Report thewiru's Profile

Keep acting^^

You slipped up there, didn't you? :P
Control those anger issues....please :*

Hey, what happened little coward?^^
Got scared and deleted the sexism?

Awwww :*

Chapter 10 should be a good entry-point; the rest of the book is more complicated, as it goes beyond psychology proper into history, philosophy and art. I think it is worth reading if only because you will learn even where you don’t understand, but I recommend reading Chapter 10 first, so that in case you don’t read the whole book, you read at least that chapter. I remember Van der Hoop’s Conscious Orientation being a good book too, and clearer than Jung’s and easier to understand (he reinterpreted or built upon Jung’s typology). Then there are also typologies like the MBTI (Jung’s typology watered down) and the Enneagram, although here we are already entering the domain of “self-help book” superficiality. The caveat is resisting the temptation of typing for the sake of typing or giving a type more reality than it has, but I don’t think you will have problems with that. With that caveat in mind, your way of thinking seems markedly “intuitive”; hence your reliance on visual analogies and your tendency to envisage various ideas amalgamated as a single visual image.

No offense, but you need to stop trying to sound so smart. In fact, you simultaneously sound pretentious and stupid, which is a feat in itself.

Do you like the characters

Do you like Princession Orchestra

What your favorite anime

I didn’t want to derail this thread, so I am replying you here.

Think about your proneness to using quotations marks. If there was a word that expressed clearly what you want to express, you would use that word; but if there is no word, you use a different word and put it between quotation marks to indicate that you mean something different from what the word usually means (a sort of warning that warns the reader not to interpret the word mechanically, automatically, but to stop and reflect), hoping that the context will render the meaning clear. And since language is not only something we use externally and with others, but also something that we use in our own internal thought-stream, that inadequacy of language also renders our thoughts inadequate. At the end of the day, we are children of our epoch; there is a tension between us as historically conditioned by the prevailing modes of thought and perception, and us as universally striving to transcend that limitation.

Have you ever thought about reading about psychology? Given your penchant for introspection, it seems something you could read naturally and without straining yourself. For example, psychological typology. It is a double-edged sword, as there abounds superficial interest in typing oneself and others, but it is undeniable that there is also truth in it. I was thinking of Carl Jung’s Psychological Types. Jung has the advantage that he was immersed in the cultural and intellectual tradition and had not fallen victim to the atomization of sciences that was already well under way even then. The book as a whole presupposes certain knowledge, but even if you don’t understand everything (which, I dare say, is impossible), you can still read it, and in fact part of the knowledge it presupposes you can learn through it. If this proves difficult, you can just read Chapter 10, which deals with the typology proper and is of easier digestion. He was a stepping stone for a self-taught illiterate like me.

Good morning

before i yap what do you think about psx games & aesthetic?

why do you value early 2000's culture so much? you weren't around for it.

i like your forum questions^^

digibro morreu de ligma em 2020

realmente estamos precisando de um novo digibro agora que ele morreu, não tem ninguém para definir o que é anime cult e o que é coisa de pleb
acho que tu pode cumprir esse papel

Same rating protocol