Anime & Manga News

Manga 'Rokudou no Onna-tachi' Gets TV Anime in Spring 2023

by DatRandomDude
Jan 18, 2023 6:23 AM | 37 Comments
Production company Mixer announced a television anime adaptation of Yuuji Nakamura's Rokudou no Onna-tachi (Rokudou's Wicked Girls) manga on Wednesday. An official website also opened and revealed the main staff, cast, and the first key visual (pictured). The anime is scheduled to premiere in April 2023 on Tokyo MX, MBS, and, BS Asahi.

Cast
Tousuke Rokudou: Gen Satou (Yofukashi no Uta)
Ranna Himawari: Sumire Uesaka (Ijiranaide, Nagatoro-san)
Sayuri Osanada: Naomi Oozora (Uzaki-chan wa Asobitai!)
Azami Himeno: Yuki Yomichi (Super Cub)
Tsubaki Tachibana: Misato Matsuoka (Eizouken ni wa Te wo Dasu na!)
Mizue Tsuyukasa: Hitomi Sekine (Shinobi no Ittoki)
Haruya Iinuma: Haruki Ishiya (Murenase! Seton Gakuen)

Staff
Director: Hiroya Saitou (Baki episode director)
Series Composition: Yuuichirou Momose (Kumo desu ga, Nani ka?)
Character Design: Shinya Segawa (Pastel Memories)
Sub-character Design: Hideaki Oonishi (Golden Kamuy animation director)
Mechanical Design: Hiroyuki Taiga (Fuuto Tantei)
Prop Design: Yasuyoshi Uetsu (Triage X), Tomoaki Chishima (Val x Love animation director)
Art Director: Kenichi Tajiri (Mukuo Studio) (Tsugumomo)
Color Design: Yoshimi Kawakami (Fairy Tail (2014))
Director of Photography: Yuujirou Yamane (Inaho) (Mahou Shoujo Site)
Editing: Shuuji Matsumoto (Kuro no Shoukanshi)
Sound Director: Kouji Yamamoto (Muhyo to Rouji no Mahouritsu Soudan Jimusho)
Studio: Satelight

Nakamura serialized the romantic comedy manga in Weekly Shounen Champion from June 2016 to April 2021. Akita Shoten shipped the 26th and final volume in June 2021.

Synopsis
Tousuke Rokudou is a first-year attending Aomori High, a school full of delinquents. He is often bullied by his classmates due to his incompatibility with their behavior, the only exceptions being his two good friends who are also social outcasts. Frustrated at the way they are treated, the three wish they could stand up and claim the fun, peaceful school life of their dreams.

However, Tousuke's life takes a drastic turn when he receives a package from his late grandfather containing their family heirloom, a scroll said to possess the power to save him from impending danger. Upon holding the scroll, a sudden glow emanates, leaving a strange mark on Tousuke's forehead.

Thinking that he's received the means to free himself and his friends from their daily treatment, Tousuke is shocked to find out that its effects are far different than what he had imagined. Although his bullying continues, he realizes that the mark from the scroll acts as a charm, capturing the hearts of delinquent girls—in particular, Ranna Himawari, the strongest of them all. [Written by MAL Rewrite]

Official site: https://www.rokudo-akujo.com/
Official Twitter: @akujorokudo

Source: PR Times

Rokudou no Onna-tachi on MAL

20 of 37 Comments Recent Comments

Piromysl said:
I clearly remember, that when Nagatoro adaptation was announced and this whole drama regarding that mistranslation happened, people were saying that THIS is an actual bullying manga.
Is this really that hard?

Oh, and it seems that Main Girl in that one will share VA with Nagatoro. Coincidence? I think not.




MC is never bullied by the main girl, if thats your question.

He is victim of bullying in his school. At least early on.

Mar 8, 2023 8:26 AM by Fabris

I will definitely be keeping an eye on this anime, it seems intriguing and has the potential to be a dark horse of the spring season.

Jan 20, 2023 12:31 PM by AnimeholikPl

Thread cleaned, chatter and offt-topic posts removed.


Jan 19, 2023 8:18 AM by -DxP-

madarchod said:
@DrHizzle
Geez! if something from 2016 is older then I guess all the 80s and 90s manga I have read must be from antiquity for you?
Honestly, I thought this manga ended around 2016 rather than starting around then.
I don't really mean older as in it is old if it had ended in 2016 as I assumed, but that it's old for a show that just got adapted. Usually adaptations get announced while the manga is publishing or right as it ends.

Also yea, I only started watching anime around 2017 and reading manga about a year later, so yea anything pre-2000 is ancient to me.

Jan 19, 2023 7:49 AM by DrHizzle

Poster reminds me of when I first saw the "Heion Sedai no Idaten Tachi" announcement. I might be looking forward to this a little.

Jan 19, 2023 2:01 AM by Ronichko

At the very least the main character is on the cover, which can not be said of most harem anime. The art design looks very bland, this seems like it's going to be a pretty bland production. 

WOW self-insert main character who receives magic, which makes delinquent girls fall in love with him. This is just blatantly lazy. Yet another escapist fantasy of girls magically starting to like you. I guess I'm not the target audience though, maybe the next key visual or trailer will give a better impression.

Satelight is a pretty decent studio, so maybe the visuals won't be bad.

Jan 19, 2023 2:01 AM by Kumiveneella

@DrHizzle
Geez! if something from 2016 is older then I guess all the 80s and 90s manga I have read must be from antiquity for you?

Jan 19, 2023 12:08 AM by madarchod

Absolutely w manga, can’t wait for this.

It’s weird, I’m new enough to anime that this is only like the second time I’ve seen a manga I’ve read get adopted. (The first being Tomo-chan)
Gotta say it’s a really cool feeling, hope the show turns out alright.

Jan 18, 2023 5:33 PM by JumbledStars

Gosh!, thats one manga that picked up my interest long time ago but never gave it a chance.  Then I  forgot about it existed. And now its finished. I guess its a good excuse to watch the adaptation. hope it gets proper visuals.

Jan 18, 2023 11:13 AM by MichaelJackson

JTZ29 said:
ssjokg said:
Besides that it looks like a rough 00s anime that barely looks like the original source??

You can be cartoonish and non-moe(whatever that means since moe doesnt have a specific art ) without being bad. Iruma-kun is cartoonish and looks good.This looks like a key visual for an anime 20 years ago.
Thank you! Glad someone has my back here.
I'm not even surprised that you really perceived our dialogue as an argument, and to such an extent that you were pleased with the support of the person with whom you previously agreed.

Jan 18, 2023 11:12 AM by RobertBobert

@ssjokg You forgot about one thing - that this is a matter of tastes. I personally find the Iruma anime to be very mediocre in terms of design, like it's an indie animation lol. But I'm not trying to argue about it as if it's objective. And yes, to me this art still looks like regular shonen design that is aimed at comedy rather than fanservice. Sorry.

Jan 18, 2023 11:10 AM by RobertBobert

ssjokg said:
RobertBobert said:
Because I don't see any other reason to consider this art to be bad. This is a typical cartoon-ish design that relies more on comedy than detailed drawing.
Besides that it looks like a rough 00s anime that barely looks like the original source??

You can be cartoonish and non-moe(whatever that means since moe doesnt have a specific art ) without being bad. Iruma-kun is cartoonish and looks good.This looks like a key visual for an anime 20 years ago.
Thank you! Glad someone has my back here.

Jan 18, 2023 11:06 AM by JTZ29

RobertBobert said:
JTZ29 said:
When did I say it had to be moe-ish? Have you actually read the manga? Because I have, and I don't think the art is particularly great. It's not ugly by any means, but I'd say it's mediocre/passable at best.
Because I don't see any other reason to consider this art to be bad. This is a typical cartoon-ish design that relies more on comedy than detailed drawing.
Besides that it looks like a rough 00s anime that barely looks like the original source??

You can be cartoonish and non-moe(whatever that means since moe doesnt have a specific art ) without being bad. Iruma-kun is cartoonish and looks good.This looks like a key visual for an anime 20 years ago.

Jan 18, 2023 11:05 AM by ssjokg

JTZ29 said:
RobertBobert said:
I'm sorry, but no matter how much you say "I think so" or imply that if I don't agree with you, I haven't read the manga, your answers won't carry any weight. I still don't see anything ugly or bad about this design.
Because if you haven't actually read the series, and haven't seen the way the art looks in the manga, you can't realistically or reliably form an opinion on its art style. You're basing your entire opinion on a single promotional image from the anime, which already has a semi-different visual style from the manga and that's just ridiculous. Like, how on earth can you form an opinion on a manga's art style when you haven't even read it? That literally makes no sense.
One question. Why didn't you even for a second admit that I could find the manga on any of the resources or even random pages and not see what it looks like?

Jan 18, 2023 11:04 AM by RobertBobert

RobertBobert said:
JTZ29 said:
Never said that it had to have detailed drawings either. I just don't think the art is good, again it's perfectly passable. The character designs range from fine to actually ugly, and nothing stands out in the series stylistically. And if you haven't actually read the manga, I don't really think you can speak about this series' art style.
I'm sorry, but no matter how much you say "I think so" or imply that if I don't agree with you, I haven't read the manga, your answers won't carry any weight. I still don't see anything ugly or bad about this design.
Because if you haven't actually read the series, and haven't seen the way the art looks in the manga, you can't realistically or reliably form an opinion on its art style. You're basing your entire opinion on a single promotional image from the anime, which already has a semi-different visual style from the manga and that's just ridiculous. Like, how on earth can you form an opinion on a manga's art style when you haven't even read it? That literally makes no sense.

Jan 18, 2023 10:56 AM by JTZ29

JTZ29 said:
RobertBobert said:
Because I don't see any other reason to consider this art to be bad. This is a typical cartoon-ish design that relies more on comedy than detailed drawing.
Never said that it had to have detailed drawings either. I just don't think the art is good, again it's perfectly passable. The character designs range from fine to actually ugly, and nothing stands out in the series stylistically. And if you haven't actually read the manga, I don't really think you can speak about this series' art style.
I'm sorry, but no matter how much you say "I think so" or imply that if I don't agree with you, I haven't read the manga, your answers won't carry any weight. I still don't see anything ugly or bad about this design.

Jan 18, 2023 10:52 AM by RobertBobert

RobertBobert said:
JTZ29 said:
When did I say it had to be moe-ish? Have you actually read the manga? Because I have, and I don't think the art is particularly great. It's not ugly by any means, but I'd say it's mediocre/passable at best.
Because I don't see any other reason to consider this art to be bad. This is a typical cartoon-ish design that relies more on comedy than detailed drawing.
Never said that it had to have detailed drawings either. I just don't think the art is good, again it's perfectly passable. The character designs range from fine to actually ugly, and nothing stands out in the series stylistically. And if you haven't actually read the manga, I don't really think you can speak about this series' art style.

Jan 18, 2023 10:50 AM by JTZ29

It looks like there's a 99% chance the mc is a cringe lord ruining everything.

It seemed interesting untill I read shounen, harem and saw the mc page.

Jan 18, 2023 10:50 AM by Roevhaal

DrHizzle said:
Oh hey, I read some of this. The art wasn't my favorite, but the parts I read of it were fun.

Also, this one is kind of older, right? Every time something older gets adapted I get a sliver of hope that Saotome Senshu will get an adaptation.
It's not THAT old. The first chapter came out in 2016 and it ended in 2021.

Jan 18, 2023 10:47 AM by JTZ29

JTZ29 said:
RobertBobert said:
Art doesn't have to be incredibly moe-ish to be good.
When did I say it had to be moe-ish? Have you actually read the manga? Because I have, and I don't think the art is particularly great. It's not ugly by any means, but I'd say it's mediocre/passable at best.
Because I don't see any other reason to consider this art to be bad. This is a typical cartoon-ish design that relies more on comedy than detailed drawing.

Jan 18, 2023 10:47 AM by RobertBobert

Related Database Entries

It’s time to ditch the text file.
Keep track of your anime easily by creating your own list.
Sign Up Login