Forum Settings
Forums
New
What did you think of this chapter?
DO NOT discuss the source material beyond this chapter. If you want to discuss future events, please use separate threads.
DO NOT ask where to read/download this chapter or give links to copyrighted, non-fair use material.
DO NOT troll/bait/harass/abuse other users for liking or disliking the series/characters.
DO read the Manga Discussion Rules and Site & Forum Guidelines.
Apr 3, 2020 6:36 AM
#1
Offline
Nov 2008
430
THIS IS A MANGA ONLY DISCUSSION POST. DO NOT DISCUSS ANYTHING BEYOND THIS CHAPTER.
----------------------------------------
New chapter is out. Looks like the manga will be ending soon. Who do you think should be God?
Apr 4, 2020 2:37 AM
#2
Offline
Nov 2018
718
Me, lol. xD
Whatever it's, I hope Dr. Yoneda doesn't die.
He seems chill and I like some things he said actually. I hate the kid on his side tho.



"Self respect is the greatest gift we can give to our self"




Apr 16, 2020 6:12 AM
#3

Offline
Jan 2018
1856
hope it ends soon

the more yoneda talks the worse it gets.

He is supposed to be the smartest guy arround yet his arguments have massive ,gigantic, innumerable logical flaws but nobody really comments on that

they just suck it up
Apr 18, 2020 4:01 AM
#4

Offline
Jan 2013
2334
amusingly stupid but at the same time an ingenious trolling. noo! you can't barf out pretentious concepts. haha rick and morty go babble. i'm a creature now.
Jul 10, 2020 5:22 PM
#5

Offline
Oct 2013
58
I don't get what he is supposed point out by the sentences "From the beginning of the earth - no, the universe - to the end, everything is a series of moments. Whichever one you select is already the past in the very next moment." Like, I am here saying "And?"
Aug 18, 2021 10:14 AM
#6

Offline
Sep 2014
3515
Yoneda is getting annoying, just hurry up and get rid of him already πŸ™„
Nov 3, 2021 10:08 AM
#7

Offline
Dec 2007
8126
dunno if i like to concept of talking about time, reminding me too much how mirai nikki confronted it, and the last thing i want is to yondei reveal "i'm from the future".
i get the psychological battle here, but it's really matter of opinion as hoshi said, yondei have his own theory and force it on the world.
for once i'm actually with mirai thought, to let the people choose their own fate rather than believing it's settle in stone.

oh and i forgot to say - the return of metropoliman, lol, didn't we got already enough "hostage" situations? exactly as metropoliman...
hope though it's gonna have better solution than all since we already in the climax
CuteAssTiger said:

He is supposed to be the smartest guy arround yet his arguments have massive ,gigantic, innumerable logical flaws but nobody really comments on that
because it his own theory and his own research, the fact that ohba didn't wrote and scientist essay for yundei doesn't say nothing.
yoneda talking about time aspects, literally sci-fi, and you chose to critic him for having flaw. it's same for critic start wars for having flaw on how the force can read the future.
Collectivus said:
I don't get what he is supposed point out by the sentences "From the beginning of the earth - no, the universe - to the end, everything is a series of moments. Whichever one you select is already the past in the very next moment." Like, I am here saying "And?"
i think obata described it well in his drawings, it's basically saying that any choice people is acting is already made, since it's chosen it's already the past.
Nov 3, 2021 3:09 PM
#8

Offline
Jan 2018
1856
User-Name said:
dunno if i like to concept of talking about time, reminding me too much how mirai nikki confronted it, and the last thing i want is to yondei reveal "i'm from the future".
i get the psychological battle here, but it's really matter of opinion as hoshi said, yondei have his own theory and force it on the world.
for once i'm actually with mirai thought, to let the people choose their own fate rather than believing it's settle in stone.

oh and i forgot to say - the return of metropoliman, lol, didn't we got already enough "hostage" situations? exactly as metropoliman...
hope though it's gonna have better solution than all since we already in the climax
CuteAssTiger said:

He is supposed to be the smartest guy arround yet his arguments have massive ,gigantic, innumerable logical flaws but nobody really comments on that
because it his own theory and his own research, the fact that ohba didn't wrote and scientist essay for yundei doesn't say nothing.
yoneda talking about time aspects, literally sci-fi, and you chose to critic him for having flaw. it's same for critic start wars for having flaw on how the force can read the future.
Collectivus said:
I don't get what he is supposed point out by the sentences "From the beginning of the earth - no, the universe - to the end, everything is a series of moments. Whichever one you select is already the past in the very next moment." Like, I am here saying "And?"
i think obata described it well in his drawings, it's basically saying that any choice people is acting is already made, since it's chosen it's already the past.


Pulling a thesis out of nowhere while willingly ignoring strong evidence against it has nothing to do with simply not displaying a data graph of his research
Nice strawman you got there.
Either way simply by not having anything to show for the story runs into the logical problem i just mentioned. His theory is obviously flawed on no one comments on that . They all just pretend he is smart. So either way the point stands .
That has nothing to do with the force.
Nov 3, 2021 3:31 PM
#9

Offline
Dec 2007
8126
CuteAssTiger said:

Pulling a thesis out of nowhere while willingly ignoring strong evidence against it has nothing to do with simply not displaying a data graph of his research
Nice strawman you got there.
Either way simply by not having anything to show for the story runs into the logical problem i just mentioned. His theory is obviously flawed on no one comments on that . They all just pretend he is smart. So either way the point stands .
That has nothing to do with the force.
LOL at the last sentence xDD
seeing your comments making me feel like you never heard scientist talking about the whole "if god exists" consensus, yonde is talking exactly as one of them.
and if you have problems with that, it's because you probably thinks like me that god is beyond science.
Nov 3, 2021 5:39 PM

Offline
Jan 2018
1856
User-Name said:
CuteAssTiger said:

Pulling a thesis out of nowhere while willingly ignoring strong evidence against it has nothing to do with simply not displaying a data graph of his research
Nice strawman you got there.
Either way simply by not having anything to show for the story runs into the logical problem i just mentioned. His theory is obviously flawed on no one comments on that . They all just pretend he is smart. So either way the point stands .
That has nothing to do with the force.
LOL at the last sentence xDD
seeing your comments making me feel like you never heard scientist talking about the whole "if god exists" consensus, yonde is talking exactly as one of them.
and if you have problems with that, it's because you probably thinks like me that god is beyond science.
User-Name said:
CuteAssTiger said:

Pulling a thesis out of nowhere while willingly ignoring strong evidence against it has nothing to do with simply not displaying a data graph of his research
Nice strawman you got there.
Either way simply by not having anything to show for the story runs into the logical problem i just mentioned. His theory is obviously flawed on no one comments on that . They all just pretend he is smart. So either way the point stands .
That has nothing to do with the force.
LOL at the last sentence xDD
seeing your comments making me feel like you never heard scientist talking about the whole "if god exists" consensus, yonde is talking exactly as one of them.
and if you have problems with that, it's because you probably thinks like me that god is beyond science.


Try to find a single scientist that makes a thesis like this based on litteraly nothing.
Another great strawman Argument you got there.
If an angel showed up tomorrow and announced to the world that they exist then scientist wouldn't just ignore it and make up a BS reason why they don't believe it.

Science is t about not believing in god.
Science is about explaining observable phenomenon.
Science is about the opposite of ignorance.
Nov 3, 2021 5:58 PM

Offline
Dec 2007
8126
CuteAssTiger said:

Try to find a single scientist that makes a thesis like this based on litteraly nothing.
Another great strawman Argument you got there.
If an angel showed up tomorrow and announced to the world that they exist then scientist wouldn't just ignore it and make up a BS reason why they don't believe it.

Science is t about not believing in god.
Science is about explaining observable phenomenon.
Science is about the opposite of ignorance.
you and i are in the same mind man. (or woman, your profile doesn't say so) scientist making statement about those thing without really evidence, and they think they are right, phrasing it in some pretty words to convince people.
and yeah they are doing it, you should google it.
Nov 3, 2021 6:14 PM

Offline
Jan 2018
1856
User-Name said:
CuteAssTiger said:

Try to find a single scientist that makes a thesis like this based on litteraly nothing.
Another great strawman Argument you got there.
If an angel showed up tomorrow and announced to the world that they exist then scientist wouldn't just ignore it and make up a BS reason why they don't believe it.

Science is t about not believing in god.
Science is about explaining observable phenomenon.
Science is about the opposite of ignorance.
you and i are in the same mind man. (or woman, your profile doesn't say so) scientist making statement about those thing without really evidence, and they think they are right, phrasing it in some pretty words to convince people.
and yeah they are doing it, you should google it.


No we are not at all of the same mind.
It's pretty clear that you have never read a scientific paper nor do understand how the scientific community works.
Scientific papers are specifically designed to prevent the things you acuse them of
Nov 3, 2021 6:24 PM

Offline
Dec 2007
8126
CuteAssTiger said:
User-Name said:
you and i are in the same mind man. (or woman, your profile doesn't say so) scientist making statement about those thing without really evidence, and they think they are right, phrasing it in some pretty words to convince people.
and yeah they are doing it, you should google it.


No we are not at all of the same mind.
It's pretty clear that you have never read a scientific paper nor do understand how the scientific community works.
Scientific papers are specifically designed to prevent the things you acuse them of
this conversation going nowhere, and i really prefer us to discuss about the manga and not about science.
just read my post about the last chapter man.
Nov 3, 2021 6:27 PM

Offline
Jan 2018
1856
User-Name said:
CuteAssTiger said:


No we are not at all of the same mind.
It's pretty clear that you have never read a scientific paper nor do understand how the scientific community works.
Scientific papers are specifically designed to prevent the things you acuse them of
this conversation going nowhere, and i really prefer us to discuss about the manga and not about science.
just read my post about the last chapter man.


Nah dude I'm gonna pass on that. I'm more interested to know why you think you are older then a person you literally don't know and how that makes you more knowledge about their field of study . On what basis do you even make that assumption?
Nov 3, 2021 6:33 PM

Offline
Dec 2007
8126
CuteAssTiger said:

Nah dude I'm gonna pass on that. I'm more interested to know why you think you are older then a person you literally don't know and how that makes you more knowledge about their field of study . On what basis do you even make that assumption?
because the way you talking about scientist is how innocent ones talking about them.
as one who past the innocent age, i know for a fact that when scientist say things like "we should remove prejudice!" is hypocrite, their opinions are the opposite from what they wrote.
i don't need to google that for you, google it yourself.

and again, read that post, you may like it actually.
Nov 3, 2021 6:39 PM

Offline
Jan 2018
1856
User-Name said:
CuteAssTiger said:

Nah dude I'm gonna pass on that. I'm more interested to know why you think you are older then a person you literally don't know and how that makes you more knowledge about their field of study . On what basis do you even make that assumption?
because the way you talking about scientist is how innocent ones talking about them.
as one who past the innocent age, i know for a fact that when scientist say things like "we should remove prejudice!" is hypocrite, their opinions are the opposite from what they wrote.
i don't need to google that for you, google it yourself.

and again, read that post, you may like it actually.


So essentially you made an assumption based on not actual evidence or established knowledge but your own prejudice πŸ€”πŸ€”πŸ€”
Interesting πŸ€”πŸ€”πŸ€”


"i know for a fact that when scientist say"
Where did you get that fact from ?
How do you know that ?
What is this claim based on ?


"i don't need to google that for you"
So you don't have a source ?
Not that some article found via Google usually qualifies as a very good source.
What I'm asking for is an actual source .

I also previously asked you to name a scientist that makes similar claims to yoneda based on nothing.
Something you were unable to provide.

So what is your claim based on ?
Nov 3, 2021 6:45 PM

Offline
Dec 2007
8126
CuteAssTiger said:
[
So essentially you made an assumption based on not actual evidence or established knowledge but your own prejudice πŸ€”πŸ€”πŸ€”
Interesting πŸ€”πŸ€”πŸ€”


"i know for a fact that when scientist say"
Where did you get that fact from ?
How do you know that ?
What is this claim based on ?


"i don't need to google that for you"
So you don't have a source ?
Not that some article found via Google usually qualifies as a very good source.
What I'm asking for is an actual source .

I also previously asked you to name a scientist that makes similar claims to yoneda based on nothing.
Something you were unable to provide.

So what is your claim based on ?
google your favourite scientist, (lol i actually wrote that xD) if you don't find anything wrong, you probably the one who's prejudice. lol

i will admit that currently i don't have a clear source, but it's not that hard to find.

if other people were to join this conversation i might get back up lol
@Catalano @NextUniverse @Atlos
Nov 3, 2021 6:56 PM

Offline
Jan 2018
1856
User-Name said:
CuteAssTiger said:
[
So essentially you made an assumption based on not actual evidence or established knowledge but your own prejudice πŸ€”πŸ€”πŸ€”
Interesting πŸ€”πŸ€”πŸ€”


"i know for a fact that when scientist say"
Where did you get that fact from ?
How do you know that ?
What is this claim based on ?


"i don't need to google that for you"
So you don't have a source ?
Not that some article found via Google usually qualifies as a very good source.
What I'm asking for is an actual source .

I also previously asked you to name a scientist that makes similar claims to yoneda based on nothing.
Something you were unable to provide.

So what is your claim based on ?
google your favourite scientist, (lol i actually wrote that xD) if you don't find anything wrong, you probably the one who's prejudice. lol

i will admit that currently i don't have a clear source, but it's not that hard to find.

if other people were to join this conversation i might get back up lol
@Catalano @NextUniverse @Atlos


The first point is a very weak attempt to shift prejudice here.

The second one is rather funny considering that you aren't able to provide it.

And after that you try to call in support. What a pity.

I think you displayed the irony of prejudice very well .

While I've been able to give plenty examples for many things I believe in you were only able to examplify your prejudice while accusing others of it

You displayed an obvious lack of knowledge about science and when called out for it you just assumed to be older ( Wich doesn't help your case but ok) Wich was just another claim based on nothing but prejudice.

The irony here has been more entertaining then the later half of Platinum end tbh

I'm propably going to leave it at that.
It's honestly just kind of sad that you are trying to call in support from your buddy's like it's somehow going to change the truth .

Take it as a learning experience buddy ;)
Nov 3, 2021 6:58 PM

Offline
Aug 2018
5195
User-Name said:
CuteAssTiger said:
[
So essentially you made an assumption based on not actual evidence or established knowledge but your own prejudice πŸ€”πŸ€”πŸ€”
Interesting πŸ€”πŸ€”πŸ€”


"i know for a fact that when scientist say"
Where did you get that fact from ?
How do you know that ?
What is this claim based on ?


"i don't need to google that for you"
So you don't have a source ?
Not that some article found via Google usually qualifies as a very good source.
What I'm asking for is an actual source .

I also previously asked you to name a scientist that makes similar claims to yoneda based on nothing.
Something you were unable to provide.

So what is your claim based on ?
google your favourite scientist, (lol i actually wrote that xD) if you don't find anything wrong, you probably the one who's prejudice. lol

i will admit that currently i don't have a clear source, but it's not that hard to find.

if other people were to join this conversation i might get back up lol
@Catalano @NextUniverse @Atlos
I'm going to stay out lol since I haven't read the manga, I don't want to accidentally spoil myself >.>
_______I like rocks__
Nov 3, 2021 6:59 PM

Offline
Jan 2018
1856
Atlos said:
User-Name said:
google your favourite scientist, (lol i actually wrote that xD) if you don't find anything wrong, you probably the one who's prejudice. lol

i will admit that currently i don't have a clear source, but it's not that hard to find.

if other people were to join this conversation i might get back up lol
@Catalano @NextUniverse @Atlos
I'm going to stay out lol since I haven't read the manga, I don't want to accidentally spoil myself >.>


I would recommend watching the anime since it's comming out at the moment. It's nice to be up to date with new anime ☺️
Nov 3, 2021 7:00 PM

Offline
Aug 2018
5195
CuteAssTiger said:
Atlos said:
I'm going to stay out lol since I haven't read the manga, I don't want to accidentally spoil myself >.>


I would recommend watching the anime since it's comming out at the moment. It's nice to be up to date with new anime ☺️
It's on hold right now, I've seen the first 3 or so episodes
_______I like rocks__
Nov 3, 2021 7:15 PM

Offline
Dec 2007
8126
Atlos said:
[]I'm going to stay out lol since I haven't read the manga, I don't want to accidentally spoil myself >.>
lol you didn't even noticed what i referred you on xDDD
CuteAssTiger said:


The first point is a very weak attempt to shift prejudice here.

The second one is rather funny considering that you aren't able to provide it.

And after that you try to call in support. What a pity.

I think you displayed the irony of prejudice very well .

While I've been able to give plenty examples for many things I believe in you were only able to examplify your prejudice while accusing others of it

You displayed an obvious lack of knowledge about science and when called out for it you just assumed to be older ( Wich doesn't help your case but ok) Wich was just another claim based on nothing but prejudice.

The irony here has been more entertaining then the later half of Platinum end tbh

I'm propably going to leave it at that.
It's honestly just kind of sad that you are trying to call in support from your buddy's like it's somehow going to change the truth .

Take it as a learning experience buddy ;)
you actually expect from a guy in 4am to now discuss you seriously about scientists? lol
i have already told you in other thread that i'm more interested to discuss you about the manga anyway, not science, it's not that interesting to me i will now gonna struggle my head to remember which scientist said and gonna look for it, that's why i'm telling you that you just google it man.

oh and yeah, i have prejudice on any man in the world that his ideas and opinions is effecting him, the only one doesn't would be god.

@Atlos
Atlos said:
It's on hold right now, I've seen the first 3 or so episodes
you should just marathon the manga my man.
just did it and i'm very statisfied.
(though i have bad things about it too, read my damn long post about it ><)
https://myanimelist.net/forum/?topicid=1887078&goto=post&id=64829309
Nov 4, 2021 12:11 AM

Offline
Jan 2018
1856
User-Name said:
Atlos said:
[]I'm going to stay out lol since I haven't read the manga, I don't want to accidentally spoil myself >.>
lol you didn't even noticed what i referred you on xDDD
CuteAssTiger said:


The first point is a very weak attempt to shift prejudice here.

The second one is rather funny considering that you aren't able to provide it.

And after that you try to call in support. What a pity.

I think you displayed the irony of prejudice very well .

While I've been able to give plenty examples for many things I believe in you were only able to examplify your prejudice while accusing others of it

You displayed an obvious lack of knowledge about science and when called out for it you just assumed to be older ( Wich doesn't help your case but ok) Wich was just another claim based on nothing but prejudice.

The irony here has been more entertaining then the later half of Platinum end tbh

I'm propably going to leave it at that.
It's honestly just kind of sad that you are trying to call in support from your buddy's like it's somehow going to change the truth .

Take it as a learning experience buddy ;)
you actually expect from a guy in 4am to now discuss you seriously about scientists? lol
i have already told you in other thread that i'm more interested to discuss you about the manga anyway, not science, it's not that interesting to me i will now gonna struggle my head to remember which scientist said and gonna look for it, that's why i'm telling you that you just google it man.

oh and yeah, i have prejudice on any man in the world that his ideas and opinions is effecting him, the only one doesn't would be god.

@Atlos
Atlos said:
It's on hold right now, I've seen the first 3 or so episodes
you should just marathon the manga my man.
just did it and i'm very statisfied.
(though i have bad things about it too, read my damn long post about it ><)
https://myanimelist.net/forum/?topicid=1887078&goto=post&id=64829309


it is relevant simply due to how unrealistic yoneda was in this manga and how screwd your perception of scientists is.

you also said that it would be easy to find scientist like that but now you are telling me that it will "struggle my head to remember which scientist said"
what is it ? is it easy or is it not ?

and after that you admit that your judgement was just your own prejudice.πŸ˜‚
i thought you knew this "for a fact" .
what is it now ? facts or prejudice.
it its a fact that deliver the evidence.
if its just your own prejudice then how do you not see how you are basically admitting to being wrong ? πŸ˜‚
Nov 4, 2021 1:40 AM

Offline
Oct 2010
21360
User-Name said:
CuteAssTiger said:
[
So essentially you made an assumption based on not actual evidence or established knowledge but your own prejudice πŸ€”πŸ€”πŸ€”
Interesting πŸ€”πŸ€”πŸ€”


"i know for a fact that when scientist say"
Where did you get that fact from ?
How do you know that ?
What is this claim based on ?


"i don't need to google that for you"
So you don't have a source ?
Not that some article found via Google usually qualifies as a very good source.
What I'm asking for is an actual source .

I also previously asked you to name a scientist that makes similar claims to yoneda based on nothing.
Something you were unable to provide.

So what is your claim based on ?
google your favourite scientist, (lol i actually wrote that xD) if you don't find anything wrong, you probably the one who's prejudice. lol

i will admit that currently i don't have a clear source, but it's not that hard to find.

if other people were to join this conversation i might get back up lol
@Catalano

I don't have enough context to participate in this discussion and I only read 15-20 chapters of PE. This stuff with scientists is over my head, next time.
Nov 4, 2021 7:29 AM

Offline
Dec 2007
8126
CuteAssTiger said:
[

and after that you admit that your judgement was just your own prejudice.πŸ˜‚
i thought you knew this "for a fact" .
what is it now ? facts or prejudice.
it its a fact that deliver the evidence.
if its just your own prejudice then how do you not see how you are basically admitting to being wrong ? πŸ˜‚
i'm glad to see that you are laughing LOL
well, if you cannot see for yourself that your opinions is with prejudice, because you clearly doesn't see when scientist are brushing off claims of those kind of stuff, there's no continue to this conversation LOL

just read my post of the final chapter plz
Nov 4, 2021 7:34 AM

Offline
Jan 2018
1856
User-Name said:
CuteAssTiger said:
[

and after that you admit that your judgement was just your own prejudice.πŸ˜‚
i thought you knew this "for a fact" .
what is it now ? facts or prejudice.
it its a fact that deliver the evidence.
if its just your own prejudice then how do you not see how you are basically admitting to being wrong ? πŸ˜‚
i'm glad to see that you are laughing LOL
well, if you cannot see for yourself that your opinions is with prejudice, because you clearly doesn't see when scientist are brushing off claims of those kind of stuff, there's no continue to this conversation LOL

just read my post of the final chapter plz


the hypocrisy in this statement is hilarious .
you are the one making baseless claims and saying its easy to find proof yet you are unable to provide any .

meanwhile I'm the one pulling in actual examples to support my points.

the only one relying on prejudice here is you and the fact that you were not able to proof any of your claims shows that you are wrong .

you were not able to provide a single name , a single study ,any single scientific paper, literally nothing . you just pretend that its easy but at the same time you are unable to do it . Small children are able to come up with more convincing lies.

you can run away and live in ignorance but by doing that you are literally the archetype of people you complained about
Nov 4, 2021 7:40 AM

Offline
Jan 2018
1856
Catalano said:
User-Name said:
google your favourite scientist, (lol i actually wrote that xD) if you don't find anything wrong, you probably the one who's prejudice. lol

i will admit that currently i don't have a clear source, but it's not that hard to find.

if other people were to join this conversation i might get back up lol
@Catalano

I don't have enough context to participate in this discussion and I only read 15-20 chapters of PE. This stuff with scientists is over my head, next time.


no spoilers but in a nutshell .
PE has an important scientist character later that just pulls random claims and thesis out of his ass while ignoring glaring flaws in his logic or actual evidence against his thesis. while his thesis is based on literally nothing.

and i take issue with a scientist character acting more like a flat earther then someone who has even remotely heard of the scientific method. He doesn't observe the events of the story and develops a realistic explanation for it . he just already has an idea ( aka the earth is flat ) and shoves every new piece of information around that . even though a lot of information in the manga directly contradicts what he wants to be true .
and the worst part is that all the characters just pretend like he is smart.


user name argues that is a realistic portrait of a scientist because he has literally no idea what scientists do.
In his eyes they just do that all the time . and when asked to provide an example of any shape or form he is unable to do so .

wich ironically means that his entire basis is a preconceived opinion.
wich is literally prejudice and the very thing that he accuses scientists do all the time XD
Nov 4, 2021 8:50 AM

Offline
Dec 2007
8126
CuteAssTiger said:

you can run away and live in ignorance but by doing that you are literally the archetype of people you complained about
i'm not running away, i have better staff to do in life than arguing in the internet about things i know for a fact.
and instead talking PE you are insisting talking about science which doesn't interests me much.
fact is that i can see when scientist talking about "existence of god" i can see clearly that he just wants to prove it isn't with weak proofs but with nice smart word. if you can't see it, it's because you yourself have prejudice about this topic and wants to think that scientist are "perfect" so you just don't see it. and i can see it for a fact that you saying staff like "you never read a scientist paper which came in the opposite of this thinking and saying i didn't. i did read those long time ago (10 years maybe?) and those days i can clearly see why what they were saying was wrong and prejudice opinions. the fact that i can't remember or can't give you names doesn't mean i don't know, it's because i have better things to do.

fact is, i told you in other thread it is "late" in the night, and you didn't understood why i said that. it's really hard to understand? really? i were saying that because i was tired, and couldn't struggle my head to do that at that hour, and from some reason you didn't understood that. same for other time i said it was 6 hours ago and i needed explaining to do for you. why am i saying that? because it's clearly you don't seek what i am saying but trying to make your claim better, you write long posts with some "clever" evidences and proofs, and when i'm rejecting your proofs and evidences you are fighting back with some "explanation" why i amt the wrong one and you are the right.

this is not discussion, discussion is when you try to understand what i am saying, not rejecting what i'm saying without checking out thoughts. that's why i find this discussion going no where and the reason i will not struggle my head even now (which no isn't late in the night, in case you might wonder why am i saying that) and want to discuss you with about the manga more.

that's why i'm keep saying you should just check my post in chp58, once you do, you will understand my view better.
CuteAssTiger said:

PE has an important scientist character later that just pulls random claims and thesis out of his ass while ignoring glaring flaws in his logic or actual evidence against his thesis. while his thesis is based on literally nothing.
this is too much spoiler you got there.
Nov 4, 2021 11:29 AM

Offline
Oct 2010
21360
CuteAssTiger said:
Catalano said:

I don't have enough context to participate in this discussion and I only read 15-20 chapters of PE. This stuff with scientists is over my head, next time.


no spoilers but in a nutshell .
PE has an important scientist character later that just pulls random claims and thesis out of his ass while ignoring glaring flaws in his logic or actual evidence against his thesis. while his thesis is based on literally nothing.

and i take issue with a scientist character acting more like a flat earther then someone who has even remotely heard of the scientific method. He doesn't observe the events of the story and develops a realistic explanation for it . he just already has an idea ( aka the earth is flat ) and shoves every new piece of information around that . even though a lot of information in the manga directly contradicts what he wants to be true .
and the worst part is that all the characters just pretend like he is smart.


user name argues that is a realistic portrait of a scientist because he has literally no idea what scientists do.
In his eyes they just do that all the time . and when asked to provide an example of any shape or form he is unable to do so .

wich ironically means that his entire basis is a preconceived opinion.
wich is literally prejudice and the very thing that he accuses scientists do all the time XD

I see, well, I expect scientists to be smart and have arguments for their theories of course, we have some clowns in the media but those are just TV personalities put there to make science look cool.
Nov 4, 2021 2:41 PM

Offline
Jan 2018
1856
User-Name said:
CuteAssTiger said:

you can run away and live in ignorance but by doing that you are literally the archetype of people you complained about
i'm not running away, i have better staff to do in life than arguing in the internet about things i know for a fact.
and instead talking PE you are insisting talking about science which doesn't interests me much.
fact is that i can see when scientist talking about "existence of god" i can see clearly that he just wants to prove it isn't with weak proofs but with nice smart word. if you can't see it, it's because you yourself have prejudice about this topic and wants to think that scientist are "perfect" so you just don't see it. and i can see it for a fact that you saying staff like "you never read a scientist paper which came in the opposite of this thinking and saying i didn't. i did read those long time ago (10 years maybe?) and those days i can clearly see why what they were saying was wrong and prejudice opinions. the fact that i can't remember or can't give you names doesn't mean i don't know, it's because i have better things to do.

fact is, i told you in other thread it is "late" in the night, and you didn't understood why i said that. it's really hard to understand? really? i were saying that because i was tired, and couldn't struggle my head to do that at that hour, and from some reason you didn't understood that. same for other time i said it was 6 hours ago and i needed explaining to do for you. why am i saying that? because it's clearly you don't seek what i am saying but trying to make your claim better, you write long posts with some "clever" evidences and proofs, and when i'm rejecting your proofs and evidences you are fighting back with some "explanation" why i amt the wrong one and you are the right.

this is not discussion, discussion is when you try to understand what i am saying, not rejecting what i'm saying without checking out thoughts. that's why i find this discussion going no where and the reason i will not struggle my head even now (which no isn't late in the night, in case you might wonder why am i saying that) and want to discuss you with about the manga more.

that's why i'm keep saying you should just check my post in chp58, once you do, you will understand my view better.
CuteAssTiger said:

PE has an important scientist character later that just pulls random claims and thesis out of his ass while ignoring glaring flaws in his logic or actual evidence against his thesis. while his thesis is based on literally nothing.
this is too much spoiler you got there.


Yeah sure . The classic "i don't have a point because I have better things to do" . Try something convincing next time.

I've already explained twice why science is relevant here. I'm not going to do it again

1. You didn't provide anything

2. Science is not about proof but evidence.
3. Can you provide any example of these "weak " proofs (of course you can't )
4. You are missing the point. The point litteraly was that scientist don't make baseless claims. Scientists that don't believe in god do so because of the information available to them.
Science is not about "not believing in god" . Science is about the explanation of observable phenomenon

5. Your point boils down to " i am right because I am right, and i could proof it but I'm not going to because you should know I'm right" I've seen toddlers argue in a more convincing manner.
Fact is that I'm the one pulling actual examples and making actual an actual basis for my point. By definition you are the one who is objectively relying on his prejudice because your entire point is solely based on your preconceived opinion.
I'm not going to debunk and explain this again.
I'm going to dub this point the toddler approach for future reference so I don't have to explain it multiple times over

6."the fact that i can't remember or can't give you names doesn't mean i don't know, it's because i have better things to do 🀑"
Yet you have the time to type out all of that.
No offense, unironically, I've seen literally children pulling off better lies.
I'm gonna dub this one the clown approach for future reference.

7.just sleep and text back later. Really complicated. Nobody is rushing you. If mommy said it's time for bed be a good boy and go to sleep. You can always text me later

8." "clever" evidences and proofs, and when i'm rejecting your proofs and evidences you are fighting back with some "explanation" why i amt the wrong one and you are the right. "

Really sounds like the concept of ignorance is way to complicated for you

9." this is not discussion, discussion is when you try to understand what i am saying, not rejecting what i'm saying without checking out thoughts 🀑"

The hypocrisy in this statement is off the wall dude. You are ignoring actual evidence and points . Rejecting actual points πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚
And now you are complaining that I'm not blindly accepting your blatantly false point of view after you were unable to provide anything that would support your view ?
Oh jolly me , i wonder why I wouldn't be convinced after someone said something that made it pretty obvious that they have no idea what they are talking about . And then repeatedly failed to provide anything that would support their argument πŸ€”πŸ€”πŸ€”πŸ€”πŸ€”πŸ€”πŸ€”πŸ€”πŸ€”πŸ€”πŸ€”
Maybe I should ask my professor how that could be.
Or maybe the kids i baby sit from time to time. I'm unironically pretty sure even they would figure out why I'm not convincedπŸ˜‚


10. Great excuse. Not like we debunked that one already. Just try it again lmfao


Pure internet gold dude πŸ˜‚
Nov 4, 2021 2:43 PM

Offline
Jan 2018
1856
Catalano said:
CuteAssTiger said:


no spoilers but in a nutshell .
PE has an important scientist character later that just pulls random claims and thesis out of his ass while ignoring glaring flaws in his logic or actual evidence against his thesis. while his thesis is based on literally nothing.

and i take issue with a scientist character acting more like a flat earther then someone who has even remotely heard of the scientific method. He doesn't observe the events of the story and develops a realistic explanation for it . he just already has an idea ( aka the earth is flat ) and shoves every new piece of information around that . even though a lot of information in the manga directly contradicts what he wants to be true .
and the worst part is that all the characters just pretend like he is smart.


user name argues that is a realistic portrait of a scientist because he has literally no idea what scientists do.
In his eyes they just do that all the time . and when asked to provide an example of any shape or form he is unable to do so .

wich ironically means that his entire basis is a preconceived opinion.
wich is literally prejudice and the very thing that he accuses scientists do all the time XD

I see, well, I expect scientists to be smart and have arguments for their theories of course, we have some clowns in the media but those are just TV personalities put there to make science look cool.


I would go into more detail but that would get kinda ranty and pretty spoiler heavy. I haven't started the PE anime yet but i don't expect it to even reach that point in the story with it's first season
Nov 4, 2021 5:29 PM

Offline
Dec 2007
8126
Catalano said:
CuteAssTiger said:


no spoilers but in a nutshell .
PE has an important scientist character later that just pulls random claims and thesis out of his ass while ignoring glaring flaws in his logic or actual evidence against his thesis. while his thesis is based on literally nothing.

and i take issue with a scientist character acting more like a flat earther then someone who has even remotely heard of the scientific method. He doesn't observe the events of the story and develops a realistic explanation for it . he just already has an idea ( aka the earth is flat ) and shoves every new piece of information around that . even though a lot of information in the manga directly contradicts what he wants to be true .
and the worst part is that all the characters just pretend like he is smart.


user name argues that is a realistic portrait of a scientist because he has literally no idea what scientists do.
In his eyes they just do that all the time . and when asked to provide an example of any shape or form he is unable to do so .

wich ironically means that his entire basis is a preconceived opinion.
wich is literally prejudice and the very thing that he accuses scientists do all the time XD

I see, well, I expect scientists to be smart and have arguments for their theories of course, we have some clowns in the media but those are just TV personalities put there to make science look cool.
the argument is - does scientist sometimes are making theories with weak evidences because they have prejudice, or all what they saying is pure true without any prejudice.
i'm saying that there isn't man in the world who isn't working and making their stuff without prejudice, and scientist might be even worse when it comes to thing that might contradict science.
@CuteAssTiger claiming that scientist are god when it comes on things like this, and they never wrong, and do not have any prejudice, and when it comes to things contradict science they are 100% covering it with evidences and proof that no one can reject and havre no prejudice at all.
CuteAssTiger said:

Yeah sure . The classic "i don't have a point because I have better things to do" . Try something convincing next time.

having life isn't convincing? :/
CuteAssTiger said:

2. Science is not about proof but evidence.
3. Can you provide any example of these "weak " proofs (of course you can't )
i already rejected how the big-bang theory isn't contradicting presence of god, even if you say it's true. but scientists using it to prove the opposite.
CuteAssTiger said:

6."the fact that i can't remember or can't give you names doesn't mean i don't know, it's because i have better things to do 🀑"
Yet you have the time to type out all of that.
No offense, unironically, I've seen literally children pulling off better lies.
I'm gonna dub this one the clown approach for future reference.
i have life?
User-NameNov 4, 2021 5:37 PM
Nov 5, 2021 12:28 AM

Offline
Jan 2018
1856
User-Name said:
Catalano said:

I see, well, I expect scientists to be smart and have arguments for their theories of course, we have some clowns in the media but those are just TV personalities put there to make science look cool.
the argument is - does scientist sometimes are making theories with weak evidences because they have prejudice, or all what they saying is pure true without any prejudice.
i'm saying that there isn't man in the world who isn't working and making their stuff without prejudice, and scientist might be even worse when it comes to thing that might contradict science.
@CuteAssTiger claiming that scientist are god when it comes on things like this, and they never wrong, and do not have any prejudice, and when it comes to things contradict science they are 100% covering it with evidences and proof that no one can reject and havre no prejudice at all.
CuteAssTiger said:

Yeah sure . The classic "i don't have a point because I have better things to do" . Try something convincing next time.

having life isn't convincing? :/
CuteAssTiger said:

2. Science is not about proof but evidence.
3. Can you provide any example of these "weak " proofs (of course you can't )
i already rejected how the big-bang theory isn't contradicting presence of god, even if you say it's true. but scientists using it to prove the opposite.
CuteAssTiger said:

6."the fact that i can't remember or can't give you names doesn't mean i don't know, it's because i have better things to do 🀑"
Yet you have the time to type out all of that.
No offense, unironically, I've seen literally children pulling off better lies.
I'm gonna dub this one the clown approach for future reference.
i have life?


1.That is a complete strawman Argument.
The Argument was whenever scientist make completely baseless claim like yoneda does while ignoring direct evidence against what they want to be true .
Why are you lying ?
Are you really this desperate ?
Weak af dude.

also "and scientist might be even worse when it comes to thing that might contradict science."
name an example . evidence,proof ANYTHING.
its painfully obvious that you dont know anything about science because science constantly looks for new knowledge and when old hypothesis get contradicted by strong evidence models are redone and revised.

name a single example where the scientific community outright refused new knowledge that was strongly supported by evidence simply because it "contradicted science"
if you cant do that your claim is literally invalid

If you have something that can support your funny claims then proof it . otherwise its just another example of you not knowing what you are saying.


2."having life isn't convincing? :/"

I've already invalidated that excuse in the clown approach.

Do you really need to have this explained twice to you ?
Ok. Let's explain this very simply so even you understand.
-you claim it's easy to find an example
-but you don't have the time because you "have a life"
-but at the same time you spend so much time explaining why you don't have time to simply find the evidence
-you spend more time making up excuses as to why you can't do it then it would take to simply do it

This excuse has been on the internet for a long time and had always been a laughing stock.
Are you sure you are older then me ?
Because you argue like a literal toddler.

3.ive already explained to you that the the big bang is simply terminology to refer to a certain event. Scientist don't try to "proof" that god doesn't exist with the big bang. Yoneda did. And i made fun of him for that because it's a ridiculously bad argument.
Real scientist don't argue that the BigBang somehow contradicts the existence of god.
Why do you need everything explained to you multiple times ?


4. We have already established that the clown approach doesn't work.
I'm not going to explain this again πŸ˜‚.
It's a self contradiction that has been propably longer on the internet then you have.
CuteAssTigerNov 5, 2021 8:30 AM
Nov 5, 2021 12:37 AM

Offline
Jan 2018
1856
Im actually tempted to deconstruct this argument in a video because it's so comedically bad πŸ˜‚
Nov 5, 2021 8:55 AM

Offline
Jan 2018
1856
User-Name said:
CuteAssTiger said:

you can run away and live in ignorance but by doing that you are literally the archetype of people you complained about
i'm not running away, i have better staff to do in life than arguing in the internet about things i know for a fact.
and instead talking PE you are insisting talking about science which doesn't interests me much.
fact is that i can see when scientist talking about "existence of god" i can see clearly that he just wants to prove it isn't with weak proofs but with nice smart word. if you can't see it, it's because you yourself have prejudice about this topic and wants to think that scientist are "perfect" so you just don't see it. and i can see it for a fact that you saying staff like "you never read a scientist paper which came in the opposite of this thinking and saying i didn't. i did read those long time ago (10 years maybe?) and those days i can clearly see why what they were saying was wrong and prejudice opinions. the fact that i can't remember or can't give you names doesn't mean i don't know, it's because i have better things to do.

fact is, i told you in other thread it is "late" in the night, and you didn't understood why i said that. it's really hard to understand? really? i were saying that because i was tired, and couldn't struggle my head to do that at that hour, and from some reason you didn't understood that. same for other time i said it was 6 hours ago and i needed explaining to do for you. why am i saying that? because it's clearly you don't seek what i am saying but trying to make your claim better, you write long posts with some "clever" evidences and proofs, and when i'm rejecting your proofs and evidences you are fighting back with some "explanation" why i amt the wrong one and you are the right.

this is not discussion, discussion is when you try to understand what i am saying, not rejecting what i'm saying without checking out thoughts. that's why i find this discussion going no where and the reason i will not struggle my head even now (which no isn't late in the night, in case you might wonder why am i saying that) and want to discuss you with about the manga more.

that's why i'm keep saying you should just check my post in chp58, once you do, you will understand my view better.
CuteAssTiger said:

PE has an important scientist character later that just pulls random claims and thesis out of his ass while ignoring glaring flaws in his logic or actual evidence against his thesis. while his thesis is based on literally nothing.
this is too much spoiler you got there.


" i know for a fact."

how ? from where ?
still no proof . I'm still waiting for that .

do you even know what a "fact" is ?

Either provide facts or learn what a fact is .
or alternatively stop talking about facts when you dont have any. it's just funny and irritating how you pretend to have facts.
But arent willing to share them.
the obvious truth is that you dont have facts.

see the issue is that you just claim things to be true. And refuse to actually look for/at evidence or proof of that claim .
that is by definition prejudice and ignorant.

You claim other people are prejudiced if they don't agree with you.
But the same thing can be said about you.

the difference is that i seek the truth by observing actual evidence and proof while you refuse to do that . you just claim certain things to be "facts" but you dont name any.

the most logical conclusion for this case is that you are simply wrong.
if we weight the information gathered then this is the logical outcome.

That phenomenon is called "naive realism"

I'm going to upload a video that may help you understand that concept .
it should be up in arround 2 hours

https://youtu.be/xrivNX_fDHk


If we want to know the truth we have to examine the evidence. We can not know the truth simply by pretending that we know the truth.
Fact is that all the evidence is stacked against you
-you made it very clear that you lack understanding and knowledge of science or how scientists operate
-all the evidence shows that you are wrong
- and you were unable to provide any evidence that suggests otherwise.

You can live in ignorance and just pretend that you know "facts" but that is simply not how knowledge works.
Every child can say they know a fact and then refuse to share it . But that doesn't magically mean they are right.
They can pretend to know things but that doesn't make them knowlegeble.


i really hope this video helps you . if you want to educate yourself a bit more on that topic ( or at all ) i would recommend "The Hapieness Hypothesis " by Jonathan Haidt

And "The Better Angels of our Nature" by Steven Pinker.

https://youtu.be/xrivNX_fDHk
Nov 6, 2021 9:56 AM

Offline
Dec 2007
8126
@CuteAssTiger too bad i didn't convinced you i have a life outside MAL, internet, PC
i have nothing else to add
Nov 6, 2021 3:03 PM

Offline
Jan 2018
1856
User-Name said:
@CuteAssTiger too bad i didn't convinced you i have a life outside MAL, internet, PC
i have nothing else to add


I'm not going to go over the clown approach again.
I already explained that to you ;)
Take notes. It's going to be on the next class test 🀑

More topics from this board

Poll: » Platinum End Chapter 58 Discussion ( 1 2 )

Axelthrow - Jan 6, 2021

55 by ss4chris »»
Nov 18, 2024 4:09 AM

» My spoiler-ridden rant, er, review

NDskies - Sep 17, 2023

5 by g83 »»
Nov 1, 2024 4:42 PM

» How would you rate it???

Goated_Weeb526 - Nov 11, 2021

4 by waalex11 »»
Sep 11, 2023 5:13 PM

Poll: » Platinum End Chapter 23 Discussion

TheGeniusBaka - Jan 1, 2018

6 by bucciest »»
Nov 6, 2022 12:02 PM

Poll: » Platinum End Chapter 30 Discussion

Akoram - May 8, 2018

4 by lycoradz0 »»
May 14, 2022 3:28 AM
It’s time to ditch the text file.
Keep track of your anime easily by creating your own list.
Sign Up Login