Como este site virou repositório de fascismo esotérico, neofeudalismo e às vezes coisa pior, decidi que vou usar mais o letterboxd: letterboxd.com pode me encontrar nos outros sites pelo carrd: artir.carrd.co
10 - Ethics V, prop 40. 9 - An unbelievably touching experience, despite its weaknesses. Unforgettable and truly unique. 8 - Deeply impressive or meaningful to me, yet subject to criticism. There's more potential it could reach. 7 - Good, substantial, with a lot of derivative elements that are worth pointing out. 6 - It was worth watching but could also have been more substantial. 5 - It isn't flawed even though I didn't find anything special enough to call them worth it. 4 - Pretty sure they've spent a lot of effort in the production but feel careless, misguided or unexpressive. 3 - It's definitely flawed but could be revisited. 2 - Frustrating to watch, analyze or even remember. 1 - Deliberately damaging.
favorites sorted by personal connection over rating(desc.↘ order)
emblemas nas tags: 🔂: reassistido - 🔂: reassistido duas ou mais vezes - 📌: planejo revisitar - 💮: alto valor emocional atrelado
“Compassion is an unstable emotion. It needs to be translated into action, or it withers. The question of what to do with the feelings that have been aroused, the knowledge that has been communicated. If one feels that there is nothing 'we' can do -- but who is that 'we'? -- and nothing 'they' can do either -- and who are 'they' -- then one starts to get bored, cynical, apathetic.” ― Susan Sontag
Comments