Statistics
Anime Stats
Days: 49.9
Mean Score:
6.63
- Total Entries252
- Rewatched27
- Episodes3,134
Last Anime Updates
Access to this list has been restricted by the owner.
Manga Stats
Days: 4.1
Mean Score:
6.67
- Total Entries34
- Reread0
- Chapters545
- Volumes72
Last Manga Updates
Access to this list has been restricted by the owner.
All Comments (9) Comments
A negative purpose is a purpose without content, one can only imagine that the work of art is made for some purpose but no clear purpose fits it.
As in the artwork is not a tool to reach some other goal, the artwork is the goal in itself, a sort of manifestation of the freedom of reason.
It can be pleasent, it can be unpleasent, but the artwork draws one in by it's unique lack of a positive purpose, a negative purpose, just the form of a purpose without it's defining content.
Radically free does not mean innovative, rather it is about it's negativity of it's purpose, if he as you say only wanted to make enjoyable music, then his music loses to the most enjoyable music, or the most enjoyable thing.
To be enjoyable is a positive purpose, radical freedom in art is to do something without such a clear purpose.
If they only serve to be pleasent then they are craftmaship or design, as in devoid of the free artistic thinking of art.
We are talking about art, classics are only examples of art, and the ability of art to become a classic tend to show that it is radically free in the sense that I am implying.
Edit: Sorry I had to make another comment, it wouldn't let me post in the already existing comment chain for some reason.