Forum SettingsEpisode Information
Forums
New
Jul 22, 2017 9:20 PM
#1

Offline
Jan 2008
258
The art is lazily drawn, lack of detail, lazy backgrounds, unimpressive effects and lack of motion. It looks like a badly drawn flash animation back when flash was still owned by Macromedia.
yvancJul 22, 2017 9:24 PM
Jul 22, 2017 9:38 PM
#2
Offline
Jul 2018
562355
I mean it's more of the worst production I've seen this season and for me this looks plain as shit.

From what I got from a friend of mine, production is ALREADY a mess based on the credits for the first episode.

removed-userJul 22, 2017 10:23 PM
Jul 22, 2017 10:08 PM
#3

Offline
Oct 2015
22
I didn't really have much of an issue with the art style, it looked different and it was one of the things that initially had me intrigued when seeing the PVs, however the animation really sucked, the fight scenes were slow, dull and frustrating to watch. The sound and ED were nice though, so thats a thing.
Jul 22, 2017 10:12 PM
#4

Offline
Mar 2016
177
Im cool with the comicbook artsyle but the animation is not very smooth.
Jul 22, 2017 10:19 PM
#5

Offline
Sep 2014
2794
Studio Deen should be praised for making another shitty animated show that is actually worse than whatever Toei produces. A new era has begun.
.
Jul 22, 2017 10:23 PM
#6
Offline
Jul 2018
562355
Elegade said:
Studio Deen should be praised for making another shitty animated show that is actually worse than whatever Toei produces. A new era has begun.

>Another shitty animated show

I'm sorry if this comes off as, rather off but... don't know, KonoSuba and other shows they made were good.

And for fucks sake people blaming DEEN for everything just like with most studios is rather absurd... I am kind of getting tired of it but I'd digress.
Jul 22, 2017 11:08 PM
#7
Offline
Jan 2016
976
It's atrocious. I never thought this anime could have that bad of an animation.


SoundsOfTheWild3 said:
Im cool with the comicbook artsyle but the animation is not very smooth.

I do not mind too, but some scenes/backgrounds are awful. It could have great backgrounds with the comic book art style, instead they decided to make awful backgrounds with comic book art style.


Symphyon said:
From what I got from a friend of mine, production is ALREADY a mess based on the credits for the first episode.


Really? Could you elaborate?
Jul 22, 2017 11:09 PM
#8

Online
Jan 2009
102681
im fine with the animation since its trying to copy the american comic book look anyway

what i do not like is the very boring and slow story telling/pacing so thats why i dropped it

the director of this show is known for his boring and slow story telling/pacing too anyway with the likes of Mushishi and Aku no Hana so i should have expected that
Jul 22, 2017 11:16 PM
#9
Offline
Jul 2018
562355
TheServant said:
It's atrocious. I never thought this anime could have that bad of an animation.


SoundsOfTheWild3 said:
Im cool with the comicbook artsyle but the animation is not very smooth.

I do not mind too, but some scenes/backgrounds are awful. It could have great backgrounds with the comic book art style, instead they decided to make awful backgrounds with comic book art style.


Symphyon said:
From what I got from a friend of mine, production is ALREADY a mess based on the credits for the first episode.


Really? Could you elaborate?

Well from what I got (I might be wrong mind you) is that the episode had at least 4 AD (Animation Directors), which while is a normal/standard number its still rather worrying. Usually in production it would mean a mess if there's at least more than 7 AD working in an episode.

Having a lot of Animation Directors means either off model characters or inconsistent production when it comes to animation towards the artstyle, it also means that it's probably a sign that the staff is going on a struggle too, but all depends on the staff members in question.

The few little times this works is with Katsugeki/Touken Ranbu since there's 8 AD each focusing on their respective characters and keeping the consistency by fixing their own characters' frames etc. So it doesn't become as annoying or frustrating compared to the prior (this is also from what I've gathered, and this is more of a practice too iirc).

I might be uninformed but since I got a bit of information in regards to this because of my friend (who is also focusing on Sakuga and animation) it might be an possibility as well that it might get worse over time.

j0x said:
im fine with the animation since its trying to copy the american comic book look anyway

what i do not like is the very boring and slow story telling/pacing so thats why i dropped it

the director of this show is known for his boring and slow story telling/pacing too anyway with the likes of Mushishi and Aku no Hana so i should have expected that

Haven't seen Aku no Hana but I feel like the director should work on something that is more to his specialty too. This doesn't work either as well for him as a director. I'm not even the biggest fan of his end and it just feels completely off-putting.
removed-userJul 22, 2017 11:20 PM
Jul 22, 2017 11:21 PM

Offline
Sep 2014
2794
Symphyon said:
Elegade said:
Studio Deen should be praised for making another shitty animated show that is actually worse than whatever Toei produces. A new era has begun.

>Another shitty animated show

I'm sorry if this comes off as, rather off but... don't know, KonoSuba and other shows they made were good.

And for fucks sake people blaming DEEN for everything just like with most studios is rather absurd... I am kind of getting tired of it but I'd digress.


I misworded my first point, Deen making another show that has shit animation is what I meant, and Deen deserves the shit they've been getting since they can't seem to improve their visuals. The best looking show I've seen them make is Sakura Trick, but even that is sub-par.
.
Jul 22, 2017 11:24 PM

Online
Jan 2009
102681
@Symphyon

Aku no Hana has a different animation style called rotoscoping (basically tracing/drawing over a live action footage or 3DCG but in this case they draw over live actors movements), this director likes to make unique animation style thats for sure but he should work on his story pacing lol
Jul 22, 2017 11:25 PM
Offline
Jul 2018
562355
Elegade said:
Symphyon said:

>Another shitty animated show

I'm sorry if this comes off as, rather off but... don't know, KonoSuba and other shows they made were good.

And for fucks sake people blaming DEEN for everything just like with most studios is rather absurd... I am kind of getting tired of it but I'd digress.


I misworded my first point, Deen making another show that has shit animation is what I meant, and Deen deserves the shit they've been getting since they can't seem to improve their visuals. The best looking show I've seen them make is Sakura Trick, but even that is sub-par.


I mean from what I got weren't they really using that as their usual quirk in their favor in a way? Though all depends on the show but for an action-based series... it doesn't work much.

For me while I don't like the series at all it has to be Shouwa (due to its artistic presentation despite me thinking that its quite lackluster, I have to admit some of its choices are pretty neat). But that applies to the shows I've seen as well from their end.

Not trying to sound like I'm defending them because I even dislike some stuff they made but it comes off as weird when you worded it like that.
Jul 22, 2017 11:27 PM
Offline
Jul 2018
562355
j0x said:
@Symphyon

Aku no Hana has a different animation style called rotoscoping (basically tracing/drawing over a live action footage or 3DCG but in this case they draw over live actors movements), this director likes to make unique animation style thats for sure but he should work on his story pacing lol

Yeah I admit that he's unique in that regard which I give points at that (I have to check that show out myself but we'll see), but yeah he has to work a lot on the pacing and story because in those regards he falls off very flat to me as well.
Jul 22, 2017 11:35 PM
Offline
Jan 2016
976
Symphyon said:
Well from what I got (I might be wrong mind you) is that the episode had at least 4 AD (Animation Directors), which while is a normal/standard number its still rather worrying. Usually in production it would mean a mess if there's at least more than 7 AD working in an episode.

Having a lot of Animation Directors means either off model characters or inconsistent production when it comes to animation towards the artstyle, it also means that it's probably a sign that the staff is going on a struggle too, but all depends on the staff members in question.

The few little times this works is with Katsugeki/Touken Ranbu since there's 8 AD each focusing on their respective characters and keeping the consistency by fixing their own characters' frames etc. So it doesn't become as annoying or frustrating compared to the prior (this is also from what I've gathered, and this is more of a practice too iirc).

I might be uninformed but since I got a bit of information in regards to this because of my friend (who is also focusing on Sakuga and animation) it might be an possibility as well that it might get worse over time.

I see. That does not sound good. Thank you for the explanation.
Jul 22, 2017 11:42 PM
Offline
Jul 2018
562355
TheServant said:
Symphyon said:
Well from what I got (I might be wrong mind you) is that the episode had at least 4 AD (Animation Directors), which while is a normal/standard number its still rather worrying. Usually in production it would mean a mess if there's at least more than 7 AD working in an episode.

Having a lot of Animation Directors means either off model characters or inconsistent production when it comes to animation towards the artstyle, it also means that it's probably a sign that the staff is going on a struggle too, but all depends on the staff members in question.

The few little times this works is with Katsugeki/Touken Ranbu since there's 8 AD each focusing on their respective characters and keeping the consistency by fixing their own characters' frames etc. So it doesn't become as annoying or frustrating compared to the prior (this is also from what I've gathered, and this is more of a practice too iirc).

I might be uninformed but since I got a bit of information in regards to this because of my friend (who is also focusing on Sakuga and animation) it might be an possibility as well that it might get worse over time.

I see. That does not sound good. Thank you for the explanation.

Well I'm happy to help, but yeah this doesn't look good at all when you think about it.

And about this bit I gave you there's a lot of directions this could take and different circumstances, and well having a lot of ADs doesn't really mean a bad thing but it gives a higher chance of the effects happening, if that makes sense. And this is just bits of what I got and make a possible conclusion to it, it might happen? it might not? who knows. It's too early to judge but will see how that goes.
Jul 23, 2017 12:03 AM

Offline
Apr 2017
13
i personally dont like how they punch, it feels week and boring.
Jul 23, 2017 12:07 AM
Offline
Oct 2009
12
I feel like you could easily re-edit this show and reduce the run-time by 5-10 minutes, just by fixing the combat scenes. It might actually be watchable then too...
Jul 23, 2017 12:12 AM

Offline
Oct 2008
4667
j0x said:
im fine with the animation since its trying to copy the american comic book look anyway

what i do not like is the very boring and slow story telling/pacing so thats why i dropped it

the director of this show is known for his boring and slow story telling/pacing too anyway with the likes of Mushishi and Aku no Hana so i should have expected that

the director isn't known for being boring (that's just your personal take on it) nor is he known for slow storytelling. What he's known for is being an auteur who almost exclusively does adaptations and does them incredibly well. He's a master stylist and once again with this he's made something stylistically unique. Whether or not the visuals are good is a matter of taste - I happen to like them. There are some really amazing shots. The animation is pretty clunky for sure but I didn't find it too offputting.

I don't really see how the pacing is slow. It's not hyperkinetic craziness like Trigger's stuff, but that's a good thing... this is doing its own thing.

Oh and the director made Detroit Metal City, one of the most frenetic shows ever made. So there.
Jul 23, 2017 12:32 AM

Offline
Oct 2007
396
Simple designs can, and do work if there's enough movement and action. Slow pacing can, and does work if there's enough details to appreciate in character's expressions and backgrounds. This show is the worst of both worlds.

It feels like it wastes my time. It feels like I was forced to watch a series of incredibly boring static pictures.
Jul 23, 2017 12:59 AM
Offline
Jan 2016
30
watch it at 2x speed, framerate/animation became smooth, it's finally watchable.
Jul 23, 2017 1:06 AM

Offline
Oct 2007
396
jin_raito said:
watch it at 2x speed, framerate/animation became smooth, it's finally watchable.

And you won't miss any important lines because none are.
Jul 23, 2017 1:14 AM

Offline
Nov 2014
368
Possibly the worst thing I have tried to watch in modern times and I got through several episodes of Gundam Reconshit and all of Dragonlance.
Jul 23, 2017 1:32 AM

Offline
Feb 2016
1212
Maybe the animation isn't that good but I don't want to judge the whole Anime just because of how it looks. The artstyle looks unique and I like unique artstyles.


I will not believe that everything is controlled by fate.

ll X ll
Jul 23, 2017 6:14 AM

Offline
Jul 2010
161
You little kids have never seen cel shading or what ? This is way better than those crappy flat 3DCG with drooling polygons we've been served recently.
Jul 23, 2017 6:45 AM

Offline
Apr 2016
4864
You mean it has worse animation than Hand Shakers, Super Kid, and Chaos Dragon?!
Jul 23, 2017 7:32 AM

Offline
Jan 2017
1561
CodeBlazeFate said:
You mean it has worse animation than Hand Shakers, Super Kid, and Chaos Dragon?!
the animation of hand shaker is good lol the camera movement isn't tho
Jul 23, 2017 8:32 AM

Offline
Apr 2016
4864
kikyo1hinamora said:
CodeBlazeFate said:
You mean it has worse animation than Hand Shakers, Super Kid, and Chaos Dragon?!
the animation of hand shaker is good lol the camera movement isn't tho
The animation is terrible, especially in fight scenes. The characters constantly skip frames, almost every episode has a decent amount of reused animation (which is unacceptable by today's standards), the frame rate often dips to absurdly low degrees, and the characters don't even feel like they have contact with anything other than each other. Plus, the CGI is abysmal. The character art looks nice, but the actual animation is terrible.
Jul 23, 2017 9:48 AM
Offline
Oct 2014
15
-Ayu said:
Maybe the animation isn't that good but I don't want to judge the whole Anime just because of how it looks. The artstyle looks unique and I like unique artstyles.
I agree, also this was made it intentionally , obviously Deen can do it better, but they choice this style and kind of animation because of the feeling of overall story. The original creator is Stan Lee, go figure out.

Jul 23, 2017 10:50 AM

Offline
May 2010
8394
I just wish people would learn what they should actually be criticizing. The actual animation quality was good. The art direction is fairly good. The problem is the scenes themselves are drawn out painfully, along with a few very questionable decisions or perhaps lazily done scenes of minor characters with very little detail.

Like someone else said already, if you watch it at 2x, the flow is a lot better. This attests to that the actual final animation is of good quality, but for some reason they decided they had to draw it out, I guess to pad 22 minutes or something.

Does that make it acceptable? That's up to you.

Second of all, Stan Lee isn't an animation studio, chill guys. He is a collaborator, he didn't call all the shots regarding the animation.
Jul 23, 2017 3:08 PM
Offline
Jan 2015
50
Srsly, i don't mind the artstyle(actually like it even though some scenes looks dull) but punching and animation is rly lacking, but now when i played it 2x the speed everything looks natural and there is weight to the punches, so weird. If they had cut the run time and kept animation fluid as it is at 2x i think it would be tolerable to watch.
Jul 23, 2017 3:43 PM

Offline
Nov 2013
20921
I like the style even if the animation could have been more fluid.

But I've seen worse. Actually that isn't close to the worst.
You're a louse, Roger Smith. - R. Dorothy Wayneright
This is my fight! No Senpai, this is our fight! - Kojou Akatsuki & Yukina Himeragi
Jul 23, 2017 4:15 PM

Offline
May 2010
8394
private_eye said:
Srsly, i don't mind the artstyle(actually like it even though some scenes looks dull) but punching and animation is rly lacking, but now when i played it 2x the speed everything looks natural and there is weight to the punches, so weird. If they had cut the run time and kept animation fluid as it is at 2x i think it would be tolerable to watch.
If you're still left wondering why the speed has caused such a big difference in your perception, then it might do some good to listen to the lead animator for Skullgirls talk about 2D animation and the perception of it.

Although it's centered around video games, it still applies to any sort of 2D animation.
Jul 23, 2017 5:06 PM

Offline
Mar 2016
1072
LMAO... There is a difference between shit animation and art style!
Worst animation is when you choose a type of animation but fail on apllying it to the show.
Art style refers to the choosen art to your anime adaptation! And the art choosen for this anime is great for where I see it. Except from the fight scenes where the fight is not that big of a deal, the rest is just great LMAO...

This was a co-production with Stan Lee... Of course it would have a cartoonish style!
You shuld do your homework before watch any anime!
azertz99Jul 23, 2017 5:13 PM
Jul 23, 2017 6:12 PM

Offline
Jul 2017
111
azertyY said:
LMAO... There is a difference between shit animation and art style!
Worst animation is when you choose a type of animation but fail on apllying it to the show.
Art style refers to the choosen art to your anime adaptation! And the art choosen for this anime is great for where I see it. Except from the fight scenes where the fight is not that big of a deal, the rest is just great LMAO...

This was a co-production with Stan Lee... Of course it would have a cartoonish style!
You shuld do your homework before watch any anime!


Dude, they will NEVER understand what you're saying haha even tho it should be common sense.
Jul 24, 2017 3:18 PM

Offline
Feb 2015
2020
Studio Derp strikes again. Even 1990's spiderman looked better that this shit. I mean I love Konosuba but lets not pretend the animation was good. Deen do their reputation no help
Jul 24, 2017 8:17 PM
Offline
Mar 2009
348
I never actually wished for negative numbers in the review scores, until now.

I actively wish to get a refund for my time.

Jul 24, 2017 9:23 PM

Online
Jan 2009
102681
azertyY said:
LMAO... There is a difference between shit animation and art style!


art style is part of animation dude since animation is moving art/drawings anyway, the less hard to draw something the better the movement should be but in this case its not lol

still my only complain is how boring and slow pace the story telling is
Jul 29, 2017 11:34 PM

Offline
Mar 2009
8123
All this hate for DEEN. I'm ashamed, MAL.
Jul 31, 2017 12:23 AM

Offline
Sep 2009
1214
The problem is the show is being done by a Japanese studio trying to imitate an American comic book art style but still keeping all the bad habits associated with Anime; too many still frames, no actual life drawing input, etc.

Huge lack of oversight either from Stan Lee's side or from oversees for letting Studio Deen handle this project. I mean common, Studio Deen? Might as well flip a coin.

Aug 6, 2017 11:32 PM

Offline
Feb 2008
4958
Aku no Hana all over again. All anime should look generic it seems.

"Your sight, my delight. Will you marry me?"
Aug 7, 2017 12:18 AM

Offline
Nov 2009
1409
I see some people just can't get it through their heads there's this thing called intentional stylizing. Every time a show uses animation different from the generic moeblob style we see these kinds of threads... Last time it was for Mob Psycho 100, I think? Well, I guess some people just never want to learn.
ったく、嫌な世の中だよ。
Aug 7, 2017 12:36 AM

Offline
Dec 2015
6485
LordLagann said:
The problem is the show is being done by a Japanese studio trying to imitate an American comic book art style but still keeping all the bad habits associated with Anime; too many still frames, no actual life drawing input, etc.


I have read 60s and 70s US superheroes publications and most of them had very little dynamism, despite having lots of action scenes. This lack of movement sounds actually like a good imitation.

@LordLagann Understood.
Rei_IIIAug 7, 2017 11:29 AM
Aug 7, 2017 10:53 AM

Offline
Sep 2009
1214
Rei366 said:
LordLagann said:
The problem is the show is being done by a Japanese studio trying to imitate an American comic book art style but still keeping all the bad habits associated with Anime; too many still frames, no actual life drawing input, etc.


I have read 60s and 70s US superheroes publications and most of them had very little dynamism, despite having lots of action scenes. This lack of movement sounds actually like a good imitation.


Except we're not talking about still images in a comic book and for the sake of argument even if we were it's still an animated television series. Unless you purposely were trying to make look like a motion graphic novel you need to take liberties into adapting it for the sake of the show. There are plenty of adaptions, both comics and manga, that make a point to go above and beyond whats written and show on the source material simply because it's whats needed to make a good adaption.

Honestly I'm not sure where it went wrong here. Maybe it's Studio Deen for being so bureaucratic when it comes to management, maybe it's the association with Marvel and their style lack luster cartoon series, or Stan Lee simply biting off more than he can chew at his age. At any rate something is wrong and it can be seen clear as day.
Aug 7, 2017 11:39 AM
Review Moderator
Offline
Jan 2017
438
Isn't the best animation but isn't the worst. For example, episode 3 was developed in a right way and was smooth. It improved the speed from the last two episodes. They are trying to mix old comic ideas and old comic animation with a palette from that era, for the smooth part, the comics (50 - 80s) had gaps and pauses (similar to what we are seeing). New comics, 90 - 2010 changed that idea and are more smooth.

If the production were that BAD, ¿do you think that Stan Lee will give his voice for the advance titles or be a part of the production? Also, he is one of the creators.

Finally, if you can't stand the animation is better to stop watching the show. We can't compare this animation with any other because the technique used is very different (American Comic in Motion), and honestly, they are doing it in acceptable way.






Aug 9, 2017 6:10 AM
Offline
Sep 2015
76
ZetaZaku said:
Unique =good

I cant believe you are justifying this monstrosity.
Aug 9, 2017 7:01 AM

Offline
Feb 2008
4958
swn said:
ZetaZaku said:
Unique =good

I cant believe you are justifying this monstrosity.

Who are you quoting?

"Your sight, my delight. Will you marry me?"
Aug 9, 2017 8:38 PM

Offline
Jun 2013
1245
Crashmatt said:
I mean I love Konosuba but lets not pretend the animation was good

No one's pretending, it's called having a different taste. Konosuba's animation is supposed to be funny and derpy and it succeeds in that. It fits well for such a silly and wacky a show. I mean, it literally has breasts flapping around all over the place.


Deen did Rakugo Shinjuu; I think that's a good reminder that studio doesn't automatically determine quality.
LeeTailorAug 9, 2017 8:45 PM
Aug 10, 2017 1:53 PM

Offline
Jul 2010
8334
ZetaZaku said:
Aku no Hana all over again. All anime should look generic it seems.

Seems that way, I just wonder how the fuck they could just look at these anime and then go "this is fine". The Reflection animation doesn't even look like the final product they put out lol

More topics from this board

Poll: » The Reflection Episode 6 Discussion

Stark700 - Aug 26, 2017

16 by eblf2013 »»
Dec 21, 2024 8:21 PM

Poll: » The Reflection Episode 1 Discussion ( 1 2 3 4 )

Stark700 - Jul 22, 2017

160 by eblf2013 »»
Dec 11, 2024 10:10 PM

Poll: » The Reflection Episode 8 Discussion

Stark700 - Sep 9, 2017

10 by theferrell »»
Jan 12, 2023 11:49 AM

» Any news of second season?

Keidohanna - Sep 20, 2019

2 by Daniel_Naumov »»
Dec 14, 2019 4:31 AM

Poll: » The Reflection Episode 2 Discussion ( 1 2 )

Stark700 - Jul 29, 2017

53 by BikeGoneRampant »»
Jul 18, 2019 9:33 AM
It’s time to ditch the text file.
Keep track of your anime easily by creating your own list.
Sign Up Login