FULL SPOILERS
I had a rollercoaster of thoughts grappling with Nameless Asterism. I came into it expecting a messy yuri love triangle (i.e. my kind of junk food), came out betrayed by the lack of any romantic resolution at all, considered the potential artistic intention of avoiding catharsis in writing a story, sought out opinions from online Japanese readers, found one (a blogger on “note” named Aria) that described Nameless Asterism as a “relationship information card battle”, felt motivated enough to give Nameless Asterism another go, reread it, and hated the experience even more than the first time. Oops.
Let's get into Nameless Asterism,
...
starting with what I liked. I thought the character writing was very solid, and the author showed capability in planning ahead (which isn’t always common in manga). However, my favorite thing about Nameless Asterism is how it captures that social pressure in middle school to start dating. The main narrative engine of the first couple volumes is provided by a boy from another school, Kyousuke, confessing his love to Shiratori despite never having met. On my first read, I never took this plotline seriously as I assumed that, this being a yuri manga, Shiratori would get with one of her female friends, Washio or Kotooka, in the end anyway. That didn’t happen. Anyway, on my second readthrough, I tried to examine Shiratori’s feelings with clearer eyes. Part of her is just afraid to cross the threshold. She characterizes her friends gathering intel on Kyousuke as “making decisions for her”, which is a stretch. Part of her is excited, and even flattered, to be confessed to at all, but I think an element of social accomplishment—of successfully fulfilling the script provided by society—also contributes to her happiness in this case. It’s natural to rely on a roadmap when internally you have no idea what to feel about anything. And then, the most strongly felt part of all, Shiratori has her crush on Washio, which not only reasserts itself whenever it damn well pleases, but which she is afraid will fade away if she involves herself with a nice, hot boy. She values her feelings for Washio so much that she ends up rejecting Kyousuke just so she can hold onto them. Acting as a foil to Shiratori in this sense is Kotooka, who conforms to that social pressure to date with unfeeling nihilism, getting with and dumping boyfriend after boyfriend in a fruitless attempt to extinguish her crush on Shiratori. As for the third girl, Washio, unfortunately she isn’t as well-defined as the other two, and I don’t have any special comment regarding her other than that too much of her character is defined by her troubled dynamic with Kotooka.
While there is inherent intrigue in seeing what happens with this friend group, the story itself starts to stumble as early as volume 2 of the manga, but you wouldn’t know it until after the fact. See, the beginning of volume 2 has Shiratori rejecting Kyousuke, and while the yuri fans will rejoice at that moment, they will later wish that she would have gotten with him instead, at least temporarily. Because without Kyousuke as a focal point, the rest of Nameless Asterism has our three girls spinning their wheels, sometimes threatening to upend the status quo, but always interrupted or foiled before they can upend it. Either that, or we spend chapters centering on Kyousuke’s relationship with Shiratori’s crossdressing brother Subaru. Those chapters are fine, and Subaru almost manages to substantially affect the A-plot by pretending to be his sister on fake dates with Kyousuke, but everyone dutifully makes sure nobody knows anything they aren’t supposed to... Anyway, the problem is that these B-plot chapters, along with backstory chapters for the main girls, take up big enough chunks of later volumes that the A-plot barely progresses the way it needs to. The worst of it happens in volume 4, which has two chapters of Washio backstory, two chapters of Kyousuke/Subaru stuff, and just one chapter of A-plot which is just a calm-before-the-storm fluff chapter. By the time volume 5 begins, the mind struggles to remember exactly where the characters were mentally so that their current behaviors make sense.
Which leads us to discussing the dreaded volume 5. In this volume, Kotooka spitefully refuses to help a group of girls out with an issue and insults them for good measure. When Shiratori and Washio call her out for going too far, she insults them too and even slaps Washio in the face. While Nameless Asterism attempts to justify her extreme behavior with an admittedly sad backstory, I would instead sum up the writing decisions here as propping up Kotooka as a strawman villain. See, what Kotooka did was so bad, the secret crushes that have been plaguing our main characters suddenly don’t matter anymore because the friend group is already broken, and it must be fixed at all costs. Shiratori confronts Kotooka and causes her to realize that she never actually cared about other people (an extreme idea I have trouble believing and which is hardly supported by the story). With Kotooka’s psychological issues resolved, the group patch things up via baffling dialogue about how they don’t have to be perfect to be friends (when was this a narrative throughline?) and promise to be together from now on. Everything’s fine now! Oh, they’ll reveal their crushes to each other, our characters promise themselves. Only, they’ll get to it "someday", and off the page. You can see why some people weren’t happy with the ending. What can I even say? To even debate whether the decision to not have any of the girls get together is artistically sound or misguided assumes that the ending is coherent to begin with. It feels like the author couldn’t come up with a real solution to the love triangle and instead had to think of another way out of it. Who knows. A few readers speculate that the series was canceled before it could be finished properly. But as I said above, the cracks were showing even before the ending.
The only reason why I wanted to write this review was because I thought I had made a mistake in my evaluation of Nameless Asterism the first time, which could have yielded an interesting review. I did make a mistake: I criticized the wrong thing, and I wasn't harsh enough. And what's yielded is just a cold evaluation. As for score, Nameless Asterism averages out to an empty feeling, and for me, that's right down the middle.
Jan 27, 2025
Nanashi no Asterism
(Manga)
add
Not Recommended Spoiler
FULL SPOILERS
I had a rollercoaster of thoughts grappling with Nameless Asterism. I came into it expecting a messy yuri love triangle (i.e. my kind of junk food), came out betrayed by the lack of any romantic resolution at all, considered the potential artistic intention of avoiding catharsis in writing a story, sought out opinions from online Japanese readers, found one (a blogger on “note” named Aria) that described Nameless Asterism as a “relationship information card battle”, felt motivated enough to give Nameless Asterism another go, reread it, and hated the experience even more than the first time. Oops. Let's get into Nameless Asterism, ...
Reviewer’s Rating: 5
What did you think of this review?
Nice
 0
Love it
 0
Funny
 0
Confusing
 0
Informative
 0
Well-written
 0
Creative
 0Show all 
Apr 1, 2023
Hiraeth wa Tabiji no Hate
(Manga)
add
Mixed Feelings Well-written
About a year ago, I wrote a preliminary review gushing about the English release of Hiraeth: The End of the Journey’s first volume. It resonated with my own views on life and death in a way that seemed rare (since then, I watched A24’s Everything Everywhere All at Once, which scratched a similar yet different itch). This past February, the final English volume—volume three—of Hiraeth released, and despite ending much sooner than I wanted it to, I appreciated the whole run all the same, and maintained my 9/10 rating.
You surely noticed that I’ve got a “Mixed Feelings” tag on this review. Well, I read through ... Hiraeth a second time, paying closer attention to the story. I don’t take back my preliminary review, as that’s how I really felt, and I still think that Hiraeth has some very powerful moments that hit just as hard. However, structurally speaking, Hiraeth doesn’t quite hold up on subsequent readings. I won’t spoil the story apart from speaking in the most general terms, except when I talk specifically about an exchange that happens at the end of volume one divorced from all other context. If you don’t want to risk it, I suggest checking out Hiraeth for yourself if you’re interested. Before I go further, I’ll give a synopsis. Hiraeth is a character drama that takes place cross-country across Japan. Our party of characters go west from Shinagawa City, Tokyo to Shimane Prefecture, which for context takes 1 hour, 25 minutes by plane (in the story, the characters drive and make stops along the way). Shinagawa City is home to 14-year-old Mika, the closest thing to our main POV character. Mika recently lost Mitsuha, who you can freely interpret as her best friend or her girlfriend. Due to grief, Mika has decided that life is no longer worth living. Her initial suicide attempt is foiled by Hibino, a man cursed with immortality. Though he has lived many vocations and known many loves, Hibino is now searching for a way to end his life as well. Accompanying Hibino is a youthful looking god who later goes by Hani. As they’ve lost basically all of their believers to the sands of time, Hani is near the end of their lifespan. Hani is the first one to plan this journey—they must visit shrines and say goodbye to fellow gods they know, and then arrive in Shimane, where the entrance to Yomi, the land of the dead, resides, so that they may formally end their life. Hibino sees Hani’s pilgrimage as an opportunity to reverse his immortality. And Mika, upon learning of Yomi, is excited at the possibility of meeting Mitsuha again, giving her suicide mission a slightly new bearing. And so Mika, Hibino, and Hani travel to Yomi, learning about the histories of different towns (mostly thanks to Hibino having lived those histories himself), getting to know specific people and their life perspectives and struggles, and overcoming their own interpersonal frictions with each other. Let’s start with the positives. First, I want to emphasize that Hiraeth is more about death than it is about suicide. Granted, our main character Mika is suicidal; the main question for her, narratively speaking, is if she should reunite with Mitsuha in death, or not. But, Hiraeth is larger than Mika’s story. We have Hibino, who had to deal with outliving anyone he meets—learning how to process death as it happens only to those around him, never to himself. We have Hani, who is able to literally see the “roads toward death” of every person they meet, and is genuinely yet clinically fascinated by how humans behave on those “roads toward death” they unknowingly walk. We have Chihiro, a student who researches folkloric representations of death partly out of sincere academic drive, but also as a method of coping with something very personal to her. We have Michino, an old woman who suffered loss like Mika has, but who learned to keep living and make compromises when she must. All these encounters influence Mika’s own relationship to death, and by extension her suicidality. Even if suicide is her guiding endpoint throughout, the journey she goes on concerns death in general. It gets heavy, and I don’t blame you if you don’t want to engage with such charged subject matter. However, Hiraeth always makes sure to counterbalance the darkness with some legitimately helpful optimism, and in the end, Hiraeth treats death and suicide with real thought and compassion. In volume 1, Mika is told, essentially, that her desire to die for her friend is understandable and even normal. That feels radical, especially compared to how verbalizing your depression around where I live would result in getting chastised for even daring to “think something horrible like that”, and getting complained at for “not sucking it up like everyone else.” Of course, Hiraeth isn’t advocating for suicide by any stretch (well, one scene in the final volume plays a bit odd when taken out of context), but it does argue that empathy and understanding are fundamental in connecting with and helping others who are struggling. That sounds super obvious, but actually, the most powerful moments in Hiraeth are just these beautiful gestures between people. Moments that, on the one hand, do capitalize on previous development. But on the other hand, they just utterly and completely capture the power of kindness and of vulnerability via these interactions between Hibino and Mika specifically, all the more powerful when death lingers, and lingers persistently, just outside their comprehension. I admit I am weak to that stuff. Every person on planet Earth has their button that can be pressed, and Hiraeth just knows how to press my buttons when it needs to. And the ending of Hiraeth is powerful because I personally felt those feelings before. I’ve been at life’s precipice, needing to decide if I want to live or not. I know what it’s like. The fact that mangaka Yuhki Kamatani writes to that experience—other elements of the writing notwithstanding—cannot be discounted. Of course, not everyone will relate as much as I do, but there are people out there who will relate as much, if not more. That is a genuine power of fiction, and Hiraeth at its best shines with this power. Now, however, is a good time to talk about the negatives. Again, using storytelling to convey powerful and relatable life experiences is good, even if it doesn’t resonate with everyone. Speak your truth rather than appeal to the lowest common denominator. But, I wonder, if Hiraeth should have tried *harder* to be more broadly appealing. I’m not saying that Hiraeth should have filled its story to the brim with tired tropes and canned story beats. I’m speaking more fundamentally: Hiraeth relies on relatability too much to carry its story (a double-edged sword), and there’s a lack of organizational narrative techniques that could have picked up some of the slack—whether that be a logical backbone of dramatic cause-and-effect (maybe you know it as South Park’s “therefore, but” approach), or a built-in layer of thematic meaning that would further organize and add meaning to the story. Those aforementioned “big moments” I mentioned before do pull the story together in meaningful ways, but much the rest of the time, Hiraeth just meanders. It takes these characters who do have a lot of dimension to them, lets things play out in dramatic and messy ways, and asks you to do the work of making sense of what’s happening. And sometimes, basic dramatic cause-and-effect is missing. For example, Hibino has these moments early on where he’s a bit of a jerk, but then he comes back around and plays the “nice adult” without any explanation, where my only reaction is, “Yeah I guess adults are like that sometimes?” Sure, this is fleshing out Hibino’s character in a way, but it’s hard to get invested when scenes have no clear purpose. And Mika’s character arc—the centerpiece of Hiraeth—sometimes has these “learning moments” that barely affect her at all. They’re there more to add texture to the journey than anything. None of this is helped by mangaka Kamatani’s bad habit of making scenes as visually dramatic and shocking as possible, sometimes imbuing scenes with unwarranted importance. These complaints didn’t really apply when I first read Hiraeth, since I didn’t know what would end up mattering or not. In fact, rolling with the chaos was part of the initial appeal, since it made the story feel unpredictable and real. And the fact that this is a character drama that relies substantially on organic conflict might be enough respite from a lot of other stories in manga and anime that feel so artificial, to the point where anything that *isn’t* made entirely out of tropes will feel like the best thing ever. But, it’s on a second readthrough that the novelty wears off, the story cannot rely on unpredictability anymore, and the dysfunctions and inefficiencies of the narrative structure become noticeable. The worst of it is localized in chapter two of Hiraeth, which I consider functionally useless. I had no idea what purpose all the needless drama was serving, and I was actually worried that I wouldn’t like Hiraeth enough to even finish it again. Admittedly, it never gets quite as bad as chapter two ever again, but there’s sprinklings of structural sloppiness throughout—moments of confusion that added up enough to keep Hiraeth from being truly great. An experiential narrative—one that relies on the power of relatability and bolstered by rich details—has only one layer of meaning, regardless of how much meaning is packed into that layer. Stories that truly survive the passage of time have multiple layers with which readers can engage. There is some thematic writing in Hiraeth, of course, but it is not agile enough to keep with the subtle intricacies of Mika’s journey. I did neglect to mention the Japanese-religious subtext in Hiraeth which makes for an additional layer, but I couldn’t ascertain if those elements amounted to something greater than its parts (maybe check Hiraeth out if you are into Shintō and/or Japanese Buddhism). And again, dramatic cause-and-effect would have lent an almost physics-like inevitability to the narrative, bolstering its staying power with function alone. It’s because of these structural weaknesses, along with the subjectivity of Hiraeth’s main message, that I cannot easily recommend Hiraeth to everyone. As a side complaint, I did not like what they did with Hani, the god character. For most of Hiraeth, Hani was not a very prominent character compared to Mika or Hibino, but that did fit in with their detached, observational personality. I figure so long as they lightly interacted with the narrative as they have been doing, it would be ok. However, near the end, something is revealed about Hani, which suddenly adds new aspects to their character, and also ties the overall narrative into a bow so neat it’s disgusting. When I talked about Hiraeth avoiding tired tropes, this is the one big exception. It feels tacked on. I’m not sure if this was an editorial mandate or if this was Kamatani’s idea. It does technically slot in with the rest of the story, but the rest of the story wasn’t asking for something like this either. I understand why there may have been an urge to give Hani more narrative prominence and emotional impact, since they are a “main character”, after all. I admit that going a subtler route with Hani’s character would have been far more challenging to write, but I think it could have been done. Well, at least it doesn’t actually figure that much into the overall story. As a final point, I want to compare Hiraeth with Kamatani’s previous work, Our Dreams at Dusk (which I’ll call Dusk from now on), and talk about why I think Dusk is ultimately the more successful work. I’d skip to the final paragraph if you haven’t read Dusk (not out of spoilers, but because it won't matter to you). For one, Dusk’s narrative structure was much tighter, focusing on main character Tasuku’s journey of accepting his sexuality and learning how to help others like him. His experiences stack in an intuitive way, such that every step of his journey feels meaningful. Meanwhile, as I’ve already mentioned, Mika’s journey is more muddled. The overall arc is satisfying, sure, but the individual pieces don’t fit together as nicely. Hiraeth’s significant focus on Hibino is very welcome and interesting, and I think this time away from Mika does actually add something to the manga. But still, I must wonder if the narrative could have come together more (an extra volume would have been nice). Secondly, while we are firmly in Tasuku’s head from the first moment of Dusk, Mika’s interiority in the early chapters is unknown not only to us readers but to Mika herself. This is because she hasn’t fully accepted her friend/gf Mitsuha’s death, and doesn’t seem to be processing the world around her as real. It takes us a while to really see how Mika ticks, and this can be really hit-or-miss. On my second readthrough, I was not charmed by how Mika seemed to be “suicidal in a quirky way.” She came off like an early-era Adventure Time character. It actually takes some time to get used to Hibino and Hani as well, whereas I feel in Dusk there are at least some immediately palatable characters. It just makes for an odd on-ramp experience for Hiraeth. Lastly, Dusk is about LGBTQ people dealing with present circumstances and learning how to move forward with their lives, while Hiraeth is about people weighing the value of their entire lives (a big task for an immortal like Hibino) as they prepare to either live or die. Both are rich subject matters, but, and this is my opinion, I think the latter is much more complicated and thus harder to completely express. Of course, it’s not like Dusk captured everything about the LGBTQ experience, but it didn’t have to either. Meanwhile, Hiraeth tackles life and death, perhaps the biggest and most expansive topics of all time? I think Hiraeth did a good job with discussing death, but there’s just more opportunity for it to miss something or to not fulfill expectations. Admittedly, I have never identified under the queer umbrella, so I could be underselling Dusk’s capacity to mess up in the same regard. But I think it’s clear that Hiraeth’s ambitions would be particularly difficult to fulfill perfectly. (I just want to mention Kamatani’s art in Hiraeth. Their art in general is very accomplished, and always pleasing to look at. However, I feel Kamatani’s art in Hiraeth is more mature than their work on Dusk. While Dusk was flashy, non-diegetic, and sometimes needlessly detailed (though it at least engaged the eye), Hiraeth was more restrained, and kept its maximalist collages within the context of Hani’s visions, where the fantastical actually makes sense being there. There is one standout sequence depicting “death as nothingness”, using abstract art and minimalism, which is the opposite style of Dusk. It was just cool to see Kamatani do something different.) In conclusion, if you try Hiraeth and find the ride enjoyable, you’ll probably like the whole thing. And I still see myself going back to chapters five and sixteen in the future. However, for me at least, the second reading experience felt compromised. I do wonder if years from now, when I’ve worked through my baggage a bit more, I might come back to Hiraeth and suddenly have Mika’s story click for me—all the little cul-de-sacs in her journey gaining an intimate power that I couldn’t feel before. It’s possible. I just have to keep growing and see what happens. Hopefully by then, stories like Hiraeth will make more sense, not less.
Reviewer’s Rating: 7
What did you think of this review?
Nice
0
Love it
0
Funny
0
Confusing
0
Informative
0
Well-written
0
Creative
0Show all 
Mar 7, 2023
Shimanami Tasogare
(Manga)
add
Recommended
Our Dreams at Dusk by Yuhki Kamatani is a standout manga about LGBTQ lives. It’s not only highly regarded by queer manga readers, but also a great read for those who aren’t queer, as I can attest. Not only does Our Dreams at Dusk bring lots of representation, but it effectively explores that representation with excellent drama and character writing. It’s not a perfect manga, but its faults are not serious in the face of its strengths.
Let’s review the premise. Tasuku, a victim of homophobic bullying by his high school classmates, comes across a homely little building called the “drop-in center.” The drop-in center ... is a safe space where anyone looking for belonging can come to do homework, drink coffee, or, most significantly, help renovate abandoned houses. The first person Tasuku encounters is the enigmatic owner of the drop-in center, a woman who is called “Someone-san”. She offers an ear to Tasuku’s problems, though she “won’t listen”. As Tasuku meets the other regulars of the drop-in center, he comes not only to accept his own sexuality, but to figure out his place and role in community, and to discover his form of happiness. Despite Our Dreams at Dusk being serialized, each of the four manga volumes which make up the series focuses on different regulars of the drop-in center. As Tasuku gets to know their unique lives and struggles, he is compelled to help them, or at least try. Volume One follows Tasuku himself as he slowly learns to accept his sexuality, learning from the stories and perspective of Haruko, who is a lesbian. In Volume Two, we meet Misora, a rude middle school boy who likes crossdressing, but is not sure what that means about his identity. In Volume Three, we have two encounters: Natsuyoshi, a man whose transness is carelessly othered by his old high school classmate, and Tsubaki, Tasuku’s crush, whose behavior around Tasuku has become baffling, and not in a reassuring way. Volume Four fleshes out the stories of Tchaiko, an old man whose male partner is in the hospital for lung cancer, and Someone-san herself, whose distant otherworldliness may hide a small shard of humanity. Thankfully, this formulaic story structure is hardly felt. One reason that each character arc is usually tied to Tasuku’s character growth. Not only are we in a different mental state when each arc begins, each lesson Tasuku learns depends on what his mind is ready to receive. Since this process feels organic, everything around this process also feels organic. The other way structural regularity is obscured is in the story’s dynamism and variety. In one arc, Tasuku hardly helps the person he gets to know, instead feeling educated and inspired by what he experiences with that person. In another, Tasuku utterly fails at helping, and must somehow pick up the pieces. But, when he does succeed at helping someone, you really feel the weight of all that he’s learned. This is again thanks to the sense of continuity given by the story’s focus on Tasuku. To reiterate, Tasuku’s growth from a scared, closeted first-year to a confident, proactive, and empathetic second-year is the core engine of Our Dreams at Dusk. There are, of course, more characters than just Tasuku. It is impressive that despite the wide swath of representation included, everyone’s story is well-sketched and compellingly told. To be more specific, the following three goals of Our Dreams at Dusk (as I see it), though they are not all embodied in every character, deeply permeate the general story: 1. You feel the emotional process of how these drop-in regulars come to terms with their identity. 2. You understand the differing philosophies of living each person has cultivated in response to the environment around them. 3. You observe that even within a queer community, there are inevitable and consequential differences in mindset and understanding. All of this makes a story rich in and firmly situated in queer introspection and action. The fact that Tasuku is new to LGBTQ issues and is learning experientially as the story progresses makes Our Dreams at Dusk accessible and meaningful even to non-queer readers, but especially for queer readers. That all said, there are some things that keep Our Dreams at Dusk from being perfect. I’ll only touch on the biggest issues. Though all the active characters are great, some of them are really asking for more page-time, for some further resolution. Of course, if you’ve read the story, you know that “not knowing everything about the characters” (i.e., “minding our own business”) is kind of the point. But even just an extra scene or two with some of the characters would have left me feeling more satisfied. However, the biggest problem with the story, to me, was the relatively weak ending. Part of it was that when Tasuku finished the major portion of his character journey, the “core engine” is thus gone, and we are left with a more passive experience. I’d say the other characters are more reactive than active in this stretch too. Couple that with the unfulfilled character exploration I mentioned before, and I finished the manga thinking that the ending was “ok, I guess.” Not to say the ending wasn’t an enjoyable or affecting experience, but it’s after I’m done reading the ending that I feel just a little unsatisfied. In conclusion, if you like character dramas at all, I recommend checking out Our Dreams at Dusk. It is a great primer to queer identity and issues, the characters are fantastic and vibrant, the story makes some interesting choices, and the life lessons are something that anyone could benefit from hearing. It doesn’t scratch enough of a personal itch for me to score it higher, but the quality of Our Dreams at Dusk cannot be denied.
Reviewer’s Rating: 8
What did you think of this review?
Nice
0
Love it
0
Funny
0
Confusing
0
Informative
0
Well-written
0
Creative
0Show all |