Core principles: 1) Shows are judged as a whole (not season by season per se). More than 2 point discrepancy between seasons always has a good reason behind it (inconsistencies, drastic and unwarranted change in theme, characters suddenly acting different without a good explanation) . 2) Production value is the least important aspect of my ratings. Most important is the story, characters and well executed themes 3) Every art is both subjective and objective - you can like a show that is bad and hate show that is good, but it does not change the fact. Do not compare two 10s or 9s as the subjective part is there much harder to distinguish from the objective. Objective part is always somewhat debatable when it comes to fine details but if you wanna say my 10s and 9s are 7s or lower, provide evidence or there is nothing to talk about.
10. Masterpiece - either a nigh flawless series or one close to heart (reserved just for my absolute favorites)
9. Great/excellent/splendid - is almost at the same level as 10 but does not belong to the "heart" category
8. Very good - either 10s or 9s that did not personally impress me all that much or still one of my favorites
7. Good - very enjoyable but not belonging into favorites + mediocre shows that have one aspect I love (fox girls and such...)
6. Fine - nor boring nor impressive. Has some aspects that lift it from "mid" category or really only good productionwise
5. Mid - Nor standing out nor bad/bad but with redeeming qualities/ good or fine with some horrible aspects
4. Bad - not that jarring but not enjoyable either (can contain some redeeming scenes or characters; slight chance of dropping)
3. Very bad - badly written with scarse enjoyable aspects (like one "almost waifu";chance of dropping)
2. Horrible - almost unwatchable/awful writing or production (high chance of dropping)
1. Garbage - irredeemable trash (almost always drop)
All Comments (24) Comments
Your profile picture is so cute :D
Takagi-san exactly looks like little Emilia. Now I understand, If Emilia hadn't lost all her memories, maybe she would have grown up like Takagi-san.
Nishikata always looks like Subaru.
By the way, I'm glad to meet you ^_^
"Most porn watchers are not addicted at all" yeah buddy you have absolutely no idea what you're talking about. Whatever, you can fuck off now. It was a displeasure having to reply to your pea-brained "arguments".
Unlike him, his arguments were pretty much a joke. This is why radical feminists aren't respected because, for some reason, they don't like to see men happy. And seeing how he'll call any guy a "white male" clearly was a red flag.
No problem, have a wonderful day ^^
I also hurt his feelings about the Kaguya-sama OVA which resulted in him blocking me.
🠗 🠗 🠗
Your opinion on OVAs not counting towards the wholesomeness of the anime itself is again, your opinion, why the fuck are you trying to debate subjective opinions with me? Judging by how many people found my review helpful I'd say that it's not just me who feels this way, either.
And please don't give me that bullshit on addiction. Do you really not understand what I'm trying to say or are you purposefully trying to misrepresent what I said? Do you not know that recent research has revealed that behavioral addictions and substance addictions share many of the same fundamental mechanisms leading to a collection of shared alterations in brain anatomy and chemistry? What the fuck does it matter what kind of addiction it is? Literally everything you're saying since your first message is besides the point.
If you're against radical feminism for any reason then there's no reason for us to continue talking. Judging from your comical definition of "real feminism" (leave it to a white male living in a first world country to define real feminism LMAO), you have absolutely zero fucking idea about the oppression and subordination of women so it's no surprise that you're oblivious to the actual harms of sexualization in media and pornography in general. No need for you to read the books I listed btw, you can jerk off to all of my logical fallacies instead.
No one's talking about whether it's canon or not, it being Ishigami's fantasy doesn't change the fact that it's disturbing and uncalled for. Like I said the first part wasn't as bad in the source material, it was intentionally made to be that way in the OVA to attract more attention. That's my entire point. It's disrespectful not only to the characters themselves but to the people who watched Kaguya for its rich substance, wholesome interactions and creative humor.
Porn isn't "really problematic for a rather small portion of people", that's like saying heroin, cocaine or other highly addictive drugs are "really problematic for a rather small portion of people". In fact porn might be even worse because not only is it highly addictive and FREE (which means that literal children can get hooked) but along with the dopamine rush it feeds your brain it also reinforces damaging, unrealistic and made up concepts about sex, sexuality and relationships in general.
If you actually want to read up then I'd recommend starting with Pornography: Men Possessing Women, and then The End of Patriarchy: Radical Feminism for Men.
Selling out to pander to horny retards wasn't what the source material intended, it's what it was parodying. Ironically the OVA seemed to completely miss this and go full retard by focusing purely on the sexualization part, even more than most fucking ecchi anime.
If you want to know what I mean by contemporary male sexuality then go read some books (actual books that focus on what really matters, not some dumb bullshit NoFap articles) about how porn/hentai have brainwashed boys and men, and the consequent effects of said brainwashing on girls and women. It would be a waste of time to argue with or convince you about something that you don't even take seriously in the first place.
Anyway, I'm off to kill your dad. Make sure to PM me some of your favorite dishes.