| This thread is for the posting of evidence on behalf of the DEFENDANT (Pokemon/Pokemon Creators) in case MAL-1001, Geriatrics v. Pokemon. NO other types of posts are permitted. DO NOT directly quote or cite other posts or make responses to eachother, especially if it is a post from the opposing evidence thread.) Post in this thread ONLY if you believe that the creators of Pokemon DO age their characters correctly or do NOT deserve punishment -Please post only once (if you must add additional information, please edit your post) -Please make sure any photographic/uploaded evidence is properly linked and working -Again, DO NOT QUOTE from other posters. Make an original post presenting your own evidence or testimony. ~EVIDENCE SUBMISSIONS WILL BE ALLOWED UNTIL 12 MIDNIGHT (EST/-5 GMT) THURSDAY, JUNE 10. NO EDITS OR ADDITIONAL POSTS AFTER THAT~ Opening Statement of the Petition: This show is charged with not aging the characters in 10 years and basically resetting the show every new season after Johto (but including it on how Pikachu seams to be reborn every time). |
Mr_PandaJun 6, 2010 8:43 PM
| ~ Mr. Panda // Twitter: @ManlyBats ~ The Anime Historian ~ Fleet Admiral, Manly Battleships® Ask Mr. Panda Thread Follow Mr. Panda's VCR of DOOM! review series here. Now on YouTube! |
| They aged. They're roughly around 12 by now. |
More topics from this board
» MAL-1001 Magistrate DecissionMr_Panda - Jun 15, 2010 |
0 |
by Mr_Panda
»»
Jun 15, 2010 6:35 AM |
|
» MAL-1001 EVIDENCE-PLAINTIFFMr_Panda - Jun 2, 2010 |
2 |
by imperlast
»»
Jun 14, 2010 12:25 AM |
|
Sticky: » Parliament PetitionsMr_Panda - May 29, 2010 |
1 |
by Mr_Panda
»»
Jun 2, 2010 11:24 PM |
|
Sticky: » Anime Parliament CASE LAWMr_Panda - May 29, 2010 |
0 |
by Mr_Panda
»»
May 29, 2010 3:48 AM |
|
Sticky: » Anime Parliament BYLAWSMr_Panda - May 29, 2010 |
0 |
by Mr_Panda
»»
May 29, 2010 3:27 AM |