Aug 27, 2021
Was doing fine enough until the mangaka revealed their hand on how much they hate feminism.
From the top, man gets isekai'd into a world of primitive monster people and decides to build stuff for them without making 4 certain technologies that are commonplace in modern day because the mangaka wanted a writing challenge(literally says this in volume extras). That is half of the manga. The other half is pure hentai, way past ecchi. Lots of boob and lots of loli in every chapter. The manga is at it's best when it is a pure hentai that is describing how these creatures biologically exist rather than
...
its few underwhelming fights.
Speaking of descriptions, the mangaka has an extremely verbose manner of explaining every single detail of how every bit of biology and technology works in this magicless world. There are extreme walls of texts to rationalize every single wooden contraption made. It is truly exhaustive and undecipherable without lots of patience or multiple degrees so who can say if any of it is actually scientifically valid.
Then there comes the sexism centaur. Oh boy, the sexism centaur. She who also speaks in an extremely verbose manner, but this time about how "females aren't oppressed because they can just manipulate men with love". Of course in a wall-of-text format with a bunch of explanations about how centaur society evolved to counter human socieity's gender equality. Human society is generally shown to be bad in this manga as humans who think women and children shouldn't be annihilated, are revenge should be sought against monster rapists are debunked with the mangaka's signature verbosity.
And it isn't just the characters. It gets unbearably awful when the author starts taking volume extras to preach directly to the readers about how women just have to submit to men then they will be free. Really paints the MC's whole "gonna be the monster girl harem king" thing in a different light.
Can't just have a manga about building a harem of monster girls by introducing technology, could we?
Reviewer’s Rating: 1
What did you think of this review?
Nice
0
Love it
0
Funny
0
Confusing
0
Well-written
0
Creative
0Show all
