Report NoizyFrog's Profile

I was gonna comment abt ur GGO review, but i saw you put demon slayer at 5 so nvm, demon slayer is only higher than 5 if you only take the animation into account

Even though SAO: A has a whole lot of drawbacks and the score you give it seems reasonable, your review conveniently summarises the whole plot and brings up only bad aspects. Not to mention, you quickly skip over those bad things you mention without giving any detail. For example, you write "There is Kirito and there is a lesser Kirito, who is just a slightly inferior version of the original" and then you move right on to the supporting cast and conclude them in one sentence with them being boring. Instead of understanding how bad SAO: A is, the only thing I understand is how much you want to drag it down. I would appreciate it if you take a look at SunlitSonata's review on SAO: A.

this is just weird

looser just know to low rate anime

yellow eyes of Kirito and the others is just an incarnation which is a side effect due to how the Graphics Engine vs the actual code base interacts with each other on different layers or is just basically exploiting how mind uploading works frame-of-reference is data being constantly uploaded into the system, that data is part of game world) in sci-f is not explained because they do not know what is at all in the anime but in reality it exists and the reason why he uses it best is that it is used only seriously life-threatening and anxious - the irony is that asuna and others use it as much as they can

Basic SAO-Hater Review, SAO-A was so amazing that normal haters cant even say something against it, but you tried it.
You said: "Terrible writing is more apparent in this season than anywhere else in the franchise."

Literally a few sentences later: "an entire episode to establish something as simple as basic royalty system; or 15 minutes of backstory for 2 characters, who lose within 10 seconds and vanish, just to name a few."

That literally means, that the story gets well detailed explained, thats not bad, thats GOOD. The viewer is well informed and can even better empathize and fever with the anime, this is pure entertainment. Sword Art Online isn't without a reason so popular / famous.

About the Music: Dude, wtf are u talking about, SAO has one of the best ops and theme songs in the hole Anime-Industry. Since S1 with Crossing Field and Innocence, they just got better after every season. Adamas and Resister were just awesome. And Underworld has already topped them.

Ik, ik, The 2nd Part of S1 wasn't the best part, but you cant simply hate the Sequels, because of one controversial part...

i respect you my homie

bruh

is this guy trolling with his list im so confused

I would've respected your SAO review more if it was anywhere nearly as good as SunlitSonata's.

Sorry man, your SAO review is just bad. The review is just very empty only contain generic critics painted in catchy words usually used by people to bash show they dislike. I think you should realize that your review is voted helpful by many likely just because hating on SAO is very popular, not because the content of your review. I suggest you rewrite your review because as it is now, your review on SAO is just hot garbage. Sunlit Sonata's review is much better than yours.

Just don't misunderstand I respect opinions, so it''s ok with me that you don't like the anime. Oh and season 3 is coming this summer. :)

About your Overlord review... Read the novels, then you will know that the 'side' characters are not there for nothing.

Hey , nice list and reviews

I don't care what you said about anything else in the PriPri review, but a story doesn't need to be told in chronological order. This is simply fact & to suggest that it must be shows an inability to give credit to more complex orders of story telling. If you believe the only good way to tell is story is in chronological order, you fail to understand the cleverness of more "rag rug" (the analogy doesn't even make sense to be honest), irregular style of story-telling.