the review he gave is understandable, however, I believe this is another of the typical cases where an mal user only sees one way and treats this convenient and lcomplete information as an absolute truth, as it always happens. I completely agree on the unreality of the characters, it's a poor and stupid work, but doesn't this little bit that I said already define at least a third of the existing anime? we mal users love this crap where an illustration that theoretically should resemble a human being (but only theoretically because in practice it is an aberration) and that talks following the unanimous script with patterns present in all possible works. There are good animes, so there are bad right? but is it really the "unreality" that makes a bad anime? when you stop to reflect this is ridiculous, please stay away from me pseudo-intellectual evangelion fans. There are specific places for specific narratives, in the case of lookism, despite being a bad work, for me, the unreality and exaggeration in the personalities is essential to develop the ambiance that is so characteristic of the work.
crazy how u went outta ur way to make an alt, just says ur mal page is full of dog shit lmfao. u take anime too seriously and it shows. u elitists gotta stop projecting, thinking anyone cares about ur shity biased reviews as if ur opinion matters, it's embarrassing.
All Comments (10) Comments
bro literally get a life lol