| so is this part of the real story or is this just non canon? |
| It's not canon It's just a "what if". |
 |
| Yes, it is canon lol |
caio_ken said: Yes, it is canon lol LOLWUT? This is a sequel to Father of Goku, a backstory which Toriyama himself retconned with Dragon Ball Minus. So nope, this is even more non-canon than Garlic Jr. |
 |
TheBloodstomper said: uncivilized_one said: Thank goodness it is not cannon. Everything about this anime is wrong. This film is cool IMHO and explains well the legend of the Super Saiyajin once every 1000 years, that was a big problem in the anime. Hope they will explain that better in DBS! No, it doesn't. Nobody knew what the legend was in the Frieza saga. Chilled said "Careful of the blonde saiyan", but no one on DBZ mentioned the Super Saiyan being blonde. This story is just a what if, or if you wish, a prequel to the xenoverse game. DarthNightmaric said: ziggy_Z said: LOLWUT? This is a sequel to Father of Goku, a backstory which Toriyama himself retconned with Dragon Ball Minus. So nope, this is even more non-canon than Garlic Jr. We don't talk about Minus here. That is a travesty that shall never be mentioned. If there ever was an official canon (hint: there isn't), Minus would be the last thing I'd want in it. There is an official canon: The original manga, you twat. |
| Signature removed. Please follow the signature rules, as defined in the Site & Forum Guidelines. |
| it's hilarious that this still get asked about something as obviously non canon as this |
| I have a third testicle that gives me psychic powers |
More topics from this board
Poll: » Dragon Ball: Episode of Bardock Episode 1 DiscussionThreepwood - Dec 21, 2011 |
42 |
by JVskunkape
»»
Oct 11, 2023 9:55 AM |
|
» Dragon Ball Z What’s Still Canon From Bardock: The Father of Goku?Dragonballtank - Feb 2, 2023 |
1 |
by Alexioos95
»»
Feb 25, 2023 1:10 AM |