- Last OnlineDec 22, 2024 8:02 PM
- GenderMale
- BirthdayNov 30, 1993
- LocationIndiana, USA
- JoinedJul 23, 2014
All (1780)Friends
Also Available at
RSS Feeds
Precursor Scores do not matter. Critical consensus does not matter. Art matters. What you like/dislike is not a measurement of your intellect; none of these works are things we're entitled to, they're not "ours." We're simply given the chance to share in someone else's creation, whether that be a passion project or the product of a studio algorithm. The act of dissecting, rating, and looking at the reception of art to measure yourself is all pointless; if it's not about that very artistic expression, it's of tertiary value. Seek to understand before you seek to dissect. Anyone can point at a broken vase, but a true view of its discrete shards and their refraction before light is reserved for the aesthete. To realize that sometimes, the blemishes are what make it beautiful. The vase may be broken, but the way light contorts off the shards is perhaps where the true expression lies. To see beyond mere surface-level observations. To realize that the moment you attempt to pigeonhole things is the moment you've effectively missed the point of expression altogether. Your knowledge of literary devices, narrative structures, tropes, and terminology are all for further understanding—never for baseless dismissals. The consumer, the reviewer, the critic, it doesn't matter what you call yourself by; all of us are entering the world of the art and not the other way around. We're the outside force. Whatever you call yourself before art, know that we are the foreigners in its dominion, and not it in our's. Empty yourself of any pretense or prenotions to be filled with what the art and its expression have to offer. And if after all that. After seeking to understand. After living with the artist's vision, you come to a conclusion on whether you like it or not, only then should you dissect and further expound upon your reason for why. But for those that haven't had that epiphany yet and/or still get pleasure out of numbers and ratings, the ranking scale and quality-control evaluations are listed below. Scores indicate the level of inherent value I believe the title retains for itself, as well as where it may fall in the placement of other similar works. The symbols listed are made to negate all scores and strip things to the raw feelings I have for them: "◆" indicates if I liked it/enjoyed something throughout, similar to Letterboxd's "♥" option. "★" means I loved it/adored it/a personal favorite. Basically, the reason I love the medium. "◉" means I did not enjoy/disliked it/found it incredibly boring. Hopefully, with this installed in my tag section, the stigma associated with scores would be alleviated and people will focus on what really matters; my feelings for the content itself. Please keep in mind, just because a title on my list doesn't get a "◆" or a "★" doesn't mean I didn't enjoy it. I could have enjoyed watching the show in question but the enjoyment was far too sporadic, with too many moments of dead time for me to state I thoroughly enjoyed watching it from beginning to end. It may also be something I don't have much recollection of to give it a symbol, and if that's the case, adding a symbol for the sake of doing so would be disingenuous. So if you have a question regarding a show without a symbol, simply ask. My Ranking Scale 10/10 : The crème de la crème of the anime medium. Content that reached heights rarely seen, not only for the medium but also in the broader storytelling landscape in general. An anime that pushed the envelope far beyond what's expected, finding an equilibrium across all fronts. These titles are all-time favorites that appeal to me on a personal/conceptual level. I enjoyed them from beginning to end. Memorable characters and story, both of which were thoroughly explored and presented. An ambitious project that came the closest to perfecting its vision. The kind of titles that leave you with a void upon completion, the bittersweet feeling you receive from experiencing something truly awe-inspiring. There's no true perfect 10/10 out there, but when it comes to these entries, my strong, personal bias won't allow it anything lower. Whatever minor flaws they have become null and void from how much I adore them. If an anime ever made me love like a blind fanboy, these are it. They are the closest to my definition of a masterpiece. They're the reason I remain anchored to the medium to this day. They’re irreplaceable. 9/10 : Among the best entries that the anime medium has to offer, and as far as I'm concerned, they are also masterpieces in their own right. Extremely enjoyable. Superb script. Endearing cast. Rich in content. Went far beyond expectations. And it should go without saying, but many of them go on to become all-time favorites. Exceeded in setting itself apart from the rest and left a substantial impact. Properly tackled its themes and concepts in a way that distills its principals. I have minor qualms about this title and most of it was easily overlooked from everything else it did right. Whether propelled to the top for its sheer amount of entertainment value or praised for its thematic resonance, they deserve to be celebrated. This is a title that understands the medium it's working with and utilized audiovisuals with proper writing to achieve optimum results. They're timeless and not limited by contemporary standards. 8/10 : An exceptional title. Its positive aspects dwarfed many of its minor missteps. Whether it's the personal project of an auteur or the assembly of passionate individuals pooling together, when you watch the work, you get a sense that a great deal of effort and care was poured into its inception—utilized its themes in an effective and engaging manner. There may be a few minor discrepancies keeping it from ranking higher, but despite that, it's still a solid piece of work. May not always register with a strong personal connection but still a title I look back on with fond memories. They are powerhouses. Titles people use as examples of certain things being done right, stepping above the call of duty. Might have theatrical displays but never needlessly sensationalized. Titles with integrity and earnestness that you can't help but respect. A title I love, flaws and all. Endearing, memorable, and left a lasting impression. Sets a benchmark for others to follow. 7/10 : A good anime, memorable, and easily recommendable. A title with noticeable flaws but despite those aspects, manage to power through to create something worth the initial investment. Memorable/likable/distinct enough characters. They may not always be the most compelling, but they were certainly endearing. Intuitive visual and auditory decisions that demonstrate it was made with care. An enjoyable experience that left me with satisfactory final impressions. May have been formulaic at times, but still sets itself apart with proper execution and presentation. These are the anime that had a clear amount of effort displayed toward seeing its vision through. They might not have captured it in its entirety, but they certainly put their best foot forward while attempting to. Rewatchable, but a few issues hinder it from being better. But as all things go, they're still solid pieces of work, if only not as explored, consistently entertaining, or as rich in content as they could have been. 6/10 : A decent anime. For what it's worth, it had merits that edged it ahead of similar works in its playing field. Had good moments but had quite a few times where it wasn't appealing. May have had promise, but either poor execution or too many glaring issues kept it from being better. Understand that this score isn't a bad one; in fact, it's still relatively "good," it just means I'm not fully comfortable with assigning it a 7 for a few reasons. These tend to be titles that make for a good time-passer but rarely elevate beyond the glass ceiling it has imposed on itself. Also, very rarely, depending on the effort on the content's behalf or whatever mood I'm in, they can lean towards a 7... emphasis on "rarely" as it doesn't happen often. My enjoyment can also be the biggest reason for saving it from being a 5. The functionality of its world and/or characters may not have been finely tuned. With all that being said, it's still an anime I can recommend to a certain extent, if only with a few disclaimers beforehand. 5/10 : Not necessarily a bad anime but, at the same time, far from a good one. A mediocre / wasted potential / standard / run-of-the-mill type of content. Watch at your own risk, something I can't fully recommend without a lot of precursors. For every highlight or aspect that the title may have had in its favor, there's an equally detracting quality found that counteracts it. May have shown promise but squandered it. May also have had a few unique qualities but still does nothing to capitalize on it. It can also be a case where the anime excelled in a certain area but neglected a lot of the fundamentals. May have had a good premise or concept but failed to utilize it properly. Sometimes they're easily forgettable. Sometimes its only purpose is that of a time-passer. Sometimes it's an anime that I feel nothing for at all. It could be something that didn't aim that high to begin with, which is fine. Other times, it was too ambitious for the content provided. Whatever the path that each title ended up taking, they all find themselves being "middle of the road" in one way or another. Whatever the case may be, it's something that might still warrant a watch, but one that's a hit or miss depending on the individual at hand. 4/10 : Poorly-realized, bland, or subpar content. Now, this is where recommending titles becomes harder to do. Suffers from more problems than highlights. Way too many noticeable flaws. It may have shown promise for something worthwhile but didn't follow through with it. At best, they're easily digestible pieces of entertainment with nothing of substance keeping them afloat. So basically, think The McDonalds of anime; quick to consume but offers nothing of nutritional value. Sensationalized content that's reduced to plot twists, trite storylines, and shock value moments to hold the audiences' attention. Fail even to meet typical standards or even to get the fundamentals right. Doesn't properly tackle its themes. May only have a few redeeming qualities keeping it from being a complete failure. An anime that's "bad" not because it had nothing good to offer but because what little "good" was there couldn't help the overall "bad" that it was surrounded by. Squandered whatever idea it had, making no visible attempts to make it better. These works are the bane of the anime industry. Titles that lower the bar for quality content byways of simple confetti and masquerading. 3/10 : Deplorable. These are works with almost no redeemable quality. They're mostly trainwrecks or "bottom of the barrel" type of anime. No highlights to take away from it unless ironic. Mostly one-trick-ponies with nothing else to offer. Very poorly written and poorly presented. A lot of these tend to be "schlock" level titles that serve the lowest denominator. They're throw-away titles that will easily be replaced by another in a similar vein. Trying to defend titles like these requires an extreme amount of mental gymnastics and delusion. The kind of bad that even the average viewer could subconsciously tell there's something "off" with what they're seeing. At best, they're easy-to-consume titles with nothing else to offer but dumb theatrics, and at their worst, a pile of trash that needs to be discarded upon viewing. 2/10 : It's shit, anime so bad it's either comical or infuriating. These are titles that failed in almost every category imaginable—the type of content where its ineptitude has spread throughout the entire production. Narratively and thematically undercooked. Usually contains cardboard cut-out stereotypical characters. Illogical storyboarding. Sloppy directing. Sloppy writing. No heart or effort seemed to be placed into it. Almost cynically brought together in order to cash in on a recognizable property. The kind of anime that leaves all artistry or personality at the front door to make more room for easy profit. Avoid these like the plague. The only enjoyment received might come from turning the whole thing into a drinking game. No finesse, no integrity, nothing. These are the type of anime that go on to serve as punching bags for endless walls of diatribe. Content that abandons its craft for cheap gimmicks. Anime that have reached the apex of pointlessness. 1/10 : How was this greenlit to be made? How does this even exist? I'm being held against my will at this point. Content so bad that it's almost unfathomable to think that somewhere out there exists people who like lit wholeheartedly. Cancer. It's the kind of bad anime that everyone could agree that there's something wrong with it. So, in a way, these are the kind of things that bring people together as we all gather around and fling verbal feces at it. These titles manage to do everything wrong, an accomplishment within itself. Titles are so bad they almost become masterpieces in their own right. Like anything else, there are exceptions to this ranking scale as well. Experimental/unconventional titles may not apply. Simply treat it as a guideline to my thought process when assigning scores to a title. Rating Thoughts If you're curious about why I think scores matter despite my whole spiel in the precursor section stating otherwise, then read this: Rating Philosophy. The act of rating anime, to me, is insignificant BUT still a necessary evil, especially when you're dealing with data-gathering sites like this one, where people falsely equate their favorites or shows they dislike as a measurement of their intellect and self-worth. Hopefully, this blog entry will help you mitigate those fallacies and perhaps come to a better understanding as to why scores themselves aren't inherently important without first acknowledging art's importance in relation to the viewer. My Favorites Favorite Anime Characters |
Statistics
All Anime Stats Anime Stats
Days: 240.3
Mean Score:
4.99
- Watching7
- Completed1,130
- On-Hold9
- Dropped8
- Plan to Watch613
- Total Entries1,767
- Rewatched3
- Episodes14,714
All Favorites Favorites
Anime (20)
- Ergo Proxy TV·2006
- Argento Soma TV·2000
- Jin-Rou Movie·2000
- Flag ONA·2006
- Gankutsuou TV·2004
- Mushishi TV·2005
- Koukaku Kidoutai: Stand Alone Complex 2nd GIG TV·2004
- Kachou Ouji TV·1999
- Vampire Hunter D (2000) Movie·2000
- Tenshi no Tamago OVA·1985
- Ginga Eiyuu Densetsu OVA·1988
- Monster TV·2004
- Koi Kaze TV·2004
- Top wo Nerae! Gunbuster OVA·1988
- Samurai Champloo TV·2004
- Saraiya Goyou TV·2010
- Fantastic Children TV·2004
- Nana TV·2006
- Omoide Poroporo Movie·1991
- Akage no Anne TV·1979
Character (20)
- Mugen Samurai Champloo
- Holo Ookami to Koushinryou
- Revy Black Lagoon
- Shirley, Anne Akage no Anne
- Kotoishi, Naru Barakamon
- Onizuka, Eikichi Great Teacher Onizuka
- de Jarjayes, Oscar François Versailles no Bara
- Griffith Kenpuu Denki Berserk
- The Count of Monte Cristo Gankutsuou
- Izumi, Noa Kidou Keisatsu Patlabor: On Television
- von Oberstein, Paul Ginga Eiyuu Densetsu
- Rossi, Marco Haha wo Tazunete Sanzenri
- Kazundo, Gouda Koukaku Kidoutai: Stand Alone Complex 2nd GIG
- Tainaka, Ritsu K-On!
- Sakamoto Sakamoto desu ga?
- Mayer, Re-l Ergo Proxy
- Kaneshiro, Takuto Argento Soma
- von Reuenthal, Oskar Ginga Eiyuu Densetsu
- Jaegerjaquez, Grimmjow Bleach
- Jin, Kappei Muteki Choujin Zanbot 3
People (20)
- Takahashi, Ryousuke
- Oshii, Mamoru
- Murase, Shukou
- Hamasaki, Hiroshi
- Amano, Yoshitaka
- Kanno, Yoko
- Kon, Satoshi
- Asian Kung-Fu Generation
- Iso, Mitsuo
- Onda, Naoyuki
- Okiura, Hiroyuki
- Price, Jamieson
- Yasuhiko, Yoshikazu
- Araki, Tetsurou
- Takahata, Isao
- TK from Ling tosite sigure
- Watanabe, Shinichirou
- Miyazaki, Hayao
- Koike, Takeshi
- Izubuchi, Yutaka
All Comments (10356) Comments
xD good, i know you like more things in films that just "da Feels". You are still the best reviewer of all MAL
Merry Christmas
Also what makes Vampire Hunter D one of your all time favorite animes? I've been meaning to check it out because of the visuals alone.
This extends far past my own social circle, at cosplayer events and other gatherings that I personally have no interest in attending, characters from Frieren are very popular. The manga is also very popular not only in the west but also in Japan. Now, like you were saying, popularity obviously does not correlate to the quality of a work, but when multiple sources (social events, ranking aggregator sites, sales, etc) are alluding to the same thing (that a work is well received) then I would argue that there is significant merit in that. I don't know what your background is, but when it comes to scientific literature, the most empirical form of evidence comes in the form of systematic reviews and meta analyses. Which is a fancy way of saying "journal articles that take data from hundreds of smaller journal articles and trials to try and develop a consensus opinion on something". You don't necessarily have to agree with the consensus opinion, especially on something as subjective as art, but if a lot of different people enjoyed something, then it was probably a solid work. If you find yourself overwhelmingly disliking a lot of new anime that are coming out, while most people seem to be liking them, then that does mean you've (figuratively) aged yourself out of the medium.
>Again, this is another assumption, especially given what my previous reply stated: I know where to find the true gems in the medium divorced from its core demographic, and it's certainly not on this website's silly top ratings chart.
>I often disagree with both. I know my sensibilities, and I rely on specific networks and individuals if needed.
Which ones were these? I'd be interested to check them out myself. And which networks are you using?
>Using consensus from this community of mostly young adults to teens with limited exposure isn't how I find what I'm looking for, nor will it ever be.
Is this not just another way of saying that you've aged/fatigued yourself out of the medium? Am I misunderstanding something?
I would not say these are critically praised, and certainly not the best anime to come out of this year. Or at the very least, not the best full-length series to come out of this year, which is what most folks are talking about when discussing the best anime to come out during the year. Among fans of anime broadly, they are still very niche. Sure, people know about One Piece, but offline I don't think a single person I have conversed with knows what "Look Back" is. Meanwhile, most folks who have watched anime at least this year both on forums and in real life at least know what Frieren is (probably not Apothecary Diaries though, that one starts off a lot slower and is thus less appealing to the general viewer).
I am not a fan of One Piece in general so I will not comment on that, but I did watch Look Back some time after it aired and I very much disliked it. Way too sentimental for my taste and it tries to bite off more than it can chew in the timespan of an hour. I also didn't like that multiple times throughout the movie it felt like I was being "told to feel sad" and empathize with the characters, whom I barely knew or cared about. These sort of coming-of-age, kind of stories that rely on you empathizing with or understanding the character often do not work as shorts/movies. Can they be done? With a solid director certainly, and I have seen films where that is the case, but 90% of the time they can be done better in the form of a longer (but not too long) series where you have the time to develop a character and their relationships.
>"I would however disagree that the best has been mediocre to bad," where did I say that? I'm speaking about the year, not the medium as a whole.
I know you are. And I'm saying that the best hasn't been mediocre to bad. There are a lot more shitty anime these days because a lot more anime is being produced, but the best anime that is coming out on a year-to-year basis is about as good as the best yearly anime that have been coming out for at least the past decade.
To me, what it seems like is that you've probably aged yourself out of the medium, or at least that's what it seems like based on what you said you've watched this year. I would wager that a lot of the anime you've enjoyed in the past (whatever they may be) might not be particularly enjoyable to you now if you rewatched them. Which is not necessarily a bad thing, because most anime (especially now) DOES suck. But saying that the best anime coming out nowadays is just average or mediocre tells me that you're just so far divorced from the medium that your current impression on it is remarkably outdated. And mine probably is too, which is why I've started to watch the stuff that is critically acclaimed by casual and hardcore folks to get a better understanding of what people enjoy so that my opinions hold some salt.
My apologies if I sound like a bit of an asshole in my replies, it's hard to illustrate emotion/tone through text but I don't mean to offend.
I'm curious what you see in Monster that's of worth to you from an thematic standpoint. I don't really agree with most of the discourse around Monster concerning its exploration of evil and morality. Johan as a character is a bit confusing to me and his past is too ambiguous for me to glean any insight on the nature of evil, or what it means to be a monster. From a moral standpoint, I don't understand the moral dilemma that Tenma faces. It's clear to me that if he were to do anything, he would at least apprehend Johan to keep him from being a danger to more people, if not kill him. Not that you necessarily hold the same views as the discourse I've been seeing, but I just want to know the meaning that you get from it when you decipher it, as per your tag.
When I said I’m not a fan of the script, I didn’t mean I necessarily disliked or hated them.
I said this because many people keep forgetting this. Why else would I bring this up?
Well, which ones have you watched this year? And the reason I say ones is because there's probably only like 2-3 that were meaningfully good, so if you watched any more than that then you objectively weren't only watching "the best" of this year lmao. Which is kinda sad to think about but unfortunately that is the state of anime. I say this as someone who is not really a fan of anime anymore - I enjoy literature, films, and video games more.
I would however disagree that the best has been mediocre to bad, but that of course is dependent on which ones you've watched. Frieren for example is Top 1 on this site by a large margin, a position that was held by FMAB for as long as I've been on this site and I'd say it holds up pretty well. It has united both casual and hardcore watchers of anime, something that I didn't really think was possible until now. Maybe part of that is because of how shitty anime has become, but as someone who became very cynical and quit the medium for like half a decade and still really enjoyed it, I'd say there is some merit to it being a pretty damn good work in general.
I'd say if you've also become critical of the medium to give it a try and see what you think, maybe it'll offer you a different perspective, or maybe it won't.
Uhh, animation direction and scriptwriting are still distinctly two different things, even though they do go hand in hand quite often. In fact, Kon himself isn’t always the one writing them. It’s not uncommon to like one aspect but not the other, regardless if there’s a “symbiotic connection” between the two in question. You can like the technical aspects in how fluid and expressive some animated cuts are, but not like the actual story writing quality associated with it.
I will say however that the best-of-the-best coming out now are still exceptionally great media, just that like you said there isn't really a lot of them. I stopped watching anime for like 3-4 years and watched Frieren and Apothecary Diaries at the request of a friend and was astonished by how refreshing they felt to watch.
I don't think I'll go back to watching anime routinely myself, but I will at least try to keep up with the highly rated shows because they are pretty damn good and can go toe-to-toe with the best yearly releases in any other adjacent artistic medium. Unfortunately you do have to ignore about 90% of anime releases because they are absolutely bottom-of-the-barrel shlock. But keeping up with like the 3-5 great series that come out every year (and I'm really being liberal with the quantity here, it's probably closer to like 2 or 3) has been pretty easy for me to do. I have no idea how people are keeping up with every release and keeping their sanity intact though.
It does give you a sort of unrealistic sense of the medium though, because there is such a disparity between a great anime and a garbage one, which only becomes wider if you filter out the shit lol.