Tokyo Revengers
Available on Manga Store
New
Nov 13, 2023 8:59 PM
#51
INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: lovealyssafaith said: INTJ_Ren said: lovealyssafaith said: INTJ_Ren said: lovealyssafaith said: INTJ_Ren said: lovealyssafaith said: INTJ_Ren said: You could’ve easily found the answer yourself without being spoiled. It’s not gonna hurt the website or app if you make a useless thread but damn you lazy π Lmao ok? ππ Do better idk π€· no thanks π€·πΌβοΈ You probably should. It’s 2023 like i said no thanks π€·πΌβοΈπ Like I said you should π nahππππππ I hate when that happens but β¬οΈ Get a room already. You two cant stop talking to each other… Well…..I mean ……when I initially repliedβ¬οΈ Thats interesting. How could you not know it would get this far if you participated in continuing it? Some people really just like talking I guess, I only responded accordingly Right, some people… Some peoole just enjoy a good casual convo π I got it the first time π And I was just agreeing with you π I didnt say anything about a “good casual convo”, so im not sure who youre agreeing with π I got that the first time, a good casual convo is what I said because a I was agreeing with you that some people just like talking. Except I never said some people just like talking, you did. Yeah but you said right some people which allowed me to agree with you and mention that someone just enjoy a good casual convo Except when I said “right some people”, I was already reasserting your statement. So you were really just agreeing with yourself, not me. That could go both ways so there really isn’t a one way with that comment especially when it doesn’t directly reassert π Nope, no it cant. You said something and I responding with a word of agreement: “right”. Yes because your interpretation isn’t the only one so that’s just causal convo doing its thing there buddy. Yes, and there are still rules to a casual convo. It’s simple really: I made no assertion, therefore, it was impossible for you to agree with anything I had said. You didn’t need to make an assertion you just said something and I agreed to it, be more direct in what you’re trying to say cause yes there are rules to casual convo. If you say something that can be interpreted different or have double meanings then your intention is null and void. Yes, but you are agreeing with me agreeing to a statement that you made. Thats not a convo anymore, and this is why there are rules to a convo. I also got that the first time, there’s no confusion here. I said something you gave a response and I agreed with said response with my own, that’s a convo, don’t know how else to spell it for ya π Except you dont get it. If I already agreed with you then why are you agreeing with me agreeing with you? How do you not understand how this makes no sense at all? π Oh but you see I do get it, a lot more than you think, you see, when I see we’re on the same page I had one more response and that was to agree with you agree with me, little did I know you weren’t finished and wanted to keep going by not asking the appropriate questions or for me to rephrase, now we’re here because one of us has to clear things up, I mean I don’t have to but aye I’m nice. If this doesn’t make sense then why keep going, if you haven’t figured it out yet and I’m not doing a good enough job at clearing up any misunderstandings then maybe the problem is you? I get what’s going on why don’t you? Exactly, thank you for admitting it. You were just talking for talkings sake. Only took like 50 replies lol. Oh and by the way, normal convos don’t usually include one long run-on sentence. Word for word did I say I anything about admitting anything or is that an accusation you’re using as a scapegoat? I men’s I was talking just because you kept ing hitting the quote button so I assumed you wanted to keep this up, making a lot of assumptions are we? π€£ a conversation is a conversation, normal complex, are a means to an end. “I was talking just because you kept hitting the quote button”. Lmao you just played yourself. If thats not admitting it then i don’t know what is. π€£ Good try though, you kept it up a long time. Well it’s not, you accused me of something I wasn’t doing, and I brought you more close to the actual answer if anything, so please elaborate where did I say anything about admitting anything word for word? It was a good try tho I’ll give you that π you hit the quote button so clearly you want to talk to me, I’m not replying because I genuinely want to. Responding just because I am talking to you is the exact definition of talking just for talkings sake. I mean you keep digging yourself a hole, ren. If you don’t want to talk to me and you continue to talk to me, then you are talking for talkings sake. And if that really were true and you didn’t want to respond at all, then you simply wouldn’t. Yes, I hit the quote button no one is disputing that, ren. π If you still don’t understand the term “talking for talkings sake” then I’m afraid I can’t help you anymore. See you’re doing it again. I’m not talking for the sake of talking, believe me it’s a signature phrase I use often. (especially on MaL) I guess you can’t help me nor do I wish to help you, I gave you everything I got, I don’t know what else you want from me, we discuss things on forums and it takes two to tango so unless the discussion is over then you’re just gonna keep dragging this on till we have 100 replies in this thread, truth be told I was done after the first 3 but I guess you like talking to me. Reality is the only one who’s been talking for the sake of talking is you, you could’ve chose to not hit quote yet here we are, normally I’d say so haha you played yourself but this ain’t one of those moments. I think you genuinely wanted to talk so I kept it up as long as you hit quote, just tryna be nice, and spare some of my time on someone who may or may not need it. I never wanted anything from you, I’m just telling you how it is and you don’t want to accept it. If you were done after the third reply then you would have stopped. Instead, you are talking for the sake of talking. You claim that you are talking just because you think I need someone to talk to. That is talking for the sake of talking. If anyone needs someone to talk to, it’s the introvert lol. Here’s the deal Ren, I actually want to talk to you and you have indicated that you do not want to talk to me, and thats OK. You continue to blame me for pressing the quote button when you have just as much power as me. This is a lesson for all future interactions, not just this one, Ren. Like you said you had just as much power as me yet kept going so there was no point in you saying that, you quoted me which means you wanted a reply, that’s not talking for the sake of talking, you clearly want something from me which I can’t really give you since this isn’t even anime related. You’re an introvert? Not name calling, cause I’m confused as to who you’re referring to cause I’m an extrovert as you see by my inconsistent replies π I got that the entirety of this interaction, but again I don’t really want to talk to you but you keep quoting me, imma keep quoting you back and if you think I was talking for the sake of talking then, I wasn’t but now I am since I clearly told you I was done and you keep quoting me, if you taught a lesson it fell on deaf ears or I can’t see it cause where’s the lesson π€¨ Yes, I said you have just as much power as me, but you missed the part where I actually want to talk to you. YOU dont. Like I said, I was only trying to help you understand. But like a wise man once said, “You cant get someone to understand something that they dont want to understand”. Oh well. I think we both know youre not the extrovert. It’s in your username lmao. Not that bright I guess. π Again, if you don’t want to talk to me, you don’t have to. I do though, so I will continue to. Not that hard of a concept, but like you said, “deaf ears”. You don’t listen, Ren. I don’t think I missed anything. As you didn’t want anything from me, I didn’t want anything from you, all you tried to do was say why you’re right and I’m wrong over the tiniest thing that may or may not even be all that much of a big deal to the average Joe, where this help is, well that’s beyond me. I share the same username as my girlfriend I’m more of a EFNJ, try again. We’re still here cause you don’t listen there buddy, I gave you all the info as to why what I said made sense and cleared up the misunderstanding you had which led to the 59 replies you were going on about, we’re still here cause you want to talk to me as you said yourself. It’s exactly as I said, “deaf ears”, I bet you already have a reply already ready since you don’t listen. Wrong again, you never cleared anything up. There’s no way you can explain a triple agreement in a two way conversation. Haha, sorry Ren, it’s just not a thing in a normal conversation. A more accurate response would have been, “my bad dude, I meant to add a more logical response to the conversation.” But hey, like you said, “deaf ears”. Do better next time, Ren. Oh and why would you share a MAL account with your girl? Im not really surprised cause you’re not that bright but damn. Unless you’re watching everything together then whats the point? Lol Wrong again buddy. Normal and complex or whatever word you want to use as a place holder, it’s a means to an end. You’re telling what I can’t do when I just did it, kinda defeats the point there buddyπ there hasn’t been a single logical thing about this interaction so I don’t think I need to do better unless you want to actually throw down some college level responses. Wow the pot calling the kettle black, I think I understand the problem now. You can’t read, and what you’ve been doing this entire time is reading but you’re not reading what you want to hear you’re reading the next thing to counter which I turn tells me you’re not even trying to talk to me but more or less bother me because I share a name, not the account smart one. Again try again. Or don’t cause really that’d be the most logical thing you can do since you wanna talk logic π Just like I said, “those who dont want to learn, cant”. Sad honestly, hopefully you change your ways one day, Ren! Until then, good luck with your triple agreements in life. Everyone will think you are unable to uphold a real conversation. Can’t say I didn’t try lol. Ha, genuinely wasn’t trying to bother you. I didn’t think it was possible to share a username with someone else, as in all other social media platforms this is not possible. Try again at what? I haven’t been trying, I’ve been doing. Apparently, I’ve been making you miserable every time I respond lol. |
Nov 13, 2023 9:24 PM
#52
Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: lovealyssafaith said: INTJ_Ren said: lovealyssafaith said: INTJ_Ren said: lovealyssafaith said: INTJ_Ren said: lovealyssafaith said: INTJ_Ren said: You could’ve easily found the answer yourself without being spoiled. It’s not gonna hurt the website or app if you make a useless thread but damn you lazy π Lmao ok? ππ Do better idk π€· no thanks π€·πΌβοΈ You probably should. It’s 2023 like i said no thanks π€·πΌβοΈπ Like I said you should π nahππππππ I hate when that happens but β¬οΈ Get a room already. You two cant stop talking to each other… Well…..I mean ……when I initially repliedβ¬οΈ Thats interesting. How could you not know it would get this far if you participated in continuing it? Some people really just like talking I guess, I only responded accordingly Right, some people… Some peoole just enjoy a good casual convo π I got it the first time π And I was just agreeing with you π I didnt say anything about a “good casual convo”, so im not sure who youre agreeing with π I got that the first time, a good casual convo is what I said because a I was agreeing with you that some people just like talking. Except I never said some people just like talking, you did. Yeah but you said right some people which allowed me to agree with you and mention that someone just enjoy a good casual convo Except when I said “right some people”, I was already reasserting your statement. So you were really just agreeing with yourself, not me. That could go both ways so there really isn’t a one way with that comment especially when it doesn’t directly reassert π Nope, no it cant. You said something and I responding with a word of agreement: “right”. Yes because your interpretation isn’t the only one so that’s just causal convo doing its thing there buddy. Yes, and there are still rules to a casual convo. It’s simple really: I made no assertion, therefore, it was impossible for you to agree with anything I had said. You didn’t need to make an assertion you just said something and I agreed to it, be more direct in what you’re trying to say cause yes there are rules to casual convo. If you say something that can be interpreted different or have double meanings then your intention is null and void. Yes, but you are agreeing with me agreeing to a statement that you made. Thats not a convo anymore, and this is why there are rules to a convo. I also got that the first time, there’s no confusion here. I said something you gave a response and I agreed with said response with my own, that’s a convo, don’t know how else to spell it for ya π Except you dont get it. If I already agreed with you then why are you agreeing with me agreeing with you? How do you not understand how this makes no sense at all? π Oh but you see I do get it, a lot more than you think, you see, when I see we’re on the same page I had one more response and that was to agree with you agree with me, little did I know you weren’t finished and wanted to keep going by not asking the appropriate questions or for me to rephrase, now we’re here because one of us has to clear things up, I mean I don’t have to but aye I’m nice. If this doesn’t make sense then why keep going, if you haven’t figured it out yet and I’m not doing a good enough job at clearing up any misunderstandings then maybe the problem is you? I get what’s going on why don’t you? Exactly, thank you for admitting it. You were just talking for talkings sake. Only took like 50 replies lol. Oh and by the way, normal convos don’t usually include one long run-on sentence. Word for word did I say I anything about admitting anything or is that an accusation you’re using as a scapegoat? I men’s I was talking just because you kept ing hitting the quote button so I assumed you wanted to keep this up, making a lot of assumptions are we? π€£ a conversation is a conversation, normal complex, are a means to an end. “I was talking just because you kept hitting the quote button”. Lmao you just played yourself. If thats not admitting it then i don’t know what is. π€£ Good try though, you kept it up a long time. Well it’s not, you accused me of something I wasn’t doing, and I brought you more close to the actual answer if anything, so please elaborate where did I say anything about admitting anything word for word? It was a good try tho I’ll give you that π you hit the quote button so clearly you want to talk to me, I’m not replying because I genuinely want to. Responding just because I am talking to you is the exact definition of talking just for talkings sake. I mean you keep digging yourself a hole, ren. If you don’t want to talk to me and you continue to talk to me, then you are talking for talkings sake. And if that really were true and you didn’t want to respond at all, then you simply wouldn’t. Yes, I hit the quote button no one is disputing that, ren. π If you still don’t understand the term “talking for talkings sake” then I’m afraid I can’t help you anymore. See you’re doing it again. I’m not talking for the sake of talking, believe me it’s a signature phrase I use often. (especially on MaL) I guess you can’t help me nor do I wish to help you, I gave you everything I got, I don’t know what else you want from me, we discuss things on forums and it takes two to tango so unless the discussion is over then you’re just gonna keep dragging this on till we have 100 replies in this thread, truth be told I was done after the first 3 but I guess you like talking to me. Reality is the only one who’s been talking for the sake of talking is you, you could’ve chose to not hit quote yet here we are, normally I’d say so haha you played yourself but this ain’t one of those moments. I think you genuinely wanted to talk so I kept it up as long as you hit quote, just tryna be nice, and spare some of my time on someone who may or may not need it. I never wanted anything from you, I’m just telling you how it is and you don’t want to accept it. If you were done after the third reply then you would have stopped. Instead, you are talking for the sake of talking. You claim that you are talking just because you think I need someone to talk to. That is talking for the sake of talking. If anyone needs someone to talk to, it’s the introvert lol. Here’s the deal Ren, I actually want to talk to you and you have indicated that you do not want to talk to me, and thats OK. You continue to blame me for pressing the quote button when you have just as much power as me. This is a lesson for all future interactions, not just this one, Ren. Like you said you had just as much power as me yet kept going so there was no point in you saying that, you quoted me which means you wanted a reply, that’s not talking for the sake of talking, you clearly want something from me which I can’t really give you since this isn’t even anime related. You’re an introvert? Not name calling, cause I’m confused as to who you’re referring to cause I’m an extrovert as you see by my inconsistent replies π I got that the entirety of this interaction, but again I don’t really want to talk to you but you keep quoting me, imma keep quoting you back and if you think I was talking for the sake of talking then, I wasn’t but now I am since I clearly told you I was done and you keep quoting me, if you taught a lesson it fell on deaf ears or I can’t see it cause where’s the lesson π€¨ Yes, I said you have just as much power as me, but you missed the part where I actually want to talk to you. YOU dont. Like I said, I was only trying to help you understand. But like a wise man once said, “You cant get someone to understand something that they dont want to understand”. Oh well. I think we both know youre not the extrovert. It’s in your username lmao. Not that bright I guess. π Again, if you don’t want to talk to me, you don’t have to. I do though, so I will continue to. Not that hard of a concept, but like you said, “deaf ears”. You don’t listen, Ren. I don’t think I missed anything. As you didn’t want anything from me, I didn’t want anything from you, all you tried to do was say why you’re right and I’m wrong over the tiniest thing that may or may not even be all that much of a big deal to the average Joe, where this help is, well that’s beyond me. I share the same username as my girlfriend I’m more of a EFNJ, try again. We’re still here cause you don’t listen there buddy, I gave you all the info as to why what I said made sense and cleared up the misunderstanding you had which led to the 59 replies you were going on about, we’re still here cause you want to talk to me as you said yourself. It’s exactly as I said, “deaf ears”, I bet you already have a reply already ready since you don’t listen. Wrong again, you never cleared anything up. There’s no way you can explain a triple agreement in a two way conversation. Haha, sorry Ren, it’s just not a thing in a normal conversation. A more accurate response would have been, “my bad dude, I meant to add a more logical response to the conversation.” But hey, like you said, “deaf ears”. Do better next time, Ren. Oh and why would you share a MAL account with your girl? Im not really surprised cause you’re not that bright but damn. Unless you’re watching everything together then whats the point? Lol Wrong again buddy. Normal and complex or whatever word you want to use as a place holder, it’s a means to an end. You’re telling what I can’t do when I just did it, kinda defeats the point there buddyπ there hasn’t been a single logical thing about this interaction so I don’t think I need to do better unless you want to actually throw down some college level responses. Wow the pot calling the kettle black, I think I understand the problem now. You can’t read, and what you’ve been doing this entire time is reading but you’re not reading what you want to hear you’re reading the next thing to counter which I turn tells me you’re not even trying to talk to me but more or less bother me because I share a name, not the account smart one. Again try again. Or don’t cause really that’d be the most logical thing you can do since you wanna talk logic π Just like I said, “those who dont want to learn, cant”. Sad honestly, hopefully you change your ways one day, Ren! Until then, good luck with your triple agreements in life. Everyone will think you are unable to uphold a real conversation. Can’t say I didn’t try lol. Ha, genuinely wasn’t trying to bother you. I didn’t think it was possible to share a username with someone else, as in all other social media platforms this is not possible. Try again at what? I haven’t been trying, I’ve been doing. Apparently, I’ve been making you miserable every time I respond lol. Those with degrees teach properly, unless you are teacher, there’s not much to learn from someone online, especially since I got A’s in English so as much as you’d like to think I can’t hold a conversation the state I live in begs to differ. Speaking of which whether you or anyone thinks I can is irrelevant, lions do not concern themselves with opinions of sheep. You weren’t bothering, I was just informing you of my observation and telling you that my name isn’t something chose without considering the implications. Oh then that makes two of us, I get this all the time but just cause I type essays doesn’t mean I’m trying, I’m a very talkative person and I can’t fit everything I want to say into a single sentence, miserable? Would you say something tedious makes someone miserable because miserable is making a lot of assumptions. |
Nov 13, 2023 9:34 PM
#53
INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: lovealyssafaith said: INTJ_Ren said: lovealyssafaith said: INTJ_Ren said: lovealyssafaith said: INTJ_Ren said: lovealyssafaith said: INTJ_Ren said: You could’ve easily found the answer yourself without being spoiled. It’s not gonna hurt the website or app if you make a useless thread but damn you lazy π Lmao ok? ππ Do better idk π€· no thanks π€·πΌβοΈ You probably should. It’s 2023 like i said no thanks π€·πΌβοΈπ Like I said you should π nahππππππ I hate when that happens but β¬οΈ Get a room already. You two cant stop talking to each other… Well…..I mean ……when I initially repliedβ¬οΈ Thats interesting. How could you not know it would get this far if you participated in continuing it? Some people really just like talking I guess, I only responded accordingly Right, some people… Some peoole just enjoy a good casual convo π I got it the first time π And I was just agreeing with you π I didnt say anything about a “good casual convo”, so im not sure who youre agreeing with π I got that the first time, a good casual convo is what I said because a I was agreeing with you that some people just like talking. Except I never said some people just like talking, you did. Yeah but you said right some people which allowed me to agree with you and mention that someone just enjoy a good casual convo Except when I said “right some people”, I was already reasserting your statement. So you were really just agreeing with yourself, not me. That could go both ways so there really isn’t a one way with that comment especially when it doesn’t directly reassert π Nope, no it cant. You said something and I responding with a word of agreement: “right”. Yes because your interpretation isn’t the only one so that’s just causal convo doing its thing there buddy. Yes, and there are still rules to a casual convo. It’s simple really: I made no assertion, therefore, it was impossible for you to agree with anything I had said. You didn’t need to make an assertion you just said something and I agreed to it, be more direct in what you’re trying to say cause yes there are rules to casual convo. If you say something that can be interpreted different or have double meanings then your intention is null and void. Yes, but you are agreeing with me agreeing to a statement that you made. Thats not a convo anymore, and this is why there are rules to a convo. I also got that the first time, there’s no confusion here. I said something you gave a response and I agreed with said response with my own, that’s a convo, don’t know how else to spell it for ya π Except you dont get it. If I already agreed with you then why are you agreeing with me agreeing with you? How do you not understand how this makes no sense at all? π Oh but you see I do get it, a lot more than you think, you see, when I see we’re on the same page I had one more response and that was to agree with you agree with me, little did I know you weren’t finished and wanted to keep going by not asking the appropriate questions or for me to rephrase, now we’re here because one of us has to clear things up, I mean I don’t have to but aye I’m nice. If this doesn’t make sense then why keep going, if you haven’t figured it out yet and I’m not doing a good enough job at clearing up any misunderstandings then maybe the problem is you? I get what’s going on why don’t you? Exactly, thank you for admitting it. You were just talking for talkings sake. Only took like 50 replies lol. Oh and by the way, normal convos don’t usually include one long run-on sentence. Word for word did I say I anything about admitting anything or is that an accusation you’re using as a scapegoat? I men’s I was talking just because you kept ing hitting the quote button so I assumed you wanted to keep this up, making a lot of assumptions are we? π€£ a conversation is a conversation, normal complex, are a means to an end. “I was talking just because you kept hitting the quote button”. Lmao you just played yourself. If thats not admitting it then i don’t know what is. π€£ Good try though, you kept it up a long time. Well it’s not, you accused me of something I wasn’t doing, and I brought you more close to the actual answer if anything, so please elaborate where did I say anything about admitting anything word for word? It was a good try tho I’ll give you that π you hit the quote button so clearly you want to talk to me, I’m not replying because I genuinely want to. Responding just because I am talking to you is the exact definition of talking just for talkings sake. I mean you keep digging yourself a hole, ren. If you don’t want to talk to me and you continue to talk to me, then you are talking for talkings sake. And if that really were true and you didn’t want to respond at all, then you simply wouldn’t. Yes, I hit the quote button no one is disputing that, ren. π If you still don’t understand the term “talking for talkings sake” then I’m afraid I can’t help you anymore. See you’re doing it again. I’m not talking for the sake of talking, believe me it’s a signature phrase I use often. (especially on MaL) I guess you can’t help me nor do I wish to help you, I gave you everything I got, I don’t know what else you want from me, we discuss things on forums and it takes two to tango so unless the discussion is over then you’re just gonna keep dragging this on till we have 100 replies in this thread, truth be told I was done after the first 3 but I guess you like talking to me. Reality is the only one who’s been talking for the sake of talking is you, you could’ve chose to not hit quote yet here we are, normally I’d say so haha you played yourself but this ain’t one of those moments. I think you genuinely wanted to talk so I kept it up as long as you hit quote, just tryna be nice, and spare some of my time on someone who may or may not need it. I never wanted anything from you, I’m just telling you how it is and you don’t want to accept it. If you were done after the third reply then you would have stopped. Instead, you are talking for the sake of talking. You claim that you are talking just because you think I need someone to talk to. That is talking for the sake of talking. If anyone needs someone to talk to, it’s the introvert lol. Here’s the deal Ren, I actually want to talk to you and you have indicated that you do not want to talk to me, and thats OK. You continue to blame me for pressing the quote button when you have just as much power as me. This is a lesson for all future interactions, not just this one, Ren. Like you said you had just as much power as me yet kept going so there was no point in you saying that, you quoted me which means you wanted a reply, that’s not talking for the sake of talking, you clearly want something from me which I can’t really give you since this isn’t even anime related. You’re an introvert? Not name calling, cause I’m confused as to who you’re referring to cause I’m an extrovert as you see by my inconsistent replies π I got that the entirety of this interaction, but again I don’t really want to talk to you but you keep quoting me, imma keep quoting you back and if you think I was talking for the sake of talking then, I wasn’t but now I am since I clearly told you I was done and you keep quoting me, if you taught a lesson it fell on deaf ears or I can’t see it cause where’s the lesson π€¨ Yes, I said you have just as much power as me, but you missed the part where I actually want to talk to you. YOU dont. Like I said, I was only trying to help you understand. But like a wise man once said, “You cant get someone to understand something that they dont want to understand”. Oh well. I think we both know youre not the extrovert. It’s in your username lmao. Not that bright I guess. π Again, if you don’t want to talk to me, you don’t have to. I do though, so I will continue to. Not that hard of a concept, but like you said, “deaf ears”. You don’t listen, Ren. I don’t think I missed anything. As you didn’t want anything from me, I didn’t want anything from you, all you tried to do was say why you’re right and I’m wrong over the tiniest thing that may or may not even be all that much of a big deal to the average Joe, where this help is, well that’s beyond me. I share the same username as my girlfriend I’m more of a EFNJ, try again. We’re still here cause you don’t listen there buddy, I gave you all the info as to why what I said made sense and cleared up the misunderstanding you had which led to the 59 replies you were going on about, we’re still here cause you want to talk to me as you said yourself. It’s exactly as I said, “deaf ears”, I bet you already have a reply already ready since you don’t listen. Wrong again, you never cleared anything up. There’s no way you can explain a triple agreement in a two way conversation. Haha, sorry Ren, it’s just not a thing in a normal conversation. A more accurate response would have been, “my bad dude, I meant to add a more logical response to the conversation.” But hey, like you said, “deaf ears”. Do better next time, Ren. Oh and why would you share a MAL account with your girl? Im not really surprised cause you’re not that bright but damn. Unless you’re watching everything together then whats the point? Lol Wrong again buddy. Normal and complex or whatever word you want to use as a place holder, it’s a means to an end. You’re telling what I can’t do when I just did it, kinda defeats the point there buddyπ there hasn’t been a single logical thing about this interaction so I don’t think I need to do better unless you want to actually throw down some college level responses. Wow the pot calling the kettle black, I think I understand the problem now. You can’t read, and what you’ve been doing this entire time is reading but you’re not reading what you want to hear you’re reading the next thing to counter which I turn tells me you’re not even trying to talk to me but more or less bother me because I share a name, not the account smart one. Again try again. Or don’t cause really that’d be the most logical thing you can do since you wanna talk logic π Just like I said, “those who dont want to learn, cant”. Sad honestly, hopefully you change your ways one day, Ren! Until then, good luck with your triple agreements in life. Everyone will think you are unable to uphold a real conversation. Can’t say I didn’t try lol. Ha, genuinely wasn’t trying to bother you. I didn’t think it was possible to share a username with someone else, as in all other social media platforms this is not possible. Try again at what? I haven’t been trying, I’ve been doing. Apparently, I’ve been making you miserable every time I respond lol. Those with degrees teach properly, unless you are teacher, there’s not much to learn from someone online, especially since I got A’s in English so as much as you’d like to think I can’t hold a conversation the state I live in begs to differ. Speaking of which whether you or anyone thinks I can is irrelevant, lions do not concern themselves with opinions of sheep. You weren’t bothering, I was just informing you of my observation and telling you that my name isn’t something chose without considering the implications. Oh then that makes two of us, I get this all the time but just cause I type essays doesn’t mean I’m trying, I’m a very talkative person and I can’t fit everything I want to say into a single sentence, miserable? Would you say something tedious makes someone miserable because miserable is making a lot of assumptions. You don’t have to be a teacher to teach something to someone. Smart people learn a lot from a lot of people. Remember that, Ren. Now that I think about it, sharing a username is still pretty dumb. Because now, you two are just misrepresenting yourselves. That is not your correct personality type for you, and thats not her correct name. Anyways, no big deal, just wanted to point that out. You’re thinking too hard on the word “miserable”. Let me try again since you didn’t get it. Seeing my response pop up makes you “miserable”. Better now? |
Nov 13, 2023 9:42 PM
#54
Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: lovealyssafaith said: INTJ_Ren said: lovealyssafaith said: INTJ_Ren said: lovealyssafaith said: INTJ_Ren said: lovealyssafaith said: INTJ_Ren said: You could’ve easily found the answer yourself without being spoiled. It’s not gonna hurt the website or app if you make a useless thread but damn you lazy π Lmao ok? ππ Do better idk π€· no thanks π€·πΌβοΈ You probably should. It’s 2023 like i said no thanks π€·πΌβοΈπ Like I said you should π nahππππππ I hate when that happens but β¬οΈ Get a room already. You two cant stop talking to each other… Well…..I mean ……when I initially repliedβ¬οΈ Thats interesting. How could you not know it would get this far if you participated in continuing it? Some people really just like talking I guess, I only responded accordingly Right, some people… Some peoole just enjoy a good casual convo π I got it the first time π And I was just agreeing with you π I didnt say anything about a “good casual convo”, so im not sure who youre agreeing with π I got that the first time, a good casual convo is what I said because a I was agreeing with you that some people just like talking. Except I never said some people just like talking, you did. Yeah but you said right some people which allowed me to agree with you and mention that someone just enjoy a good casual convo Except when I said “right some people”, I was already reasserting your statement. So you were really just agreeing with yourself, not me. That could go both ways so there really isn’t a one way with that comment especially when it doesn’t directly reassert π Nope, no it cant. You said something and I responding with a word of agreement: “right”. Yes because your interpretation isn’t the only one so that’s just causal convo doing its thing there buddy. Yes, and there are still rules to a casual convo. It’s simple really: I made no assertion, therefore, it was impossible for you to agree with anything I had said. You didn’t need to make an assertion you just said something and I agreed to it, be more direct in what you’re trying to say cause yes there are rules to casual convo. If you say something that can be interpreted different or have double meanings then your intention is null and void. Yes, but you are agreeing with me agreeing to a statement that you made. Thats not a convo anymore, and this is why there are rules to a convo. I also got that the first time, there’s no confusion here. I said something you gave a response and I agreed with said response with my own, that’s a convo, don’t know how else to spell it for ya π Except you dont get it. If I already agreed with you then why are you agreeing with me agreeing with you? How do you not understand how this makes no sense at all? π Oh but you see I do get it, a lot more than you think, you see, when I see we’re on the same page I had one more response and that was to agree with you agree with me, little did I know you weren’t finished and wanted to keep going by not asking the appropriate questions or for me to rephrase, now we’re here because one of us has to clear things up, I mean I don’t have to but aye I’m nice. If this doesn’t make sense then why keep going, if you haven’t figured it out yet and I’m not doing a good enough job at clearing up any misunderstandings then maybe the problem is you? I get what’s going on why don’t you? Exactly, thank you for admitting it. You were just talking for talkings sake. Only took like 50 replies lol. Oh and by the way, normal convos don’t usually include one long run-on sentence. Word for word did I say I anything about admitting anything or is that an accusation you’re using as a scapegoat? I men’s I was talking just because you kept ing hitting the quote button so I assumed you wanted to keep this up, making a lot of assumptions are we? π€£ a conversation is a conversation, normal complex, are a means to an end. “I was talking just because you kept hitting the quote button”. Lmao you just played yourself. If thats not admitting it then i don’t know what is. π€£ Good try though, you kept it up a long time. Well it’s not, you accused me of something I wasn’t doing, and I brought you more close to the actual answer if anything, so please elaborate where did I say anything about admitting anything word for word? It was a good try tho I’ll give you that π you hit the quote button so clearly you want to talk to me, I’m not replying because I genuinely want to. Responding just because I am talking to you is the exact definition of talking just for talkings sake. I mean you keep digging yourself a hole, ren. If you don’t want to talk to me and you continue to talk to me, then you are talking for talkings sake. And if that really were true and you didn’t want to respond at all, then you simply wouldn’t. Yes, I hit the quote button no one is disputing that, ren. π If you still don’t understand the term “talking for talkings sake” then I’m afraid I can’t help you anymore. See you’re doing it again. I’m not talking for the sake of talking, believe me it’s a signature phrase I use often. (especially on MaL) I guess you can’t help me nor do I wish to help you, I gave you everything I got, I don’t know what else you want from me, we discuss things on forums and it takes two to tango so unless the discussion is over then you’re just gonna keep dragging this on till we have 100 replies in this thread, truth be told I was done after the first 3 but I guess you like talking to me. Reality is the only one who’s been talking for the sake of talking is you, you could’ve chose to not hit quote yet here we are, normally I’d say so haha you played yourself but this ain’t one of those moments. I think you genuinely wanted to talk so I kept it up as long as you hit quote, just tryna be nice, and spare some of my time on someone who may or may not need it. I never wanted anything from you, I’m just telling you how it is and you don’t want to accept it. If you were done after the third reply then you would have stopped. Instead, you are talking for the sake of talking. You claim that you are talking just because you think I need someone to talk to. That is talking for the sake of talking. If anyone needs someone to talk to, it’s the introvert lol. Here’s the deal Ren, I actually want to talk to you and you have indicated that you do not want to talk to me, and thats OK. You continue to blame me for pressing the quote button when you have just as much power as me. This is a lesson for all future interactions, not just this one, Ren. Like you said you had just as much power as me yet kept going so there was no point in you saying that, you quoted me which means you wanted a reply, that’s not talking for the sake of talking, you clearly want something from me which I can’t really give you since this isn’t even anime related. You’re an introvert? Not name calling, cause I’m confused as to who you’re referring to cause I’m an extrovert as you see by my inconsistent replies π I got that the entirety of this interaction, but again I don’t really want to talk to you but you keep quoting me, imma keep quoting you back and if you think I was talking for the sake of talking then, I wasn’t but now I am since I clearly told you I was done and you keep quoting me, if you taught a lesson it fell on deaf ears or I can’t see it cause where’s the lesson π€¨ Yes, I said you have just as much power as me, but you missed the part where I actually want to talk to you. YOU dont. Like I said, I was only trying to help you understand. But like a wise man once said, “You cant get someone to understand something that they dont want to understand”. Oh well. I think we both know youre not the extrovert. It’s in your username lmao. Not that bright I guess. π Again, if you don’t want to talk to me, you don’t have to. I do though, so I will continue to. Not that hard of a concept, but like you said, “deaf ears”. You don’t listen, Ren. I don’t think I missed anything. As you didn’t want anything from me, I didn’t want anything from you, all you tried to do was say why you’re right and I’m wrong over the tiniest thing that may or may not even be all that much of a big deal to the average Joe, where this help is, well that’s beyond me. I share the same username as my girlfriend I’m more of a EFNJ, try again. We’re still here cause you don’t listen there buddy, I gave you all the info as to why what I said made sense and cleared up the misunderstanding you had which led to the 59 replies you were going on about, we’re still here cause you want to talk to me as you said yourself. It’s exactly as I said, “deaf ears”, I bet you already have a reply already ready since you don’t listen. Wrong again, you never cleared anything up. There’s no way you can explain a triple agreement in a two way conversation. Haha, sorry Ren, it’s just not a thing in a normal conversation. A more accurate response would have been, “my bad dude, I meant to add a more logical response to the conversation.” But hey, like you said, “deaf ears”. Do better next time, Ren. Oh and why would you share a MAL account with your girl? Im not really surprised cause you’re not that bright but damn. Unless you’re watching everything together then whats the point? Lol Wrong again buddy. Normal and complex or whatever word you want to use as a place holder, it’s a means to an end. You’re telling what I can’t do when I just did it, kinda defeats the point there buddyπ there hasn’t been a single logical thing about this interaction so I don’t think I need to do better unless you want to actually throw down some college level responses. Wow the pot calling the kettle black, I think I understand the problem now. You can’t read, and what you’ve been doing this entire time is reading but you’re not reading what you want to hear you’re reading the next thing to counter which I turn tells me you’re not even trying to talk to me but more or less bother me because I share a name, not the account smart one. Again try again. Or don’t cause really that’d be the most logical thing you can do since you wanna talk logic π Just like I said, “those who dont want to learn, cant”. Sad honestly, hopefully you change your ways one day, Ren! Until then, good luck with your triple agreements in life. Everyone will think you are unable to uphold a real conversation. Can’t say I didn’t try lol. Ha, genuinely wasn’t trying to bother you. I didn’t think it was possible to share a username with someone else, as in all other social media platforms this is not possible. Try again at what? I haven’t been trying, I’ve been doing. Apparently, I’ve been making you miserable every time I respond lol. Those with degrees teach properly, unless you are teacher, there’s not much to learn from someone online, especially since I got A’s in English so as much as you’d like to think I can’t hold a conversation the state I live in begs to differ. Speaking of which whether you or anyone thinks I can is irrelevant, lions do not concern themselves with opinions of sheep. You weren’t bothering, I was just informing you of my observation and telling you that my name isn’t something chose without considering the implications. Oh then that makes two of us, I get this all the time but just cause I type essays doesn’t mean I’m trying, I’m a very talkative person and I can’t fit everything I want to say into a single sentence, miserable? Would you say something tedious makes someone miserable because miserable is making a lot of assumptions. You don’t have to be a teacher to teach something to someone. Smart people learn a lot from a lot of people. Remember that, Ren. Now that I think about it, sharing a username is still pretty dumb. Because now, you two are just misrepresenting yourselves. That is not your correct personality type for you, and thats not her correct name. Anyways, no big deal, just wanted to point that out. You’re thinking too hard on the word “miserable”. Let me try again since you didn’t get it. Seeing my response pop up makes you “miserable”. Better now? Well if that’s the case then why haven’t I learned anything from you? You’re smart but not reaching me anything, leave it to professionals or people who classify and/or qualify as well you know smart. When you get a girl, youll do a lot of dumb things what we do doesn’t have to make sense to you ya know. Don’t think you needed to point that out but to e ah their own I guess. Ahh, damn I respect the effort but…..i…..well-…. Nah still not getting it, can you use the word miserable in a sentence? Jokes aside no see this doesn’t bother ke it just puts on display how ignorance is bliss ya know, I got all day and night I really couldn’t be bothered by someone else other than myself who clearly doesn’t know when to call it quits. |
Nov 13, 2023 9:52 PM
#55
INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: lovealyssafaith said: INTJ_Ren said: lovealyssafaith said: INTJ_Ren said: lovealyssafaith said: INTJ_Ren said: lovealyssafaith said: INTJ_Ren said: You could’ve easily found the answer yourself without being spoiled. It’s not gonna hurt the website or app if you make a useless thread but damn you lazy π Lmao ok? ππ Do better idk π€· no thanks π€·πΌβοΈ You probably should. It’s 2023 like i said no thanks π€·πΌβοΈπ Like I said you should π nahππππππ I hate when that happens but β¬οΈ Get a room already. You two cant stop talking to each other… Well…..I mean ……when I initially repliedβ¬οΈ Thats interesting. How could you not know it would get this far if you participated in continuing it? Some people really just like talking I guess, I only responded accordingly Right, some people… Some peoole just enjoy a good casual convo π I got it the first time π And I was just agreeing with you π I didnt say anything about a “good casual convo”, so im not sure who youre agreeing with π I got that the first time, a good casual convo is what I said because a I was agreeing with you that some people just like talking. Except I never said some people just like talking, you did. Yeah but you said right some people which allowed me to agree with you and mention that someone just enjoy a good casual convo Except when I said “right some people”, I was already reasserting your statement. So you were really just agreeing with yourself, not me. That could go both ways so there really isn’t a one way with that comment especially when it doesn’t directly reassert π Nope, no it cant. You said something and I responding with a word of agreement: “right”. Yes because your interpretation isn’t the only one so that’s just causal convo doing its thing there buddy. Yes, and there are still rules to a casual convo. It’s simple really: I made no assertion, therefore, it was impossible for you to agree with anything I had said. You didn’t need to make an assertion you just said something and I agreed to it, be more direct in what you’re trying to say cause yes there are rules to casual convo. If you say something that can be interpreted different or have double meanings then your intention is null and void. Yes, but you are agreeing with me agreeing to a statement that you made. Thats not a convo anymore, and this is why there are rules to a convo. I also got that the first time, there’s no confusion here. I said something you gave a response and I agreed with said response with my own, that’s a convo, don’t know how else to spell it for ya π Except you dont get it. If I already agreed with you then why are you agreeing with me agreeing with you? How do you not understand how this makes no sense at all? π Oh but you see I do get it, a lot more than you think, you see, when I see we’re on the same page I had one more response and that was to agree with you agree with me, little did I know you weren’t finished and wanted to keep going by not asking the appropriate questions or for me to rephrase, now we’re here because one of us has to clear things up, I mean I don’t have to but aye I’m nice. If this doesn’t make sense then why keep going, if you haven’t figured it out yet and I’m not doing a good enough job at clearing up any misunderstandings then maybe the problem is you? I get what’s going on why don’t you? Exactly, thank you for admitting it. You were just talking for talkings sake. Only took like 50 replies lol. Oh and by the way, normal convos don’t usually include one long run-on sentence. Word for word did I say I anything about admitting anything or is that an accusation you’re using as a scapegoat? I men’s I was talking just because you kept ing hitting the quote button so I assumed you wanted to keep this up, making a lot of assumptions are we? π€£ a conversation is a conversation, normal complex, are a means to an end. “I was talking just because you kept hitting the quote button”. Lmao you just played yourself. If thats not admitting it then i don’t know what is. π€£ Good try though, you kept it up a long time. Well it’s not, you accused me of something I wasn’t doing, and I brought you more close to the actual answer if anything, so please elaborate where did I say anything about admitting anything word for word? It was a good try tho I’ll give you that π you hit the quote button so clearly you want to talk to me, I’m not replying because I genuinely want to. Responding just because I am talking to you is the exact definition of talking just for talkings sake. I mean you keep digging yourself a hole, ren. If you don’t want to talk to me and you continue to talk to me, then you are talking for talkings sake. And if that really were true and you didn’t want to respond at all, then you simply wouldn’t. Yes, I hit the quote button no one is disputing that, ren. π If you still don’t understand the term “talking for talkings sake” then I’m afraid I can’t help you anymore. See you’re doing it again. I’m not talking for the sake of talking, believe me it’s a signature phrase I use often. (especially on MaL) I guess you can’t help me nor do I wish to help you, I gave you everything I got, I don’t know what else you want from me, we discuss things on forums and it takes two to tango so unless the discussion is over then you’re just gonna keep dragging this on till we have 100 replies in this thread, truth be told I was done after the first 3 but I guess you like talking to me. Reality is the only one who’s been talking for the sake of talking is you, you could’ve chose to not hit quote yet here we are, normally I’d say so haha you played yourself but this ain’t one of those moments. I think you genuinely wanted to talk so I kept it up as long as you hit quote, just tryna be nice, and spare some of my time on someone who may or may not need it. I never wanted anything from you, I’m just telling you how it is and you don’t want to accept it. If you were done after the third reply then you would have stopped. Instead, you are talking for the sake of talking. You claim that you are talking just because you think I need someone to talk to. That is talking for the sake of talking. If anyone needs someone to talk to, it’s the introvert lol. Here’s the deal Ren, I actually want to talk to you and you have indicated that you do not want to talk to me, and thats OK. You continue to blame me for pressing the quote button when you have just as much power as me. This is a lesson for all future interactions, not just this one, Ren. Like you said you had just as much power as me yet kept going so there was no point in you saying that, you quoted me which means you wanted a reply, that’s not talking for the sake of talking, you clearly want something from me which I can’t really give you since this isn’t even anime related. You’re an introvert? Not name calling, cause I’m confused as to who you’re referring to cause I’m an extrovert as you see by my inconsistent replies π I got that the entirety of this interaction, but again I don’t really want to talk to you but you keep quoting me, imma keep quoting you back and if you think I was talking for the sake of talking then, I wasn’t but now I am since I clearly told you I was done and you keep quoting me, if you taught a lesson it fell on deaf ears or I can’t see it cause where’s the lesson π€¨ Yes, I said you have just as much power as me, but you missed the part where I actually want to talk to you. YOU dont. Like I said, I was only trying to help you understand. But like a wise man once said, “You cant get someone to understand something that they dont want to understand”. Oh well. I think we both know youre not the extrovert. It’s in your username lmao. Not that bright I guess. π Again, if you don’t want to talk to me, you don’t have to. I do though, so I will continue to. Not that hard of a concept, but like you said, “deaf ears”. You don’t listen, Ren. I don’t think I missed anything. As you didn’t want anything from me, I didn’t want anything from you, all you tried to do was say why you’re right and I’m wrong over the tiniest thing that may or may not even be all that much of a big deal to the average Joe, where this help is, well that’s beyond me. I share the same username as my girlfriend I’m more of a EFNJ, try again. We’re still here cause you don’t listen there buddy, I gave you all the info as to why what I said made sense and cleared up the misunderstanding you had which led to the 59 replies you were going on about, we’re still here cause you want to talk to me as you said yourself. It’s exactly as I said, “deaf ears”, I bet you already have a reply already ready since you don’t listen. Wrong again, you never cleared anything up. There’s no way you can explain a triple agreement in a two way conversation. Haha, sorry Ren, it’s just not a thing in a normal conversation. A more accurate response would have been, “my bad dude, I meant to add a more logical response to the conversation.” But hey, like you said, “deaf ears”. Do better next time, Ren. Oh and why would you share a MAL account with your girl? Im not really surprised cause you’re not that bright but damn. Unless you’re watching everything together then whats the point? Lol Wrong again buddy. Normal and complex or whatever word you want to use as a place holder, it’s a means to an end. You’re telling what I can’t do when I just did it, kinda defeats the point there buddyπ there hasn’t been a single logical thing about this interaction so I don’t think I need to do better unless you want to actually throw down some college level responses. Wow the pot calling the kettle black, I think I understand the problem now. You can’t read, and what you’ve been doing this entire time is reading but you’re not reading what you want to hear you’re reading the next thing to counter which I turn tells me you’re not even trying to talk to me but more or less bother me because I share a name, not the account smart one. Again try again. Or don’t cause really that’d be the most logical thing you can do since you wanna talk logic π Just like I said, “those who dont want to learn, cant”. Sad honestly, hopefully you change your ways one day, Ren! Until then, good luck with your triple agreements in life. Everyone will think you are unable to uphold a real conversation. Can’t say I didn’t try lol. Ha, genuinely wasn’t trying to bother you. I didn’t think it was possible to share a username with someone else, as in all other social media platforms this is not possible. Try again at what? I haven’t been trying, I’ve been doing. Apparently, I’ve been making you miserable every time I respond lol. Those with degrees teach properly, unless you are teacher, there’s not much to learn from someone online, especially since I got A’s in English so as much as you’d like to think I can’t hold a conversation the state I live in begs to differ. Speaking of which whether you or anyone thinks I can is irrelevant, lions do not concern themselves with opinions of sheep. You weren’t bothering, I was just informing you of my observation and telling you that my name isn’t something chose without considering the implications. Oh then that makes two of us, I get this all the time but just cause I type essays doesn’t mean I’m trying, I’m a very talkative person and I can’t fit everything I want to say into a single sentence, miserable? Would you say something tedious makes someone miserable because miserable is making a lot of assumptions. You don’t have to be a teacher to teach something to someone. Smart people learn a lot from a lot of people. Remember that, Ren. Now that I think about it, sharing a username is still pretty dumb. Because now, you two are just misrepresenting yourselves. That is not your correct personality type for you, and thats not her correct name. Anyways, no big deal, just wanted to point that out. You’re thinking too hard on the word “miserable”. Let me try again since you didn’t get it. Seeing my response pop up makes you “miserable”. Better now? Well if that’s the case then why haven’t I learned anything from you? You’re smart but not reaching me anything, leave it to professionals or people who classify and/or qualify as well you know smart. When you get a girl, youll do a lot of dumb things what we do doesn’t have to make sense to you ya know. Don’t think you needed to point that out but to e ah their own I guess. Ahh, damn I respect the effort but…..i…..well-…. Nah still not getting it, can you use the word miserable in a sentence? Jokes aside no see this doesn’t bother ke it just puts on display how ignorance is bliss ya know, I got all day and night I really couldn’t be bothered by someone else other than myself who clearly doesn’t know when to call it quits. Several reasons for that, Ren. Some of which I have already said many, many times. I won’t be repeating myself anymore though. No point in wasting anymore effort, you know? Does it make sense to you though? Thats the better question. π I know you don’t know when to call it quits, you didn’t have to tell me that lol. |
Nov 13, 2023 9:57 PM
#56
Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: lovealyssafaith said: INTJ_Ren said: lovealyssafaith said: INTJ_Ren said: lovealyssafaith said: INTJ_Ren said: lovealyssafaith said: INTJ_Ren said: You could’ve easily found the answer yourself without being spoiled. It’s not gonna hurt the website or app if you make a useless thread but damn you lazy π Lmao ok? ππ Do better idk π€· no thanks π€·πΌβοΈ You probably should. It’s 2023 like i said no thanks π€·πΌβοΈπ Like I said you should π nahππππππ I hate when that happens but β¬οΈ Get a room already. You two cant stop talking to each other… Well…..I mean ……when I initially repliedβ¬οΈ Thats interesting. How could you not know it would get this far if you participated in continuing it? Some people really just like talking I guess, I only responded accordingly Right, some people… Some peoole just enjoy a good casual convo π I got it the first time π And I was just agreeing with you π I didnt say anything about a “good casual convo”, so im not sure who youre agreeing with π I got that the first time, a good casual convo is what I said because a I was agreeing with you that some people just like talking. Except I never said some people just like talking, you did. Yeah but you said right some people which allowed me to agree with you and mention that someone just enjoy a good casual convo Except when I said “right some people”, I was already reasserting your statement. So you were really just agreeing with yourself, not me. That could go both ways so there really isn’t a one way with that comment especially when it doesn’t directly reassert π Nope, no it cant. You said something and I responding with a word of agreement: “right”. Yes because your interpretation isn’t the only one so that’s just causal convo doing its thing there buddy. Yes, and there are still rules to a casual convo. It’s simple really: I made no assertion, therefore, it was impossible for you to agree with anything I had said. You didn’t need to make an assertion you just said something and I agreed to it, be more direct in what you’re trying to say cause yes there are rules to casual convo. If you say something that can be interpreted different or have double meanings then your intention is null and void. Yes, but you are agreeing with me agreeing to a statement that you made. Thats not a convo anymore, and this is why there are rules to a convo. I also got that the first time, there’s no confusion here. I said something you gave a response and I agreed with said response with my own, that’s a convo, don’t know how else to spell it for ya π Except you dont get it. If I already agreed with you then why are you agreeing with me agreeing with you? How do you not understand how this makes no sense at all? π Oh but you see I do get it, a lot more than you think, you see, when I see we’re on the same page I had one more response and that was to agree with you agree with me, little did I know you weren’t finished and wanted to keep going by not asking the appropriate questions or for me to rephrase, now we’re here because one of us has to clear things up, I mean I don’t have to but aye I’m nice. If this doesn’t make sense then why keep going, if you haven’t figured it out yet and I’m not doing a good enough job at clearing up any misunderstandings then maybe the problem is you? I get what’s going on why don’t you? Exactly, thank you for admitting it. You were just talking for talkings sake. Only took like 50 replies lol. Oh and by the way, normal convos don’t usually include one long run-on sentence. Word for word did I say I anything about admitting anything or is that an accusation you’re using as a scapegoat? I men’s I was talking just because you kept ing hitting the quote button so I assumed you wanted to keep this up, making a lot of assumptions are we? π€£ a conversation is a conversation, normal complex, are a means to an end. “I was talking just because you kept hitting the quote button”. Lmao you just played yourself. If thats not admitting it then i don’t know what is. π€£ Good try though, you kept it up a long time. Well it’s not, you accused me of something I wasn’t doing, and I brought you more close to the actual answer if anything, so please elaborate where did I say anything about admitting anything word for word? It was a good try tho I’ll give you that π you hit the quote button so clearly you want to talk to me, I’m not replying because I genuinely want to. Responding just because I am talking to you is the exact definition of talking just for talkings sake. I mean you keep digging yourself a hole, ren. If you don’t want to talk to me and you continue to talk to me, then you are talking for talkings sake. And if that really were true and you didn’t want to respond at all, then you simply wouldn’t. Yes, I hit the quote button no one is disputing that, ren. π If you still don’t understand the term “talking for talkings sake” then I’m afraid I can’t help you anymore. See you’re doing it again. I’m not talking for the sake of talking, believe me it’s a signature phrase I use often. (especially on MaL) I guess you can’t help me nor do I wish to help you, I gave you everything I got, I don’t know what else you want from me, we discuss things on forums and it takes two to tango so unless the discussion is over then you’re just gonna keep dragging this on till we have 100 replies in this thread, truth be told I was done after the first 3 but I guess you like talking to me. Reality is the only one who’s been talking for the sake of talking is you, you could’ve chose to not hit quote yet here we are, normally I’d say so haha you played yourself but this ain’t one of those moments. I think you genuinely wanted to talk so I kept it up as long as you hit quote, just tryna be nice, and spare some of my time on someone who may or may not need it. I never wanted anything from you, I’m just telling you how it is and you don’t want to accept it. If you were done after the third reply then you would have stopped. Instead, you are talking for the sake of talking. You claim that you are talking just because you think I need someone to talk to. That is talking for the sake of talking. If anyone needs someone to talk to, it’s the introvert lol. Here’s the deal Ren, I actually want to talk to you and you have indicated that you do not want to talk to me, and thats OK. You continue to blame me for pressing the quote button when you have just as much power as me. This is a lesson for all future interactions, not just this one, Ren. Like you said you had just as much power as me yet kept going so there was no point in you saying that, you quoted me which means you wanted a reply, that’s not talking for the sake of talking, you clearly want something from me which I can’t really give you since this isn’t even anime related. You’re an introvert? Not name calling, cause I’m confused as to who you’re referring to cause I’m an extrovert as you see by my inconsistent replies π I got that the entirety of this interaction, but again I don’t really want to talk to you but you keep quoting me, imma keep quoting you back and if you think I was talking for the sake of talking then, I wasn’t but now I am since I clearly told you I was done and you keep quoting me, if you taught a lesson it fell on deaf ears or I can’t see it cause where’s the lesson π€¨ Yes, I said you have just as much power as me, but you missed the part where I actually want to talk to you. YOU dont. Like I said, I was only trying to help you understand. But like a wise man once said, “You cant get someone to understand something that they dont want to understand”. Oh well. I think we both know youre not the extrovert. It’s in your username lmao. Not that bright I guess. π Again, if you don’t want to talk to me, you don’t have to. I do though, so I will continue to. Not that hard of a concept, but like you said, “deaf ears”. You don’t listen, Ren. I don’t think I missed anything. As you didn’t want anything from me, I didn’t want anything from you, all you tried to do was say why you’re right and I’m wrong over the tiniest thing that may or may not even be all that much of a big deal to the average Joe, where this help is, well that’s beyond me. I share the same username as my girlfriend I’m more of a EFNJ, try again. We’re still here cause you don’t listen there buddy, I gave you all the info as to why what I said made sense and cleared up the misunderstanding you had which led to the 59 replies you were going on about, we’re still here cause you want to talk to me as you said yourself. It’s exactly as I said, “deaf ears”, I bet you already have a reply already ready since you don’t listen. Wrong again, you never cleared anything up. There’s no way you can explain a triple agreement in a two way conversation. Haha, sorry Ren, it’s just not a thing in a normal conversation. A more accurate response would have been, “my bad dude, I meant to add a more logical response to the conversation.” But hey, like you said, “deaf ears”. Do better next time, Ren. Oh and why would you share a MAL account with your girl? Im not really surprised cause you’re not that bright but damn. Unless you’re watching everything together then whats the point? Lol Wrong again buddy. Normal and complex or whatever word you want to use as a place holder, it’s a means to an end. You’re telling what I can’t do when I just did it, kinda defeats the point there buddyπ there hasn’t been a single logical thing about this interaction so I don’t think I need to do better unless you want to actually throw down some college level responses. Wow the pot calling the kettle black, I think I understand the problem now. You can’t read, and what you’ve been doing this entire time is reading but you’re not reading what you want to hear you’re reading the next thing to counter which I turn tells me you’re not even trying to talk to me but more or less bother me because I share a name, not the account smart one. Again try again. Or don’t cause really that’d be the most logical thing you can do since you wanna talk logic π Just like I said, “those who dont want to learn, cant”. Sad honestly, hopefully you change your ways one day, Ren! Until then, good luck with your triple agreements in life. Everyone will think you are unable to uphold a real conversation. Can’t say I didn’t try lol. Ha, genuinely wasn’t trying to bother you. I didn’t think it was possible to share a username with someone else, as in all other social media platforms this is not possible. Try again at what? I haven’t been trying, I’ve been doing. Apparently, I’ve been making you miserable every time I respond lol. Those with degrees teach properly, unless you are teacher, there’s not much to learn from someone online, especially since I got A’s in English so as much as you’d like to think I can’t hold a conversation the state I live in begs to differ. Speaking of which whether you or anyone thinks I can is irrelevant, lions do not concern themselves with opinions of sheep. You weren’t bothering, I was just informing you of my observation and telling you that my name isn’t something chose without considering the implications. Oh then that makes two of us, I get this all the time but just cause I type essays doesn’t mean I’m trying, I’m a very talkative person and I can’t fit everything I want to say into a single sentence, miserable? Would you say something tedious makes someone miserable because miserable is making a lot of assumptions. You don’t have to be a teacher to teach something to someone. Smart people learn a lot from a lot of people. Remember that, Ren. Now that I think about it, sharing a username is still pretty dumb. Because now, you two are just misrepresenting yourselves. That is not your correct personality type for you, and thats not her correct name. Anyways, no big deal, just wanted to point that out. You’re thinking too hard on the word “miserable”. Let me try again since you didn’t get it. Seeing my response pop up makes you “miserable”. Better now? Well if that’s the case then why haven’t I learned anything from you? You’re smart but not reaching me anything, leave it to professionals or people who classify and/or qualify as well you know smart. When you get a girl, youll do a lot of dumb things what we do doesn’t have to make sense to you ya know. Don’t think you needed to point that out but to e ah their own I guess. Ahh, damn I respect the effort but…..i…..well-…. Nah still not getting it, can you use the word miserable in a sentence? Jokes aside no see this doesn’t bother ke it just puts on display how ignorance is bliss ya know, I got all day and night I really couldn’t be bothered by someone else other than myself who clearly doesn’t know when to call it quits. Several reasons for that, Ren. Some of which I have already said many, many times. I won’t be repeating myself anymore though. No point in wasting anymore effort, you know? Does it make sense to you though? Thats the better question. π I know you don’t know when to call it quits, you didn’t have to tell me that lol. No by all means, be as efficient as you see fit, I think we both have given enough reasonings for one day, no need for reminders. Clearly if I can crack jokes, it makes enough sense, unless it doesn’t but I don’t think it doesn’t make sense so it should make sense or is sense just a shallow question with no answers. Alright my bad for pointing out something we have in common π’ |
Nov 13, 2023 10:01 PM
#57
INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: lovealyssafaith said: INTJ_Ren said: lovealyssafaith said: INTJ_Ren said: lovealyssafaith said: INTJ_Ren said: lovealyssafaith said: INTJ_Ren said: You could’ve easily found the answer yourself without being spoiled. It’s not gonna hurt the website or app if you make a useless thread but damn you lazy π Lmao ok? ππ Do better idk π€· no thanks π€·πΌβοΈ You probably should. It’s 2023 like i said no thanks π€·πΌβοΈπ Like I said you should π nahππππππ I hate when that happens but β¬οΈ Get a room already. You two cant stop talking to each other… Well…..I mean ……when I initially repliedβ¬οΈ Thats interesting. How could you not know it would get this far if you participated in continuing it? Some people really just like talking I guess, I only responded accordingly Right, some people… Some peoole just enjoy a good casual convo π I got it the first time π And I was just agreeing with you π I didnt say anything about a “good casual convo”, so im not sure who youre agreeing with π I got that the first time, a good casual convo is what I said because a I was agreeing with you that some people just like talking. Except I never said some people just like talking, you did. Yeah but you said right some people which allowed me to agree with you and mention that someone just enjoy a good casual convo Except when I said “right some people”, I was already reasserting your statement. So you were really just agreeing with yourself, not me. That could go both ways so there really isn’t a one way with that comment especially when it doesn’t directly reassert π Nope, no it cant. You said something and I responding with a word of agreement: “right”. Yes because your interpretation isn’t the only one so that’s just causal convo doing its thing there buddy. Yes, and there are still rules to a casual convo. It’s simple really: I made no assertion, therefore, it was impossible for you to agree with anything I had said. You didn’t need to make an assertion you just said something and I agreed to it, be more direct in what you’re trying to say cause yes there are rules to casual convo. If you say something that can be interpreted different or have double meanings then your intention is null and void. Yes, but you are agreeing with me agreeing to a statement that you made. Thats not a convo anymore, and this is why there are rules to a convo. I also got that the first time, there’s no confusion here. I said something you gave a response and I agreed with said response with my own, that’s a convo, don’t know how else to spell it for ya π Except you dont get it. If I already agreed with you then why are you agreeing with me agreeing with you? How do you not understand how this makes no sense at all? π Oh but you see I do get it, a lot more than you think, you see, when I see we’re on the same page I had one more response and that was to agree with you agree with me, little did I know you weren’t finished and wanted to keep going by not asking the appropriate questions or for me to rephrase, now we’re here because one of us has to clear things up, I mean I don’t have to but aye I’m nice. If this doesn’t make sense then why keep going, if you haven’t figured it out yet and I’m not doing a good enough job at clearing up any misunderstandings then maybe the problem is you? I get what’s going on why don’t you? Exactly, thank you for admitting it. You were just talking for talkings sake. Only took like 50 replies lol. Oh and by the way, normal convos don’t usually include one long run-on sentence. Word for word did I say I anything about admitting anything or is that an accusation you’re using as a scapegoat? I men’s I was talking just because you kept ing hitting the quote button so I assumed you wanted to keep this up, making a lot of assumptions are we? π€£ a conversation is a conversation, normal complex, are a means to an end. “I was talking just because you kept hitting the quote button”. Lmao you just played yourself. If thats not admitting it then i don’t know what is. π€£ Good try though, you kept it up a long time. Well it’s not, you accused me of something I wasn’t doing, and I brought you more close to the actual answer if anything, so please elaborate where did I say anything about admitting anything word for word? It was a good try tho I’ll give you that π you hit the quote button so clearly you want to talk to me, I’m not replying because I genuinely want to. Responding just because I am talking to you is the exact definition of talking just for talkings sake. I mean you keep digging yourself a hole, ren. If you don’t want to talk to me and you continue to talk to me, then you are talking for talkings sake. And if that really were true and you didn’t want to respond at all, then you simply wouldn’t. Yes, I hit the quote button no one is disputing that, ren. π If you still don’t understand the term “talking for talkings sake” then I’m afraid I can’t help you anymore. See you’re doing it again. I’m not talking for the sake of talking, believe me it’s a signature phrase I use often. (especially on MaL) I guess you can’t help me nor do I wish to help you, I gave you everything I got, I don’t know what else you want from me, we discuss things on forums and it takes two to tango so unless the discussion is over then you’re just gonna keep dragging this on till we have 100 replies in this thread, truth be told I was done after the first 3 but I guess you like talking to me. Reality is the only one who’s been talking for the sake of talking is you, you could’ve chose to not hit quote yet here we are, normally I’d say so haha you played yourself but this ain’t one of those moments. I think you genuinely wanted to talk so I kept it up as long as you hit quote, just tryna be nice, and spare some of my time on someone who may or may not need it. I never wanted anything from you, I’m just telling you how it is and you don’t want to accept it. If you were done after the third reply then you would have stopped. Instead, you are talking for the sake of talking. You claim that you are talking just because you think I need someone to talk to. That is talking for the sake of talking. If anyone needs someone to talk to, it’s the introvert lol. Here’s the deal Ren, I actually want to talk to you and you have indicated that you do not want to talk to me, and thats OK. You continue to blame me for pressing the quote button when you have just as much power as me. This is a lesson for all future interactions, not just this one, Ren. Like you said you had just as much power as me yet kept going so there was no point in you saying that, you quoted me which means you wanted a reply, that’s not talking for the sake of talking, you clearly want something from me which I can’t really give you since this isn’t even anime related. You’re an introvert? Not name calling, cause I’m confused as to who you’re referring to cause I’m an extrovert as you see by my inconsistent replies π I got that the entirety of this interaction, but again I don’t really want to talk to you but you keep quoting me, imma keep quoting you back and if you think I was talking for the sake of talking then, I wasn’t but now I am since I clearly told you I was done and you keep quoting me, if you taught a lesson it fell on deaf ears or I can’t see it cause where’s the lesson π€¨ Yes, I said you have just as much power as me, but you missed the part where I actually want to talk to you. YOU dont. Like I said, I was only trying to help you understand. But like a wise man once said, “You cant get someone to understand something that they dont want to understand”. Oh well. I think we both know youre not the extrovert. It’s in your username lmao. Not that bright I guess. π Again, if you don’t want to talk to me, you don’t have to. I do though, so I will continue to. Not that hard of a concept, but like you said, “deaf ears”. You don’t listen, Ren. I don’t think I missed anything. As you didn’t want anything from me, I didn’t want anything from you, all you tried to do was say why you’re right and I’m wrong over the tiniest thing that may or may not even be all that much of a big deal to the average Joe, where this help is, well that’s beyond me. I share the same username as my girlfriend I’m more of a EFNJ, try again. We’re still here cause you don’t listen there buddy, I gave you all the info as to why what I said made sense and cleared up the misunderstanding you had which led to the 59 replies you were going on about, we’re still here cause you want to talk to me as you said yourself. It’s exactly as I said, “deaf ears”, I bet you already have a reply already ready since you don’t listen. Wrong again, you never cleared anything up. There’s no way you can explain a triple agreement in a two way conversation. Haha, sorry Ren, it’s just not a thing in a normal conversation. A more accurate response would have been, “my bad dude, I meant to add a more logical response to the conversation.” But hey, like you said, “deaf ears”. Do better next time, Ren. Oh and why would you share a MAL account with your girl? Im not really surprised cause you’re not that bright but damn. Unless you’re watching everything together then whats the point? Lol Wrong again buddy. Normal and complex or whatever word you want to use as a place holder, it’s a means to an end. You’re telling what I can’t do when I just did it, kinda defeats the point there buddyπ there hasn’t been a single logical thing about this interaction so I don’t think I need to do better unless you want to actually throw down some college level responses. Wow the pot calling the kettle black, I think I understand the problem now. You can’t read, and what you’ve been doing this entire time is reading but you’re not reading what you want to hear you’re reading the next thing to counter which I turn tells me you’re not even trying to talk to me but more or less bother me because I share a name, not the account smart one. Again try again. Or don’t cause really that’d be the most logical thing you can do since you wanna talk logic π Just like I said, “those who dont want to learn, cant”. Sad honestly, hopefully you change your ways one day, Ren! Until then, good luck with your triple agreements in life. Everyone will think you are unable to uphold a real conversation. Can’t say I didn’t try lol. Ha, genuinely wasn’t trying to bother you. I didn’t think it was possible to share a username with someone else, as in all other social media platforms this is not possible. Try again at what? I haven’t been trying, I’ve been doing. Apparently, I’ve been making you miserable every time I respond lol. Those with degrees teach properly, unless you are teacher, there’s not much to learn from someone online, especially since I got A’s in English so as much as you’d like to think I can’t hold a conversation the state I live in begs to differ. Speaking of which whether you or anyone thinks I can is irrelevant, lions do not concern themselves with opinions of sheep. You weren’t bothering, I was just informing you of my observation and telling you that my name isn’t something chose without considering the implications. Oh then that makes two of us, I get this all the time but just cause I type essays doesn’t mean I’m trying, I’m a very talkative person and I can’t fit everything I want to say into a single sentence, miserable? Would you say something tedious makes someone miserable because miserable is making a lot of assumptions. You don’t have to be a teacher to teach something to someone. Smart people learn a lot from a lot of people. Remember that, Ren. Now that I think about it, sharing a username is still pretty dumb. Because now, you two are just misrepresenting yourselves. That is not your correct personality type for you, and thats not her correct name. Anyways, no big deal, just wanted to point that out. You’re thinking too hard on the word “miserable”. Let me try again since you didn’t get it. Seeing my response pop up makes you “miserable”. Better now? Well if that’s the case then why haven’t I learned anything from you? You’re smart but not reaching me anything, leave it to professionals or people who classify and/or qualify as well you know smart. When you get a girl, youll do a lot of dumb things what we do doesn’t have to make sense to you ya know. Don’t think you needed to point that out but to e ah their own I guess. Ahh, damn I respect the effort but…..i…..well-…. Nah still not getting it, can you use the word miserable in a sentence? Jokes aside no see this doesn’t bother ke it just puts on display how ignorance is bliss ya know, I got all day and night I really couldn’t be bothered by someone else other than myself who clearly doesn’t know when to call it quits. Several reasons for that, Ren. Some of which I have already said many, many times. I won’t be repeating myself anymore though. No point in wasting anymore effort, you know? Does it make sense to you though? Thats the better question. π I know you don’t know when to call it quits, you didn’t have to tell me that lol. No by all means, be as efficient as you see fit, I think we both have given enough reasonings for one day, no need for reminders. Clearly if I can crack jokes, it makes enough sense, unless it doesn’t but I don’t think it doesn’t make sense so it should make sense or is sense just a shallow question with no answers. Alright my bad for pointing out something we have in common π’ Yes, especially if reminders do not good in getting through to the desired audience. Oh so you’re trying to say that the whole username thing is a joke. I think? |
Nov 13, 2023 10:08 PM
#58
Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: lovealyssafaith said: INTJ_Ren said: lovealyssafaith said: INTJ_Ren said: lovealyssafaith said: INTJ_Ren said: lovealyssafaith said: INTJ_Ren said: You could’ve easily found the answer yourself without being spoiled. It’s not gonna hurt the website or app if you make a useless thread but damn you lazy π Lmao ok? ππ Do better idk π€· no thanks π€·πΌβοΈ You probably should. It’s 2023 like i said no thanks π€·πΌβοΈπ Like I said you should π nahππππππ I hate when that happens but β¬οΈ Get a room already. You two cant stop talking to each other… Well…..I mean ……when I initially repliedβ¬οΈ Thats interesting. How could you not know it would get this far if you participated in continuing it? Some people really just like talking I guess, I only responded accordingly Right, some people… Some peoole just enjoy a good casual convo π I got it the first time π And I was just agreeing with you π I didnt say anything about a “good casual convo”, so im not sure who youre agreeing with π I got that the first time, a good casual convo is what I said because a I was agreeing with you that some people just like talking. Except I never said some people just like talking, you did. Yeah but you said right some people which allowed me to agree with you and mention that someone just enjoy a good casual convo Except when I said “right some people”, I was already reasserting your statement. So you were really just agreeing with yourself, not me. That could go both ways so there really isn’t a one way with that comment especially when it doesn’t directly reassert π Nope, no it cant. You said something and I responding with a word of agreement: “right”. Yes because your interpretation isn’t the only one so that’s just causal convo doing its thing there buddy. Yes, and there are still rules to a casual convo. It’s simple really: I made no assertion, therefore, it was impossible for you to agree with anything I had said. You didn’t need to make an assertion you just said something and I agreed to it, be more direct in what you’re trying to say cause yes there are rules to casual convo. If you say something that can be interpreted different or have double meanings then your intention is null and void. Yes, but you are agreeing with me agreeing to a statement that you made. Thats not a convo anymore, and this is why there are rules to a convo. I also got that the first time, there’s no confusion here. I said something you gave a response and I agreed with said response with my own, that’s a convo, don’t know how else to spell it for ya π Except you dont get it. If I already agreed with you then why are you agreeing with me agreeing with you? How do you not understand how this makes no sense at all? π Oh but you see I do get it, a lot more than you think, you see, when I see we’re on the same page I had one more response and that was to agree with you agree with me, little did I know you weren’t finished and wanted to keep going by not asking the appropriate questions or for me to rephrase, now we’re here because one of us has to clear things up, I mean I don’t have to but aye I’m nice. If this doesn’t make sense then why keep going, if you haven’t figured it out yet and I’m not doing a good enough job at clearing up any misunderstandings then maybe the problem is you? I get what’s going on why don’t you? Exactly, thank you for admitting it. You were just talking for talkings sake. Only took like 50 replies lol. Oh and by the way, normal convos don’t usually include one long run-on sentence. Word for word did I say I anything about admitting anything or is that an accusation you’re using as a scapegoat? I men’s I was talking just because you kept ing hitting the quote button so I assumed you wanted to keep this up, making a lot of assumptions are we? π€£ a conversation is a conversation, normal complex, are a means to an end. “I was talking just because you kept hitting the quote button”. Lmao you just played yourself. If thats not admitting it then i don’t know what is. π€£ Good try though, you kept it up a long time. Well it’s not, you accused me of something I wasn’t doing, and I brought you more close to the actual answer if anything, so please elaborate where did I say anything about admitting anything word for word? It was a good try tho I’ll give you that π you hit the quote button so clearly you want to talk to me, I’m not replying because I genuinely want to. Responding just because I am talking to you is the exact definition of talking just for talkings sake. I mean you keep digging yourself a hole, ren. If you don’t want to talk to me and you continue to talk to me, then you are talking for talkings sake. And if that really were true and you didn’t want to respond at all, then you simply wouldn’t. Yes, I hit the quote button no one is disputing that, ren. π If you still don’t understand the term “talking for talkings sake” then I’m afraid I can’t help you anymore. See you’re doing it again. I’m not talking for the sake of talking, believe me it’s a signature phrase I use often. (especially on MaL) I guess you can’t help me nor do I wish to help you, I gave you everything I got, I don’t know what else you want from me, we discuss things on forums and it takes two to tango so unless the discussion is over then you’re just gonna keep dragging this on till we have 100 replies in this thread, truth be told I was done after the first 3 but I guess you like talking to me. Reality is the only one who’s been talking for the sake of talking is you, you could’ve chose to not hit quote yet here we are, normally I’d say so haha you played yourself but this ain’t one of those moments. I think you genuinely wanted to talk so I kept it up as long as you hit quote, just tryna be nice, and spare some of my time on someone who may or may not need it. I never wanted anything from you, I’m just telling you how it is and you don’t want to accept it. If you were done after the third reply then you would have stopped. Instead, you are talking for the sake of talking. You claim that you are talking just because you think I need someone to talk to. That is talking for the sake of talking. If anyone needs someone to talk to, it’s the introvert lol. Here’s the deal Ren, I actually want to talk to you and you have indicated that you do not want to talk to me, and thats OK. You continue to blame me for pressing the quote button when you have just as much power as me. This is a lesson for all future interactions, not just this one, Ren. Like you said you had just as much power as me yet kept going so there was no point in you saying that, you quoted me which means you wanted a reply, that’s not talking for the sake of talking, you clearly want something from me which I can’t really give you since this isn’t even anime related. You’re an introvert? Not name calling, cause I’m confused as to who you’re referring to cause I’m an extrovert as you see by my inconsistent replies π I got that the entirety of this interaction, but again I don’t really want to talk to you but you keep quoting me, imma keep quoting you back and if you think I was talking for the sake of talking then, I wasn’t but now I am since I clearly told you I was done and you keep quoting me, if you taught a lesson it fell on deaf ears or I can’t see it cause where’s the lesson π€¨ Yes, I said you have just as much power as me, but you missed the part where I actually want to talk to you. YOU dont. Like I said, I was only trying to help you understand. But like a wise man once said, “You cant get someone to understand something that they dont want to understand”. Oh well. I think we both know youre not the extrovert. It’s in your username lmao. Not that bright I guess. π Again, if you don’t want to talk to me, you don’t have to. I do though, so I will continue to. Not that hard of a concept, but like you said, “deaf ears”. You don’t listen, Ren. I don’t think I missed anything. As you didn’t want anything from me, I didn’t want anything from you, all you tried to do was say why you’re right and I’m wrong over the tiniest thing that may or may not even be all that much of a big deal to the average Joe, where this help is, well that’s beyond me. I share the same username as my girlfriend I’m more of a EFNJ, try again. We’re still here cause you don’t listen there buddy, I gave you all the info as to why what I said made sense and cleared up the misunderstanding you had which led to the 59 replies you were going on about, we’re still here cause you want to talk to me as you said yourself. It’s exactly as I said, “deaf ears”, I bet you already have a reply already ready since you don’t listen. Wrong again, you never cleared anything up. There’s no way you can explain a triple agreement in a two way conversation. Haha, sorry Ren, it’s just not a thing in a normal conversation. A more accurate response would have been, “my bad dude, I meant to add a more logical response to the conversation.” But hey, like you said, “deaf ears”. Do better next time, Ren. Oh and why would you share a MAL account with your girl? Im not really surprised cause you’re not that bright but damn. Unless you’re watching everything together then whats the point? Lol Wrong again buddy. Normal and complex or whatever word you want to use as a place holder, it’s a means to an end. You’re telling what I can’t do when I just did it, kinda defeats the point there buddyπ there hasn’t been a single logical thing about this interaction so I don’t think I need to do better unless you want to actually throw down some college level responses. Wow the pot calling the kettle black, I think I understand the problem now. You can’t read, and what you’ve been doing this entire time is reading but you’re not reading what you want to hear you’re reading the next thing to counter which I turn tells me you’re not even trying to talk to me but more or less bother me because I share a name, not the account smart one. Again try again. Or don’t cause really that’d be the most logical thing you can do since you wanna talk logic π Just like I said, “those who dont want to learn, cant”. Sad honestly, hopefully you change your ways one day, Ren! Until then, good luck with your triple agreements in life. Everyone will think you are unable to uphold a real conversation. Can’t say I didn’t try lol. Ha, genuinely wasn’t trying to bother you. I didn’t think it was possible to share a username with someone else, as in all other social media platforms this is not possible. Try again at what? I haven’t been trying, I’ve been doing. Apparently, I’ve been making you miserable every time I respond lol. Those with degrees teach properly, unless you are teacher, there’s not much to learn from someone online, especially since I got A’s in English so as much as you’d like to think I can’t hold a conversation the state I live in begs to differ. Speaking of which whether you or anyone thinks I can is irrelevant, lions do not concern themselves with opinions of sheep. You weren’t bothering, I was just informing you of my observation and telling you that my name isn’t something chose without considering the implications. Oh then that makes two of us, I get this all the time but just cause I type essays doesn’t mean I’m trying, I’m a very talkative person and I can’t fit everything I want to say into a single sentence, miserable? Would you say something tedious makes someone miserable because miserable is making a lot of assumptions. You don’t have to be a teacher to teach something to someone. Smart people learn a lot from a lot of people. Remember that, Ren. Now that I think about it, sharing a username is still pretty dumb. Because now, you two are just misrepresenting yourselves. That is not your correct personality type for you, and thats not her correct name. Anyways, no big deal, just wanted to point that out. You’re thinking too hard on the word “miserable”. Let me try again since you didn’t get it. Seeing my response pop up makes you “miserable”. Better now? Well if that’s the case then why haven’t I learned anything from you? You’re smart but not reaching me anything, leave it to professionals or people who classify and/or qualify as well you know smart. When you get a girl, youll do a lot of dumb things what we do doesn’t have to make sense to you ya know. Don’t think you needed to point that out but to e ah their own I guess. Ahh, damn I respect the effort but…..i…..well-…. Nah still not getting it, can you use the word miserable in a sentence? Jokes aside no see this doesn’t bother ke it just puts on display how ignorance is bliss ya know, I got all day and night I really couldn’t be bothered by someone else other than myself who clearly doesn’t know when to call it quits. Several reasons for that, Ren. Some of which I have already said many, many times. I won’t be repeating myself anymore though. No point in wasting anymore effort, you know? Does it make sense to you though? Thats the better question. π I know you don’t know when to call it quits, you didn’t have to tell me that lol. No by all means, be as efficient as you see fit, I think we both have given enough reasonings for one day, no need for reminders. Clearly if I can crack jokes, it makes enough sense, unless it doesn’t but I don’t think it doesn’t make sense so it should make sense or is sense just a shallow question with no answers. Alright my bad for pointing out something we have in common π’ Yes, especially if reminders do not good in getting through to the desired audience. Oh so you’re trying to say that the whole username thing is a joke. I think? Well at least we’re on the same page on that. Uhh no. The whole cracking jokes part is in reference to your accusation of me getting miserable when I see notifications from you. The username isn’t a joke in my opinion. |
Nov 13, 2023 10:10 PM
#59
INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: lovealyssafaith said: INTJ_Ren said: lovealyssafaith said: INTJ_Ren said: lovealyssafaith said: INTJ_Ren said: lovealyssafaith said: INTJ_Ren said: You could’ve easily found the answer yourself without being spoiled. It’s not gonna hurt the website or app if you make a useless thread but damn you lazy π Lmao ok? ππ Do better idk π€· no thanks π€·πΌβοΈ You probably should. It’s 2023 like i said no thanks π€·πΌβοΈπ Like I said you should π nahππππππ I hate when that happens but β¬οΈ Get a room already. You two cant stop talking to each other… Well…..I mean ……when I initially repliedβ¬οΈ Thats interesting. How could you not know it would get this far if you participated in continuing it? Some people really just like talking I guess, I only responded accordingly Right, some people… Some peoole just enjoy a good casual convo π I got it the first time π And I was just agreeing with you π I didnt say anything about a “good casual convo”, so im not sure who youre agreeing with π I got that the first time, a good casual convo is what I said because a I was agreeing with you that some people just like talking. Except I never said some people just like talking, you did. Yeah but you said right some people which allowed me to agree with you and mention that someone just enjoy a good casual convo Except when I said “right some people”, I was already reasserting your statement. So you were really just agreeing with yourself, not me. That could go both ways so there really isn’t a one way with that comment especially when it doesn’t directly reassert π Nope, no it cant. You said something and I responding with a word of agreement: “right”. Yes because your interpretation isn’t the only one so that’s just causal convo doing its thing there buddy. Yes, and there are still rules to a casual convo. It’s simple really: I made no assertion, therefore, it was impossible for you to agree with anything I had said. You didn’t need to make an assertion you just said something and I agreed to it, be more direct in what you’re trying to say cause yes there are rules to casual convo. If you say something that can be interpreted different or have double meanings then your intention is null and void. Yes, but you are agreeing with me agreeing to a statement that you made. Thats not a convo anymore, and this is why there are rules to a convo. I also got that the first time, there’s no confusion here. I said something you gave a response and I agreed with said response with my own, that’s a convo, don’t know how else to spell it for ya π Except you dont get it. If I already agreed with you then why are you agreeing with me agreeing with you? How do you not understand how this makes no sense at all? π Oh but you see I do get it, a lot more than you think, you see, when I see we’re on the same page I had one more response and that was to agree with you agree with me, little did I know you weren’t finished and wanted to keep going by not asking the appropriate questions or for me to rephrase, now we’re here because one of us has to clear things up, I mean I don’t have to but aye I’m nice. If this doesn’t make sense then why keep going, if you haven’t figured it out yet and I’m not doing a good enough job at clearing up any misunderstandings then maybe the problem is you? I get what’s going on why don’t you? Exactly, thank you for admitting it. You were just talking for talkings sake. Only took like 50 replies lol. Oh and by the way, normal convos don’t usually include one long run-on sentence. Word for word did I say I anything about admitting anything or is that an accusation you’re using as a scapegoat? I men’s I was talking just because you kept ing hitting the quote button so I assumed you wanted to keep this up, making a lot of assumptions are we? π€£ a conversation is a conversation, normal complex, are a means to an end. “I was talking just because you kept hitting the quote button”. Lmao you just played yourself. If thats not admitting it then i don’t know what is. π€£ Good try though, you kept it up a long time. Well it’s not, you accused me of something I wasn’t doing, and I brought you more close to the actual answer if anything, so please elaborate where did I say anything about admitting anything word for word? It was a good try tho I’ll give you that π you hit the quote button so clearly you want to talk to me, I’m not replying because I genuinely want to. Responding just because I am talking to you is the exact definition of talking just for talkings sake. I mean you keep digging yourself a hole, ren. If you don’t want to talk to me and you continue to talk to me, then you are talking for talkings sake. And if that really were true and you didn’t want to respond at all, then you simply wouldn’t. Yes, I hit the quote button no one is disputing that, ren. π If you still don’t understand the term “talking for talkings sake” then I’m afraid I can’t help you anymore. See you’re doing it again. I’m not talking for the sake of talking, believe me it’s a signature phrase I use often. (especially on MaL) I guess you can’t help me nor do I wish to help you, I gave you everything I got, I don’t know what else you want from me, we discuss things on forums and it takes two to tango so unless the discussion is over then you’re just gonna keep dragging this on till we have 100 replies in this thread, truth be told I was done after the first 3 but I guess you like talking to me. Reality is the only one who’s been talking for the sake of talking is you, you could’ve chose to not hit quote yet here we are, normally I’d say so haha you played yourself but this ain’t one of those moments. I think you genuinely wanted to talk so I kept it up as long as you hit quote, just tryna be nice, and spare some of my time on someone who may or may not need it. I never wanted anything from you, I’m just telling you how it is and you don’t want to accept it. If you were done after the third reply then you would have stopped. Instead, you are talking for the sake of talking. You claim that you are talking just because you think I need someone to talk to. That is talking for the sake of talking. If anyone needs someone to talk to, it’s the introvert lol. Here’s the deal Ren, I actually want to talk to you and you have indicated that you do not want to talk to me, and thats OK. You continue to blame me for pressing the quote button when you have just as much power as me. This is a lesson for all future interactions, not just this one, Ren. Like you said you had just as much power as me yet kept going so there was no point in you saying that, you quoted me which means you wanted a reply, that’s not talking for the sake of talking, you clearly want something from me which I can’t really give you since this isn’t even anime related. You’re an introvert? Not name calling, cause I’m confused as to who you’re referring to cause I’m an extrovert as you see by my inconsistent replies π I got that the entirety of this interaction, but again I don’t really want to talk to you but you keep quoting me, imma keep quoting you back and if you think I was talking for the sake of talking then, I wasn’t but now I am since I clearly told you I was done and you keep quoting me, if you taught a lesson it fell on deaf ears or I can’t see it cause where’s the lesson π€¨ Yes, I said you have just as much power as me, but you missed the part where I actually want to talk to you. YOU dont. Like I said, I was only trying to help you understand. But like a wise man once said, “You cant get someone to understand something that they dont want to understand”. Oh well. I think we both know youre not the extrovert. It’s in your username lmao. Not that bright I guess. π Again, if you don’t want to talk to me, you don’t have to. I do though, so I will continue to. Not that hard of a concept, but like you said, “deaf ears”. You don’t listen, Ren. I don’t think I missed anything. As you didn’t want anything from me, I didn’t want anything from you, all you tried to do was say why you’re right and I’m wrong over the tiniest thing that may or may not even be all that much of a big deal to the average Joe, where this help is, well that’s beyond me. I share the same username as my girlfriend I’m more of a EFNJ, try again. We’re still here cause you don’t listen there buddy, I gave you all the info as to why what I said made sense and cleared up the misunderstanding you had which led to the 59 replies you were going on about, we’re still here cause you want to talk to me as you said yourself. It’s exactly as I said, “deaf ears”, I bet you already have a reply already ready since you don’t listen. Wrong again, you never cleared anything up. There’s no way you can explain a triple agreement in a two way conversation. Haha, sorry Ren, it’s just not a thing in a normal conversation. A more accurate response would have been, “my bad dude, I meant to add a more logical response to the conversation.” But hey, like you said, “deaf ears”. Do better next time, Ren. Oh and why would you share a MAL account with your girl? Im not really surprised cause you’re not that bright but damn. Unless you’re watching everything together then whats the point? Lol Wrong again buddy. Normal and complex or whatever word you want to use as a place holder, it’s a means to an end. You’re telling what I can’t do when I just did it, kinda defeats the point there buddyπ there hasn’t been a single logical thing about this interaction so I don’t think I need to do better unless you want to actually throw down some college level responses. Wow the pot calling the kettle black, I think I understand the problem now. You can’t read, and what you’ve been doing this entire time is reading but you’re not reading what you want to hear you’re reading the next thing to counter which I turn tells me you’re not even trying to talk to me but more or less bother me because I share a name, not the account smart one. Again try again. Or don’t cause really that’d be the most logical thing you can do since you wanna talk logic π Just like I said, “those who dont want to learn, cant”. Sad honestly, hopefully you change your ways one day, Ren! Until then, good luck with your triple agreements in life. Everyone will think you are unable to uphold a real conversation. Can’t say I didn’t try lol. Ha, genuinely wasn’t trying to bother you. I didn’t think it was possible to share a username with someone else, as in all other social media platforms this is not possible. Try again at what? I haven’t been trying, I’ve been doing. Apparently, I’ve been making you miserable every time I respond lol. Those with degrees teach properly, unless you are teacher, there’s not much to learn from someone online, especially since I got A’s in English so as much as you’d like to think I can’t hold a conversation the state I live in begs to differ. Speaking of which whether you or anyone thinks I can is irrelevant, lions do not concern themselves with opinions of sheep. You weren’t bothering, I was just informing you of my observation and telling you that my name isn’t something chose without considering the implications. Oh then that makes two of us, I get this all the time but just cause I type essays doesn’t mean I’m trying, I’m a very talkative person and I can’t fit everything I want to say into a single sentence, miserable? Would you say something tedious makes someone miserable because miserable is making a lot of assumptions. You don’t have to be a teacher to teach something to someone. Smart people learn a lot from a lot of people. Remember that, Ren. Now that I think about it, sharing a username is still pretty dumb. Because now, you two are just misrepresenting yourselves. That is not your correct personality type for you, and thats not her correct name. Anyways, no big deal, just wanted to point that out. You’re thinking too hard on the word “miserable”. Let me try again since you didn’t get it. Seeing my response pop up makes you “miserable”. Better now? Well if that’s the case then why haven’t I learned anything from you? You’re smart but not reaching me anything, leave it to professionals or people who classify and/or qualify as well you know smart. When you get a girl, youll do a lot of dumb things what we do doesn’t have to make sense to you ya know. Don’t think you needed to point that out but to e ah their own I guess. Ahh, damn I respect the effort but…..i…..well-…. Nah still not getting it, can you use the word miserable in a sentence? Jokes aside no see this doesn’t bother ke it just puts on display how ignorance is bliss ya know, I got all day and night I really couldn’t be bothered by someone else other than myself who clearly doesn’t know when to call it quits. Several reasons for that, Ren. Some of which I have already said many, many times. I won’t be repeating myself anymore though. No point in wasting anymore effort, you know? Does it make sense to you though? Thats the better question. π I know you don’t know when to call it quits, you didn’t have to tell me that lol. No by all means, be as efficient as you see fit, I think we both have given enough reasonings for one day, no need for reminders. Clearly if I can crack jokes, it makes enough sense, unless it doesn’t but I don’t think it doesn’t make sense so it should make sense or is sense just a shallow question with no answers. Alright my bad for pointing out something we have in common π’ Yes, especially if reminders do not good in getting through to the desired audience. Oh so you’re trying to say that the whole username thing is a joke. I think? Well at least we’re on the same page on that. Uhh no. The whole cracking jokes part is in reference to your accusation of me getting miserable when I see notifications from you. The username isn’t a joke in my opinion. Oh ok i got it. I was just confused cause you put it in the wrong paragraph. |
Nov 13, 2023 10:11 PM
#60
Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: lovealyssafaith said: INTJ_Ren said: lovealyssafaith said: INTJ_Ren said: lovealyssafaith said: INTJ_Ren said: lovealyssafaith said: INTJ_Ren said: You could’ve easily found the answer yourself without being spoiled. It’s not gonna hurt the website or app if you make a useless thread but damn you lazy π Lmao ok? ππ Do better idk π€· no thanks π€·πΌβοΈ You probably should. It’s 2023 like i said no thanks π€·πΌβοΈπ Like I said you should π nahππππππ I hate when that happens but β¬οΈ Get a room already. You two cant stop talking to each other… Well…..I mean ……when I initially repliedβ¬οΈ Thats interesting. How could you not know it would get this far if you participated in continuing it? Some people really just like talking I guess, I only responded accordingly Right, some people… Some peoole just enjoy a good casual convo π I got it the first time π And I was just agreeing with you π I didnt say anything about a “good casual convo”, so im not sure who youre agreeing with π I got that the first time, a good casual convo is what I said because a I was agreeing with you that some people just like talking. Except I never said some people just like talking, you did. Yeah but you said right some people which allowed me to agree with you and mention that someone just enjoy a good casual convo Except when I said “right some people”, I was already reasserting your statement. So you were really just agreeing with yourself, not me. That could go both ways so there really isn’t a one way with that comment especially when it doesn’t directly reassert π Nope, no it cant. You said something and I responding with a word of agreement: “right”. Yes because your interpretation isn’t the only one so that’s just causal convo doing its thing there buddy. Yes, and there are still rules to a casual convo. It’s simple really: I made no assertion, therefore, it was impossible for you to agree with anything I had said. You didn’t need to make an assertion you just said something and I agreed to it, be more direct in what you’re trying to say cause yes there are rules to casual convo. If you say something that can be interpreted different or have double meanings then your intention is null and void. Yes, but you are agreeing with me agreeing to a statement that you made. Thats not a convo anymore, and this is why there are rules to a convo. I also got that the first time, there’s no confusion here. I said something you gave a response and I agreed with said response with my own, that’s a convo, don’t know how else to spell it for ya π Except you dont get it. If I already agreed with you then why are you agreeing with me agreeing with you? How do you not understand how this makes no sense at all? π Oh but you see I do get it, a lot more than you think, you see, when I see we’re on the same page I had one more response and that was to agree with you agree with me, little did I know you weren’t finished and wanted to keep going by not asking the appropriate questions or for me to rephrase, now we’re here because one of us has to clear things up, I mean I don’t have to but aye I’m nice. If this doesn’t make sense then why keep going, if you haven’t figured it out yet and I’m not doing a good enough job at clearing up any misunderstandings then maybe the problem is you? I get what’s going on why don’t you? Exactly, thank you for admitting it. You were just talking for talkings sake. Only took like 50 replies lol. Oh and by the way, normal convos don’t usually include one long run-on sentence. Word for word did I say I anything about admitting anything or is that an accusation you’re using as a scapegoat? I men’s I was talking just because you kept ing hitting the quote button so I assumed you wanted to keep this up, making a lot of assumptions are we? π€£ a conversation is a conversation, normal complex, are a means to an end. “I was talking just because you kept hitting the quote button”. Lmao you just played yourself. If thats not admitting it then i don’t know what is. π€£ Good try though, you kept it up a long time. Well it’s not, you accused me of something I wasn’t doing, and I brought you more close to the actual answer if anything, so please elaborate where did I say anything about admitting anything word for word? It was a good try tho I’ll give you that π you hit the quote button so clearly you want to talk to me, I’m not replying because I genuinely want to. Responding just because I am talking to you is the exact definition of talking just for talkings sake. I mean you keep digging yourself a hole, ren. If you don’t want to talk to me and you continue to talk to me, then you are talking for talkings sake. And if that really were true and you didn’t want to respond at all, then you simply wouldn’t. Yes, I hit the quote button no one is disputing that, ren. π If you still don’t understand the term “talking for talkings sake” then I’m afraid I can’t help you anymore. See you’re doing it again. I’m not talking for the sake of talking, believe me it’s a signature phrase I use often. (especially on MaL) I guess you can’t help me nor do I wish to help you, I gave you everything I got, I don’t know what else you want from me, we discuss things on forums and it takes two to tango so unless the discussion is over then you’re just gonna keep dragging this on till we have 100 replies in this thread, truth be told I was done after the first 3 but I guess you like talking to me. Reality is the only one who’s been talking for the sake of talking is you, you could’ve chose to not hit quote yet here we are, normally I’d say so haha you played yourself but this ain’t one of those moments. I think you genuinely wanted to talk so I kept it up as long as you hit quote, just tryna be nice, and spare some of my time on someone who may or may not need it. I never wanted anything from you, I’m just telling you how it is and you don’t want to accept it. If you were done after the third reply then you would have stopped. Instead, you are talking for the sake of talking. You claim that you are talking just because you think I need someone to talk to. That is talking for the sake of talking. If anyone needs someone to talk to, it’s the introvert lol. Here’s the deal Ren, I actually want to talk to you and you have indicated that you do not want to talk to me, and thats OK. You continue to blame me for pressing the quote button when you have just as much power as me. This is a lesson for all future interactions, not just this one, Ren. Like you said you had just as much power as me yet kept going so there was no point in you saying that, you quoted me which means you wanted a reply, that’s not talking for the sake of talking, you clearly want something from me which I can’t really give you since this isn’t even anime related. You’re an introvert? Not name calling, cause I’m confused as to who you’re referring to cause I’m an extrovert as you see by my inconsistent replies π I got that the entirety of this interaction, but again I don’t really want to talk to you but you keep quoting me, imma keep quoting you back and if you think I was talking for the sake of talking then, I wasn’t but now I am since I clearly told you I was done and you keep quoting me, if you taught a lesson it fell on deaf ears or I can’t see it cause where’s the lesson π€¨ Yes, I said you have just as much power as me, but you missed the part where I actually want to talk to you. YOU dont. Like I said, I was only trying to help you understand. But like a wise man once said, “You cant get someone to understand something that they dont want to understand”. Oh well. I think we both know youre not the extrovert. It’s in your username lmao. Not that bright I guess. π Again, if you don’t want to talk to me, you don’t have to. I do though, so I will continue to. Not that hard of a concept, but like you said, “deaf ears”. You don’t listen, Ren. I don’t think I missed anything. As you didn’t want anything from me, I didn’t want anything from you, all you tried to do was say why you’re right and I’m wrong over the tiniest thing that may or may not even be all that much of a big deal to the average Joe, where this help is, well that’s beyond me. I share the same username as my girlfriend I’m more of a EFNJ, try again. We’re still here cause you don’t listen there buddy, I gave you all the info as to why what I said made sense and cleared up the misunderstanding you had which led to the 59 replies you were going on about, we’re still here cause you want to talk to me as you said yourself. It’s exactly as I said, “deaf ears”, I bet you already have a reply already ready since you don’t listen. Wrong again, you never cleared anything up. There’s no way you can explain a triple agreement in a two way conversation. Haha, sorry Ren, it’s just not a thing in a normal conversation. A more accurate response would have been, “my bad dude, I meant to add a more logical response to the conversation.” But hey, like you said, “deaf ears”. Do better next time, Ren. Oh and why would you share a MAL account with your girl? Im not really surprised cause you’re not that bright but damn. Unless you’re watching everything together then whats the point? Lol Wrong again buddy. Normal and complex or whatever word you want to use as a place holder, it’s a means to an end. You’re telling what I can’t do when I just did it, kinda defeats the point there buddyπ there hasn’t been a single logical thing about this interaction so I don’t think I need to do better unless you want to actually throw down some college level responses. Wow the pot calling the kettle black, I think I understand the problem now. You can’t read, and what you’ve been doing this entire time is reading but you’re not reading what you want to hear you’re reading the next thing to counter which I turn tells me you’re not even trying to talk to me but more or less bother me because I share a name, not the account smart one. Again try again. Or don’t cause really that’d be the most logical thing you can do since you wanna talk logic π Just like I said, “those who dont want to learn, cant”. Sad honestly, hopefully you change your ways one day, Ren! Until then, good luck with your triple agreements in life. Everyone will think you are unable to uphold a real conversation. Can’t say I didn’t try lol. Ha, genuinely wasn’t trying to bother you. I didn’t think it was possible to share a username with someone else, as in all other social media platforms this is not possible. Try again at what? I haven’t been trying, I’ve been doing. Apparently, I’ve been making you miserable every time I respond lol. Those with degrees teach properly, unless you are teacher, there’s not much to learn from someone online, especially since I got A’s in English so as much as you’d like to think I can’t hold a conversation the state I live in begs to differ. Speaking of which whether you or anyone thinks I can is irrelevant, lions do not concern themselves with opinions of sheep. You weren’t bothering, I was just informing you of my observation and telling you that my name isn’t something chose without considering the implications. Oh then that makes two of us, I get this all the time but just cause I type essays doesn’t mean I’m trying, I’m a very talkative person and I can’t fit everything I want to say into a single sentence, miserable? Would you say something tedious makes someone miserable because miserable is making a lot of assumptions. You don’t have to be a teacher to teach something to someone. Smart people learn a lot from a lot of people. Remember that, Ren. Now that I think about it, sharing a username is still pretty dumb. Because now, you two are just misrepresenting yourselves. That is not your correct personality type for you, and thats not her correct name. Anyways, no big deal, just wanted to point that out. You’re thinking too hard on the word “miserable”. Let me try again since you didn’t get it. Seeing my response pop up makes you “miserable”. Better now? Well if that’s the case then why haven’t I learned anything from you? You’re smart but not reaching me anything, leave it to professionals or people who classify and/or qualify as well you know smart. When you get a girl, youll do a lot of dumb things what we do doesn’t have to make sense to you ya know. Don’t think you needed to point that out but to e ah their own I guess. Ahh, damn I respect the effort but…..i…..well-…. Nah still not getting it, can you use the word miserable in a sentence? Jokes aside no see this doesn’t bother ke it just puts on display how ignorance is bliss ya know, I got all day and night I really couldn’t be bothered by someone else other than myself who clearly doesn’t know when to call it quits. Several reasons for that, Ren. Some of which I have already said many, many times. I won’t be repeating myself anymore though. No point in wasting anymore effort, you know? Does it make sense to you though? Thats the better question. π I know you don’t know when to call it quits, you didn’t have to tell me that lol. No by all means, be as efficient as you see fit, I think we both have given enough reasonings for one day, no need for reminders. Clearly if I can crack jokes, it makes enough sense, unless it doesn’t but I don’t think it doesn’t make sense so it should make sense or is sense just a shallow question with no answers. Alright my bad for pointing out something we have in common π’ Yes, especially if reminders do not good in getting through to the desired audience. Oh so you’re trying to say that the whole username thing is a joke. I think? Well at least we’re on the same page on that. Uhh no. The whole cracking jokes part is in reference to your accusation of me getting miserable when I see notifications from you. The username isn’t a joke in my opinion. Oh ok i got it. I was just confused cause you put it in the wrong paragraph. That’s been a consistent thing on both sides. |
Nov 13, 2023 10:13 PM
#61
INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: lovealyssafaith said: INTJ_Ren said: lovealyssafaith said: INTJ_Ren said: lovealyssafaith said: INTJ_Ren said: lovealyssafaith said: INTJ_Ren said: You could’ve easily found the answer yourself without being spoiled. It’s not gonna hurt the website or app if you make a useless thread but damn you lazy π Lmao ok? ππ Do better idk π€· no thanks π€·πΌβοΈ You probably should. It’s 2023 like i said no thanks π€·πΌβοΈπ Like I said you should π nahππππππ I hate when that happens but β¬οΈ Get a room already. You two cant stop talking to each other… Well…..I mean ……when I initially repliedβ¬οΈ Thats interesting. How could you not know it would get this far if you participated in continuing it? Some people really just like talking I guess, I only responded accordingly Right, some people… Some peoole just enjoy a good casual convo π I got it the first time π And I was just agreeing with you π I didnt say anything about a “good casual convo”, so im not sure who youre agreeing with π I got that the first time, a good casual convo is what I said because a I was agreeing with you that some people just like talking. Except I never said some people just like talking, you did. Yeah but you said right some people which allowed me to agree with you and mention that someone just enjoy a good casual convo Except when I said “right some people”, I was already reasserting your statement. So you were really just agreeing with yourself, not me. That could go both ways so there really isn’t a one way with that comment especially when it doesn’t directly reassert π Nope, no it cant. You said something and I responding with a word of agreement: “right”. Yes because your interpretation isn’t the only one so that’s just causal convo doing its thing there buddy. Yes, and there are still rules to a casual convo. It’s simple really: I made no assertion, therefore, it was impossible for you to agree with anything I had said. You didn’t need to make an assertion you just said something and I agreed to it, be more direct in what you’re trying to say cause yes there are rules to casual convo. If you say something that can be interpreted different or have double meanings then your intention is null and void. Yes, but you are agreeing with me agreeing to a statement that you made. Thats not a convo anymore, and this is why there are rules to a convo. I also got that the first time, there’s no confusion here. I said something you gave a response and I agreed with said response with my own, that’s a convo, don’t know how else to spell it for ya π Except you dont get it. If I already agreed with you then why are you agreeing with me agreeing with you? How do you not understand how this makes no sense at all? π Oh but you see I do get it, a lot more than you think, you see, when I see we’re on the same page I had one more response and that was to agree with you agree with me, little did I know you weren’t finished and wanted to keep going by not asking the appropriate questions or for me to rephrase, now we’re here because one of us has to clear things up, I mean I don’t have to but aye I’m nice. If this doesn’t make sense then why keep going, if you haven’t figured it out yet and I’m not doing a good enough job at clearing up any misunderstandings then maybe the problem is you? I get what’s going on why don’t you? Exactly, thank you for admitting it. You were just talking for talkings sake. Only took like 50 replies lol. Oh and by the way, normal convos don’t usually include one long run-on sentence. Word for word did I say I anything about admitting anything or is that an accusation you’re using as a scapegoat? I men’s I was talking just because you kept ing hitting the quote button so I assumed you wanted to keep this up, making a lot of assumptions are we? π€£ a conversation is a conversation, normal complex, are a means to an end. “I was talking just because you kept hitting the quote button”. Lmao you just played yourself. If thats not admitting it then i don’t know what is. π€£ Good try though, you kept it up a long time. Well it’s not, you accused me of something I wasn’t doing, and I brought you more close to the actual answer if anything, so please elaborate where did I say anything about admitting anything word for word? It was a good try tho I’ll give you that π you hit the quote button so clearly you want to talk to me, I’m not replying because I genuinely want to. Responding just because I am talking to you is the exact definition of talking just for talkings sake. I mean you keep digging yourself a hole, ren. If you don’t want to talk to me and you continue to talk to me, then you are talking for talkings sake. And if that really were true and you didn’t want to respond at all, then you simply wouldn’t. Yes, I hit the quote button no one is disputing that, ren. π If you still don’t understand the term “talking for talkings sake” then I’m afraid I can’t help you anymore. See you’re doing it again. I’m not talking for the sake of talking, believe me it’s a signature phrase I use often. (especially on MaL) I guess you can’t help me nor do I wish to help you, I gave you everything I got, I don’t know what else you want from me, we discuss things on forums and it takes two to tango so unless the discussion is over then you’re just gonna keep dragging this on till we have 100 replies in this thread, truth be told I was done after the first 3 but I guess you like talking to me. Reality is the only one who’s been talking for the sake of talking is you, you could’ve chose to not hit quote yet here we are, normally I’d say so haha you played yourself but this ain’t one of those moments. I think you genuinely wanted to talk so I kept it up as long as you hit quote, just tryna be nice, and spare some of my time on someone who may or may not need it. I never wanted anything from you, I’m just telling you how it is and you don’t want to accept it. If you were done after the third reply then you would have stopped. Instead, you are talking for the sake of talking. You claim that you are talking just because you think I need someone to talk to. That is talking for the sake of talking. If anyone needs someone to talk to, it’s the introvert lol. Here’s the deal Ren, I actually want to talk to you and you have indicated that you do not want to talk to me, and thats OK. You continue to blame me for pressing the quote button when you have just as much power as me. This is a lesson for all future interactions, not just this one, Ren. Like you said you had just as much power as me yet kept going so there was no point in you saying that, you quoted me which means you wanted a reply, that’s not talking for the sake of talking, you clearly want something from me which I can’t really give you since this isn’t even anime related. You’re an introvert? Not name calling, cause I’m confused as to who you’re referring to cause I’m an extrovert as you see by my inconsistent replies π I got that the entirety of this interaction, but again I don’t really want to talk to you but you keep quoting me, imma keep quoting you back and if you think I was talking for the sake of talking then, I wasn’t but now I am since I clearly told you I was done and you keep quoting me, if you taught a lesson it fell on deaf ears or I can’t see it cause where’s the lesson π€¨ Yes, I said you have just as much power as me, but you missed the part where I actually want to talk to you. YOU dont. Like I said, I was only trying to help you understand. But like a wise man once said, “You cant get someone to understand something that they dont want to understand”. Oh well. I think we both know youre not the extrovert. It’s in your username lmao. Not that bright I guess. π Again, if you don’t want to talk to me, you don’t have to. I do though, so I will continue to. Not that hard of a concept, but like you said, “deaf ears”. You don’t listen, Ren. I don’t think I missed anything. As you didn’t want anything from me, I didn’t want anything from you, all you tried to do was say why you’re right and I’m wrong over the tiniest thing that may or may not even be all that much of a big deal to the average Joe, where this help is, well that’s beyond me. I share the same username as my girlfriend I’m more of a EFNJ, try again. We’re still here cause you don’t listen there buddy, I gave you all the info as to why what I said made sense and cleared up the misunderstanding you had which led to the 59 replies you were going on about, we’re still here cause you want to talk to me as you said yourself. It’s exactly as I said, “deaf ears”, I bet you already have a reply already ready since you don’t listen. Wrong again, you never cleared anything up. There’s no way you can explain a triple agreement in a two way conversation. Haha, sorry Ren, it’s just not a thing in a normal conversation. A more accurate response would have been, “my bad dude, I meant to add a more logical response to the conversation.” But hey, like you said, “deaf ears”. Do better next time, Ren. Oh and why would you share a MAL account with your girl? Im not really surprised cause you’re not that bright but damn. Unless you’re watching everything together then whats the point? Lol Wrong again buddy. Normal and complex or whatever word you want to use as a place holder, it’s a means to an end. You’re telling what I can’t do when I just did it, kinda defeats the point there buddyπ there hasn’t been a single logical thing about this interaction so I don’t think I need to do better unless you want to actually throw down some college level responses. Wow the pot calling the kettle black, I think I understand the problem now. You can’t read, and what you’ve been doing this entire time is reading but you’re not reading what you want to hear you’re reading the next thing to counter which I turn tells me you’re not even trying to talk to me but more or less bother me because I share a name, not the account smart one. Again try again. Or don’t cause really that’d be the most logical thing you can do since you wanna talk logic π Just like I said, “those who dont want to learn, cant”. Sad honestly, hopefully you change your ways one day, Ren! Until then, good luck with your triple agreements in life. Everyone will think you are unable to uphold a real conversation. Can’t say I didn’t try lol. Ha, genuinely wasn’t trying to bother you. I didn’t think it was possible to share a username with someone else, as in all other social media platforms this is not possible. Try again at what? I haven’t been trying, I’ve been doing. Apparently, I’ve been making you miserable every time I respond lol. Those with degrees teach properly, unless you are teacher, there’s not much to learn from someone online, especially since I got A’s in English so as much as you’d like to think I can’t hold a conversation the state I live in begs to differ. Speaking of which whether you or anyone thinks I can is irrelevant, lions do not concern themselves with opinions of sheep. You weren’t bothering, I was just informing you of my observation and telling you that my name isn’t something chose without considering the implications. Oh then that makes two of us, I get this all the time but just cause I type essays doesn’t mean I’m trying, I’m a very talkative person and I can’t fit everything I want to say into a single sentence, miserable? Would you say something tedious makes someone miserable because miserable is making a lot of assumptions. You don’t have to be a teacher to teach something to someone. Smart people learn a lot from a lot of people. Remember that, Ren. Now that I think about it, sharing a username is still pretty dumb. Because now, you two are just misrepresenting yourselves. That is not your correct personality type for you, and thats not her correct name. Anyways, no big deal, just wanted to point that out. You’re thinking too hard on the word “miserable”. Let me try again since you didn’t get it. Seeing my response pop up makes you “miserable”. Better now? Well if that’s the case then why haven’t I learned anything from you? You’re smart but not reaching me anything, leave it to professionals or people who classify and/or qualify as well you know smart. When you get a girl, youll do a lot of dumb things what we do doesn’t have to make sense to you ya know. Don’t think you needed to point that out but to e ah their own I guess. Ahh, damn I respect the effort but…..i…..well-…. Nah still not getting it, can you use the word miserable in a sentence? Jokes aside no see this doesn’t bother ke it just puts on display how ignorance is bliss ya know, I got all day and night I really couldn’t be bothered by someone else other than myself who clearly doesn’t know when to call it quits. Several reasons for that, Ren. Some of which I have already said many, many times. I won’t be repeating myself anymore though. No point in wasting anymore effort, you know? Does it make sense to you though? Thats the better question. π I know you don’t know when to call it quits, you didn’t have to tell me that lol. No by all means, be as efficient as you see fit, I think we both have given enough reasonings for one day, no need for reminders. Clearly if I can crack jokes, it makes enough sense, unless it doesn’t but I don’t think it doesn’t make sense so it should make sense or is sense just a shallow question with no answers. Alright my bad for pointing out something we have in common π’ Yes, especially if reminders do not good in getting through to the desired audience. Oh so you’re trying to say that the whole username thing is a joke. I think? Well at least we’re on the same page on that. Uhh no. The whole cracking jokes part is in reference to your accusation of me getting miserable when I see notifications from you. The username isn’t a joke in my opinion. Oh ok i got it. I was just confused cause you put it in the wrong paragraph. That’s been a consistent thing on both sides. No, I only do it when i change the amount of paragraphs to fit the amount of topics we are discussing. |
Nov 13, 2023 10:14 PM
#62
Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: lovealyssafaith said: INTJ_Ren said: lovealyssafaith said: INTJ_Ren said: lovealyssafaith said: INTJ_Ren said: lovealyssafaith said: INTJ_Ren said: You could’ve easily found the answer yourself without being spoiled. It’s not gonna hurt the website or app if you make a useless thread but damn you lazy π Lmao ok? ππ Do better idk π€· no thanks π€·πΌβοΈ You probably should. It’s 2023 like i said no thanks π€·πΌβοΈπ Like I said you should π nahππππππ I hate when that happens but β¬οΈ Get a room already. You two cant stop talking to each other… Well…..I mean ……when I initially repliedβ¬οΈ Thats interesting. How could you not know it would get this far if you participated in continuing it? Some people really just like talking I guess, I only responded accordingly Right, some people… Some peoole just enjoy a good casual convo π I got it the first time π And I was just agreeing with you π I didnt say anything about a “good casual convo”, so im not sure who youre agreeing with π I got that the first time, a good casual convo is what I said because a I was agreeing with you that some people just like talking. Except I never said some people just like talking, you did. Yeah but you said right some people which allowed me to agree with you and mention that someone just enjoy a good casual convo Except when I said “right some people”, I was already reasserting your statement. So you were really just agreeing with yourself, not me. That could go both ways so there really isn’t a one way with that comment especially when it doesn’t directly reassert π Nope, no it cant. You said something and I responding with a word of agreement: “right”. Yes because your interpretation isn’t the only one so that’s just causal convo doing its thing there buddy. Yes, and there are still rules to a casual convo. It’s simple really: I made no assertion, therefore, it was impossible for you to agree with anything I had said. You didn’t need to make an assertion you just said something and I agreed to it, be more direct in what you’re trying to say cause yes there are rules to casual convo. If you say something that can be interpreted different or have double meanings then your intention is null and void. Yes, but you are agreeing with me agreeing to a statement that you made. Thats not a convo anymore, and this is why there are rules to a convo. I also got that the first time, there’s no confusion here. I said something you gave a response and I agreed with said response with my own, that’s a convo, don’t know how else to spell it for ya π Except you dont get it. If I already agreed with you then why are you agreeing with me agreeing with you? How do you not understand how this makes no sense at all? π Oh but you see I do get it, a lot more than you think, you see, when I see we’re on the same page I had one more response and that was to agree with you agree with me, little did I know you weren’t finished and wanted to keep going by not asking the appropriate questions or for me to rephrase, now we’re here because one of us has to clear things up, I mean I don’t have to but aye I’m nice. If this doesn’t make sense then why keep going, if you haven’t figured it out yet and I’m not doing a good enough job at clearing up any misunderstandings then maybe the problem is you? I get what’s going on why don’t you? Exactly, thank you for admitting it. You were just talking for talkings sake. Only took like 50 replies lol. Oh and by the way, normal convos don’t usually include one long run-on sentence. Word for word did I say I anything about admitting anything or is that an accusation you’re using as a scapegoat? I men’s I was talking just because you kept ing hitting the quote button so I assumed you wanted to keep this up, making a lot of assumptions are we? π€£ a conversation is a conversation, normal complex, are a means to an end. “I was talking just because you kept hitting the quote button”. Lmao you just played yourself. If thats not admitting it then i don’t know what is. π€£ Good try though, you kept it up a long time. Well it’s not, you accused me of something I wasn’t doing, and I brought you more close to the actual answer if anything, so please elaborate where did I say anything about admitting anything word for word? It was a good try tho I’ll give you that π you hit the quote button so clearly you want to talk to me, I’m not replying because I genuinely want to. Responding just because I am talking to you is the exact definition of talking just for talkings sake. I mean you keep digging yourself a hole, ren. If you don’t want to talk to me and you continue to talk to me, then you are talking for talkings sake. And if that really were true and you didn’t want to respond at all, then you simply wouldn’t. Yes, I hit the quote button no one is disputing that, ren. π If you still don’t understand the term “talking for talkings sake” then I’m afraid I can’t help you anymore. See you’re doing it again. I’m not talking for the sake of talking, believe me it’s a signature phrase I use often. (especially on MaL) I guess you can’t help me nor do I wish to help you, I gave you everything I got, I don’t know what else you want from me, we discuss things on forums and it takes two to tango so unless the discussion is over then you’re just gonna keep dragging this on till we have 100 replies in this thread, truth be told I was done after the first 3 but I guess you like talking to me. Reality is the only one who’s been talking for the sake of talking is you, you could’ve chose to not hit quote yet here we are, normally I’d say so haha you played yourself but this ain’t one of those moments. I think you genuinely wanted to talk so I kept it up as long as you hit quote, just tryna be nice, and spare some of my time on someone who may or may not need it. I never wanted anything from you, I’m just telling you how it is and you don’t want to accept it. If you were done after the third reply then you would have stopped. Instead, you are talking for the sake of talking. You claim that you are talking just because you think I need someone to talk to. That is talking for the sake of talking. If anyone needs someone to talk to, it’s the introvert lol. Here’s the deal Ren, I actually want to talk to you and you have indicated that you do not want to talk to me, and thats OK. You continue to blame me for pressing the quote button when you have just as much power as me. This is a lesson for all future interactions, not just this one, Ren. Like you said you had just as much power as me yet kept going so there was no point in you saying that, you quoted me which means you wanted a reply, that’s not talking for the sake of talking, you clearly want something from me which I can’t really give you since this isn’t even anime related. You’re an introvert? Not name calling, cause I’m confused as to who you’re referring to cause I’m an extrovert as you see by my inconsistent replies π I got that the entirety of this interaction, but again I don’t really want to talk to you but you keep quoting me, imma keep quoting you back and if you think I was talking for the sake of talking then, I wasn’t but now I am since I clearly told you I was done and you keep quoting me, if you taught a lesson it fell on deaf ears or I can’t see it cause where’s the lesson π€¨ Yes, I said you have just as much power as me, but you missed the part where I actually want to talk to you. YOU dont. Like I said, I was only trying to help you understand. But like a wise man once said, “You cant get someone to understand something that they dont want to understand”. Oh well. I think we both know youre not the extrovert. It’s in your username lmao. Not that bright I guess. π Again, if you don’t want to talk to me, you don’t have to. I do though, so I will continue to. Not that hard of a concept, but like you said, “deaf ears”. You don’t listen, Ren. I don’t think I missed anything. As you didn’t want anything from me, I didn’t want anything from you, all you tried to do was say why you’re right and I’m wrong over the tiniest thing that may or may not even be all that much of a big deal to the average Joe, where this help is, well that’s beyond me. I share the same username as my girlfriend I’m more of a EFNJ, try again. We’re still here cause you don’t listen there buddy, I gave you all the info as to why what I said made sense and cleared up the misunderstanding you had which led to the 59 replies you were going on about, we’re still here cause you want to talk to me as you said yourself. It’s exactly as I said, “deaf ears”, I bet you already have a reply already ready since you don’t listen. Wrong again, you never cleared anything up. There’s no way you can explain a triple agreement in a two way conversation. Haha, sorry Ren, it’s just not a thing in a normal conversation. A more accurate response would have been, “my bad dude, I meant to add a more logical response to the conversation.” But hey, like you said, “deaf ears”. Do better next time, Ren. Oh and why would you share a MAL account with your girl? Im not really surprised cause you’re not that bright but damn. Unless you’re watching everything together then whats the point? Lol Wrong again buddy. Normal and complex or whatever word you want to use as a place holder, it’s a means to an end. You’re telling what I can’t do when I just did it, kinda defeats the point there buddyπ there hasn’t been a single logical thing about this interaction so I don’t think I need to do better unless you want to actually throw down some college level responses. Wow the pot calling the kettle black, I think I understand the problem now. You can’t read, and what you’ve been doing this entire time is reading but you’re not reading what you want to hear you’re reading the next thing to counter which I turn tells me you’re not even trying to talk to me but more or less bother me because I share a name, not the account smart one. Again try again. Or don’t cause really that’d be the most logical thing you can do since you wanna talk logic π Just like I said, “those who dont want to learn, cant”. Sad honestly, hopefully you change your ways one day, Ren! Until then, good luck with your triple agreements in life. Everyone will think you are unable to uphold a real conversation. Can’t say I didn’t try lol. Ha, genuinely wasn’t trying to bother you. I didn’t think it was possible to share a username with someone else, as in all other social media platforms this is not possible. Try again at what? I haven’t been trying, I’ve been doing. Apparently, I’ve been making you miserable every time I respond lol. Those with degrees teach properly, unless you are teacher, there’s not much to learn from someone online, especially since I got A’s in English so as much as you’d like to think I can’t hold a conversation the state I live in begs to differ. Speaking of which whether you or anyone thinks I can is irrelevant, lions do not concern themselves with opinions of sheep. You weren’t bothering, I was just informing you of my observation and telling you that my name isn’t something chose without considering the implications. Oh then that makes two of us, I get this all the time but just cause I type essays doesn’t mean I’m trying, I’m a very talkative person and I can’t fit everything I want to say into a single sentence, miserable? Would you say something tedious makes someone miserable because miserable is making a lot of assumptions. You don’t have to be a teacher to teach something to someone. Smart people learn a lot from a lot of people. Remember that, Ren. Now that I think about it, sharing a username is still pretty dumb. Because now, you two are just misrepresenting yourselves. That is not your correct personality type for you, and thats not her correct name. Anyways, no big deal, just wanted to point that out. You’re thinking too hard on the word “miserable”. Let me try again since you didn’t get it. Seeing my response pop up makes you “miserable”. Better now? Well if that’s the case then why haven’t I learned anything from you? You’re smart but not reaching me anything, leave it to professionals or people who classify and/or qualify as well you know smart. When you get a girl, youll do a lot of dumb things what we do doesn’t have to make sense to you ya know. Don’t think you needed to point that out but to e ah their own I guess. Ahh, damn I respect the effort but…..i…..well-…. Nah still not getting it, can you use the word miserable in a sentence? Jokes aside no see this doesn’t bother ke it just puts on display how ignorance is bliss ya know, I got all day and night I really couldn’t be bothered by someone else other than myself who clearly doesn’t know when to call it quits. Several reasons for that, Ren. Some of which I have already said many, many times. I won’t be repeating myself anymore though. No point in wasting anymore effort, you know? Does it make sense to you though? Thats the better question. π I know you don’t know when to call it quits, you didn’t have to tell me that lol. No by all means, be as efficient as you see fit, I think we both have given enough reasonings for one day, no need for reminders. Clearly if I can crack jokes, it makes enough sense, unless it doesn’t but I don’t think it doesn’t make sense so it should make sense or is sense just a shallow question with no answers. Alright my bad for pointing out something we have in common π’ Yes, especially if reminders do not good in getting through to the desired audience. Oh so you’re trying to say that the whole username thing is a joke. I think? Well at least we’re on the same page on that. Uhh no. The whole cracking jokes part is in reference to your accusation of me getting miserable when I see notifications from you. The username isn’t a joke in my opinion. Oh ok i got it. I was just confused cause you put it in the wrong paragraph. That’s been a consistent thing on both sides. No, I only do it when i change the amount of paragraphs to fit the amount of topics we are discussing. There’s nothing wrong with it. Mistakes happen, no need to take it to heart. You’ve been doing it, I just did it, it really is whatevs ya know. |
Nov 13, 2023 10:16 PM
#63
INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: lovealyssafaith said: INTJ_Ren said: lovealyssafaith said: INTJ_Ren said: lovealyssafaith said: INTJ_Ren said: lovealyssafaith said: INTJ_Ren said: You could’ve easily found the answer yourself without being spoiled. It’s not gonna hurt the website or app if you make a useless thread but damn you lazy π Lmao ok? ππ Do better idk π€· no thanks π€·πΌβοΈ You probably should. It’s 2023 like i said no thanks π€·πΌβοΈπ Like I said you should π nahππππππ I hate when that happens but β¬οΈ Get a room already. You two cant stop talking to each other… Well…..I mean ……when I initially repliedβ¬οΈ Thats interesting. How could you not know it would get this far if you participated in continuing it? Some people really just like talking I guess, I only responded accordingly Right, some people… Some peoole just enjoy a good casual convo π I got it the first time π And I was just agreeing with you π I didnt say anything about a “good casual convo”, so im not sure who youre agreeing with π I got that the first time, a good casual convo is what I said because a I was agreeing with you that some people just like talking. Except I never said some people just like talking, you did. Yeah but you said right some people which allowed me to agree with you and mention that someone just enjoy a good casual convo Except when I said “right some people”, I was already reasserting your statement. So you were really just agreeing with yourself, not me. That could go both ways so there really isn’t a one way with that comment especially when it doesn’t directly reassert π Nope, no it cant. You said something and I responding with a word of agreement: “right”. Yes because your interpretation isn’t the only one so that’s just causal convo doing its thing there buddy. Yes, and there are still rules to a casual convo. It’s simple really: I made no assertion, therefore, it was impossible for you to agree with anything I had said. You didn’t need to make an assertion you just said something and I agreed to it, be more direct in what you’re trying to say cause yes there are rules to casual convo. If you say something that can be interpreted different or have double meanings then your intention is null and void. Yes, but you are agreeing with me agreeing to a statement that you made. Thats not a convo anymore, and this is why there are rules to a convo. I also got that the first time, there’s no confusion here. I said something you gave a response and I agreed with said response with my own, that’s a convo, don’t know how else to spell it for ya π Except you dont get it. If I already agreed with you then why are you agreeing with me agreeing with you? How do you not understand how this makes no sense at all? π Oh but you see I do get it, a lot more than you think, you see, when I see we’re on the same page I had one more response and that was to agree with you agree with me, little did I know you weren’t finished and wanted to keep going by not asking the appropriate questions or for me to rephrase, now we’re here because one of us has to clear things up, I mean I don’t have to but aye I’m nice. If this doesn’t make sense then why keep going, if you haven’t figured it out yet and I’m not doing a good enough job at clearing up any misunderstandings then maybe the problem is you? I get what’s going on why don’t you? Exactly, thank you for admitting it. You were just talking for talkings sake. Only took like 50 replies lol. Oh and by the way, normal convos don’t usually include one long run-on sentence. Word for word did I say I anything about admitting anything or is that an accusation you’re using as a scapegoat? I men’s I was talking just because you kept ing hitting the quote button so I assumed you wanted to keep this up, making a lot of assumptions are we? π€£ a conversation is a conversation, normal complex, are a means to an end. “I was talking just because you kept hitting the quote button”. Lmao you just played yourself. If thats not admitting it then i don’t know what is. π€£ Good try though, you kept it up a long time. Well it’s not, you accused me of something I wasn’t doing, and I brought you more close to the actual answer if anything, so please elaborate where did I say anything about admitting anything word for word? It was a good try tho I’ll give you that π you hit the quote button so clearly you want to talk to me, I’m not replying because I genuinely want to. Responding just because I am talking to you is the exact definition of talking just for talkings sake. I mean you keep digging yourself a hole, ren. If you don’t want to talk to me and you continue to talk to me, then you are talking for talkings sake. And if that really were true and you didn’t want to respond at all, then you simply wouldn’t. Yes, I hit the quote button no one is disputing that, ren. π If you still don’t understand the term “talking for talkings sake” then I’m afraid I can’t help you anymore. See you’re doing it again. I’m not talking for the sake of talking, believe me it’s a signature phrase I use often. (especially on MaL) I guess you can’t help me nor do I wish to help you, I gave you everything I got, I don’t know what else you want from me, we discuss things on forums and it takes two to tango so unless the discussion is over then you’re just gonna keep dragging this on till we have 100 replies in this thread, truth be told I was done after the first 3 but I guess you like talking to me. Reality is the only one who’s been talking for the sake of talking is you, you could’ve chose to not hit quote yet here we are, normally I’d say so haha you played yourself but this ain’t one of those moments. I think you genuinely wanted to talk so I kept it up as long as you hit quote, just tryna be nice, and spare some of my time on someone who may or may not need it. I never wanted anything from you, I’m just telling you how it is and you don’t want to accept it. If you were done after the third reply then you would have stopped. Instead, you are talking for the sake of talking. You claim that you are talking just because you think I need someone to talk to. That is talking for the sake of talking. If anyone needs someone to talk to, it’s the introvert lol. Here’s the deal Ren, I actually want to talk to you and you have indicated that you do not want to talk to me, and thats OK. You continue to blame me for pressing the quote button when you have just as much power as me. This is a lesson for all future interactions, not just this one, Ren. Like you said you had just as much power as me yet kept going so there was no point in you saying that, you quoted me which means you wanted a reply, that’s not talking for the sake of talking, you clearly want something from me which I can’t really give you since this isn’t even anime related. You’re an introvert? Not name calling, cause I’m confused as to who you’re referring to cause I’m an extrovert as you see by my inconsistent replies π I got that the entirety of this interaction, but again I don’t really want to talk to you but you keep quoting me, imma keep quoting you back and if you think I was talking for the sake of talking then, I wasn’t but now I am since I clearly told you I was done and you keep quoting me, if you taught a lesson it fell on deaf ears or I can’t see it cause where’s the lesson π€¨ Yes, I said you have just as much power as me, but you missed the part where I actually want to talk to you. YOU dont. Like I said, I was only trying to help you understand. But like a wise man once said, “You cant get someone to understand something that they dont want to understand”. Oh well. I think we both know youre not the extrovert. It’s in your username lmao. Not that bright I guess. π Again, if you don’t want to talk to me, you don’t have to. I do though, so I will continue to. Not that hard of a concept, but like you said, “deaf ears”. You don’t listen, Ren. I don’t think I missed anything. As you didn’t want anything from me, I didn’t want anything from you, all you tried to do was say why you’re right and I’m wrong over the tiniest thing that may or may not even be all that much of a big deal to the average Joe, where this help is, well that’s beyond me. I share the same username as my girlfriend I’m more of a EFNJ, try again. We’re still here cause you don’t listen there buddy, I gave you all the info as to why what I said made sense and cleared up the misunderstanding you had which led to the 59 replies you were going on about, we’re still here cause you want to talk to me as you said yourself. It’s exactly as I said, “deaf ears”, I bet you already have a reply already ready since you don’t listen. Wrong again, you never cleared anything up. There’s no way you can explain a triple agreement in a two way conversation. Haha, sorry Ren, it’s just not a thing in a normal conversation. A more accurate response would have been, “my bad dude, I meant to add a more logical response to the conversation.” But hey, like you said, “deaf ears”. Do better next time, Ren. Oh and why would you share a MAL account with your girl? Im not really surprised cause you’re not that bright but damn. Unless you’re watching everything together then whats the point? Lol Wrong again buddy. Normal and complex or whatever word you want to use as a place holder, it’s a means to an end. You’re telling what I can’t do when I just did it, kinda defeats the point there buddyπ there hasn’t been a single logical thing about this interaction so I don’t think I need to do better unless you want to actually throw down some college level responses. Wow the pot calling the kettle black, I think I understand the problem now. You can’t read, and what you’ve been doing this entire time is reading but you’re not reading what you want to hear you’re reading the next thing to counter which I turn tells me you’re not even trying to talk to me but more or less bother me because I share a name, not the account smart one. Again try again. Or don’t cause really that’d be the most logical thing you can do since you wanna talk logic π Just like I said, “those who dont want to learn, cant”. Sad honestly, hopefully you change your ways one day, Ren! Until then, good luck with your triple agreements in life. Everyone will think you are unable to uphold a real conversation. Can’t say I didn’t try lol. Ha, genuinely wasn’t trying to bother you. I didn’t think it was possible to share a username with someone else, as in all other social media platforms this is not possible. Try again at what? I haven’t been trying, I’ve been doing. Apparently, I’ve been making you miserable every time I respond lol. Those with degrees teach properly, unless you are teacher, there’s not much to learn from someone online, especially since I got A’s in English so as much as you’d like to think I can’t hold a conversation the state I live in begs to differ. Speaking of which whether you or anyone thinks I can is irrelevant, lions do not concern themselves with opinions of sheep. You weren’t bothering, I was just informing you of my observation and telling you that my name isn’t something chose without considering the implications. Oh then that makes two of us, I get this all the time but just cause I type essays doesn’t mean I’m trying, I’m a very talkative person and I can’t fit everything I want to say into a single sentence, miserable? Would you say something tedious makes someone miserable because miserable is making a lot of assumptions. You don’t have to be a teacher to teach something to someone. Smart people learn a lot from a lot of people. Remember that, Ren. Now that I think about it, sharing a username is still pretty dumb. Because now, you two are just misrepresenting yourselves. That is not your correct personality type for you, and thats not her correct name. Anyways, no big deal, just wanted to point that out. You’re thinking too hard on the word “miserable”. Let me try again since you didn’t get it. Seeing my response pop up makes you “miserable”. Better now? Well if that’s the case then why haven’t I learned anything from you? You’re smart but not reaching me anything, leave it to professionals or people who classify and/or qualify as well you know smart. When you get a girl, youll do a lot of dumb things what we do doesn’t have to make sense to you ya know. Don’t think you needed to point that out but to e ah their own I guess. Ahh, damn I respect the effort but…..i…..well-…. Nah still not getting it, can you use the word miserable in a sentence? Jokes aside no see this doesn’t bother ke it just puts on display how ignorance is bliss ya know, I got all day and night I really couldn’t be bothered by someone else other than myself who clearly doesn’t know when to call it quits. Several reasons for that, Ren. Some of which I have already said many, many times. I won’t be repeating myself anymore though. No point in wasting anymore effort, you know? Does it make sense to you though? Thats the better question. π I know you don’t know when to call it quits, you didn’t have to tell me that lol. No by all means, be as efficient as you see fit, I think we both have given enough reasonings for one day, no need for reminders. Clearly if I can crack jokes, it makes enough sense, unless it doesn’t but I don’t think it doesn’t make sense so it should make sense or is sense just a shallow question with no answers. Alright my bad for pointing out something we have in common π’ Yes, especially if reminders do not good in getting through to the desired audience. Oh so you’re trying to say that the whole username thing is a joke. I think? Well at least we’re on the same page on that. Uhh no. The whole cracking jokes part is in reference to your accusation of me getting miserable when I see notifications from you. The username isn’t a joke in my opinion. Oh ok i got it. I was just confused cause you put it in the wrong paragraph. That’s been a consistent thing on both sides. No, I only do it when i change the amount of paragraphs to fit the amount of topics we are discussing. There’s nothing wrong with it. Mistakes happen, no need to take it to heart. You’ve been doing it, I just did it, it really is whatevs ya know. If only you took that meaning seriously π |
Nov 14, 2023 1:23 AM
#64
Thread cleaned. Please refrain from spamming. |
Nov 14, 2023 6:44 AM
#65
Reply to INTJ_Ren
Realicle said:
No, I only do it when i change the amount of paragraphs to fit the amount of topics we are discussing.
INTJ_Ren said:
That’s been a consistent thing on both sides.
Realicle said:
Oh ok i got it. I was just confused cause you put it in the wrong paragraph.
INTJ_Ren said:
Well at least we’re on the same page on that.
Uhh no. The whole cracking jokes part is in reference to your accusation of me getting miserable when I see notifications from you. The username isn’t a joke in my opinion.
Realicle said:
Yes, especially if reminders do not good in getting through to the desired audience.
Oh so you’re trying to say that the whole username thing is a joke. I think?
INTJ_Ren said:
No by all means, be as efficient as you see fit, I think we both have given enough reasonings for one day, no need for reminders.
Clearly if I can crack jokes, it makes enough sense, unless it doesn’t but I don’t think it doesn’t make sense so it should make sense or is sense just a shallow question with no answers.
Alright my bad for pointing out something we have in common π’
Realicle said:
Several reasons for that, Ren. Some of which I have already said many, many times. I won’t be repeating myself anymore though. No point in wasting anymore effort, you know?
Does it make sense to you though? Thats the better question. π
I know you don’t know when to call it quits, you didn’t have to tell me that lol.
INTJ_Ren said:
Well if that’s the case then why haven’t I learned anything from you? You’re smart but not reaching me anything, leave it to professionals or people who classify and/or qualify as well you know smart.
When you get a girl, youll do a lot of dumb things what we do doesn’t have to make sense to you ya know. Don’t think you needed to point that out but to e ah their own I guess.
Ahh, damn I respect the effort but…..i…..well-…. Nah still not getting it, can you use the word miserable in a sentence? Jokes aside no see this doesn’t bother ke it just puts on display how ignorance is bliss ya know, I got all day and night I really couldn’t be bothered by someone else other than myself who clearly doesn’t know when to call it quits.
Realicle said:
You don’t have to be a teacher to teach something to someone. Smart people learn a lot from a lot of people. Remember that, Ren.
Now that I think about it, sharing a username is still pretty dumb. Because now, you two are just misrepresenting yourselves. That is not your correct personality type for you, and thats not her correct name. Anyways, no big deal, just wanted to point that out.
You’re thinking too hard on the word “miserable”. Let me try again since you didn’t get it. Seeing my response pop up makes you “miserable”. Better now?
INTJ_Ren said:
Those with degrees teach properly, unless you are teacher, there’s not much to learn from someone online, especially since I got A’s in English so as much as you’d like to think I can’t hold a conversation the state I live in begs to differ. Speaking of which whether you or anyone thinks I can is irrelevant, lions do not concern themselves with opinions of sheep.
You weren’t bothering, I was just informing you of my observation and telling you that my name isn’t something chose without considering the implications.
Oh then that makes two of us, I get this all the time but just cause I type essays doesn’t mean I’m trying, I’m a very talkative person and I can’t fit everything I want to say into a single sentence, miserable? Would you say something tedious makes someone miserable because miserable is making a lot of assumptions.
Realicle said:
Just like I said, “those who dont want to learn, cant”. Sad honestly, hopefully you change your ways one day, Ren! Until then, good luck with your triple agreements in life. Everyone will think you are unable to uphold a real conversation. Can’t say I didn’t try lol.
Ha, genuinely wasn’t trying to bother you. I didn’t think it was possible to share a username with someone else, as in all other social media platforms this is not possible.
Try again at what? I haven’t been trying, I’ve been doing. Apparently, I’ve been making you miserable every time I respond lol.
INTJ_Ren said:
Wrong again buddy. Normal and complex or whatever word you want to use as a place holder, it’s a means to an end. You’re telling what I can’t do when I just did it, kinda defeats the point there buddyπ there hasn’t been a single logical thing about this interaction so I don’t think I need to do better unless you want to actually throw down some college level responses.
Wow the pot calling the kettle black, I think I understand the problem now. You can’t read, and what you’ve been doing this entire time is reading but you’re not reading what you want to hear you’re reading the next thing to counter which I turn tells me you’re not even trying to talk to me but more or less bother me because I share a name, not the account smart one.
Again try again. Or don’t cause really that’d be the most logical thing you can do since you wanna talk logic π
Realicle said:
Wrong again, you never cleared anything up. There’s no way you can explain a triple agreement in a two way conversation. Haha, sorry Ren, it’s just not a thing in a normal conversation. A more accurate response would have been, “my bad dude, I meant to add a more logical response to the conversation.” But hey, like you said, “deaf ears”. Do better next time, Ren.
Oh and why would you share a MAL account with your girl? Im not really surprised cause you’re not that bright but damn. Unless you’re watching everything together then whats the point? Lol
INTJ_Ren said:
I don’t think I missed anything. As you didn’t want anything from me, I didn’t want anything from you, all you tried to do was say why you’re right and I’m wrong over the tiniest thing that may or may not even be all that much of a big deal to the average Joe, where this help is, well that’s beyond me.
I share the same username as my girlfriend I’m more of a EFNJ, try again.
We’re still here cause you don’t listen there buddy, I gave you all the info as to why what I said made sense and cleared up the misunderstanding you had which led to the 59 replies you were going on about, we’re still here cause you want to talk to me as you said yourself. It’s exactly as I said, “deaf ears”, I bet you already have a reply already ready since you don’t listen.
Realicle said:
Yes, I said you have just as much power as me, but you missed the part where I actually want to talk to you. YOU dont. Like I said, I was only trying to help you understand. But like a wise man once said, “You cant get someone to understand something that they dont want to understand”. Oh well.
I think we both know youre not the extrovert. It’s in your username lmao. Not that bright I guess. π
Again, if you don’t want to talk to me, you don’t have to. I do though, so I will continue to. Not that hard of a concept, but like you said, “deaf ears”. You don’t listen, Ren.
INTJ_Ren said:
Like you said you had just as much power as me yet kept going so there was no point in you saying that, you quoted me which means you wanted a reply, that’s not talking for the sake of talking, you clearly want something from me which I can’t really give you since this isn’t even anime related.
You’re an introvert? Not name calling, cause I’m confused as to who you’re referring to cause I’m an extrovert as you see by my inconsistent replies π
I got that the entirety of this interaction, but again I don’t really want to talk to you but you keep quoting me, imma keep quoting you back and if you think I was talking for the sake of talking then, I wasn’t but now I am since I clearly told you I was done and you keep quoting me, if you taught a lesson it fell on deaf ears or I can’t see it cause where’s the lesson π€¨
Realicle said:
I never wanted anything from you, I’m just telling you how it is and you don’t want to accept it. If you were done after the third reply then you would have stopped. Instead, you are talking for the sake of talking.
You claim that you are talking just because you think I need someone to talk to. That is talking for the sake of talking. If anyone needs someone to talk to, it’s the introvert lol.
Here’s the deal Ren, I actually want to talk to you and you have indicated that you do not want to talk to me, and thats OK. You continue to blame me for pressing the quote button when you have just as much power as me. This is a lesson for all future interactions, not just this one, Ren.
INTJ_Ren said:
See you’re doing it again. I’m not talking for the sake of talking, believe me it’s a signature phrase I use often. (especially on MaL)
I guess you can’t help me nor do I wish to help you, I gave you everything I got, I don’t know what else you want from me, we discuss things on forums and it takes two to tango so unless the discussion is over then you’re just gonna keep dragging this on till we have 100 replies in this thread, truth be told I was done after the first 3 but I guess you like talking to me. Reality is the only one who’s been talking for the sake of talking is you, you could’ve chose to not hit quote yet here we are, normally I’d say so haha you played yourself but this ain’t one of those moments. I think you genuinely wanted to talk so I kept it up as long as you hit quote, just tryna be nice, and spare some of my time on someone who may or may not need it.
Realicle said:
Responding just because I am talking to you is the exact definition of talking just for talkings sake. I mean you keep digging yourself a hole, ren. If you don’t want to talk to me and you continue to talk to me, then you are talking for talkings sake. And if that really were true and you didn’t want to respond at all, then you simply wouldn’t.
Yes, I hit the quote button no one is disputing that, ren. π If you still don’t understand the term “talking for talkings sake” then I’m afraid I can’t help you anymore.
INTJ_Ren said:
Well it’s not, you accused me of something I wasn’t doing, and I brought you more close to the actual answer if anything, so please elaborate where did I say anything about admitting anything word for word? It was a good try tho I’ll give you that π you hit the quote button so clearly you want to talk to me, I’m not replying because I genuinely want to.
Realicle said:
“I was talking just because you kept hitting the quote button”. Lmao you just played yourself. If thats not admitting it then i don’t know what is. π€£ Good try though, you kept it up a long time.
INTJ_Ren said:
Word for word did I say I anything about admitting anything or is that an accusation you’re using as a scapegoat? I men’s I was talking just because you kept ing hitting the quote button so I assumed you wanted to keep this up, making a lot of assumptions are we? π€£ a conversation is a conversation, normal complex, are a means to an end.
Realicle said:
Exactly, thank you for admitting it. You were just talking for talkings sake. Only took like 50 replies lol. Oh and by the way, normal convos don’t usually include one long run-on sentence.
INTJ_Ren said:
Oh but you see I do get it, a lot more than you think, you see, when I see we’re on the same page I had one more response and that was to agree with you agree with me, little did I know you weren’t finished and wanted to keep going by not asking the appropriate questions or for me to rephrase, now we’re here because one of us has to clear things up, I mean I don’t have to but aye I’m nice.
If this doesn’t make sense then why keep going, if you haven’t figured it out yet and I’m not doing a good enough job at clearing up any misunderstandings then maybe the problem is you? I get what’s going on why don’t you?
Realicle said:
Except you dont get it. If I already agreed with you then why are you agreeing with me agreeing with you? How do you not understand how this makes no sense at all? π
INTJ_Ren said:
I also got that the first time, there’s no confusion here. I said something you gave a response and I agreed with said response with my own, that’s a convo, don’t know how else to spell it for ya π
Realicle said:
Yes, but you are agreeing with me agreeing to a statement that you made. Thats not a convo anymore, and this is why there are rules to a convo.
INTJ_Ren said:
You didn’t need to make an assertion you just said something and I agreed to it, be more direct in what you’re trying to say cause yes there are rules to casual convo. If you say something that can be interpreted different or have double meanings then your intention is null and void.
Realicle said:
Yes, and there are still rules to a casual convo. It’s simple really: I made no assertion, therefore, it was impossible for you to agree with anything I had said.
INTJ_Ren said:
Yes because your interpretation isn’t the only one so that’s just causal convo doing its thing there buddy.
Realicle said:
Nope, no it cant. You said something and I responding with a word of agreement: “right”.
INTJ_Ren said:
That could go both ways so there really isn’t a one way with that comment especially when it doesn’t directly reassert π
Realicle said:
Except when I said “right some people”, I was already reasserting your statement. So you were really just agreeing with yourself, not me.
INTJ_Ren said:
Yeah but you said right some people which allowed me to agree with you and mention that someone just enjoy a good casual convo
Realicle said:
Except I never said some people just like talking, you did.
INTJ_Ren said:
I got that the first time, a good casual convo is what I said because a I was agreeing with you that some people just like talking.
Realicle said:
I didnt say anything about a “good casual convo”, so im not sure who youre agreeing with π
INTJ_Ren said:
And I was just agreeing with you π
Realicle said:
I got it the first time π
INTJ_Ren said:
Some peoole just enjoy a good casual convo π
Realicle said:
Right, some people…
INTJ_Ren said:
Some people really just like talking I guess, I only responded accordingly
Realicle said:
Thats interesting. How could you not know it would get this far if you participated in continuing it?
INTJ_Ren said:
Well…..I mean ……when I initially repliedβ¬οΈ
Realicle said:
Get a room already. You two cant stop talking to each other…
INTJ_Ren said:
I hate when that happens but β¬οΈ
lovealyssafaith said:
nahππππππ
INTJ_Ren said:
Like I said you should π
lovealyssafaith said:
like i said no thanks π€·πΌβοΈπ
INTJ_Ren said:
You probably should. It’s 2023
lovealyssafaith said:
no thanks π€·πΌβοΈ
INTJ_Ren said:
Do better idk π€·
lovealyssafaith said:
Lmao ok? ππ
INTJ_Ren said:
You could’ve easily found the answer yourself without being spoiled. It’s not gonna hurt the website or app if you make a useless thread but damn you lazy π
You could’ve easily found the answer yourself without being spoiled. It’s not gonna hurt the website or app if you make a useless thread but damn you lazy π
Lmao ok? ππ
Do better idk π€·
no thanks π€·πΌβοΈ
You probably should. It’s 2023
like i said no thanks π€·πΌβοΈπ
Like I said you should π
nahππππππ
I hate when that happens but β¬οΈ
Get a room already. You two cant stop talking to each other…
Well…..I mean ……when I initially repliedβ¬οΈ
Thats interesting. How could you not know it would get this far if you participated in continuing it?
Some people really just like talking I guess, I only responded accordingly
Right, some people…
Some peoole just enjoy a good casual convo π
I got it the first time π
And I was just agreeing with you π
I didnt say anything about a “good casual convo”, so im not sure who youre agreeing with π
I got that the first time, a good casual convo is what I said because a I was agreeing with you that some people just like talking.
Except I never said some people just like talking, you did.
Yeah but you said right some people which allowed me to agree with you and mention that someone just enjoy a good casual convo
Except when I said “right some people”, I was already reasserting your statement. So you were really just agreeing with yourself, not me.
That could go both ways so there really isn’t a one way with that comment especially when it doesn’t directly reassert π
Nope, no it cant. You said something and I responding with a word of agreement: “right”.
Yes because your interpretation isn’t the only one so that’s just causal convo doing its thing there buddy.
Yes, and there are still rules to a casual convo. It’s simple really: I made no assertion, therefore, it was impossible for you to agree with anything I had said.
You didn’t need to make an assertion you just said something and I agreed to it, be more direct in what you’re trying to say cause yes there are rules to casual convo. If you say something that can be interpreted different or have double meanings then your intention is null and void.
Yes, but you are agreeing with me agreeing to a statement that you made. Thats not a convo anymore, and this is why there are rules to a convo.
I also got that the first time, there’s no confusion here. I said something you gave a response and I agreed with said response with my own, that’s a convo, don’t know how else to spell it for ya π
Except you dont get it. If I already agreed with you then why are you agreeing with me agreeing with you? How do you not understand how this makes no sense at all? π
Oh but you see I do get it, a lot more than you think, you see, when I see we’re on the same page I had one more response and that was to agree with you agree with me, little did I know you weren’t finished and wanted to keep going by not asking the appropriate questions or for me to rephrase, now we’re here because one of us has to clear things up, I mean I don’t have to but aye I’m nice.
If this doesn’t make sense then why keep going, if you haven’t figured it out yet and I’m not doing a good enough job at clearing up any misunderstandings then maybe the problem is you? I get what’s going on why don’t you?
Exactly, thank you for admitting it. You were just talking for talkings sake. Only took like 50 replies lol. Oh and by the way, normal convos don’t usually include one long run-on sentence.
Word for word did I say I anything about admitting anything or is that an accusation you’re using as a scapegoat? I men’s I was talking just because you kept ing hitting the quote button so I assumed you wanted to keep this up, making a lot of assumptions are we? π€£ a conversation is a conversation, normal complex, are a means to an end.
“I was talking just because you kept hitting the quote button”. Lmao you just played yourself. If thats not admitting it then i don’t know what is. π€£ Good try though, you kept it up a long time.
Well it’s not, you accused me of something I wasn’t doing, and I brought you more close to the actual answer if anything, so please elaborate where did I say anything about admitting anything word for word? It was a good try tho I’ll give you that π you hit the quote button so clearly you want to talk to me, I’m not replying because I genuinely want to.
Responding just because I am talking to you is the exact definition of talking just for talkings sake. I mean you keep digging yourself a hole, ren. If you don’t want to talk to me and you continue to talk to me, then you are talking for talkings sake. And if that really were true and you didn’t want to respond at all, then you simply wouldn’t.
Yes, I hit the quote button no one is disputing that, ren. π If you still don’t understand the term “talking for talkings sake” then I’m afraid I can’t help you anymore.
See you’re doing it again. I’m not talking for the sake of talking, believe me it’s a signature phrase I use often. (especially on MaL)
I guess you can’t help me nor do I wish to help you, I gave you everything I got, I don’t know what else you want from me, we discuss things on forums and it takes two to tango so unless the discussion is over then you’re just gonna keep dragging this on till we have 100 replies in this thread, truth be told I was done after the first 3 but I guess you like talking to me. Reality is the only one who’s been talking for the sake of talking is you, you could’ve chose to not hit quote yet here we are, normally I’d say so haha you played yourself but this ain’t one of those moments. I think you genuinely wanted to talk so I kept it up as long as you hit quote, just tryna be nice, and spare some of my time on someone who may or may not need it.
I never wanted anything from you, I’m just telling you how it is and you don’t want to accept it. If you were done after the third reply then you would have stopped. Instead, you are talking for the sake of talking.
You claim that you are talking just because you think I need someone to talk to. That is talking for the sake of talking. If anyone needs someone to talk to, it’s the introvert lol.
Here’s the deal Ren, I actually want to talk to you and you have indicated that you do not want to talk to me, and thats OK. You continue to blame me for pressing the quote button when you have just as much power as me. This is a lesson for all future interactions, not just this one, Ren.
Like you said you had just as much power as me yet kept going so there was no point in you saying that, you quoted me which means you wanted a reply, that’s not talking for the sake of talking, you clearly want something from me which I can’t really give you since this isn’t even anime related.
You’re an introvert? Not name calling, cause I’m confused as to who you’re referring to cause I’m an extrovert as you see by my inconsistent replies π
I got that the entirety of this interaction, but again I don’t really want to talk to you but you keep quoting me, imma keep quoting you back and if you think I was talking for the sake of talking then, I wasn’t but now I am since I clearly told you I was done and you keep quoting me, if you taught a lesson it fell on deaf ears or I can’t see it cause where’s the lesson π€¨
Yes, I said you have just as much power as me, but you missed the part where I actually want to talk to you. YOU dont. Like I said, I was only trying to help you understand. But like a wise man once said, “You cant get someone to understand something that they dont want to understand”. Oh well.
I think we both know youre not the extrovert. It’s in your username lmao. Not that bright I guess. π
Again, if you don’t want to talk to me, you don’t have to. I do though, so I will continue to. Not that hard of a concept, but like you said, “deaf ears”. You don’t listen, Ren.
I don’t think I missed anything. As you didn’t want anything from me, I didn’t want anything from you, all you tried to do was say why you’re right and I’m wrong over the tiniest thing that may or may not even be all that much of a big deal to the average Joe, where this help is, well that’s beyond me.
I share the same username as my girlfriend I’m more of a EFNJ, try again.
We’re still here cause you don’t listen there buddy, I gave you all the info as to why what I said made sense and cleared up the misunderstanding you had which led to the 59 replies you were going on about, we’re still here cause you want to talk to me as you said yourself. It’s exactly as I said, “deaf ears”, I bet you already have a reply already ready since you don’t listen.
Wrong again, you never cleared anything up. There’s no way you can explain a triple agreement in a two way conversation. Haha, sorry Ren, it’s just not a thing in a normal conversation. A more accurate response would have been, “my bad dude, I meant to add a more logical response to the conversation.” But hey, like you said, “deaf ears”. Do better next time, Ren.
Oh and why would you share a MAL account with your girl? Im not really surprised cause you’re not that bright but damn. Unless you’re watching everything together then whats the point? Lol
Wrong again buddy. Normal and complex or whatever word you want to use as a place holder, it’s a means to an end. You’re telling what I can’t do when I just did it, kinda defeats the point there buddyπ there hasn’t been a single logical thing about this interaction so I don’t think I need to do better unless you want to actually throw down some college level responses.
Wow the pot calling the kettle black, I think I understand the problem now. You can’t read, and what you’ve been doing this entire time is reading but you’re not reading what you want to hear you’re reading the next thing to counter which I turn tells me you’re not even trying to talk to me but more or less bother me because I share a name, not the account smart one.
Again try again. Or don’t cause really that’d be the most logical thing you can do since you wanna talk logic π
Just like I said, “those who dont want to learn, cant”. Sad honestly, hopefully you change your ways one day, Ren! Until then, good luck with your triple agreements in life. Everyone will think you are unable to uphold a real conversation. Can’t say I didn’t try lol.
Ha, genuinely wasn’t trying to bother you. I didn’t think it was possible to share a username with someone else, as in all other social media platforms this is not possible.
Try again at what? I haven’t been trying, I’ve been doing. Apparently, I’ve been making you miserable every time I respond lol.
Those with degrees teach properly, unless you are teacher, there’s not much to learn from someone online, especially since I got A’s in English so as much as you’d like to think I can’t hold a conversation the state I live in begs to differ. Speaking of which whether you or anyone thinks I can is irrelevant, lions do not concern themselves with opinions of sheep.
You weren’t bothering, I was just informing you of my observation and telling you that my name isn’t something chose without considering the implications.
Oh then that makes two of us, I get this all the time but just cause I type essays doesn’t mean I’m trying, I’m a very talkative person and I can’t fit everything I want to say into a single sentence, miserable? Would you say something tedious makes someone miserable because miserable is making a lot of assumptions.
You don’t have to be a teacher to teach something to someone. Smart people learn a lot from a lot of people. Remember that, Ren.
Now that I think about it, sharing a username is still pretty dumb. Because now, you two are just misrepresenting yourselves. That is not your correct personality type for you, and thats not her correct name. Anyways, no big deal, just wanted to point that out.
You’re thinking too hard on the word “miserable”. Let me try again since you didn’t get it. Seeing my response pop up makes you “miserable”. Better now?
Well if that’s the case then why haven’t I learned anything from you? You’re smart but not reaching me anything, leave it to professionals or people who classify and/or qualify as well you know smart.
When you get a girl, youll do a lot of dumb things what we do doesn’t have to make sense to you ya know. Don’t think you needed to point that out but to e ah their own I guess.
Ahh, damn I respect the effort but…..i…..well-…. Nah still not getting it, can you use the word miserable in a sentence? Jokes aside no see this doesn’t bother ke it just puts on display how ignorance is bliss ya know, I got all day and night I really couldn’t be bothered by someone else other than myself who clearly doesn’t know when to call it quits.
Several reasons for that, Ren. Some of which I have already said many, many times. I won’t be repeating myself anymore though. No point in wasting anymore effort, you know?
Does it make sense to you though? Thats the better question. π
I know you don’t know when to call it quits, you didn’t have to tell me that lol.
No by all means, be as efficient as you see fit, I think we both have given enough reasonings for one day, no need for reminders.
Clearly if I can crack jokes, it makes enough sense, unless it doesn’t but I don’t think it doesn’t make sense so it should make sense or is sense just a shallow question with no answers.
Alright my bad for pointing out something we have in common π’
Yes, especially if reminders do not good in getting through to the desired audience.
Oh so you’re trying to say that the whole username thing is a joke. I think?
Well at least we’re on the same page on that.
Uhh no. The whole cracking jokes part is in reference to your accusation of me getting miserable when I see notifications from you. The username isn’t a joke in my opinion.
Oh ok i got it. I was just confused cause you put it in the wrong paragraph.
That’s been a consistent thing on both sides.
No, I only do it when i change the amount of paragraphs to fit the amount of topics we are discussing.
There’s nothing wrong with it. Mistakes happen, no need to take it to heart. You’ve been doing it, I just did it, it really is whatevs ya know.
@INTJ_Ren get em next time lol |
Nov 14, 2023 12:12 PM
#66
Don't be. You have all the tools necessary to lift this confusion of yours, without bothering other people^^ Now go and solve that problem. You can do it! Be strong! |
Nov 15, 2023 5:37 AM
#67
Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: lovealyssafaith said: INTJ_Ren said: lovealyssafaith said: INTJ_Ren said: lovealyssafaith said: INTJ_Ren said: lovealyssafaith said: INTJ_Ren said: You could’ve easily found the answer yourself without being spoiled. It’s not gonna hurt the website or app if you make a useless thread but damn you lazy π Lmao ok? ππ Do better idk π€· no thanks π€·πΌβοΈ You probably should. It’s 2023 like i said no thanks π€·πΌβοΈπ Like I said you should π nahππππππ I hate when that happens but β¬οΈ Get a room already. You two cant stop talking to each other… Yet you literally did the same thing in the discussion ππ |
Nov 15, 2023 8:20 AM
#68
Reply to lovealyssafaith
Realicle said:
Get a room already. You two cant stop talking to each other…
INTJ_Ren said:
I hate when that happens but β¬οΈ
lovealyssafaith said:
nahππππππ
INTJ_Ren said:
Like I said you should π
lovealyssafaith said:
like i said no thanks π€·πΌβοΈπ
INTJ_Ren said:
You probably should. It’s 2023
lovealyssafaith said:
no thanks π€·πΌβοΈ
INTJ_Ren said:
Do better idk π€·
lovealyssafaith said:
Lmao ok? ππ
INTJ_Ren said:
You could’ve easily found the answer yourself without being spoiled. It’s not gonna hurt the website or app if you make a useless thread but damn you lazy π
You could’ve easily found the answer yourself without being spoiled. It’s not gonna hurt the website or app if you make a useless thread but damn you lazy π
Lmao ok? ππ
Do better idk π€·
no thanks π€·πΌβοΈ
You probably should. It’s 2023
like i said no thanks π€·πΌβοΈπ
Like I said you should π
nahππππππ
I hate when that happens but β¬οΈ
Get a room already. You two cant stop talking to each other…
Yet you literally did the same thing in the discussion ππ
@lovealyssafaith clearly I was jealous... |
More topics from this board
Poll: » Tokyo Revengers: Seiya Kessen-hen Episode 13 Discussion ( 1 2 3 4 )Stark700 - Apr 1, 2023 |
193 |
by THORFINN_023
»»
Nov 6, 9:56 AM |
|
Poll: » Tokyo Revengers: Seiya Kessen-hen Episode 12 Discussion ( 1 2 3 )Stark700 - Mar 25, 2023 |
129 |
by SanessyAdversary
»»
Nov 1, 4:34 AM |
|
Poll: » Tokyo Revengers: Seiya Kessen-hen Episode 11 Discussion ( 1 2 3 )Stark700 - Mar 18, 2023 |
105 |
by SanessyAdversary
»»
Nov 1, 4:02 AM |
|
Poll: » Tokyo Revengers: Seiya Kessen-hen Episode 10 Discussion ( 1 2 3 )Stark700 - Mar 11, 2023 |
101 |
by SanessyAdversary
»»
Oct 31, 6:45 AM |
|
Poll: » Tokyo Revengers: Seiya Kessen-hen Episode 9 Discussion ( 1 2 3 )Stark700 - Mar 4, 2023 |
114 |
by SanessyAdversary
»»
Oct 31, 6:37 AM |