I am told time and time again to remove my review. But I feel as though you should respect my opinion and accept that other people have different preferences in terms of anime.
SAO could be considered one of the first landscape changing isekai but I think its a solid 2. However, Mirai Nikki is no better. I truly believe that Mirai Nikki is bad. Although this may make you mad, I think that Mirai Nikki's concept is intriguing. But, the execution was terrible. Between the complex and pseudo-psychological elements to the average yandere and upsetting main character, I knew that the anime would be popular but not good. Of course, this is only my opinion.
Maybe those shows were popular but not classics. Sword Art Online and Mirai Nikki were 1-3 and many would agree with me. But then again others think these are complete 10's. So calling them classics would be wrong but popular would be right.
If you could explain semi-old classics, I would like to know what you mean? Because without elaboration, "modern anime classics" would mean Evangelion, Berserk 1997, Akira, and Cowboy Bebop. However, "semi-classics" is not familiar to me in terms of anime.
Also, don't think I did not see you edit out the "you suck" part. I know that in the heat of the moment one can act impulsively but don't be so quick to spew insults.
All Comments (8) Comments
Also, don't think I did not see you edit out the "you suck" part. I know that in the heat of the moment one can act impulsively but don't be so quick to spew insults.