Report Sphinxter's Profile

A superior man above the others — master of proper grammar; untainted by bourgeois cultural influences; trifles not with the lesser man's trivial pursuits like "genres", "morality", "loyalty", or "gender" — soothly, you may kneel before me, at any moment.

Of note is:

- "he" is always used gender neutrally; unnecessarily gendered language is extremely bourgeois.
- "its" is a corruption; the possessive determiner is rightly spelt "it's"; words like "whole ", "limb", "favour", and "author" are also etymologically misshapen and contain invented letters with no historical basis that I omit sans any shame.
- The Hepburn romanization scheme is vile and disavowed in favor of the superior Nihon-Siki scheme.
- "a lot" is of course singular, not plural; the plural thereof is "lots"; why is a lot of you under the impression that it is plural?
- "aren't I" is perverse and should be condemned at once in favor of "ain't I" — the man who says "I are" soothly lives a grammarless cavern.