DO NOT discuss the source material beyond this chapter. If you want to discuss future events, please use separate threads.
DO NOT ask where to read/download this chapter or give links to copyrighted, non-fair use material.
DO NOT troll/bait/harass/abuse other users for liking or disliking the series/characters.
DO read the Manga Discussion Rules and Site & Forum Guidelines.
DO NOT ask where to read/download this chapter or give links to copyrighted, non-fair use material.
DO NOT troll/bait/harass/abuse other users for liking or disliking the series/characters.
DO read the Manga Discussion Rules and Site & Forum Guidelines.
Unionoob said: Could someone tell me what does Ghoul gains if he eats another ghoul. They turn in kakujas. But do they gain some kind of knowledge from ghoul they consumed? Ghouls who consume other ghouls, depending on the circumstances, can mutate in their rc cells, becoming kakujas, nothing else.. |
 She says the she want to eradicate the "warped root" that is behind all this, which is probably a reference to V. In fact, she is probably pissed of at them, i mean they tried to kill her father and they kill her mother. |
| Holy shit, the plot had thickened with that ending.. Arima and Furata seems to be on the same page, and they are connected to V? Which was implied as an ghoul organisation. Also, the One-Eyed King isnt Takatsuki? Someone from 100 years back, I'm sure this was mentioned before, but I thought that was just an inaccurate info from the CCG. |
 "Have you ever encounter a wild beast that guarantees to never bite anyone?" ~ Roronoa Zoro |
Luciberi said: This isn't even funny anymore. Some people actually believe that the one-eyed king from 100 years ago is the boss of the V. Joke's aside. V's leader is Ogura Hisashi.  |
| *face sours* seems like to Matsuri washuu whatever that can't be killed in a horrendous way is boring. Also he loves the sound of his voice. bet his wife loves him unconditionally too. And if what eto said is actually the case, then ishida did a damn good job to make us believe otherwise. damn it. I hadn't notice Kaneki's substitude arm..? imagine it sliding on a mirror. shivering. |
| With nothing to do i made the mistake of watching the "reaction" that Luffythewhatever did. I thought that the guy is kinda bright. I was wrong. Now i understand why most of you are so adorable, when you probably take the things that these "Reviewers" say as confirmed. |
 |
| Is Furuta working for every organization ?Triple agent ,he might be as strong as Arima,time will tell.And looks like queen Eto needs her king :^) |
| Lead me out of the dark,bishounen space Jesus. |
Nuvviveji said: Adacchan said: This is supposedly a seinen, they usually try to have a meaningful plot. Stick to shounens if you want mindless carnage and immemorable characters.What happened with TG? Sometimes, the chapters are so bored :c This time, only the last 2 pages were a little interesting. Oya oya, take it easy. Even in shounen (or any other genre), there are boring chapters & I know it. Even so, I'm considering some chapters as the calm before the storm. |
 |
KoSparrows said: Actually that might not be the case according to Chibi, if you know who I'm talking about. Overall he assumes that she's going to kill him due to a picture in the calender with Matsuri and his wife is scratched at her face and some other bullshit. Too tired to get you the pictures, check his Twitter if you want.*face sours* seems like to Matsuri washuu whatever that can't be killed in a horrendous way is boring. Also he loves the sound of his voice. bet his wife loves him unconditionally too. |
 |
| Holy crap what an amazing chapter. I thought we all knew that Eto wasnt the king but it looks like the king actually exists. Did not see that thing with Arima coming at all |
 |
Nuvviveji said: For example she's lying about Kuroiwa. He did cut her hand off but she didn't cut his. Yoshimura did. I thought even though had been Eto, but I went to see the old chapters and you're right. :) But what is the relevance to her lie about it? Or perhaps mistranslation |
haunter_ex said: The relevance of her lie is unknown as of yet. It could be mistranslation also, MangaStream usually rushes their release but polishes it over the week.Nuvviveji said: For example she's lying about Kuroiwa. He did cut her hand off but she didn't cut his. Yoshimura did. I thought even though had been Eto, but I went to see the old chapters and you're right. :) But what is the relevance to her lie about it? Or perhaps mistranslation |
| |
haunter_ex said: Nuvviveji said: For example she's lying about Kuroiwa. He did cut her hand off but she didn't cut his. Yoshimura did. I thought even though had been Eto, but I went to see the old chapters and you're right. :) But what is the relevance to her lie about it? Or perhaps mistranslation No, he isn't right. She said in the chapter. That she lost an arm vs Kuroiwa and that years later she lost that arm again. As you can see here . |
|
Arcanix said: Just checked the scans of this chapter again, you're correct and I'm wrong. Although, I don't believe that it was translated like that at first if my memory serves me, but that's irrelevant.haunter_ex said: I thought even though had been Eto, but I went to see the old chapters and you're right. :) But what is the relevance to her lie about it? Or perhaps mistranslation No, he isn't right. She said in the chapter. That she lost an arm vs Kuroiwa and that years later she lost that arm again. As you can see here . |
| |
AndyShoes said: She says the she want to eradicate the "warped root" that is behind all this, which is probably a reference to V. In fact, she is probably pissed of at them, i mean they tried to kill her father and they kill her mother. By Ishida's way of doing things, I think he would leave it more obvious if it was just the 'V' ... not excluding the possibility just be the 'V', of course ... |
Arcanix said: haunter_ex said: I thought even though had been Eto, but I went to see the old chapters and you're right. :) But what is the relevance to her lie about it? Or perhaps mistranslation No, he isn't right. She said in the chapter. That she lost an arm vs Kuroiwa and that years later she lost that arm again. As you can see here . my bad, I read the manga on that link here which was posted on the same topic... |
Nuvviveji said: ]Actually that might not be the case according to Chibi, if you know who I'm talking about. Overall he assumes that she's going to kill him due to a picture in the calender with Matsuri and his wife is scratched at her face and some other bullshit. Too tired to get you the pictures, check his Twitter if you want. the unconditional love part was sarcastic I don't know about the pic since I haven't checked all the calendar yet, but I will, thanks. and I have no idea who Chibi is. they seem sketchy though. no reason. |
KoSparrowsJan 25, 2016 2:12 AM
| So the One Eyed King and Owl/Eto are not the same people... OK 5/5 |
 |
Unionoob said: Well, I am just curios. Either I am pulling it from my ass or something looks bit strange in page 19. Knowing that Eto let him win and knew he would have to feast on her body to regain strength and that her kagune could talk. In that page he is writing with right hand and holding pen in right hand and then lather switches it to left hand and put his right hand by his ear.. Umm I reviewed the chapter and what you have written is something curious. In my view is just a gesture to be thoughtful, but I do not I doubt he has a mouth in the palm of hand kkkk |
| I knew Arima is a double agent. Or something. Shady af. Also, I have a shitty memory, but... Wasn't the One Eyed King portrayed as a skeleton with a old-fashioned crown on it's skull. Or as the skull with only one eye? That would explain this "100 years ago there was a OEK". Correct me if I'm wrong, I probably am, but it bugs the shit out of me. |
GodofWar2015 said: Arcanix said: Ishida is ruining the manga. We need to make a petition to change the mangaka. Mod Edit: Removed header. Lol you are probably the only one that thinks something so retarded. Don't like it then fuck off. You probably don't read TG:re threads very often, do you? |
| Signature removed. Please follow the signature rules, as defined in the Site & Forum Guidelines. |
TheOutsider6 said: I knew Arima is a double agent. Or something. Shady af. Also, I have a shitty memory, but... Wasn't the One Eyed King portrayed as a skeleton with a old-fashioned crown on it's skull. Or as the skull with only one eye? That would explain this "100 years ago there was a OEK". Correct me if I'm wrong, I probably am, but it bugs the shit out of me. Yeah, OEK has always been depicted by the spooky skeleton with one eye in the right socket.  |
Agent-PhrankJan 24, 2016 4:34 PM
Mukade said: Just to be clear...people understand that the OEK never existed to begin with and was just a legend Eto built up (literally everything the OEK has done, right down to description, is credited to Eto) and all this chapter indicates she intends to make that legend a reality by making Kaneki her actual "king?" (The Second King.) No one is seriously stupid enough to think there is some unknown big bad OP supreme half ghoul overlord behind the scenes, ...right? ...Please?  Are you claiming that the one eyed ghoul that existed 100 years ago, that is presumably the first king (I mean who else is a dead skeleton) , that CCG was founded in response to, is a lie? |
Drake1000 said: Mukade said: Just to be clear...people understand that the OEK never existed to begin with and was just a legend Eto built up (literally everything the OEK has done, right down to description, is credited to Eto) and all this chapter indicates she intends to make that legend a reality by making Kaneki her actual "king?" (The Second King.) No one is seriously stupid enough to think there is some unknown big bad OP supreme half ghoul overlord behind the scenes, ...right? ...Please? Are you claiming that the one eyed ghoul that existed 100 years ago, that is presumably the first king (I mean who else is a dead skeleton) , that CCG was founded in response to, is a lie? The "Dead skeleton" was never anything more than a symbol to personify the legend; unless you are trying to argue all his "minions" dressed in modern Aogiri cloaks and skull masks also existed 100 years ago. On top of that, no where did Eto say this ghoul was the OEK or "original" OEK. She merely mentioned their existence as a cornerstone for revolution. That's the fanbase jumping to assumptions as usual. |
| I want to see a skeleton be the OEK. I think its plausible. I mean Noro was basically a skeleton. |
| When was it said that V is behind the CCG? Or is everyone just making baseless assumptions? |
skwok-ravenJan 24, 2016 11:18 PM
"Have you ever encounter a wild beast that guarantees to never bite anyone?" ~ Roronoa Zoro |
NorthBayAnime said: I want to see a skeleton be the OEK. I think its plausible. I mean Noro was basically a skeleton. Sigh... How the hell is that plausible  |
Mukade said: Drake1000 said: Are you claiming that the one eyed ghoul that existed 100 years ago, that is presumably the first king (I mean who else is a dead skeleton) , that CCG was founded in response to, is a lie? The "Dead skeleton" was never anything more than a symbol to personify the legend; unless you are trying to argue all his "minions" dressed in modern Aogiri cloaks and skull masks also existed 100 years ago. On top of that, no where did Eto say this ghoul was the OEK or "original" OEK. She merely mentioned their existence as a cornerstone for revolution. That's the fanbase jumping to assumptions as usual. Well of course he's a symbol you just admitted what the rest of the fanbase thinks, that the skeletton and "first king" refers to the ghoul that died 100 yrs ago. He obviously is not the actual king of Aogiri, just some sort of inspiration for Eto that she crowned first king because of the great change he brought as a One-eyed. |
| can some one remind me of washu family history? |
Drake1000 said: Mukade said: The "Dead skeleton" was never anything more than a symbol to personify the legend; unless you are trying to argue all his "minions" dressed in modern Aogiri cloaks and skull masks also existed 100 years ago. On top of that, no where did Eto say this ghoul was the OEK or "original" OEK. She merely mentioned their existence as a cornerstone for revolution. That's the fanbase jumping to assumptions as usual. Well of course he's a symbol you just admitted what the rest of the fanbase thinks, that the skeletton and "first king" refers to the ghoul that died 100 yrs ago. He obviously is not the actual king of Aogiri, just some sort of inspiration for Eto that she crowned first king because of the great change he brought as a One-eyed. yea. and the second king is going to become Kaneki(at least that's what Eto is planning). King is supposed to have an unparalleled amount of power. Eto realized that she can't be the one. so everything comes down to Kaneki. and of course it wasn't definite that He was supposed to be the King. He was just a prototype. everything that happened to Kaneki in TG is making him stronger. He is a growing perfection as Kanou said. That's why Kaneki is the most qualified to become King. |
skwok-raven said: When was it said that V is behind the CCG? Or is everyone just making baseless assumptions? Same I don't remember V saying that thought they were an independent group that just wanted balance or something |
| We're all going to end up in hell. sigh... |
|
| Amon = OEK confirmed in this chapter. |
"I'm not gonna die, I've got a cat that's waiting for me at home" |
| I have no idea why everyone is talking about Kaneki being OEK... I may be wrong, but aren't Furuta and Onitsune Washuu the only people who call Arima by his first name? |
SleighBells said: Urie confirmed OEK.Amon = OEK confirmed in this chapter. |
 |
My bad, I meant Akira. |
| "I'm not gonna die, I've got a cat that's waiting for me at home" |
| Fuck I'm so hyped now, reading this before going to study was a bad idea. |
Luciberi said: NorthBayAnime said: I want to see a skeleton be the OEK. I think its plausible. I mean Noro was basically a skeleton. Sigh... How the hell is that plausible It is plausible wether you like it or not |
NorthBayAnime said: Luciberi said: Sigh... How the hell is that plausible It is plausible wether you like it or not no it's not plausible. there is 0% chance of that. |
| I'm going with the side that says she's going to name Kaneki as the One Eyed King. .. Or Kaneki's father. Just kidding. |
 |
Luciberi said: no it's not plausible. there is 0% chance of that. There is a .1% chance so it is plausible |
| Takizawa is gonna rape the Hachikawa squad soooooo fucking bad, it's not even funny man xD So there's a connection between Arima and V? Oh boy, this is getting interesting. And finally, Eto's speech and the reveal that she isn't the One-Eyed King but then again, who is it? The most obvious choice would be Kaneki...we'll have to wait and see. |
 |
More topics from this board
Poll: » Tokyo Ghoul:re Chapter 72 Discussion ( 1 2 3 )Stark700 - Apr 9, 2016 |
124 |
by almightybismarck
»»
Yesterday, 8:37 AM |
|
Poll: » Tokyo Ghoul:re Chapter 71 Discussion ( 1 2 3 )Stark700 - Apr 2, 2016 |
140 |
by almightybismarck
»»
Yesterday, 8:14 AM |
|
Poll: » Tokyo Ghoul:re Chapter 70 Discussion ( 1 2 3 )Stark700 - Mar 26, 2016 |
146 |
by almightybismarck
»»
Yesterday, 7:59 AM |
|
Poll: » Tokyo Ghoul:re Chapter 69 Discussion ( 1 2 3 4 )Stark700 - Mar 19, 2016 |
151 |
by almightybismarck
»»
Yesterday, 7:45 AM |
|
Poll: » Tokyo Ghoul:re Chapter 68 Discussion ( 1 2 3 )Mech4nic - Mar 12, 2016 |
129 |
by almightybismarck
»»
Yesterday, 7:22 AM |