause we VN readers were confused too at this point in the VN and it should be clear at.... Oh wait. I'm sorry dude, but i can't give your arguments any credits after seeing this. Thats just dumb and childish. And yes, i gave a 10/10 for this episode because it was worth of a 10/10 based on how they portrayed the events and how faithfully it was from the VN. Like everyone said, if they keep up, it will be a very good adaptation of the main routes/plot of the visual novel, even if the first season was a bit rushed, it will still connect the viewrs with its plot and message. |
Jan 16, 2017 10:57 AM
#40
i havent watched it but i'd probably think it's shit so have my vote |
Jan 16, 2017 11:34 AM
#41
Gotrys_Cheslock said: Symphyon said: I died laughing at this because it is so true (because note: Gotrys never adds anything to the topic other than to whine and bitch 24/7 like a kid that didn't got his favorite ice cream) I say not yet honestly. There's some solid competition around this season (Gintama 2017, KonoSuba S2, Gabriel DropOut, etc, at least for me). Repeat_it_in_red said: That automatically implies that the anime fails as a stand-alone and this is precisely what it does. You must realize that something that is only good when you have read the corresponding novel is pretty much by default a bad adaption, a shitty stand-alone, badly established and terribly executed. An anime that doesn't work on its own is pretty bad just from that alone, so while you might enjoy seeing parts of your favorite novel animated, please consider what good things the anime actually did on its own and what parts of your apparently positive experience with it stem from the anime itself and not just from your love of the novel instead. I can actually agree with this a lot when it comes to anime doing as a stand-alone... but... I can actually argue a bit with that but while the anime has its own faults it did somethings that I did liked and made the experience for me with Season 2 better. I don't know if this will count but in the Original VN, Kagari is known as a interesting character, but without going into spoiler territory for further, the entire resolution to her character in terms of the original novel wasn't all that great, moreso making her feel just there when it comes to likability to her character. While I think the anime did better for me to like Kagari and get attached to her further than the original Novel, while yeah you can argue it takes away the point of the character, you do need some characterization before liking a character, Kagari in the novel at least for the heroine routes, until the point, has been treated as the device imo, until Moon, which you'll see later on what I mean. It doesn't help much that in the end while everything was resolved, somethings for me were actually empty. So in the anime format, as much as it is as a inferior version of the original VN, I think it did itself on its own right good in few aspects for me, characterizing at least Kagari a bit more, and not to mention a message that was more subtle and not that apparent, it's easy to notice around, at least for the anime's standpoint imo. This is just how I personally look at the anime, as much as it does not go well as a standalone, it did do somethings better than the VN as a standalone product, if that even makes sense, if not then I can try to explain further. Maybe this might sound a bit biased but that's just how I personally see it. So this noob just crtl c/crtl v my elaborate post and that was funny to you? No offense Symphony, but your sense of humor is shit lately too. But, you don't really elaborated anything at all (that post isn't even an argument it's just a picture). And that has been seen throughout the 6 months I've been in the Rewrite forums though. No offense but if I can be straight up towards you, you would need to step up at least with criticism (again, most of your complaints aren't even actual criticism to me) |
Jan 16, 2017 11:40 AM
#42
Gotrys_Cheslock said: SPOT ON! Overhyped, overrated, boring, unfunny garbage without any artistic value whatsoever. Unfunny = Subjective Term I can agree at least it is overrated (because There are literally a lot of Gintama entries on MAL Tops but hey, It's MAL, so what?) Overhyped? I think most of it is just from manga readers and those that actually appreciate for what it is, of course, I have Gintama as my favorite show of all time so of course, inb4 your argument will be "your opinion is invalid" because it is my favorite show (no I'm not acting like a butthurt Gintama fangirl or anything, but point taking that you will say this in a matter of seconds). Then again that's just a thing to be debated or elaborated (highly doubt you would actually go and elaborate, knowing that you haven't done anything yet Imo to prove that you can) |
Jan 16, 2017 11:45 AM
#43
Repeat_it_in_red said: You are aware that I've been talking about the rewrite anime the whole time. How good people deem the novel to be and how popular it is has nothing to do with the quality of the anime at all. Murasa22 said: And don't even say that "score doesn't matter" or compare with MAL's system because finishing a visual novel takes a lot more time and effort than watching a 11-24 episode anime. It is kinda like that though. This is a fallacious argument known as ad populum. Humans can be mistaken and so can a large number of humans be. No matter how many people think Rewrite is good this alone doesn't mean that it is. In an actual debate an argument like this holds 0 merit. And also: Finishing a VN takes more time and effort than finishing an anime and that means an opinion on a VN holds more worth or what? A person can be mistaken and an amount of effort does not make one "more right" or anything, where that rating lies makes no difference. (And just to make counterexamples: There are many VN that fall under the range of <10 hours and hence are shorter than two-cour anime and while there are many VN in the range of 20 hours+ there also are many longer anime in the 50+ range (especially older ones) and some anime like Detective Conan, One Piece or the entirety of Naruto are longer than any VN, so you cant even say VN are longer per se) Murasa22 said: So yes, Rewrite deserves a lot of credit for being one of the best of its genre. I don't even need to say that Key is very well-know for making really good VNs. So its very likely that people who played the visual novel will give more credit to Rewrite or S;G for example than something like Gabriel DropOut or Little Witch Academia. I know they might be good shows but you can't really compare them, its like comparing The Hangover with something like Inception or Shutter Island. "one of the best of its genre" as you sufficiently proved by showing that it's popular? That is not how it works... And Key is well-known for making good VN? That is the same fallacious argument as before, but even more vague and, on top of that, even more wrong, because a studio as a whole is never consistent at any time. Even if most VN by Key were good, that wouldn't mean all are good. There's always flops, ergo this argument is really pointless. And then you are going back to the other argument again: The VN has nothing to do with the anime's quality and that is the current topic. People who like the VN will automatically fanboy over the anime (like seen in this thread) and that validates it? Now that argument is pretty dismissive... And why can't you compare them? Cause they aren't VN's? or cause they aren't as popular? (Oh wait, there are more people watching LWA this season than people who completed Rewrite S1 and that is already half a year old.) You're giving no apparent reason why I can't compare them and while I'm not particularly fond of Gabriel Dropout it still didn't do nearly as much things wrong as Rewrite S2 did. Murasa22 said: I'm sorry, but Konosuba its just another Isekai anime/LN with good comedy (atleast the first season has). You know how these type of thing gets popular nowadays, lets be real here. Well, yes, but KonoSuba actually focuses on a comedic aspect and spoofs the normally generic Isekai anime instead of being just another dumb power fantasy itself. It is by no means the best show in existence, but it is witty and funny (you're even acknowledging that yourself...) and like I pointed out before the first episode of S2 did a very good job at being the introductory episode in terms of structure and such (and now look at the incoherent mess that Rewrite's ep. 1 was). There's another funny thing here though: According to you, Rewrite is good, because many people think that it is, but KonoSuba's popularity doesn't mean anything, cause "that gets popular nowadays"? That, dear user, is hypocrisy at its finest. Murasa22 said: Chaos;Child better than Rewrite? well, im not familiar with the source material so i can't say that for now, but i would say that you are not familiar with Rewrite as well to say that right of the bat. I like the formulation "less worse" more than "better" in this context, but let's roll with it. Well, it might be that I'm not familiar with Rewrite, but guess what... I'm not to blame for wanting to watch an anime and that anime alone. You are pretty much confirming that the anime is not elaborating on anything. The VN might be good and you can feel free to believe so, but the anime didn't do a job at being as good and complex as you claim the novel to be, so it isn't. You also don't need to be familiar with Chaos;Child to say something; the quality of source material holds no merit for the quality of the anime! (but it looks like you consider being familiar with the source material an actual criteria...) Murasa22 said: And im not trying to discredit LWA, I'm just saying its a simple show with a simple premise, while Rewrite has way more depth and world building that should be seeing with other eyes. See above: World building and depth are not present in the anime which is just an accumulation of a thousands of flaws. Being simple isn't anything bad, pretentious and supposed "complexity" isn't the only thing you should attribute worth tho. Execution is a major aspect of making good shows and neither is "complexity" a substitute for "good plot" (cause, guess what, that comes down to execution) nor is "good plot" a substitute to "good quality overall". Your argument of Simplicity vs. Complexity doesn't hold much merit, because it only describes a quantity and not even a quality. TL;DR: I don't give a crap about how good the novel is, the anime sucks period Symphyon said: Now as I have said with the first quote now, you elaborated that very well with it, of course at least to me I guess when it came down to the Kagari sense, perhaps I'm more feeling a bit attached to her in the anime? But then again, as you said, you can pretty much put her in the 2nd category from you might see from my standpoint. Now at the same time... if I can be clear as I said, perhaps a personal bias, perhaps I felt like Kagari needed more character to the VN as well with the anime but I slight felt a liking for her in the anime, but I do see the issues. Although writing wise, the VN is better when it comes to that stance. Fair enough; I'm simply advocating against calling Kagari a good or even characterized character, but that's indifferent to a comparison between anime and novel as well as to your personal attachment to a character (except if you want to narrow your attachment down to certain execution aspects and claim the anime doing a good job based on that). Symphyon said: At least you (may, perhaps), not deny my second point though, at least to the meaning the series conveyed which is about the faith and destiny, the anime made it even more apparent, or more noticeable, which is pretty nice, while the VN had it pretty much subtle but... how to say this? They didn't made it very apparent to it, or at least demonstrating everyone's connections at the same time, if that makes sense. Welp, I simply can't be arsed to look into some "message" or "meaning" when the work itself isn't working on any level of story, subtlety, consistency, coherency, world building, explanations, plot and even characters. No matter any intended message the simply absence of a working base to ground that on pretty much invalidates that. The VN may have had such messages, I'm not doubting that, but that can't come across in the anime when the anime doesn't even manage to bring way more substantial points across, so basically there can't be meaning behind something that isn't even something per se. Symphyon said: "Uh... Not every show has to be an AOTS contender for being complex or very well written. Sometimes, anime series can be a contender for those seasons either for how it is delivered, and how it pretty much goes to preferences, which then reflects on the result by the end of it." In other words, complex story-line and well written shows aren't EVERYTHING in what an anime needs alone. For me for a show to be considered an AOTY or AOTS contender, it has to be a show that I love throughout, at the same time, it has to be a show that delivers what I was expecting to get or beyond what I was actually expecting, mostly when it comes to my personal eyes. If a series makes me happy and makes me laugh, or at least brings a smile on my face (that's more on a subjective perspective which invalidates my argument perhaps) then it's all well for me. If a series has good characters despite the most simple synopsis, then that's all good for me. Basically, yes. Execution is the most important element of any anime and also the part which requires the greatest skill in handling the show. You can make anything that only includes a concept good by making assumptions, you can make any resemblance of character or character conflict good by making assumptions and you can turn any story that attempts a large scale good by making assumptions. You can think of everything as good if you only think of something to make out of what is in front of you, but the way the show handles itself and presents itself is what actually determines how self-aware of its strength the show is and that is what creates good shows. Flashing out its own strengths with well-paced presentation, that is. "Complexity" and "Intelligence" is not universal, but execution is and in the end that is the sole consistent element that can define and bind all anime, because it is all encompassing. I think you have taken things out of my mouth when I was showing this to a friend of mine who he as well agreed that when Murasa brought the "VN" argument, it fell apart. No offense to Murasa or anything but if you brought the VN argument, we're not going to compare the anime with the VN. Even as much as I liked the first season of Rewrite (despite the issues it had of course) I'm not that dumb to go and bring that argument into a discussion, at least directly doing so. Also this reminds me of 2 years ago with me bringing the source material argument a lot and such, and from experience, not gonna lie... that makes you a bit stupid. Discuss what the anime did and what the anime did alone, don't directly bring the VN's quality into the discussion because that makes the argument pretty stale and weak. And while I do admit Rewrite's VN quality is pretty good, you don't just go and compare it completely with the anime or at the very least bring the VN argument because, this is an anime adaptation. Different formats and Different Sources. Maybe that's a sort of contradiction, but even I'm not that stupid to at least show rankings of the VNDB. |
Jan 16, 2017 11:51 AM
#44
Symphyon said: Repeat_it_in_red said: You are aware that I've been talking about the rewrite anime the whole time. How good people deem the novel to be and how popular it is has nothing to do with the quality of the anime at all. Murasa22 said: And don't even say that "score doesn't matter" or compare with MAL's system because finishing a visual novel takes a lot more time and effort than watching a 11-24 episode anime. It is kinda like that though. This is a fallacious argument known as ad populum. Humans can be mistaken and so can a large number of humans be. No matter how many people think Rewrite is good this alone doesn't mean that it is. In an actual debate an argument like this holds 0 merit. And also: Finishing a VN takes more time and effort than finishing an anime and that means an opinion on a VN holds more worth or what? A person can be mistaken and an amount of effort does not make one "more right" or anything, where that rating lies makes no difference. (And just to make counterexamples: There are many VN that fall under the range of <10 hours and hence are shorter than two-cour anime and while there are many VN in the range of 20 hours+ there also are many longer anime in the 50+ range (especially older ones) and some anime like Detective Conan, One Piece or the entirety of Naruto are longer than any VN, so you cant even say VN are longer per se) Murasa22 said: So yes, Rewrite deserves a lot of credit for being one of the best of its genre. I don't even need to say that Key is very well-know for making really good VNs. So its very likely that people who played the visual novel will give more credit to Rewrite or S;G for example than something like Gabriel DropOut or Little Witch Academia. I know they might be good shows but you can't really compare them, its like comparing The Hangover with something like Inception or Shutter Island. "one of the best of its genre" as you sufficiently proved by showing that it's popular? That is not how it works... And Key is well-known for making good VN? That is the same fallacious argument as before, but even more vague and, on top of that, even more wrong, because a studio as a whole is never consistent at any time. Even if most VN by Key were good, that wouldn't mean all are good. There's always flops, ergo this argument is really pointless. And then you are going back to the other argument again: The VN has nothing to do with the anime's quality and that is the current topic. People who like the VN will automatically fanboy over the anime (like seen in this thread) and that validates it? Now that argument is pretty dismissive... And why can't you compare them? Cause they aren't VN's? or cause they aren't as popular? (Oh wait, there are more people watching LWA this season than people who completed Rewrite S1 and that is already half a year old.) You're giving no apparent reason why I can't compare them and while I'm not particularly fond of Gabriel Dropout it still didn't do nearly as much things wrong as Rewrite S2 did. Murasa22 said: I'm sorry, but Konosuba its just another Isekai anime/LN with good comedy (atleast the first season has). You know how these type of thing gets popular nowadays, lets be real here. Well, yes, but KonoSuba actually focuses on a comedic aspect and spoofs the normally generic Isekai anime instead of being just another dumb power fantasy itself. It is by no means the best show in existence, but it is witty and funny (you're even acknowledging that yourself...) and like I pointed out before the first episode of S2 did a very good job at being the introductory episode in terms of structure and such (and now look at the incoherent mess that Rewrite's ep. 1 was). There's another funny thing here though: According to you, Rewrite is good, because many people think that it is, but KonoSuba's popularity doesn't mean anything, cause "that gets popular nowadays"? That, dear user, is hypocrisy at its finest. Murasa22 said: Chaos;Child better than Rewrite? well, im not familiar with the source material so i can't say that for now, but i would say that you are not familiar with Rewrite as well to say that right of the bat. I like the formulation "less worse" more than "better" in this context, but let's roll with it. Well, it might be that I'm not familiar with Rewrite, but guess what... I'm not to blame for wanting to watch an anime and that anime alone. You are pretty much confirming that the anime is not elaborating on anything. The VN might be good and you can feel free to believe so, but the anime didn't do a job at being as good and complex as you claim the novel to be, so it isn't. You also don't need to be familiar with Chaos;Child to say something; the quality of source material holds no merit for the quality of the anime! (but it looks like you consider being familiar with the source material an actual criteria...) Murasa22 said: And im not trying to discredit LWA, I'm just saying its a simple show with a simple premise, while Rewrite has way more depth and world building that should be seeing with other eyes. See above: World building and depth are not present in the anime which is just an accumulation of a thousands of flaws. Being simple isn't anything bad, pretentious and supposed "complexity" isn't the only thing you should attribute worth tho. Execution is a major aspect of making good shows and neither is "complexity" a substitute for "good plot" (cause, guess what, that comes down to execution) nor is "good plot" a substitute to "good quality overall". Your argument of Simplicity vs. Complexity doesn't hold much merit, because it only describes a quantity and not even a quality. TL;DR: I don't give a crap about how good the novel is, the anime sucks period Symphyon said: Now as I have said with the first quote now, you elaborated that very well with it, of course at least to me I guess when it came down to the Kagari sense, perhaps I'm more feeling a bit attached to her in the anime? But then again, as you said, you can pretty much put her in the 2nd category from you might see from my standpoint. Now at the same time... if I can be clear as I said, perhaps a personal bias, perhaps I felt like Kagari needed more character to the VN as well with the anime but I slight felt a liking for her in the anime, but I do see the issues. Although writing wise, the VN is better when it comes to that stance. Fair enough; I'm simply advocating against calling Kagari a good or even characterized character, but that's indifferent to a comparison between anime and novel as well as to your personal attachment to a character (except if you want to narrow your attachment down to certain execution aspects and claim the anime doing a good job based on that). Symphyon said: At least you (may, perhaps), not deny my second point though, at least to the meaning the series conveyed which is about the faith and destiny, the anime made it even more apparent, or more noticeable, which is pretty nice, while the VN had it pretty much subtle but... how to say this? They didn't made it very apparent to it, or at least demonstrating everyone's connections at the same time, if that makes sense. Welp, I simply can't be arsed to look into some "message" or "meaning" when the work itself isn't working on any level of story, subtlety, consistency, coherency, world building, explanations, plot and even characters. No matter any intended message the simply absence of a working base to ground that on pretty much invalidates that. The VN may have had such messages, I'm not doubting that, but that can't come across in the anime when the anime doesn't even manage to bring way more substantial points across, so basically there can't be meaning behind something that isn't even something per se. Symphyon said: "Uh... Not every show has to be an AOTS contender for being complex or very well written. Sometimes, anime series can be a contender for those seasons either for how it is delivered, and how it pretty much goes to preferences, which then reflects on the result by the end of it." In other words, complex story-line and well written shows aren't EVERYTHING in what an anime needs alone. For me for a show to be considered an AOTY or AOTS contender, it has to be a show that I love throughout, at the same time, it has to be a show that delivers what I was expecting to get or beyond what I was actually expecting, mostly when it comes to my personal eyes. If a series makes me happy and makes me laugh, or at least brings a smile on my face (that's more on a subjective perspective which invalidates my argument perhaps) then it's all well for me. If a series has good characters despite the most simple synopsis, then that's all good for me. Basically, yes. Execution is the most important element of any anime and also the part which requires the greatest skill in handling the show. You can make anything that only includes a concept good by making assumptions, you can make any resemblance of character or character conflict good by making assumptions and you can turn any story that attempts a large scale good by making assumptions. You can think of everything as good if you only think of something to make out of what is in front of you, but the way the show handles itself and presents itself is what actually determines how self-aware of its strength the show is and that is what creates good shows. Flashing out its own strengths with well-paced presentation, that is. "Complexity" and "Intelligence" is not universal, but execution is and in the end that is the sole consistent element that can define and bind all anime, because it is all encompassing. I think you have taken things out of my mouth when I was showing this to a friend of mine who he as well agreed that when Murasa brought the "VN" argument, it fell apart. No offense to Murasa or anything but if you brought the VN argument, we're not going to compare the anime with the VN. Even as much as I liked the first season of Rewrite (despite the issues it had of course) I'm not that dumb to go and bring that argument into a discussion, at least directly doing so. Also this reminds me of 2 years ago with me bringing the source material argument a lot and such, and from experience, not gonna lie... that makes you a bit stupid. Discuss what the anime did and what the anime did alone, don't directly bring the VN into the discussion because that makes the argument pretty stale and weak. I believe you people didn't get my point when i brought the "VN Argument" here. I was just refering myself to Moon&Terra arcs and how they portrayed the first episode, thats why i should give it the credit that it deserves based on how the VN plays out from now on. I'm not stupid to compare Anime x Source material, you guys that didn't understand what i was trying to say. |
Jan 16, 2017 11:57 AM
#45
Symphyon said: Gotrys_Cheslock said: SPOT ON! Overhyped, overrated, boring, unfunny garbage without any artistic value whatsoever. Unfunny = Subjective Term I can agree at least it is overrated (because There are literally a lot of Gintama entries on MAL Tops but hey, It's MAL, so what?) Overhyped? I think most of it is just from manga readers and those that actually appreciate for what it is, of course, I have Gintama as my favorite show of all time so of course, inb4 your argument will be "your opinion is invalid" because it is my favorite show (no I'm not acting like a butthurt Gintama fangirl or anything, but point taking that you will say this in a matter of seconds). Then again that's just a thing to be debated or elaborated (highly doubt you would actually go and elaborate, knowing that you haven't done anything yet Imo to prove that you can) Why do I have to prove anything to anyone is beyond me. Besides, I'm not a fan of the five-paragraph essays. I like old school eye-to-eye-conversation and not this online imitation of discussion. |
Jan 16, 2017 11:58 AM
#46
Murasa22 said: Symphyon said: Repeat_it_in_red said: You are aware that I've been talking about the rewrite anime the whole time. How good people deem the novel to be and how popular it is has nothing to do with the quality of the anime at all. Murasa22 said: And don't even say that "score doesn't matter" or compare with MAL's system because finishing a visual novel takes a lot more time and effort than watching a 11-24 episode anime. It is kinda like that though. This is a fallacious argument known as ad populum. Humans can be mistaken and so can a large number of humans be. No matter how many people think Rewrite is good this alone doesn't mean that it is. In an actual debate an argument like this holds 0 merit. And also: Finishing a VN takes more time and effort than finishing an anime and that means an opinion on a VN holds more worth or what? A person can be mistaken and an amount of effort does not make one "more right" or anything, where that rating lies makes no difference. (And just to make counterexamples: There are many VN that fall under the range of <10 hours and hence are shorter than two-cour anime and while there are many VN in the range of 20 hours+ there also are many longer anime in the 50+ range (especially older ones) and some anime like Detective Conan, One Piece or the entirety of Naruto are longer than any VN, so you cant even say VN are longer per se) Murasa22 said: So yes, Rewrite deserves a lot of credit for being one of the best of its genre. I don't even need to say that Key is very well-know for making really good VNs. So its very likely that people who played the visual novel will give more credit to Rewrite or S;G for example than something like Gabriel DropOut or Little Witch Academia. I know they might be good shows but you can't really compare them, its like comparing The Hangover with something like Inception or Shutter Island. "one of the best of its genre" as you sufficiently proved by showing that it's popular? That is not how it works... And Key is well-known for making good VN? That is the same fallacious argument as before, but even more vague and, on top of that, even more wrong, because a studio as a whole is never consistent at any time. Even if most VN by Key were good, that wouldn't mean all are good. There's always flops, ergo this argument is really pointless. And then you are going back to the other argument again: The VN has nothing to do with the anime's quality and that is the current topic. People who like the VN will automatically fanboy over the anime (like seen in this thread) and that validates it? Now that argument is pretty dismissive... And why can't you compare them? Cause they aren't VN's? or cause they aren't as popular? (Oh wait, there are more people watching LWA this season than people who completed Rewrite S1 and that is already half a year old.) You're giving no apparent reason why I can't compare them and while I'm not particularly fond of Gabriel Dropout it still didn't do nearly as much things wrong as Rewrite S2 did. Murasa22 said: I'm sorry, but Konosuba its just another Isekai anime/LN with good comedy (atleast the first season has). You know how these type of thing gets popular nowadays, lets be real here. Well, yes, but KonoSuba actually focuses on a comedic aspect and spoofs the normally generic Isekai anime instead of being just another dumb power fantasy itself. It is by no means the best show in existence, but it is witty and funny (you're even acknowledging that yourself...) and like I pointed out before the first episode of S2 did a very good job at being the introductory episode in terms of structure and such (and now look at the incoherent mess that Rewrite's ep. 1 was). There's another funny thing here though: According to you, Rewrite is good, because many people think that it is, but KonoSuba's popularity doesn't mean anything, cause "that gets popular nowadays"? That, dear user, is hypocrisy at its finest. Murasa22 said: Chaos;Child better than Rewrite? well, im not familiar with the source material so i can't say that for now, but i would say that you are not familiar with Rewrite as well to say that right of the bat. I like the formulation "less worse" more than "better" in this context, but let's roll with it. Well, it might be that I'm not familiar with Rewrite, but guess what... I'm not to blame for wanting to watch an anime and that anime alone. You are pretty much confirming that the anime is not elaborating on anything. The VN might be good and you can feel free to believe so, but the anime didn't do a job at being as good and complex as you claim the novel to be, so it isn't. You also don't need to be familiar with Chaos;Child to say something; the quality of source material holds no merit for the quality of the anime! (but it looks like you consider being familiar with the source material an actual criteria...) Murasa22 said: And im not trying to discredit LWA, I'm just saying its a simple show with a simple premise, while Rewrite has way more depth and world building that should be seeing with other eyes. See above: World building and depth are not present in the anime which is just an accumulation of a thousands of flaws. Being simple isn't anything bad, pretentious and supposed "complexity" isn't the only thing you should attribute worth tho. Execution is a major aspect of making good shows and neither is "complexity" a substitute for "good plot" (cause, guess what, that comes down to execution) nor is "good plot" a substitute to "good quality overall". Your argument of Simplicity vs. Complexity doesn't hold much merit, because it only describes a quantity and not even a quality. TL;DR: I don't give a crap about how good the novel is, the anime sucks period Symphyon said: Now as I have said with the first quote now, you elaborated that very well with it, of course at least to me I guess when it came down to the Kagari sense, perhaps I'm more feeling a bit attached to her in the anime? But then again, as you said, you can pretty much put her in the 2nd category from you might see from my standpoint. Now at the same time... if I can be clear as I said, perhaps a personal bias, perhaps I felt like Kagari needed more character to the VN as well with the anime but I slight felt a liking for her in the anime, but I do see the issues. Although writing wise, the VN is better when it comes to that stance. Fair enough; I'm simply advocating against calling Kagari a good or even characterized character, but that's indifferent to a comparison between anime and novel as well as to your personal attachment to a character (except if you want to narrow your attachment down to certain execution aspects and claim the anime doing a good job based on that). Symphyon said: At least you (may, perhaps), not deny my second point though, at least to the meaning the series conveyed which is about the faith and destiny, the anime made it even more apparent, or more noticeable, which is pretty nice, while the VN had it pretty much subtle but... how to say this? They didn't made it very apparent to it, or at least demonstrating everyone's connections at the same time, if that makes sense. Welp, I simply can't be arsed to look into some "message" or "meaning" when the work itself isn't working on any level of story, subtlety, consistency, coherency, world building, explanations, plot and even characters. No matter any intended message the simply absence of a working base to ground that on pretty much invalidates that. The VN may have had such messages, I'm not doubting that, but that can't come across in the anime when the anime doesn't even manage to bring way more substantial points across, so basically there can't be meaning behind something that isn't even something per se. Symphyon said: "Uh... Not every show has to be an AOTS contender for being complex or very well written. Sometimes, anime series can be a contender for those seasons either for how it is delivered, and how it pretty much goes to preferences, which then reflects on the result by the end of it." In other words, complex story-line and well written shows aren't EVERYTHING in what an anime needs alone. For me for a show to be considered an AOTY or AOTS contender, it has to be a show that I love throughout, at the same time, it has to be a show that delivers what I was expecting to get or beyond what I was actually expecting, mostly when it comes to my personal eyes. If a series makes me happy and makes me laugh, or at least brings a smile on my face (that's more on a subjective perspective which invalidates my argument perhaps) then it's all well for me. If a series has good characters despite the most simple synopsis, then that's all good for me. Basically, yes. Execution is the most important element of any anime and also the part which requires the greatest skill in handling the show. You can make anything that only includes a concept good by making assumptions, you can make any resemblance of character or character conflict good by making assumptions and you can turn any story that attempts a large scale good by making assumptions. You can think of everything as good if you only think of something to make out of what is in front of you, but the way the show handles itself and presents itself is what actually determines how self-aware of its strength the show is and that is what creates good shows. Flashing out its own strengths with well-paced presentation, that is. "Complexity" and "Intelligence" is not universal, but execution is and in the end that is the sole consistent element that can define and bind all anime, because it is all encompassing. I think you have taken things out of my mouth when I was showing this to a friend of mine who he as well agreed that when Murasa brought the "VN" argument, it fell apart. No offense to Murasa or anything but if you brought the VN argument, we're not going to compare the anime with the VN. Even as much as I liked the first season of Rewrite (despite the issues it had of course) I'm not that dumb to go and bring that argument into a discussion, at least directly doing so. Also this reminds me of 2 years ago with me bringing the source material argument a lot and such, and from experience, not gonna lie... that makes you a bit stupid. Discuss what the anime did and what the anime did alone, don't directly bring the VN into the discussion because that makes the argument pretty stale and weak. I believe you people didn't get my point when i brought the "VN Argument" here. I was just refering myself to Moon&Terra arcs and how they portrayed the first episode, thats why i should give it the credit that it deserves based on how the VN plays out from now on. I'm not stupid to compare Anime x Source material, you guys that didn't understand what i was trying to say. Then you could have made it more clear I suppose. Then again I suppose there's also the fact that you kinda brought hypocrisy around in a later comment of the forum (you pointed him at the score he gave yet you yourself rated it as well in a way, just how I called Gotrys out for being a hypocrite for doing the same thing). Of course, I can't rate shows myself for now because I have to wait until the 3rd episode to do so (except dropped shows, I won't rate dropped shows) |
Jan 16, 2017 12:05 PM
#47
Where is obviously no option for poll? |
Jan 16, 2017 12:06 PM
#48
Gotrys_Cheslock said: Symphyon said: Gotrys_Cheslock said: SPOT ON! Overhyped, overrated, boring, unfunny garbage without any artistic value whatsoever. Unfunny = Subjective Term I can agree at least it is overrated (because There are literally a lot of Gintama entries on MAL Tops but hey, It's MAL, so what?) Overhyped? I think most of it is just from manga readers and those that actually appreciate for what it is, of course, I have Gintama as my favorite show of all time so of course, inb4 your argument will be "your opinion is invalid" because it is my favorite show (no I'm not acting like a butthurt Gintama fangirl or anything, but point taking that you will say this in a matter of seconds). Then again that's just a thing to be debated or elaborated (highly doubt you would actually go and elaborate, knowing that you haven't done anything yet Imo to prove that you can) Why do I have to prove anything to anyone is beyond me. Besides, I'm not a fan of the five-paragraph essays. I like old school eye-to-eye-conversation and not this online imitation of discussion. You didn't actually get me did you? Elaborating doesn't have to have a shit ton of paragraphs. You just have to expand a bit more on your points, that's all I am saying. You don't have to be like me (and a lot of people that knows me when writing paragraphs), where I write an essay to the point where it seems like a documentary. Just saying, expand that issue, and that is enough for me (clearly you haven't done this for 6 months, that's what I am pointing out). |
Jan 16, 2017 12:09 PM
#49
SenpieX said: Where is obviously no option for poll? Dunno? xD I would want the person to add not yet too. :T But I say not yet. |
Jan 16, 2017 12:15 PM
#50
Symphyon said: Oh, my bad I meant to write never* SenpieX said: Where is obviously no option for poll? Dunno? xD I would want the person to add not yet too. :T But I say not yet. Dunno If OP is serious or he's only watching rewrite from this season. So far imo youjo senki takes the place for #1 Also, if sequels then kono suba OR Ao no exorcist Rewrite might be 1st from bottom |
SenpieXJan 16, 2017 12:18 PM
More topics from this board
Poll: » Rewrite 2nd Season Episode 1 Discussion ( 1 2 3 4 )Stark700 - Jan 14, 2017 |
181 |
by Tsukasa_Rio
»»
Dec 16, 2023 2:13 PM |
|
Poll: » Rewrite 2nd Season Episode 2 Discussion ( 1 2 3 )Stark700 - Jan 21, 2017 |
114 |
by phantomic109
»»
Jun 19, 2023 12:51 PM |
|
Poll: » Rewrite 2nd Season Episode 11 Discussion ( 1 2 3 4 5 )Stark700 - Mar 25, 2017 |
201 |
by yveltalkyogre
»»
Dec 30, 2022 2:35 PM |
|
Poll: » Rewrite 2nd Season Episode 4 Discussion ( 1 2 3 )Stark700 - Feb 4, 2017 |
110 |
by ka7eMARU
»»
Nov 5, 2022 6:10 PM |
|
Poll: » Rewrite 2nd Season Episode 3 Discussion ( 1 2 3 4 )Stark700 - Jan 28, 2017 |
153 |
by ka7eMARU
»»
Nov 5, 2022 5:45 PM |