(Alt account so you don't get triggered and report me to some MAL moderator and get me banned for invading your safe space. If you fail to read the whole thing: I win.)
This message is in regards to your braindead review of Umibe no Etranger:
Point 1: Not only was Mio 17 (believe it or not, the entire world doesn't run on Californian law), but Shun literally just gave the guy food after noticing him sitting alone on a bench on multiple occasions looking depressed. Are you really so homophobic that you think this behavior is somehow predatory?
Point 2: Not everyone responds the same way to traumatic events. Aren't you alphabet clowns always so eager to call everything "valid"? Why would it not apply to them as well? Because you're personally offended by their relationship?
Point 3: Consent doesn't apply to fictional characters. You have absolutely no way of knowing what a character's "no" actually is, nor is it of any consequence seeing as though they are FICTIONAL characters.
Point 4: As a homosexual male myself, FOR THE LOVE OF NONEXISTENT GODS, STOP TRYING TO "RECLAIM" SLURS THAT WERE NEVER USED AGAINST YOU IN THE FIRST PLACE. You are a female, I don't care that you want to arbitrarily "identify" as "non-binary"; you are a female, i.e. not a homosexual male. Why have you just decided on behalf of all gay males that "queer" is now an acceptable or respectful thing to call people or that you have any right to "identify" as it? Sweetie, you're not important, you're not valid, and I seriously doubt you're even LGBTIA (no Q).
Note: I'm not transphobic. I'm 110% in support of trans rights, but being something other than a walking female stereotype does not somehow make you trans. So let's see, you've now openly used a homophobic slur to describe a movie depicting gay males while failing to be a homosexual male yourself, you've watered the definition of "trans" because you're so pathetically desperate to have just one interesting aspect about your sad existence of eternal virtue signaling, and you've given a great movie an unwarranted terrible score simply because 13-year-old Californian girls would find entirely unproblematic aspects of it "triggering".
I wish you the best in recognizing and fixing your homophobia, transphobia, and crippling fragility. Have a nice evening.
All Comments (2) Comments
This message is in regards to your braindead review of Umibe no Etranger:
Point 1: Not only was Mio 17 (believe it or not, the entire world doesn't run on Californian law), but Shun literally just gave the guy food after noticing him sitting alone on a bench on multiple occasions looking depressed. Are you really so homophobic that you think this behavior is somehow predatory?
Point 2: Not everyone responds the same way to traumatic events. Aren't you alphabet clowns always so eager to call everything "valid"? Why would it not apply to them as well? Because you're personally offended by their relationship?
Point 3: Consent doesn't apply to fictional characters. You have absolutely no way of knowing what a character's "no" actually is, nor is it of any consequence seeing as though they are FICTIONAL characters.
Point 4: As a homosexual male myself, FOR THE LOVE OF NONEXISTENT GODS, STOP TRYING TO "RECLAIM" SLURS THAT WERE NEVER USED AGAINST YOU IN THE FIRST PLACE. You are a female, I don't care that you want to arbitrarily "identify" as "non-binary"; you are a female, i.e. not a homosexual male. Why have you just decided on behalf of all gay males that "queer" is now an acceptable or respectful thing to call people or that you have any right to "identify" as it? Sweetie, you're not important, you're not valid, and I seriously doubt you're even LGBTIA (no Q).
Note: I'm not transphobic. I'm 110% in support of trans rights, but being something other than a walking female stereotype does not somehow make you trans. So let's see, you've now openly used a homophobic slur to describe a movie depicting gay males while failing to be a homosexual male yourself, you've watered the definition of "trans" because you're so pathetically desperate to have just one interesting aspect about your sad existence of eternal virtue signaling, and you've given a great movie an unwarranted terrible score simply because 13-year-old Californian girls would find entirely unproblematic aspects of it "triggering".
I wish you the best in recognizing and fixing your homophobia, transphobia, and crippling fragility. Have a nice evening.