Hello everyone, I would just like to share how I do my anime reviews.
Story (10 points)
1. Ingenuity / Interest (3 points)
Was the story gripping and exciting?
Was the story original and unique?
Was the main conflict significant and overarching?
2. Depth / Development (3 points)
Did the story have a deeper meaning behind it?
Was the story both simple and complex?
Did the story have meaningful plot twists?
3. Coherence / Logical Sense (3 points)
Did the story make sense?
Did characters behave logically or reasonably?
Were the assumptions of the story believable?
4. Bonus points (1 point)
Were there any major plot holes?
Characters (10 points)
1. Unique / Multi-faceted (3 points)
Were the characters unique?
Did the characters have different sides to them?
Were the characters lovable?
2. Depth / Development (3 points)
Did the characters have comprehensive back stories?
Are the characters' personalities sufficiently fleshed out?
Do the characters' have convincing motives and purposes?
3. Growth / Interaction (3 points)
Do the characters learn new things and behave differently as the story progresses?
Were the interactions and relationships between characters realistic and progressive?
Was this character growth vital to the story?
4. Bonus Points (1 point)
Were there any characters worth special mention?
Enjoyment (10 points)
1. Up to 3 points each for any of the below, for a maximum of 6 points.
a. Suspense (Mystery)
b. Humour (Comedy)
c. Excitement (Action/Thriller)
d. Emotion (Romance/Drama)
2. Pacing (3 points)
Was the anime gripping from the beginning?
Did the anime manage to maintain interest throughout?
Was the main conflict resolved satisfactorily?
3. Bonus (1 point)
Were there any filler episodes?
Art (10 points)
1. Animation (3 points) based on how much I enjoyed watching it
2. Aesthetics (3 points) based on how much I liked the general artistic theme
3. OP Sequence (2 points) based on how much I liked it
4. ED Sequence (2 points) based on how much I liked it
Sound (10 points)
1. OP Theme (2 points) based on how much I like it.
2. ED Theme (2 points) based on how much I like it.
3. Background Music (2 points) based on how much I enjoyed it.
4. Additional Themes (4 points) based on how much I like it.
Overall:
10 points - Masterpiece - I am thoroughly amazed by this anime.
9 points - Excellent - I am impressed by this anime.
8 points - Very Good - I really enjoyed watching this anime.
7 points - Good - I was satisfied with this anime.
6 points - Fine - I was disappointed by this anime.
5 points & below - Average - I regret watching this anime.
|
All Comments (43) Comments
You're one of thooooooooooooose guys.
In the words of @lawlmartz :
>>>my sides
As always, I welcome discourse and not insults.
only self-righteous pricks find the need to laugh at people who love an anime they hate. Only disrespectful, immature, self-absorbed bigots feel the need to take a piss on everyone who has a differing opinion from them.
Uh, can you run that by me again? I think I missed what you were saying.
If you gave Code Geass a 1, I couldn't care less. The point I was making is that you tried to take apart Yamada and the 7 Witches... and yet by your rating system, you would most certainly have to give Code Geass a much lower score, because that show's internal consistency is about as homogenous as a bag of trail mix. There are more plot holes and asspulls in that show than interstate 40 and the Star Wars prequels combined. It's an utterly ridiculous mecha/drama romp Chinese cartoon with spider people and super powers. Can you really even get mad about how crazy it is? The same thing with Yamada... the guy kisses people and changes bodies with them. You can't apply any logic, physics, or anything real world to a romantic comedy cartoon- it's not exactly designed to be high brow, hard science docu-tainment. There's your "discourse".
It takes real love for a show to recognize that, critically, it's a piece of crap- mercilessly tear it limb from limb, textually destroy it, but as a consumer, still enjoy the heck out of it. You're not there yet, mein freund.
And in case you haven't noticed, MAL scores are an absolutely terrible measure of "sentiment", let alone quality. Everyone, and I do mean everyone, has a different idea as to what subjective rating they give to something. Your mean score is a 7.28. You've seen 59 shows. Your standard deviation from the mean is a whopping 1.27, not to mention that you overrated (by your metric of "community sentiment") both parts of code geass by a total of 0.19. the first part by 0.17 alone. Your mean score is also 0.31 greater than the global average. Do I smell a little bias there?
>> gives code geass a 9
>>> my sides
Well, as far as Chaika goes I didn't like her character. I found all the chaikas' lack of coherent speaking and straightforward (brainless) talking to be a bit annoying. However, I got used to it. What I didn't get used to, however, was her inability to be mature. It's not that I don't like moe characters who blush and whatnot, but I don't think they should have made a character like that as important as chaika. I love cute moe characters . . . just not here.
That, in combination with the mood of the anime, one that gives off the sense that they are in the middle of some great change/upheaval, leaves one wanting a bit more maturity from chaika.
Now let's look at akari/toru. They pretty much fill the gap in chaika's character. They are mature, focused, and keen. Not only that, they are some of the best main leads both male and female that I have seen in a shounen for quite some time. Nowadays, there are rarely shonen anime where the mc is not some whiny kid who is exceptionally stupid, but somehow the strongest of them all. That, or a whiny kid who is exceptionally weak, and then later powerups in the middle of the series.
Here, toru and akari are both so badass. I see in your review that you noted that they have nothing else besides their combat skills. However, that in and of itself is exceptional. They are not only good fighters, but they are badass. There are so many moments in the anime where you see the two of them instantly react to enemies, whereby they remain professional, calm, collected, and cool. There are rarely any leads out there anymore that are combat smart. Main leads are either smart in intellect, or just good at fighting. Akari and toru are both. Just look at his weapon, it's a pair of kunai/daggers on a retractable string.
Moving onto akari, I'm glad you find her brother complex funny, as did I. Once again, I feel that was more than enough to make her a standout amongst female leads. She is a breath of fresh air amongst weak clingy females. She is also unlike mikasa, as a popular example, who is waaaaay too serious and abnormal. Akari introduces enough comedy to keep the show light.
TL;DR
My main complaint is not with chaika as a person - it's with her being so important to the plot. I feel she isn't mature enough to be a lead when she can barely take care of herself, much less talk coherently.
Toru on the other hand is awesome. There isn't any moment in the anime where he becomes a generic "must protect friends so I get a powerup". He's always "I can beat this guy because I am a bawler. Oh wait no he's a bit too strong for me I'll just use my brain then."
Akari, a bit weaker in character, but still better than chaika, bring a bit of original comedy that always made me smile. She is also equally badass and mature and doesn't feel too clingy.
Of course, that is my opinion, as I'm sure you will probably still agree with your own.