New
Oct 18, 2023 8:58 AM
#101
Reply to LostSpectre
@GundhamTanaka95 I can only assume that you do not understand the concept of a narrative shift in tone, so it's probably best you don't respond.
Let's not even get into how tone deaf it is to lecture Claire about why gay people are just like everyone else, so she has no reason to think she would be in any danger from Rae, aside from all the reasons that Rae gives Claire to feel like she might be in danger when she acts like a borderline predatory gay stereotype, and Claire specifically says as much, and even worse, in the LN Rae actually admits her behavior is likely problematic and may be crossing boundaries, but justifies it by making herself the victim. lol
So, I guess the moral here is that Claire shouldn't feel unsafe because Rae is gay, she should feel unsafe because Rae is a creep? 🤣
Let's not even get into how tone deaf it is to lecture Claire about why gay people are just like everyone else, so she has no reason to think she would be in any danger from Rae, aside from all the reasons that Rae gives Claire to feel like she might be in danger when she acts like a borderline predatory gay stereotype, and Claire specifically says as much, and even worse, in the LN Rae actually admits her behavior is likely problematic and may be crossing boundaries, but justifies it by making herself the victim. lol
So, I guess the moral here is that Claire shouldn't feel unsafe because Rae is gay, she should feel unsafe because Rae is a creep? 🤣
@LostSpectre I agree with the fact that there was a narrative shift in tone out of nowhere. Ignoring that for the sake of “at least they got the conversation out” sounds lame. They could have set an episode from the beginning with a more serious tone leading to the convo rather than jokes jokes serious issue jokes jokes. I do think it was good to put it early on in the show so people can expect messages like that later on bc if it happened randomly for the first time towards the end it would have been more off guard |
Oct 18, 2023 9:14 AM
#102
Reply to Yourewashed
@LostSpectre I agree with the fact that there was a narrative shift in tone out of nowhere. Ignoring that for the sake of “at least they got the conversation out” sounds lame. They could have set an episode from the beginning with a more serious tone leading to the convo rather than jokes jokes serious issue jokes jokes. I do think it was good to put it early on in the show so people can expect messages like that later on bc if it happened randomly for the first time towards the end it would have been more off guard
@Yourewashed Yeah, in neither the source or anime there's any sort of context for that conversation, it's just kind of stated that discrimination against gays is common in that world, yet it's somehow not common enough for people to ever say anything homophobic to Rae about her behavior (until that scene) or for Claire to actually react in a way that indicates she's disgusted by the affections of another girl (until that scene) because her dialogue mainly just consists of insulting Rae for being a commoner and making a fool of her, because that's low stakes in comparison to homophobia. I also can't help but think it's laughable how the classist elitist is somehow so amenable to being called out on her homophobia, even when her "prejudice" hits way too close to home given that Rae acts like someone who you might feel unsafe with, especially after finding out her lovesick admirations aren't just a joke. |
If you reply back to me and I never respond, I lost interest and don't care. Sorry about that. |
Oct 18, 2023 10:14 AM
#103
the worst classification: yuri that's so bad 👎 |
Oct 18, 2023 11:56 AM
#104
The only thing I know about this manga is that it was written by a man which directly invalidates anything in it. Men creating yuri manga is not a good idea. They only make a homophobic flaming pile of shit instead of an actually good manga. I wouldn't waste my time on it if I were you, @ anyone reading this. You're better off reading Yamaji Ebine's works or something else along those lines. |
Oct 18, 2023 12:24 PM
#105
I think this anime is exposing people that think Japan is some utopia. I thought they did a really good job and this writing team understands relationships well and why being bigot is....as Sonic says, "It's no good!" |
I haven't updated in years but now I have changed that. I'll be free soon. |
Oct 18, 2023 12:26 PM
#106
Reply to Felsun
Dogemy said:
@Felsun
I get it, and i am right there with you with most of this. I just wouldn't label it forced and cringe, or specifically use both of those. Forced wokeness in western media, like a low hanging fruit like jk rowley makes me cringe. but here it did not, all did was leave me more confused for reasons above.
the way they brought it up tied in to the episode as well as a family cutaway given it was with the start of a scene change and not too related to the prior event given Misha was the one that brought it up. And it did not really combo with the happy go lucky comedy yuri vibe that the show was going for before it. so it sticks out. but the intentions are what would be need to make me cringe.
@Felsun
I get it, and i am right there with you with most of this. I just wouldn't label it forced and cringe, or specifically use both of those. Forced wokeness in western media, like a low hanging fruit like jk rowley makes me cringe. but here it did not, all did was leave me more confused for reasons above.
the way they brought it up tied in to the episode as well as a family cutaway given it was with the start of a scene change and not too related to the prior event given Misha was the one that brought it up. And it did not really combo with the happy go lucky comedy yuri vibe that the show was going for before it. so it sticks out. but the intentions are what would be need to make me cringe.
I hear ya. Maybe “forced” isn’t the best word to use for this. I don’t think “cringe” is applicable either. I was just disappointed honestly. I loved episodes 1 & 2 and I was really looking forward to more character development for the cast but then they just kinda skipped all that and changed who these people are and it was disappointing.
I really am hoping that things get back to the plot and we get to see normal development in Rae and Claire again but this episode just wasn’t it. There are ways to have this sort of development without sacrificing your characters but it requires more time and maybe the author was anxious about not being able to get the point across naturally? I dunno if that was the case I can sympathize at least I just think it’s a disservice to the story to do it this way.
@Felsun Bro we got 9 episodes left you'll get your development.....I feel this was an important conversation. I don't get why some people get bend out of shape of these topics being talk about. I'm not going to call anyone bigot or homophobe but you are kind of exposing yourself when you cal lit "forced", "Cringe", and etc. I know you're not saying that and good on you but some people on here are doing too much. Granted this isn't the first time the anime fandom has had members choosing to be racist, homophobic, and etc. |
I haven't updated in years but now I have changed that. I'll be free soon. |
Oct 18, 2023 2:20 PM
#107
Reply to MasterHavik
@Felsun Bro we got 9 episodes left you'll get your development.....I feel this was an important conversation. I don't get why some people get bend out of shape of these topics being talk about. I'm not going to call anyone bigot or homophobe but you are kind of exposing yourself when you cal lit "forced", "Cringe", and etc. I know you're not saying that and good on you but some people on here are doing too much. Granted this isn't the first time the anime fandom has had members choosing to be racist, homophobic, and etc.
@MasterHavik I don't like what you're implying here, the idea that socially conscious messages or initiatives are always executed well in the scope of a narrative work, is frankly, and absolutely laughable assertion. There's simply one group who will applaud the work because they find the real world importance of said messages/initiatives taking priority over a mere fictional story, and while others may be outright intolerant to the message/initiatives, some people have no issue with said themes, but take issue when they're clumsily executed, stick out like a sore thumb, don't feel organic, etc. I understand that I dislike many of the same "woke" pieces of media that bigots do, but unlike them, my reasons are strictly narrative. Also, there have certainly been works with socially conscious messages that don't come across as being forced, etc. |
If you reply back to me and I never respond, I lost interest and don't care. Sorry about that. |
Oct 18, 2023 2:28 PM
#108
MasterHavik said: @Felsun Bro we got 9 episodes left you'll get your development.....I feel this was an important conversation. I don't get why some people get bend out of shape of these topics being talk about. I'm not going to call anyone bigot or homophobe but you are kind of exposing yourself when you cal lit "forced", "Cringe", and etc. I know you're not saying that and good on you but some people on here are doing too much. Granted this isn't the first time the anime fandom has had members choosing to be racist, homophobic, and etc. I’m not sure which post you’re responding to here but my thoughts are that this conversation didn’t treat these characters as they had been characterized prior in a lot of ways. These felt like new people almost. I get that we’ll still get more development I never said that this was the end of characterization. I just don’t like that this scene didn’t make sense with what we know about the characters and came from out of nowhere. They should’ve built up to this or had this change in perspective from Claire and development in hers and Rae’s relationship occur naturally over time or in the plot. This scene ejected everyone from the plot and basically uploaded character development rather than have these be conclusions that characters reach on their own as the result of some event. Doing that makes this hold so much more meaning which is why I think doing it this way was so bad. I want to also say that I’ve seen a little of the LN and it seems like they actually do address cultural biases against lesbian relationships in the kingdom so there’s a chance (I haven’t read the volume myself so I don’t wanna say definitively) that this scene had more context and build up in the LN and was just poorly adapted. I appreciate you acknowledging that I’m not a bigot for criticizing this scene so harshly but I dunno why bring it up in response to my comment. Also, I don’t think calling it “forced” or “cringe” is homophobic. If they say “it’s forced to have Rae be gay” that’s dumb and obviously they don’t like that about the character but just calling this scene “forced” isn’t about her being gay. I kinda agree with that sentiment even if I wouldn’t word it like that just because I don’t think it explains the criticism well. To me I think it’s valid to say it’s “forced” if by that you mean it comes out of nowhere and ignores all the previous context of who these characters are. I’m not saying that this is what they meant all I’m saying is that you shouldn’t assume they’re being homophobic just for using harsh language towards this scene. I’ve been seeing some people talking about how it is a poor portrayal of this relationship due to the dynamic Claire and Rae have had up to this point so it’s just not right to assume their intentions unless they said something about Rae being gay in the same breath which then of course I’d agree with you. On last thing I wanted to say in response to you calling this an “important conversation” (just putting it in quotes not because I disagree or to denote sarcasm just for accuracy’s sake): I think that some of the character development here could’ve been good if there was any lead up to it my complaint is that we just skipped all of the meaningful bits, Claire has been told now how her character is going forward and that’s just that. It sucks. You can have all of this but skipping what gives it context and meaning is an awful way to address this. |
Oct 18, 2023 2:38 PM
#109
Aoi_hana said: The only thing I know about this manga is that it was written by a man which directly invalidates anything in it. Men creating yuri manga is not a good idea. They only make a homophobic flaming pile of shit instead of an actually good manga. I wouldn't waste my time on it if I were you, @ anyone reading this. You're better off reading Yamaji Ebine's works or something else along those lines. I heard the author is a woman? Do you have a link or something because that sounds wrong but I’m fairly ignorant on the subject so I could be wrong if you know something I don’t. |
Oct 18, 2023 2:49 PM
#110
Reply to Felsun
Aoi_hana said:
The only thing I know about this manga is that it was written by a man which directly invalidates anything in it. Men creating yuri manga is not a good idea. They only make a homophobic flaming pile of shit instead of an actually good manga. I wouldn't waste my time on it if I were you, @ anyone reading this. You're better off reading Yamaji Ebine's works or something else along those lines.
The only thing I know about this manga is that it was written by a man which directly invalidates anything in it. Men creating yuri manga is not a good idea. They only make a homophobic flaming pile of shit instead of an actually good manga. I wouldn't waste my time on it if I were you, @ anyone reading this. You're better off reading Yamaji Ebine's works or something else along those lines.
I heard the author is a woman? Do you have a link or something because that sounds wrong but I’m fairly ignorant on the subject so I could be wrong if you know something I don’t.
@Felsun The author is a gay woman, and it's just the opposite of literally everything they said, talk about missing the mark. |
If you reply back to me and I never respond, I lost interest and don't care. Sorry about that. |
Oct 18, 2023 2:53 PM
#111
LostSpectre said: @Felsun The author is a gay woman, and it's just the opposite of literally everything they said, talk about missing the mark. Ok thanks! Haha I have no real source for this but I’d seen online where people were saying that she was gay in response to some conversation about bi lighting in the show or something so I didn’t think it was a guy unless everyone was just confidently wrong in that post of course. |
Oct 18, 2023 2:58 PM
#112
Reply to Felsun
MasterHavik said:
@Felsun Bro we got 9 episodes left you'll get your development.....I feel this was an important conversation. I don't get why some people get bend out of shape of these topics being talk about. I'm not going to call anyone bigot or homophobe but you are kind of exposing yourself when you cal lit "forced", "Cringe", and etc. I know you're not saying that and good on you but some people on here are doing too much. Granted this isn't the first time the anime fandom has had members choosing to be racist, homophobic, and etc.
@Felsun Bro we got 9 episodes left you'll get your development.....I feel this was an important conversation. I don't get why some people get bend out of shape of these topics being talk about. I'm not going to call anyone bigot or homophobe but you are kind of exposing yourself when you cal lit "forced", "Cringe", and etc. I know you're not saying that and good on you but some people on here are doing too much. Granted this isn't the first time the anime fandom has had members choosing to be racist, homophobic, and etc.
I’m not sure which post you’re responding to here but my thoughts are that this conversation didn’t treat these characters as they had been characterized prior in a lot of ways. These felt like new people almost. I get that we’ll still get more development I never said that this was the end of characterization. I just don’t like that this scene didn’t make sense with what we know about the characters and came from out of nowhere. They should’ve built up to this or had this change in perspective from Claire and development in hers and Rae’s relationship occur naturally over time or in the plot. This scene ejected everyone from the plot and basically uploaded character development rather than have these be conclusions that characters reach on their own as the result of some event. Doing that makes this hold so much more meaning which is why I think doing it this way was so bad.
I want to also say that I’ve seen a little of the LN and it seems like they actually do address cultural biases against lesbian relationships in the kingdom so there’s a chance (I haven’t read the volume myself so I don’t wanna say definitively) that this scene had more context and build up in the LN and was just poorly adapted.
I appreciate you acknowledging that I’m not a bigot for criticizing this scene so harshly but I dunno why bring it up in response to my comment. Also, I don’t think calling it “forced” or “cringe” is homophobic. If they say “it’s forced to have Rae be gay” that’s dumb and obviously they don’t like that about the character but just calling this scene “forced” isn’t about her being gay. I kinda agree with that sentiment even if I wouldn’t word it like that just because I don’t think it explains the criticism well. To me I think it’s valid to say it’s “forced” if by that you mean it comes out of nowhere and ignores all the previous context of who these characters are. I’m not saying that this is what they meant all I’m saying is that you shouldn’t assume they’re being homophobic just for using harsh language towards this scene. I’ve been seeing some people talking about how it is a poor portrayal of this relationship due to the dynamic Claire and Rae have had up to this point so it’s just not right to assume their intentions unless they said something about Rae being gay in the same breath which then of course I’d agree with you.
On last thing I wanted to say in response to you calling this an “important conversation” (just putting it in quotes not because I disagree or to denote sarcasm just for accuracy’s sake): I think that some of the character development here could’ve been good if there was any lead up to it my complaint is that we just skipped all of the meaningful bits, Claire has been told now how her character is going forward and that’s just that. It sucks. You can have all of this but skipping what gives it context and meaning is an awful way to address this.
@Felsun That scene in the LN goes in to way more depth on the kingdoms prejudice at large as well as Rae relating it to homophobia in Japan, but it doesn't really change the fact that we're getting an out of context infodump about all of this at once, not to mention the fact that prior to this there's no homophobic sentiment towards Rae and her outwardly gay affection towards Claire, which seems odd when the author describes that gay characters in plays or stories are written as either overly aggressive/predatory or sexually "free" and we're just supposed to believe that Claire and Lene are both similarly ignorant, while Misha is a social justice warrior. Then we have the fact that Claire has to put up with someone who comes awfully close to checking all the boxes of the prejudiced stereotype that she's wrong for believing, and I assume the message here isn't don't be afraid of Rae because she's gay, be afraid of her because she's a creep, but that's where the logic is pointing. lol |
If you reply back to me and I never respond, I lost interest and don't care. Sorry about that. |
Oct 18, 2023 4:26 PM
#113
LostSpectre said: @Felsun That scene in the LN goes in to way more depth on the kingdoms prejudice at large as well as Rae relating it to homophobia in Japan, but it doesn't really change the fact that we're getting an out of context infodump about all of this at once, not to mention the fact that prior to this there's no homophobic sentiment towards Rae and her outwardly gay affection towards Claire, which seems odd when the author describes that gay characters in plays or stories are written as either overly aggressive/predatory or sexually "free" and we're just supposed to believe that Claire and Lene are both similarly ignorant, while Misha is a social justice warrior. Then we have the fact that Claire has to put up with someone who comes awfully close to checking all the boxes of the prejudiced stereotype that she's wrong for believing, and I assume the message here isn't don't be afraid of Rae because she's gay, be afraid of her because she's a creep, but that's where the logic is pointing. lol That’s at least better if they establish that there is prejudice in the kingdom. At least that could offer some explanation for why Claire doesn’t know that Rae is gay already and provide some relevance to this “revelation”. You’re right though that without seeing any of the reactions you would, if people were really prejudiced, every time Rae declares her love for Claire then it’s still kinda awkward. What they should’ve done is ditch the prejudice society angle (since it would muddy this proposal for a scene) and have Claire figure out that Rae has been helping her get closer to Thane and ask her why she is helping Claire out if Rae is in love with her supposedly. Rae could explain that she knows (“believes” is probably a better word since I think Claire will be bi) Claire isn’t attracted to her and that she just wants Claire to be happy. Then Claire could ask why she cares so much (following that thread from the end of episode 2) and Rae could tell her and the audience what attracted her to Claire in the first place and what she means to her. Maybe seeing her character in the game got her through heart ache or something. Then Claire could maybe see herself in a new light or push back on her assessment and give us some characterization for how she views herself. Could even have Claire suggest that Rae become friends with one of the princes who Claire thinks embodies these traits that Rae is attracted to in her so you could keep the dialogue in where Rae explains that while she is attracted to Claire as an individual she also isn’t attracted to men. You could have all of this and preserve the characters all at the same time! That’s why lazy stuff like this where we remove the cast from the plot for a second to simply tell them how they are to be characterized now and completely disregarding the context of what came before is so annoying. This is about the worst way they could’ve done it. I know people are happy with the message and all but it did not treat these characters well. Claire got it the worst in how mischaracterized she was. She’s not wrong in being wary of Rae’s intentions and even in Mischa’s example the guy would’ve been completely justified if Claire had been acting like Rae. Not only that now Claire is just going to be different because she is. There was no meaningful change in perspective or development. Maybe they won’t fully commit yet and will give us that scene next episode since she’s still unsure of why she feels guilt (which she shouldn’t be feeling anyways but whatever) to give some meaning to why she wants to adopt this attitude. Lol on that last sentence, it would be funny if that was the message that Claire should still keep an eye out. I really don’t dislike Rae as a character but she is absolutely a creep 😂 |
Oct 18, 2023 5:50 PM
#114
idk man i didn't have any problems with the scene. i feel like some people view anything less than outright homophobia as "cringe sjw bullshit" |
Oct 18, 2023 9:17 PM
#115
Oct 18, 2023 11:08 PM
#116
zombie_pegasus said: I don't get why people are complaining about gay stuff in a gay anime. You knew it was gay going into it, in fact that's probably the reason why you picked it up. Is a gay girl talking about being gay really a dealbreaker for you? I don’t wanna speak for everyone but most of the stuff I’ve seen is about the execution. I don’t think anyone who finished episode 1 is angry or confused about there being gay characters. Rae is pretty open about the fact that she loves Claire. |
Oct 19, 2023 2:00 AM
#117
Reply to Felsun
Aoi_hana said:
The only thing I know about this manga is that it was written by a man which directly invalidates anything in it. Men creating yuri manga is not a good idea. They only make a homophobic flaming pile of shit instead of an actually good manga. I wouldn't waste my time on it if I were you, @ anyone reading this. You're better off reading Yamaji Ebine's works or something else along those lines.
The only thing I know about this manga is that it was written by a man which directly invalidates anything in it. Men creating yuri manga is not a good idea. They only make a homophobic flaming pile of shit instead of an actually good manga. I wouldn't waste my time on it if I were you, @ anyone reading this. You're better off reading Yamaji Ebine's works or something else along those lines.
I heard the author is a woman? Do you have a link or something because that sounds wrong but I’m fairly ignorant on the subject so I could be wrong if you know something I don’t.
@Felsun The author is a "trans woman" aka a man pretending to be a woman. This series apparently also contains incest so do you really want to associate yourself with that or consume that? I hope not. Men cannot be lesbians. This is a manga/novel created by a straight dude, just like you guys on here. Anyone who says otherwise is lying to you. |
removed-userOct 19, 2023 2:04 AM
Oct 19, 2023 4:44 AM
#118
Reply to removed-user
@Felsun The author is a "trans woman" aka a man pretending to be a woman. This series apparently also contains incest so do you really want to associate yourself with that or consume that? I hope not.
Men cannot be lesbians. This is a manga/novel created by a straight dude, just like you guys on here. Anyone who says otherwise is lying to you.
Men cannot be lesbians. This is a manga/novel created by a straight dude, just like you guys on here. Anyone who says otherwise is lying to you.
@Aoi_hana Alright, i had to make an account just to comment on this. A while ago i heard this exact comment and did some research and i cant find any mention of Inori being Assigned Male at Birth. She has talked about the fact that she was born intersex. However, she never talked about her struggles of being percieved as a man, never talked about transitioning, or any other things that would lead me to believe she was seen as male before transitioning to female. And given how open she is about specifically her struggles as an LGBT person im reasonably sure she wouldve talked about it at some point. I think she was born in a mostly female body, was always seen and treated as a girl growing up, and her being intersex is where the trans talk comes from. So when people think Inori is trans theyre not saying she is a man who identifies as a woman, even though thats what would come to mind. Theyre saying she is an Intersex person, a woman who was born with both sexual organs, but identifies as female. I could be wrong of course, if i am then show me a tweet or other message from Inori that states she was mtf/seen and treated as a boy before transitioning, because i couldnt find one no matter how much i looked. Every person who said she is trans and had a source has referred to her stating she is Intersex. |
Oct 19, 2023 5:21 AM
#119
Reply to HadToDoIt
@Aoi_hana Alright, i had to make an account just to comment on this.
A while ago i heard this exact comment and did some research and i cant find any mention of Inori being Assigned Male at Birth. She has talked about the fact that she was born intersex. However, she never talked about her struggles of being percieved as a man, never talked about transitioning, or any other things that would lead me to believe she was seen as male before transitioning to female. And given how open she is about specifically her struggles as an LGBT person im reasonably sure she wouldve talked about it at some point.
I think she was born in a mostly female body, was always seen and treated as a girl growing up, and her being intersex is where the trans talk comes from. So when people think Inori is trans theyre not saying she is a man who identifies as a woman, even though thats what would come to mind. Theyre saying she is an Intersex person, a woman who was born with both sexual organs, but identifies as female.
I could be wrong of course, if i am then show me a tweet or other message from Inori that states she was mtf/seen and treated as a boy before transitioning, because i couldnt find one no matter how much i looked.
Every person who said she is trans and had a source has referred to her stating she is Intersex.
A while ago i heard this exact comment and did some research and i cant find any mention of Inori being Assigned Male at Birth. She has talked about the fact that she was born intersex. However, she never talked about her struggles of being percieved as a man, never talked about transitioning, or any other things that would lead me to believe she was seen as male before transitioning to female. And given how open she is about specifically her struggles as an LGBT person im reasonably sure she wouldve talked about it at some point.
I think she was born in a mostly female body, was always seen and treated as a girl growing up, and her being intersex is where the trans talk comes from. So when people think Inori is trans theyre not saying she is a man who identifies as a woman, even though thats what would come to mind. Theyre saying she is an Intersex person, a woman who was born with both sexual organs, but identifies as female.
I could be wrong of course, if i am then show me a tweet or other message from Inori that states she was mtf/seen and treated as a boy before transitioning, because i couldnt find one no matter how much i looked.
Every person who said she is trans and had a source has referred to her stating she is Intersex.
@HadToDoIt Welcome to MAL, I guess? In that case, if she's really an intersex woman, then there's no problem with her creating yuri manga. That being said, people shouldn't refer to an intersex woman as "trans" because that's not what intersex is. Anyway, I'll not be reading/watching this due to it having incest. There are so few good yuri manga out there. This simply isn't one of them. |
Oct 19, 2023 12:29 PM
#120
Reply to KryzakamiHrybami
This thread is so weird. The anime is about harassment, stalking, bullying and homosexuality and yet people here are triggered out of a character asking about gay tolerance. Did you really not expect to see your gay anime sending gay messages?
@KryzakamiHrybami to be blunt yes. historically yuri/GL media has tended to just tacitly agree about homosexuality without ever acknowledging the context of the prejudice world it exists in. KryzakamiHrybami said: The anime is about harassment, stalking, bullying and homosexuality the point of the discussion at least as i set itup is one would not have gotten that idea based off the first 2 and a half episodes. simply dismissing it as your standard yuri comedy of the season. I disagree with some in this post, but i would remiss if i didnt acknowledge that just about no one has been really triggered. hell basically no one has disagreed, the whole discussion is about the animes current inability to blend their two goals together smoothly. that is to propose its stance, as well as present comedy. the thing primarily being discussed, or at least i made this discussion with the aim to discuss is the tonal whiplash of the anime regarding this. |
Oct 19, 2023 12:37 PM
#121
Reply to zombie_pegasus
I don't get why people are complaining about gay stuff in a gay anime. You knew it was gay going into it, in fact that's probably the reason why you picked it up. Is a gay girl talking about being gay really a dealbreaker for you?
@zombie_pegasus i feel like this grossly misrepresents the discussion subject and my point as a whole. I said multiple times in this discussion i still like the show, plan to keep watching, and curious to see how they go forward with its comedy and its messages. My issue was its tonal imbalance between scenes, it was not written with natural flow from one to the next, the previous 2 episodes did not even hint that they wanted to have this conversation so its honestly hard to take super seriously at first. I love how the show approaches the subject earnestly and with clear care for the issue, but the way it goes about it at times misses the mark. as this is written my a gay female author, i am really hoping going forward a bit more nuance is attached to this subject. One thing i found particularly intriguing was Rae's comments on if gender matters and the differences between how we feel, and how people romanticize the idea of... well romance as being unrelated to gender. this all felt like interesting stuff to talk about so i asked. and on the matter of if this was shocking or not, simply put yes it was. as you correctly surmised, i have watched many yuri anime and read lots of yuri manga. both serious and comedy. and in basically every one of them the concept of homophobia and importance of gender is not raised. most of these take place in some magic world where the fact that people are gay means nothing to anyone. so to see a modern unassuming seasonal yuri anime, a comedy heavy one such as this, get into this subject well after establishing a comedy centric baseline, was surprising. i never said it was bad, and never said its a dealbreaker. it was as i called it, intriguing and facinating. |
Oct 19, 2023 12:38 PM
#122
Reply to removed-user
@Felsun The author is a "trans woman" aka a man pretending to be a woman. This series apparently also contains incest so do you really want to associate yourself with that or consume that? I hope not.
Men cannot be lesbians. This is a manga/novel created by a straight dude, just like you guys on here. Anyone who says otherwise is lying to you.
Men cannot be lesbians. This is a manga/novel created by a straight dude, just like you guys on here. Anyone who says otherwise is lying to you.
@Aoi_hana sheesh... |
Oct 19, 2023 1:50 PM
#123
Reply to Dogemy
@zombie_pegasus i feel like this grossly misrepresents the discussion subject and my point as a whole.
I said multiple times in this discussion i still like the show, plan to keep watching, and curious to see how they go forward with its comedy and its messages.
My issue was its tonal imbalance between scenes, it was not written with natural flow from one to the next, the previous 2 episodes did not even hint that they wanted to have this conversation so its honestly hard to take super seriously at first.
I love how the show approaches the subject earnestly and with clear care for the issue, but the way it goes about it at times misses the mark.
as this is written my a gay female author, i am really hoping going forward a bit more nuance is attached to this subject.
One thing i found particularly intriguing was Rae's comments on if gender matters and the differences between how we feel, and how people romanticize the idea of... well romance as being unrelated to gender.
this all felt like interesting stuff to talk about so i asked.
and on the matter of if this was shocking or not, simply put yes it was. as you correctly surmised, i have watched many yuri anime and read lots of yuri manga. both serious and comedy. and in basically every one of them the concept of homophobia and importance of gender is not raised. most of these take place in some magic world where the fact that people are gay means nothing to anyone.
so to see a modern unassuming seasonal yuri anime, a comedy heavy one such as this, get into this subject well after establishing a comedy centric baseline, was surprising. i never said it was bad, and never said its a dealbreaker. it was as i called it, intriguing and facinating.
I said multiple times in this discussion i still like the show, plan to keep watching, and curious to see how they go forward with its comedy and its messages.
My issue was its tonal imbalance between scenes, it was not written with natural flow from one to the next, the previous 2 episodes did not even hint that they wanted to have this conversation so its honestly hard to take super seriously at first.
I love how the show approaches the subject earnestly and with clear care for the issue, but the way it goes about it at times misses the mark.
as this is written my a gay female author, i am really hoping going forward a bit more nuance is attached to this subject.
One thing i found particularly intriguing was Rae's comments on if gender matters and the differences between how we feel, and how people romanticize the idea of... well romance as being unrelated to gender.
this all felt like interesting stuff to talk about so i asked.
and on the matter of if this was shocking or not, simply put yes it was. as you correctly surmised, i have watched many yuri anime and read lots of yuri manga. both serious and comedy. and in basically every one of them the concept of homophobia and importance of gender is not raised. most of these take place in some magic world where the fact that people are gay means nothing to anyone.
so to see a modern unassuming seasonal yuri anime, a comedy heavy one such as this, get into this subject well after establishing a comedy centric baseline, was surprising. i never said it was bad, and never said its a dealbreaker. it was as i called it, intriguing and facinating.
@Dogemy There are countless example of comedy anime that tackle serious topics. And curiously, they are mostly highly rated here on MAL. You can also find these example in yuri ani/manga quite frequently. As for the execution, I don't feel like it was shocking at all. The discussion was already coherent within the universe and the characters. I'm quite confortable with the idea of author adding their political views in anime. Because that's what author always do to a certain limit. But I guess the topic of gender and homophobia is not brought enough which makes people uncomfortable with it. It's just funny to me that there seem to exist a limit of tolerance regarding what to show and discuss in an episode even when the topic is entirely in connection with the synopsis of the anime. It's not something I see happening anywhere else on the forum, despite constantly facing political views of the author in the anime I watch that have similar execution. |
Oct 19, 2023 2:20 PM
#124
Reply to KryzakamiHrybami
@Dogemy There are countless example of comedy anime that tackle serious topics. And curiously, they are mostly highly rated here on MAL. You can also find these example in yuri ani/manga quite frequently.
As for the execution, I don't feel like it was shocking at all. The discussion was already coherent within the universe and the characters. I'm quite confortable with the idea of author adding their political views in anime. Because that's what author always do to a certain limit. But I guess the topic of gender and homophobia is not brought enough which makes people uncomfortable with it.
It's just funny to me that there seem to exist a limit of tolerance regarding what to show and discuss in an episode even when the topic is entirely in connection with the synopsis of the anime. It's not something I see happening anywhere else on the forum, despite constantly facing political views of the author in the anime I watch that have similar execution.
As for the execution, I don't feel like it was shocking at all. The discussion was already coherent within the universe and the characters. I'm quite confortable with the idea of author adding their political views in anime. Because that's what author always do to a certain limit. But I guess the topic of gender and homophobia is not brought enough which makes people uncomfortable with it.
It's just funny to me that there seem to exist a limit of tolerance regarding what to show and discuss in an episode even when the topic is entirely in connection with the synopsis of the anime. It's not something I see happening anywhere else on the forum, despite constantly facing political views of the author in the anime I watch that have similar execution.
@KryzakamiHrybami Hey, it's perfectly fine if that's your opinion, many other people found the execution of said scene to be very poor. It's also peculiar that you would outright dismiss it as shocking, when the author's intention was clearly to take you by surprise with that conversation and abrupt shift in tone, when Misha drops the "Are you gay?" bombshell on Rae. I can only speak for myself, but I'll criticize any anime that is extremely dissonant in tone. You keep bringing this back to the themes themselves, but the themes just aren't the issue here, aside from the fact that the serious nature of said themes may demand a higher level of competency. |
If you reply back to me and I never respond, I lost interest and don't care. Sorry about that. |
Oct 19, 2023 10:53 PM
#125
Thread locked Anime Discussion Rules: 5. Please refrain from posting thread topics which extend beyond the discussion of anime/manga as an entertainment medium to highly-debated social and/or moral issues. This includes but is not limited to: pedophilia, gender/racial equality, sexual orientation, etc. |
More topics from this board
Poll: » Watashi no Oshi wa Akuyaku Reijou. Episode 2 Discussion ( 1 2 )KANLen09 - Oct 9, 2023 |
80 |
by Rui_Rei
»»
Nov 18, 5:41 PM |
|
Poll: » Watashi no Oshi wa Akuyaku Reijou. Episode 12 Discussion ( 1 2 3 4 )KANLen09 - Dec 18, 2023 |
163 |
by iwubanime
»»
Oct 17, 10:30 PM |
|
Poll: » Watashi no Oshi wa Akuyaku Reijou. Episode 1 Discussion ( 1 2 3 )KANLen09 - Oct 2, 2023 |
137 |
by Praetoriann
»»
Oct 12, 9:08 AM |
|
Poll: » Watashi no Oshi wa Akuyaku Reijou. Episode 8 Discussion ( 1 2 )IzanaSolos - Nov 20, 2023 |
88 |
by AngryLesbian
»»
Sep 1, 10:46 AM |
|
Poll: » Watashi no Oshi wa Akuyaku Reijou. Episode 11 Discussion ( 1 2 )Yuyuichi - Dec 11, 2023 |
81 |
by Pullups4Days
»»
Jun 30, 7:03 PM |