I'll give it a shot and watch a few episodes and tell you what I think, probably in the next couple of days, and don't worry; everyone sounds stupid sometimes! :)
I did see your picture when I was scrolling through reviews one day. I thought to myself, "Why does that look so familiar?" Now I know why. Hello, again.
Oh, your reviews are gone.
Mmm. The review was fine. A couple tidibts I didn't care for, but that's simply my opinion. Here are a few things about the review I didn't like from an analytical standpoint:
"When people talk about School Days, it's usually 'wow that anime is so messed up' or 'that anime is a work of art'."
- Let me say this exact same sentence with slightly different wording; when all people talk about School Days, it's usually "Wow, that anime is messed up," or "that anime is a work of art." Notice something? Try not to put words in people's mouths. You at least put "usually," but still.
"Story:"
- This whole section talks too much about the plot, I feel. If I hadn't seen this series before, I might complain to you that your review contained spoilers. Hint at how the plot progresses; don't give us a walkthrough.
The same can be said about the character section. That explores the progressing plot a little too much as well, especially when introducing Sekai. What you did with Makoto was fine, though wordy. What you did with Kotonoha was even better. Remember, you're reviewing, not reminding.
"The story begins to go downhill when Makoto starts getting into relationships he cannot commit to and craves more and more lust."
- This is nitpicking to the extreme, but this sentence is really strange. You're aware that lust is the feeling that one gets in anticipation of engaging in sexual activities, right? It's not what they're after, it's what they feel. It'd be like saying "and craves more and more happy."
It was fine. I didn't give it any rating, but it was a nice read. Keep workin' at it.
All Comments (46) Comments
\_(・ω・`)
if you want, we can talk :)
how are you?
Oh, your reviews are gone.
Mmm. The review was fine. A couple tidibts I didn't care for, but that's simply my opinion. Here are a few things about the review I didn't like from an analytical standpoint:
"When people talk about School Days, it's usually 'wow that anime is so messed up' or 'that anime is a work of art'."
- Let me say this exact same sentence with slightly different wording; when all people talk about School Days, it's usually "Wow, that anime is messed up," or "that anime is a work of art." Notice something? Try not to put words in people's mouths. You at least put "usually," but still.
"Story:"
- This whole section talks too much about the plot, I feel. If I hadn't seen this series before, I might complain to you that your review contained spoilers. Hint at how the plot progresses; don't give us a walkthrough.
The same can be said about the character section. That explores the progressing plot a little too much as well, especially when introducing Sekai. What you did with Makoto was fine, though wordy. What you did with Kotonoha was even better. Remember, you're reviewing, not reminding.
"The story begins to go downhill when Makoto starts getting into relationships he cannot commit to and craves more and more lust."
- This is nitpicking to the extreme, but this sentence is really strange. You're aware that lust is the feeling that one gets in anticipation of engaging in sexual activities, right? It's not what they're after, it's what they feel. It'd be like saying "and craves more and more happy."
It was fine. I didn't give it any rating, but it was a nice read. Keep workin' at it.