Griffith Did Nothing Wrong

Original Description: Griffith did nothing wrong argument I hear this all the time and its defenses and the biggest counterargument I see is the fact that Griffith raped Casca which was super wrong and in no way benefitted his dream or anything. But later in the conviction arc Griffith gets a physical body again thanks to Egg Apostle and Corrupt Guts Jr. right? We know that Griffith's evil Femto sperm corrupted Casca's child and made that abomination, but is this why Griffith raped her in the first place? Did Griffith see the events of causality and knew raping Casca would eventually mean he gets a body and later his kingdom of Falconia? Then, in this way, Griffith really did do nothing wrong, right? He sacrificed a group of mercenaries, not civilians, who were willing to die for his dream anyway, and needed to get a vessel or whatever for later which is why he raped Casca. And for the greater good, a lot of people in Midland are safe in Falconia, certainly more people than were sacrificed in the Eclipse so Griffith was reasonable.