[Oshi No Ko]
Available on Manga Store
New
May 1, 2023 5:29 AM
#201
I wonder why no one has made a new thread complaining about how did he know which cigarette butts to take. Slackers. |
May 1, 2023 6:40 AM
#202
majinale said: I didn't change your quote on purpose, the forum quote system is confusing i mixed what i wrote with yours (I think it;s fixed now). Anyway you are obsessed with things that make no sense.If fanboyism is bad, reverse fanboyism is even worse. There is absolutely nothing wrong with that scene, nether technically or storytelling wise.You are stretching even for a nitpick. If you think that there is something irrational about the fandom, you can do better. “Nothing wrong with that scene, neither technically or storytelling”, tell me you never used a mobile phone before without telling you never used a mobile phone before. Edit: Just to reply to fanboyism and reverse fanboyism thing. Fans don’t act like there’s nothing and that it is flawless. Fans criticise to tell author “hey this is wrong because of…, please take care next time to research”. That way he becomes better and understand his weak points. Reverse fanboyism would be to criticise every scene, which isn’t the case here. We are criticising one scene in particular. You want it to open a floodgate. Cool I could do that, if you want but you won’t like it neither will I. So stop acting like this is a bad thing to criticise when you have people criticising other animes for less. |
Confused_100May 1, 2023 6:48 AM
May 1, 2023 6:43 AM
#203
Confused_100 said: daiotaku said: Confused_100 said: daiotaku said: Confused_100 said: I've provided the correct calculations multiple times - 30 second cooldown and 45,510 tries (45510*30)/60/60 = 379.25 hours - That would be 31.604 days 12 hours a day, or it would 9.4 weeks working a normal, full time 40 hours a week.They will see you are provoking and said wrong things like “my calculations are wrong” without providing evidence. They can search for mobile security and literally find what I said. Plus they will see you never replied to any of my questions and say it’s hypocritical of someone who didn’t answer anything ask for a link. Seems to me they will see you as not genuine. Now I am only replying because I am defending myself and I asked you to stop replying but you seem you don’t even read. If you actually spread it out over 4 years, it's about 15 minutes a day. You've posted an insane number of comments arguing with everyone trying to claim Oshi no Ko is terrible, and you're accusing other people of "provoking" lmao. If you actually wanted to defend yourself, you would post a link proving your original claim about all cellphones from 20 years ago going longer then 30 seconds if you enter a number wrong. But you haven't done so, either you're wrong, or you don't know how to use google. Again, pretty embarrassing and I'm not clear why you keep posting when you can't do this basic thing. 15 minutes a day wouldn’t be enough, it would last more than 4 years at that point btw. You still didn’t specify where my calculations are wrong. ((15x60)/30)x365x4=43,800 tries. This is less and you want to be so precise and literal in everything you said so let me use that to my advantage. Finally someone in elementary school knows that mobiles lock for more than 30 seconds now. You failed search for mobile security and is giving “20 years ago”, why specifically 20 years ago? Because you saw one random response here who said it. You didn’t even try to think about it. But let me just fill you in quick. How old is Aqua? He starts out 15 btw. Meaning 15 years ago not 20. When was manga released? 2020, this would make the phone model released in 2005. I didn’t tell “other” people that they are provoking, I only said it to you. As you are doing it on purpose to make the one replying to you lose temper and reply wrong at one point so that you can use it as an excuse to dismiss everything that person made. You aren’t making any genuine statement. You provoke, that’s your job. Now to give you real information. The mobile phone was known to have a lock system meaning it has to have incremental lockout. Incremental lockout works a day as follows; 5th try = 30 sec, 6th = 1 minute, 7 = 5 minutes, 8 = 15 minutes, 9 = 1 hour, 10 = permanently locked for whole day. Some even after 10th try remove data from mobile. Now this applies to old phones as well because this concept isn’t new. All phones imply this security measure. Now to use this realistic information to show how he should have wrote it; 10 tries max a day; 10x365=3650 tries a year. Now divide this by the number specified in anime which will give us around 12 years minimum. This could have been implemented in writing but writer was lazy to search for it. Now for you, answer the questions given to you like; Since there is a lockout, couldn’t there be removal of data mechanic? Wouldn’t that mean Aqua isn’t that smart? Or did writer just not search (lazy writing)? Which is it? Provide wrong calculations I said as you have confidently said. If nothing is given, then you are just provoking. Finally let me add this; give me a link that shows a mobile phone that only locks for 30 seconds. Since you are defending that concept so much. Everytime you don’t answer me, I will add more realistic and impossible for you to answer. Because you decided to defend this kind of writing and think it’s “good”. When it’s objectively bad. > ((15x60)/30)x365x4=43,800 tries. This is less and you want to be so precise and literal in everything you said so let me use that to my advantage. Lol, this is so ridiculous. It's 15.5749486653 minutes per day. If you want to get to that level of pedantry, you forgot to include a leap year. 4 years is (365*4)+1 days. So here, your calculations are wrong. > But let me just fill you in quick. How old is Aqua? He starts out 15 btw. Meaning 15 years ago not 20. When was manga released? 2020, this would make the phone model released in 2005. Another incorrect calculation on your part. Ai had the phone before Aqua was born, in fact before he was conceived. It's the phone she used to communicate with the father when they were still dating. So at least a year older then Aqua. And probably a couple years older then that. So again, incorrect calculations. > Finally let me add this; give me a link that shows a mobile phone that only locks for 30 seconds. Since you are defending that concept so much. You're the one making the claim bro. You haven't provided any evidence whatsoever that you're correct. Not a single link. You can't simply declare something correct and then demand other people google stuff to prove you wrong. Why do you expect anyone to listen to you about the technical details of 20 year old phones from someone who doesn't even know how to use google? A leap year would increase only 30 tries. As it’s only one day increase. Meaning it would be 43,830 which is still less. Thank you for proving that you can’t calculate right and that I was right about you. Actually we don’t know when she got the phone and if it’s the same model. By using this knowledge we can say the model is around 2005 indefinitely. And that had every information I made. So thank you again. All you do is assumptions. While I do logistic thinking here. Cool your problem not mine that you don’t believe me but you are saying that there is a phone that locks only for 30 seconds. Give me proof of that. Every information in google shows the lock system I specified. Meaning anyone with google search would see I am right. Thank you again. Btw you really did prove me right now, if you think about it. Look at your response here. > As it’s only one day increase. Meaning it would be 43,830 which is still less. Lol, now it seems like you can neither calculate nor read. As I said, in the comment which you quoted, it's 15.5749486653 minutes per day. Again, a complete inability to do basic arithmetic. > By using this knowledge we can say the model is around 2005 indefinitely. And that had every information I made. So thank you again. All you do is assumptions. No, now you're repeating the same mistake you made earlier, assuming she bought the cellphone when Aqua and Ruby were born, rather then before they were conceived. Apparently you neither know how to google nor how human reproduction actually works. > you are saying that there is a phone that locks only for 30 seconds. Give me proof of that. Lol, you're the one who made the initial claim with zero evidence. Apparently still expecting people to take your word on how technology works when you're incapable of using google. It's kind of hilarious. |
May 1, 2023 6:56 AM
#204
Confused_100 said: I literally have a working lg A133 flip phone right now in front of me. I used to use it right around the mid 2010s. You can enter UNLIMITED wrong passwords without even a delay in between. majinale said: I didn't change your quote on purpose, the forum quote system is confusing i mixed what i wrote with yours (I think it;s fixed now). Anyway you are obsessed with things that make no sense.If fanboyism is bad, reverse fanboyism is even worse. There is absolutely nothing wrong with that scene, nether technically or storytelling wise.You are stretching even for a nitpick. If you think that there is something irrational about the fandom, you can do better. “Nothing wrong with that scene, neither technically or storytelling”, tell me you never used a mobile phone before without telling you never used a mobile phone before. Edit: Just to reply to fanboyism and reverse fanboyism thing. Fans don’t act like there’s nothing and that it is flawless. Fans criticise to tell author “hey this is wrong because of…, please take care next time to research”. That way he becomes better and understand his weak points. Reverse fanboyism would be to criticise every scene, which isn’t the case here. We are criticising one scene in particular. You want it to open a floodgate. Cool I could do that, if you want but you won’t like it neither will I. So stop acting like this is a bad thing to criticise when you have people criticising other animes for less. edit: Here i am even kind enough to make a video for you as well https://streamable.com/sep6pm |
majinaleMay 1, 2023 7:31 AM
May 1, 2023 7:02 AM
#205
daiotaku said: Confused_100 said: daiotaku said: Confused_100 said: daiotaku said: Confused_100 said: I've provided the correct calculations multiple times - 30 second cooldown and 45,510 tries (45510*30)/60/60 = 379.25 hours - That would be 31.604 days 12 hours a day, or it would 9.4 weeks working a normal, full time 40 hours a week.They will see you are provoking and said wrong things like “my calculations are wrong” without providing evidence. They can search for mobile security and literally find what I said. Plus they will see you never replied to any of my questions and say it’s hypocritical of someone who didn’t answer anything ask for a link. Seems to me they will see you as not genuine. Now I am only replying because I am defending myself and I asked you to stop replying but you seem you don’t even read. If you actually spread it out over 4 years, it's about 15 minutes a day. You've posted an insane number of comments arguing with everyone trying to claim Oshi no Ko is terrible, and you're accusing other people of "provoking" lmao. If you actually wanted to defend yourself, you would post a link proving your original claim about all cellphones from 20 years ago going longer then 30 seconds if you enter a number wrong. But you haven't done so, either you're wrong, or you don't know how to use google. Again, pretty embarrassing and I'm not clear why you keep posting when you can't do this basic thing. 15 minutes a day wouldn’t be enough, it would last more than 4 years at that point btw. You still didn’t specify where my calculations are wrong. ((15x60)/30)x365x4=43,800 tries. This is less and you want to be so precise and literal in everything you said so let me use that to my advantage. Finally someone in elementary school knows that mobiles lock for more than 30 seconds now. You failed search for mobile security and is giving “20 years ago”, why specifically 20 years ago? Because you saw one random response here who said it. You didn’t even try to think about it. But let me just fill you in quick. How old is Aqua? He starts out 15 btw. Meaning 15 years ago not 20. When was manga released? 2020, this would make the phone model released in 2005. I didn’t tell “other” people that they are provoking, I only said it to you. As you are doing it on purpose to make the one replying to you lose temper and reply wrong at one point so that you can use it as an excuse to dismiss everything that person made. You aren’t making any genuine statement. You provoke, that’s your job. Now to give you real information. The mobile phone was known to have a lock system meaning it has to have incremental lockout. Incremental lockout works a day as follows; 5th try = 30 sec, 6th = 1 minute, 7 = 5 minutes, 8 = 15 minutes, 9 = 1 hour, 10 = permanently locked for whole day. Some even after 10th try remove data from mobile. Now this applies to old phones as well because this concept isn’t new. All phones imply this security measure. Now to use this realistic information to show how he should have wrote it; 10 tries max a day; 10x365=3650 tries a year. Now divide this by the number specified in anime which will give us around 12 years minimum. This could have been implemented in writing but writer was lazy to search for it. Now for you, answer the questions given to you like; Since there is a lockout, couldn’t there be removal of data mechanic? Wouldn’t that mean Aqua isn’t that smart? Or did writer just not search (lazy writing)? Which is it? Provide wrong calculations I said as you have confidently said. If nothing is given, then you are just provoking. Finally let me add this; give me a link that shows a mobile phone that only locks for 30 seconds. Since you are defending that concept so much. Everytime you don’t answer me, I will add more realistic and impossible for you to answer. Because you decided to defend this kind of writing and think it’s “good”. When it’s objectively bad. > ((15x60)/30)x365x4=43,800 tries. This is less and you want to be so precise and literal in everything you said so let me use that to my advantage. Lol, this is so ridiculous. It's 15.5749486653 minutes per day. If you want to get to that level of pedantry, you forgot to include a leap year. 4 years is (365*4)+1 days. So here, your calculations are wrong. > But let me just fill you in quick. How old is Aqua? He starts out 15 btw. Meaning 15 years ago not 20. When was manga released? 2020, this would make the phone model released in 2005. Another incorrect calculation on your part. Ai had the phone before Aqua was born, in fact before he was conceived. It's the phone she used to communicate with the father when they were still dating. So at least a year older then Aqua. And probably a couple years older then that. So again, incorrect calculations. > Finally let me add this; give me a link that shows a mobile phone that only locks for 30 seconds. Since you are defending that concept so much. You're the one making the claim bro. You haven't provided any evidence whatsoever that you're correct. Not a single link. You can't simply declare something correct and then demand other people google stuff to prove you wrong. Why do you expect anyone to listen to you about the technical details of 20 year old phones from someone who doesn't even know how to use google? A leap year would increase only 30 tries. As it’s only one day increase. Meaning it would be 43,830 which is still less. Thank you for proving that you can’t calculate right and that I was right about you. Actually we don’t know when she got the phone and if it’s the same model. By using this knowledge we can say the model is around 2005 indefinitely. And that had every information I made. So thank you again. All you do is assumptions. While I do logistic thinking here. Cool your problem not mine that you don’t believe me but you are saying that there is a phone that locks only for 30 seconds. Give me proof of that. Every information in google shows the lock system I specified. Meaning anyone with google search would see I am right. Thank you again. Btw you really did prove me right now, if you think about it. Look at your response here. > As it’s only one day increase. Meaning it would be 43,830 which is still less. Lol, now it seems like you can neither calculate nor read. As I said, in the comment which you quoted, it's 15.5749486653 minutes per day. Again, a complete inability to do basic arithmetic. > By using this knowledge we can say the model is around 2005 indefinitely. And that had every information I made. So thank you again. All you do is assumptions. No, now you're repeating the same mistake you made earlier, assuming she bought the cellphone when Aqua and Ruby were born, rather then before they were conceived. Apparently you neither know how to google nor how human reproduction actually works. > you are saying that there is a phone that locks only for 30 seconds. Give me proof of that. Lol, you're the one who made the initial claim with zero evidence. Apparently still expecting people to take your word on how technology works when you're incapable of using google. It's kind of hilarious. You said my calculations were wrong and I just proved you wrong as in your calculations were wrong and mine are correct even after applying leap year. I think you really got mad that I just proved you can’t calculate, huh? And what’s with quoting me after quoting me? Lol. Thanks though. You proving that 15 minutes (your assumption not mine) is wrong is enough for me. Now stop projecting. 9 months. And you still didn’t provide any proof of her not getting the phone in 2005. Even if it’s 2004, what I said won’t change. I said “around 2005”, but you don’t read what I say and just assume. You really want me to be wrong. But it’s over already, you were proven wrong not once but twice. Finally we had this conversation already, google says the lock system as I have provided it. Nothing in google says what you said. You are the one here who should provide proof that there’s a mobile phone which only locks for 30 seconds indefinitely and never increments from that. You won’t find any. And that’s your final wrong. Is this conversation over? You aren’t here to debate, you are here to find anything wrong. You are here to just disagree. You are here to provoke. Now stop replying to me. This whole thing you are doing could have worked with someone else but not me. This wasn’t fun but this conversation lasted for as long as one made a mistake and you did 2 at the same time. So it’s over. |
May 1, 2023 7:52 AM
#206
Confused_100 said: The problem here is that you are nitpicking the wrong thing. You think that you have some knowledge that you don't actually have (how ALL phones used to work in the 2000-2010 era) and you are being absolute about it as well. majinale said: I didn't change your quote on purpose, the forum quote system is confusing i mixed what i wrote with yours (I think it;s fixed now). Anyway you are obsessed with things that make no sense.If fanboyism is bad, reverse fanboyism is even worse. There is absolutely nothing wrong with that scene, nether technically or storytelling wise.You are stretching even for a nitpick. If you think that there is something irrational about the fandom, you can do better. “Nothing wrong with that scene, neither technically or storytelling”, tell me you never used a mobile phone before without telling you never used a mobile phone before. Edit: Just to reply to fanboyism and reverse fanboyism thing. Fans don’t act like there’s nothing and that it is flawless. Fans criticise to tell author “hey this is wrong because of…, please take care next time to research”. That way he becomes better and understand his weak points. Reverse fanboyism would be to criticise every scene, which isn’t the case here. We are criticising one scene in particular. You want it to open a floodgate. Cool I could do that, if you want but you won’t like it neither will I. So stop acting like this is a bad thing to criticise when you have people criticising other animes for less. Want to hear an actual valid criticism about the scene? He said that it was his 45510th try, which implies that he started testing with 5 digits from the start, which is irrational since it means he skipped the 10000 4digit codes. Had he said it was his 55510th try, it would have been perfect. But for the context of the scene all of that is forgiven, it works just fine. |
May 1, 2023 8:01 AM
#207
majinale said: Confused_100 said: The problem here is that you are nitpicking the wrong thing. You think that you have some knowledge that you don't actually have (how ALL phones used to work in the 2000-2010 era) and you are being absolute about it as well. majinale said: I didn't change your quote on purpose, the forum quote system is confusing i mixed what i wrote with yours (I think it;s fixed now). Anyway you are obsessed with things that make no sense.If fanboyism is bad, reverse fanboyism is even worse. There is absolutely nothing wrong with that scene, nether technically or storytelling wise.You are stretching even for a nitpick. If you think that there is something irrational about the fandom, you can do better. “Nothing wrong with that scene, neither technically or storytelling”, tell me you never used a mobile phone before without telling you never used a mobile phone before. Edit: Just to reply to fanboyism and reverse fanboyism thing. Fans don’t act like there’s nothing and that it is flawless. Fans criticise to tell author “hey this is wrong because of…, please take care next time to research”. That way he becomes better and understand his weak points. Reverse fanboyism would be to criticise every scene, which isn’t the case here. We are criticising one scene in particular. You want it to open a floodgate. Cool I could do that, if you want but you won’t like it neither will I. So stop acting like this is a bad thing to criticise when you have people criticising other animes for less. Want to hear an actual valid criticism about the scene? He said that it was his 45510th try, which implies that he started testing with 5 digits from the start, which is irrational since it means he skipped the 10000 4digit codes. Had he said it was his 55510th try, it would have been perfect. But for the context of the scene all of that is forgiven, it works just fine. You do know that the phone he is using has a 5 digit passcode most likely. I know this could be a surprise for you but not all phones were 4 digit passcode. What you said talks as if he can start with 4 digits first then try 5 digits which isn’t the case here. If that’s the case, you should add 3 digit possibilities and 2 digit possibilities. He is limited to only 5 digit passcode. But anyways it’s impossible for him to find it. I know you want to defend objectively bad writing here. It’s okay. But learn how PIN codes work first. Edit: You really outed yourself with your reply btw. Thank you |
Confused_100May 1, 2023 8:05 AM
May 1, 2023 8:07 AM
#208
Confused_100 said: So i provided video proof that there were phones with similar and even more lax security back in the day, debunking all your silly arguments about inaccuracy. And your new thing is that i don't know how pins work, even though 4 digit pin has been the standard minimum length for literally decades? At this point you are embarrassing yourself. majinale said: Confused_100 said: majinale said: I didn't change your quote on purpose, the forum quote system is confusing i mixed what i wrote with yours (I think it;s fixed now). Anyway you are obsessed with things that make no sense.If fanboyism is bad, reverse fanboyism is even worse. There is absolutely nothing wrong with that scene, nether technically or storytelling wise.You are stretching even for a nitpick. If you think that there is something irrational about the fandom, you can do better. “Nothing wrong with that scene, neither technically or storytelling”, tell me you never used a mobile phone before without telling you never used a mobile phone before. Edit: Just to reply to fanboyism and reverse fanboyism thing. Fans don’t act like there’s nothing and that it is flawless. Fans criticise to tell author “hey this is wrong because of…, please take care next time to research”. That way he becomes better and understand his weak points. Reverse fanboyism would be to criticise every scene, which isn’t the case here. We are criticising one scene in particular. You want it to open a floodgate. Cool I could do that, if you want but you won’t like it neither will I. So stop acting like this is a bad thing to criticise when you have people criticising other animes for less. Want to hear an actual valid criticism about the scene? He said that it was his 45510th try, which implies that he started testing with 5 digits from the start, which is irrational since it means he skipped the 10000 4digit codes. Had he said it was his 55510th try, it would have been perfect. But for the context of the scene all of that is forgiven, it works just fine. You do know that the phone he is using has a 5 digit passcode most likely. I know this could be a surprise for you but not all phones were 4 digit passcode. What you said talks as if he can start with 4 digits first then try 5 digits which isn’t the case here. If that’s the case, you should add 3 digit possibilities and 2 digit possibilities. I know you want to defend objectively bad writing here. It’s okay. But learn how PIN codes work first. Edit: You really outed yourself with this reply btw. Thank you edit. People have been spelling things out for you in this thread from the first page. You are missing the point, you lack knowledge since you don't seem to know anything about anything, yet you are arguing with confidence. I am even trying to throw you a bone taking as step back, so that we can conclude this discussion as a disagreement but you seem really unhinged. Feel free to continue arguing the same thing in circles with a different person each time. Anyway i am out. |
majinaleMay 1, 2023 8:34 AM
May 1, 2023 8:41 AM
#209
majinale said: Confused_100 said: So i provided video proof that there were phones with similar and even more lax security back in the day, debunking all your silly arguments about inaccuracy. And your new thing is that i don't know how pins work, even though 4 digit pin has been the standard minimum length for literally decades? At this point you are embarrassing yourself. majinale said: Confused_100 said: The problem here is that you are nitpicking the wrong thing. You think that you have some knowledge that you don't actually have (how ALL phones used to work in the 2000-2010 era) and you are being absolute about it as well. majinale said: I didn't change your quote on purpose, the forum quote system is confusing i mixed what i wrote with yours (I think it;s fixed now). Anyway you are obsessed with things that make no sense.If fanboyism is bad, reverse fanboyism is even worse. There is absolutely nothing wrong with that scene, nether technically or storytelling wise.You are stretching even for a nitpick. If you think that there is something irrational about the fandom, you can do better. “Nothing wrong with that scene, neither technically or storytelling”, tell me you never used a mobile phone before without telling you never used a mobile phone before. Edit: Just to reply to fanboyism and reverse fanboyism thing. Fans don’t act like there’s nothing and that it is flawless. Fans criticise to tell author “hey this is wrong because of…, please take care next time to research”. That way he becomes better and understand his weak points. Reverse fanboyism would be to criticise every scene, which isn’t the case here. We are criticising one scene in particular. You want it to open a floodgate. Cool I could do that, if you want but you won’t like it neither will I. So stop acting like this is a bad thing to criticise when you have people criticising other animes for less. Want to hear an actual valid criticism about the scene? He said that it was his 45510th try, which implies that he started testing with 5 digits from the start, which is irrational since it means he skipped the 10000 4digit codes. Had he said it was his 55510th try, it would have been perfect. But for the context of the scene all of that is forgiven, it works just fine. You do know that the phone he is using has a 5 digit passcode most likely. I know this could be a surprise for you but not all phones were 4 digit passcode. What you said talks as if he can start with 4 digits first then try 5 digits which isn’t the case here. If that’s the case, you should add 3 digit possibilities and 2 digit possibilities. I know you want to defend objectively bad writing here. It’s okay. But learn how PIN codes work first. Edit: You really outed yourself with this reply btw. Thank you edit. People have been spelling things out for you in this thread from the first page. You are missing the point, you lack knowledge since you don't seem to know anything about anything, yet you are arguing with confidence. I am even trying to throw you a bone taking as step back, so that we can conclude this discussion as a disagreement but you seem really unhinged. Feel free to continue arguing the same thing in circles with a different person each time. Anyway i am out. Dude you said that he can enter a 4 digit passcode in a mobile phone which accepts 5 digits lol. The video you provided proved nothing because you didn’t even show what happened after 5th try. You also didn’t admit that mobile you provided was a 4 digit passcode. The anime has the mobile phone 5 digit. Finally you didn’t contradict anything I said. You literally proved that there’s no mobile phones that only lock for 30 seconds like anime did. I know you still want to act like you debunked me but you didn’t debunk anything. And who are the people who tried with me? The other guy? Can you open his account and see most of his posts and scores? See what kind of fandom he is in? None tried to debunk except you two but here you are acting like there were “many”. Yes please go out, I am tired talking with people with little knowledge of how mobile phones work. |
May 1, 2023 10:56 AM
#210
My only probem is the author wanted him to be this creepy, super desperate dude, trying day and night to unlock the phone but when you actually calculate it, he spent around 15-16 mind per day. Kinda feels lazy. We know the following stuff, -The phone locks itself for 30 seconds after a wrong password attempt. -It took him 45510 attempts to reach the good combination that was also 45510. -He didn't know how long the password was, but we know that it can't be less then 4 digits since no password or PIN code can be shorter than that. Now, we can assume it was a phone without a SIM card and the contacts he found were stored on the internal memory. The reason to this that most if not all SIM cards lock after 3 tries. However phone passwords are not always do, they usually lock the phone for 10-15 seconds after a few bad tries, however this time usually grows with each wrong attempt, 30 sec, 1 min, 10 min.. ect. until a point where the phone resets and all data is destroyed. But not all phones are like this, its just pretty unlikely that Ai did have a type of phone with unlimited tries cuz they are rare. But I could let it slide if the scene was actually good. However... If he didn't know how many digits the code was then the code cant be 45510 on the 45510th try, since that would mean he skipped 4 digits and went with the sequence of 00001, 00002, 00003... 00100... reaching 45510 ON the 45510th attempt. That would mean he was trying with 5 digits all along. It would not be impossible for him to know how long the password was since most phones (nowadays at least..) dont require you to press OK, they automatically accept or deny the code when you reach the number of digits the code actually has. So if your password is 123456 and someone tries 676767 it will immediately deny it once you type it in, it wont let you press OK before or after, revealing how long the given password is. We also dont see if Aqua presses ok or the phone automatically accepts the code at 5 digits. So him stating he didnt know the length makes no sense, and has no significance. Since if he just guessed it was 5 digits long then the question is why. Everyone would start with 4 digits for multiple reasons, its the minimum requirement and it also requires way less tries to go trough since it has less possible combinations. Also a little detail. The 45510th attempt should be 45511 logically since 00000 should be attempt one, not 00001. Anyways, considering the password was 5 digits long, what has 10x10x10x10x10=100.000 combinations, since we can have 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9 on each spot from the 5 digits. Or in short, he just needs to count from 0 to 99.999 to try each combination. He can do a try each 30 secs (as an increase in this was NOT mentioned, its all the info we have). Meaning 1st try 0 sec, 2nd try 30 sec, 3rd try 60 sec (1 min)... ect. To reach 45510 we just multiply it by 30, 1.365.300 that is how many seconds it took. Then we try to translate it to days . So 1365300/60=22.755 mins, 22.755/60=~379 hours. 379/24=15,802... days non stop. That would be the time it took a script to do it. For a human however, if he sleeps 8-10 hours, goes to school for 6-8 hours (we see he did do it in school too btw) in the worst case he still has 6 hours free time, and while he does need to do homework eat shower ect, it is not an actual activity to try the passwords, it takes 1 sec to try then there is 30 sec downtime, realistically it only takes up 1/30th of his time, if he wants he can do it all day, and still be productive in the downtime. So doing 16 hours a day would make the final results 24 days instead, 24/16=1,5x meaning ofc 16x1,5 will be 24. Doing it for only 6 hours a day will result in 24/6=4x more time, thats 16x4=64 days, two months. So in order for it to take 4 years, he only had to devote 16 minutes to this activity every day, which gives the complete opposite impression of what the author wanted to portray, which is how desperate Aqua was. Math: - 365x4/16=91,25 x=hours spent a day with the activity 24/x=91,25 24=91,25x 24/91,25=x 0,263=x 0,263(hours)x60(minutes in hour)=15,78 minutes/day I don't think any real though was given to this scene and the numbers were just random, especially cuz he just says it took one day to do 100 (50min/day rate) attempts, and one 1 month to do 1000 (17min/day rate). So it seems like at first he was more enthusiastic, but it slowly died down, spending less and less time trying, as it became more and more hopeless to him. However, he should have been way more dedicated in the first days/weeks for him to look more realistic and also act the way the author intended. If I were in a similar situation I would spend my first day trying then slowly lose interest, probably take large breaks, weeks, moths. And one point I would stop. Thats just human nature. I dont think the 4 years is unrealistic, its plausible considering how many things we need to do in our life and how our interests shift. He could have stopped for years, we dont know. Its more of a storytelling problem, then a question of realism. He could have finished ways faster if he were truly that determined the author intended. Its not impossible at all, its somewhat realistic and logical, and makes him look as I said, just way more desperate, someone who actually spends day and night on the phone, neglecting sleep, school ect, and finishes in a month or somethin, wouldnt that depict his characterictcs and struggle way more? Or if one month doesnt have enough weight to it, then go with a 6 or 7 digit code, those could take anywhere between 1 to 10 years or more even with serious time investment. |
May 1, 2023 7:32 PM
#211
Confused_100 said: daiotaku said: Confused_100 said: daiotaku said: Confused_100 said: daiotaku said: Confused_100 said: I've provided the correct calculations multiple times - 30 second cooldown and 45,510 tries (45510*30)/60/60 = 379.25 hours - That would be 31.604 days 12 hours a day, or it would 9.4 weeks working a normal, full time 40 hours a week.They will see you are provoking and said wrong things like “my calculations are wrong” without providing evidence. They can search for mobile security and literally find what I said. Plus they will see you never replied to any of my questions and say it’s hypocritical of someone who didn’t answer anything ask for a link. Seems to me they will see you as not genuine. Now I am only replying because I am defending myself and I asked you to stop replying but you seem you don’t even read. If you actually spread it out over 4 years, it's about 15 minutes a day. You've posted an insane number of comments arguing with everyone trying to claim Oshi no Ko is terrible, and you're accusing other people of "provoking" lmao. If you actually wanted to defend yourself, you would post a link proving your original claim about all cellphones from 20 years ago going longer then 30 seconds if you enter a number wrong. But you haven't done so, either you're wrong, or you don't know how to use google. Again, pretty embarrassing and I'm not clear why you keep posting when you can't do this basic thing. 15 minutes a day wouldn’t be enough, it would last more than 4 years at that point btw. You still didn’t specify where my calculations are wrong. ((15x60)/30)x365x4=43,800 tries. This is less and you want to be so precise and literal in everything you said so let me use that to my advantage. Finally someone in elementary school knows that mobiles lock for more than 30 seconds now. You failed search for mobile security and is giving “20 years ago”, why specifically 20 years ago? Because you saw one random response here who said it. You didn’t even try to think about it. But let me just fill you in quick. How old is Aqua? He starts out 15 btw. Meaning 15 years ago not 20. When was manga released? 2020, this would make the phone model released in 2005. I didn’t tell “other” people that they are provoking, I only said it to you. As you are doing it on purpose to make the one replying to you lose temper and reply wrong at one point so that you can use it as an excuse to dismiss everything that person made. You aren’t making any genuine statement. You provoke, that’s your job. Now to give you real information. The mobile phone was known to have a lock system meaning it has to have incremental lockout. Incremental lockout works a day as follows; 5th try = 30 sec, 6th = 1 minute, 7 = 5 minutes, 8 = 15 minutes, 9 = 1 hour, 10 = permanently locked for whole day. Some even after 10th try remove data from mobile. Now this applies to old phones as well because this concept isn’t new. All phones imply this security measure. Now to use this realistic information to show how he should have wrote it; 10 tries max a day; 10x365=3650 tries a year. Now divide this by the number specified in anime which will give us around 12 years minimum. This could have been implemented in writing but writer was lazy to search for it. Now for you, answer the questions given to you like; Since there is a lockout, couldn’t there be removal of data mechanic? Wouldn’t that mean Aqua isn’t that smart? Or did writer just not search (lazy writing)? Which is it? Provide wrong calculations I said as you have confidently said. If nothing is given, then you are just provoking. Finally let me add this; give me a link that shows a mobile phone that only locks for 30 seconds. Since you are defending that concept so much. Everytime you don’t answer me, I will add more realistic and impossible for you to answer. Because you decided to defend this kind of writing and think it’s “good”. When it’s objectively bad. > ((15x60)/30)x365x4=43,800 tries. This is less and you want to be so precise and literal in everything you said so let me use that to my advantage. Lol, this is so ridiculous. It's 15.5749486653 minutes per day. If you want to get to that level of pedantry, you forgot to include a leap year. 4 years is (365*4)+1 days. So here, your calculations are wrong. > But let me just fill you in quick. How old is Aqua? He starts out 15 btw. Meaning 15 years ago not 20. When was manga released? 2020, this would make the phone model released in 2005. Another incorrect calculation on your part. Ai had the phone before Aqua was born, in fact before he was conceived. It's the phone she used to communicate with the father when they were still dating. So at least a year older then Aqua. And probably a couple years older then that. So again, incorrect calculations. > Finally let me add this; give me a link that shows a mobile phone that only locks for 30 seconds. Since you are defending that concept so much. You're the one making the claim bro. You haven't provided any evidence whatsoever that you're correct. Not a single link. You can't simply declare something correct and then demand other people google stuff to prove you wrong. Why do you expect anyone to listen to you about the technical details of 20 year old phones from someone who doesn't even know how to use google? A leap year would increase only 30 tries. As it’s only one day increase. Meaning it would be 43,830 which is still less. Thank you for proving that you can’t calculate right and that I was right about you. Actually we don’t know when she got the phone and if it’s the same model. By using this knowledge we can say the model is around 2005 indefinitely. And that had every information I made. So thank you again. All you do is assumptions. While I do logistic thinking here. Cool your problem not mine that you don’t believe me but you are saying that there is a phone that locks only for 30 seconds. Give me proof of that. Every information in google shows the lock system I specified. Meaning anyone with google search would see I am right. Thank you again. Btw you really did prove me right now, if you think about it. Look at your response here. > As it’s only one day increase. Meaning it would be 43,830 which is still less. Lol, now it seems like you can neither calculate nor read. As I said, in the comment which you quoted, it's 15.5749486653 minutes per day. Again, a complete inability to do basic arithmetic. > By using this knowledge we can say the model is around 2005 indefinitely. And that had every information I made. So thank you again. All you do is assumptions. No, now you're repeating the same mistake you made earlier, assuming she bought the cellphone when Aqua and Ruby were born, rather then before they were conceived. Apparently you neither know how to google nor how human reproduction actually works. > you are saying that there is a phone that locks only for 30 seconds. Give me proof of that. Lol, you're the one who made the initial claim with zero evidence. Apparently still expecting people to take your word on how technology works when you're incapable of using google. It's kind of hilarious. You said my calculations were wrong and I just proved you wrong as in your calculations were wrong and mine are correct even after applying leap year. I think you really got mad that I just proved you can’t calculate, huh? And what’s with quoting me after quoting me? Lol. Thanks though. You proving that 15 minutes (your assumption not mine) is wrong is enough for me. Now stop projecting. 9 months. And you still didn’t provide any proof of her not getting the phone in 2005. Even if it’s 2004, what I said won’t change. I said “around 2005”, but you don’t read what I say and just assume. You really want me to be wrong. But it’s over already, you were proven wrong not once but twice. Finally we had this conversation already, google says the lock system as I have provided it. Nothing in google says what you said. You are the one here who should provide proof that there’s a mobile phone which only locks for 30 seconds indefinitely and never increments from that. You won’t find any. And that’s your final wrong. Is this conversation over? You aren’t here to debate, you are here to find anything wrong. You are here to just disagree. You are here to provoke. Now stop replying to me. This whole thing you are doing could have worked with someone else but not me. This wasn’t fun but this conversation lasted for as long as one made a mistake and you did 2 at the same time. So it’s over. > You said my calculations were wrong and I just proved you wrong as in your calculations were wrong I legit have no idea what you're talking about. In the comment you quoted, I said it was 15.5749486653 minutes per day, including leap year - which is correct. You apparently can't read or something. Earlier I said "15 minutes" the first time I posted numbers in this thread I said "15 minutes or so" and "15 to 20 minutes" - see: daiotaku Confused_100 daiotaku Confused_100 ktg luckyowl10How else do you expect him to break the password of a basic phone? You can't hack that dumb phone, it's too basic, brute force is the only way...But there are smart ways to brute force by using combinations in a particular order to not try the same code more than once. 3 years to break a damn password is a strench for sure, that's the worst case situation, a few weeks-months s should have been more than enough. Can we stop assuming stupid things when we actually saw that it was 5 digit and the solution was 45510? And you even failed with the cd, because it was 30 secs and not mins.It probably had a 4 digit password, which has 10000 maximum combinations. Considering a failed try gives 30 minutes cooldown, he would need 5000 hours to cover all combinations in the worst case situation. So if tried passwords for 5 hours a day (10 tries per day) it would take maximum 1000 days to cover all combinations, which is almost 3 years. If we go with his numbers. 100 half a day, 1000 a months. Assuming he had to go to school or whatever. Everyday doing this for half day, so trying out 100 would be good. It would take 455,1 day Which is a bit longer than a year. But because you had 10 half a day time in a months (because he tried out 1000 a months), it means he did other stuff too. With that number it's 45.51 months. Which almost 4 years. Realistically speaking the half a day number is pretty correct the cd would be 3000 sec, which is 500 mins, which is 8.333 hours. Typing it in, taking breaks etc is half a day. So I would say with a even a slow pacing, it could be done in 2 years. It’s actually 100,000 because there are 10 possible numbers for each digit so 10^5. Also taking in logic that some phones actually lock themselves after a certain number of tries, this makes this nearly impossible to do. Also him just doing it with no notepad is concerning. As he would 100% not remember every combination. Realistically, he would have already given up and tried something else but author didn’t know any other choices so he went lazy route. “He just kept trying”. But this is anime so I will let it slide. However by this logic, 10 tries max per day. Let’s say he tried it every day, he would have tried only 3650 per year. So also by some calculations, this would take him around 27 years max, if he is super unlucky and it was in last combinations. The chances of him getting it in 3 years, is so low which makes zero sense. Anyways I wanted to just show you real calculations here. What on earth are you talking about? It's thirty SECONDS between tries, not thirty MINUTES. 45510*30 = 1,365,300 seconds, 22,755 minutes or 379.25. Going at 8 hours a day that's 47 days. Just a little over one hour a day for one year, or 15 minutes or so a day for 4 years. So no incrementation or anything? You are saying Aka never used a phone before? Have you ever used a flip phone from 20 years ago? Confused_100 Nmasih8193 Confused_100I don’t know who is defending this. But yeah this is one of the very poorly written scenes. Is it the stupidest thing in anime history? Nope. Is it one of the stupidest though? Yes. Edit: As I saw some responses, which don’t make sense and I really want to respond to them. E.g: It’s written this way to show how desperate he is. Answer: Then the writer could have made him see a set of numbers not all numbers but let’s say 4 of them (and he doesn’t remember the order) and he just tries all combinations, that would have showed how observant and desperate at the same time he is. Another e.g: He is just a doctor, he wouldn’t know how to hack. Answer: He doesn’t need to hack, the scene itself makes zero sense. It has nothing to do with his profession either. He could have just searched for another way to do it better. It’s just a writing problem. There’s no other way to spin/defend it. Bro just watch the actual show like damn. Ain’t gotta talk about something that’s shown in a 1 minute scene that changes basically nothing. If anything it displays Aqua’s godly persistence, it’s a scene that anyone can be intrigued with. For 4 literal years every day he was on the grind and figuring out the password. Not only that but the number has symbolism too and a short story named after it. Just watch the show and wait for what happens instead of nitpicking 1 scene And I said that he could have shown Aqua’s persistence better. I even said a better example. I also explained why it is almost impossible for him to do it, if we are talking logically and realistically. Like it however you want though. It's only "impossible" if you don't know the difference between minutes or seconds. Over 4 years it's literally 15-20 minutes a day, it's easily possible. You just can't do math for some reason. Saying "15 minutes or so" instead of "15.5749486653 minutes" is not a "miscalculation." Here's what you said in your initial comment, by the way - > Also him just doing it with no notepad is concerning. As he would 100% not remember every combination. ... > However by this logic, 10 tries max per day. Let’s say he tried it every day, he would have tried only 3650 per year. So also by some calculations, this would take him around 27 years max, if he is super unlucky and it was in last combinations. The chances of him getting it in 3 years, is so low which makes zero sense. First of all you don't seem to understand that you don't need to write down the combinations if you just go through from 0 and increment by one, you only need to remember the last number you entered. Also, you forgot he only needed to enter 45510 numbers total, which would take 12 years at 10 per day (oh sorry 12.4684931507 years, lol). So again. totally incorrect calculations initially in this thread, and there's no justification for the 10 per day number, other then your weird claim about lockout times increasing on 20 year old phones which you've never provided any evidence for, because you apparently don't know how to google. Totally ridiculous. |
May 2, 2023 4:15 AM
#212
i think i missed the "hacking a fliphpone" part in my gynecology class |
obscure anime for u idiots to watch right NOW 1.Odd Taxi WATCH THIS!!!!! 2.LINK CLICK super underrated!! (chinese, foto-time travelling, emotional stories dope music) 3.Mashiro no Oto if u like traditional jap banger music please support Cherry&virgin if u can!! |
May 2, 2023 1:15 PM
#213
May 2, 2023 9:43 PM
#214
majinale said: Ok, how could he know this if he was a doctor in his previous life? He could have found it on internet :))? He needs to know perfectly how to do that otherwise he would damage the phone and this is not possible if he only has knowledge in medicine.Yes yes i agree, the correct move was obviously to remove the eprom memory chip, solder some wires in the correct spots, provide the correct voltage, connect said wires to his computer's serial port then dump the memory, opening it with a hex editor praying that the memory wasn't encrypted. That would make for a much more compelling story. /s Look everyone Aqua is a smart character because he was a doctor in his previous life which is a very hard thing to achieve, but being smart doesn't mean he must knows everything. It is understandable for him not knowing how to hack an old phone, not even the anime told us if he had some little knowledge about hacking so the scene with him brute-forcing his way into Ai's phone is not dumb as others said. |
May 2, 2023 9:46 PM
#215
pedronii said: Thank you! Someone understands it.It's so funny to me how people say "just hack it" when they themselves don't even know how hacking even works lmao. Yes if we was an expert he could've carefully removed the memory and try to do something in his computer but he's a fucking doctor, the chances of him fucking it up and bricking the memory because he was impatient are high as fuck... Y'all don't know shit about computers and think hacking is clicking one button and kaboom it's done |
May 2, 2023 9:50 PM
#216
SomeNewGuy said: Absolutely correct!I feel like people are missing the point here. The reason why it was written like this is to convey to the audience just how decicated he really is about getting revenge and how far he is willing to go in order to achieve it. While it's true the author could've easily incorporated a "hacking" element here, it wouldn't have had the same impact nor conveyed the same message. As the whole point of this scene is to get the viewer/reader to react and realise just how mentally screwed up Aqua has become due to Ai's passing where he wouldn't mind "wasting" 4 years of his life just to break into a phone that may or may not contain useful information, this is messed up, it doesn't make any sense and that's the whole point. |
May 3, 2023 3:39 AM
#217
Absol125 said: In case you missed it, i was being sarcastic. majinale said: Ok, how could he know this if he was a doctor in his previous life? He could have found it on internet :))? He needs to know perfectly how to do that otherwise he would damage the phone and this is not possible if he only has knowledge in medicine.Yes yes i agree, the correct move was obviously to remove the eprom memory chip, solder some wires in the correct spots, provide the correct voltage, connect said wires to his computer's serial port then dump the memory, opening it with a hex editor praying that the memory wasn't encrypted. That would make for a much more compelling story. /s Look everyone Aqua is a smart character because he was a doctor in his previous life which is a very hard thing to achieve, but being smart doesn't mean he must knows everything. It is understandable for him not knowing how to hack an old phone, not even the anime told us if he had some little knowledge about hacking so the scene with him brute-forcing his way into Ai's phone is not dumb as others said. |
majinaleMay 3, 2023 9:42 AM
May 3, 2023 8:37 AM
#218
May 3, 2023 9:08 AM
#219
there are so many things that are off in this anime. i am glad it is not #1 anymore. eagerly waiting for it to drop down slowly. does not deserve this top spot at all |
May 3, 2023 6:34 PM
#220
May 3, 2023 6:43 PM
#221
Ain't no way your name is "animeIs4Children" and you're complaining about this... |
May 3, 2023 11:26 PM
#222
stalkerdeb said: This is a gross underestimation of the skills required. Otherwise we wouldn't need specialist to do things like this. And also a gross over-estimation of the time required.Tennouji said: kabiskac said: HoesEatinDogFood said: How else would you expect someone to guess the password to someone’s phone with no clues whatsoever? As someone said, the wear on the keypad would have been a huge problem. So you would take off the keypad and build a circuitry that bruteforces for you using the pads directly. You could attach a camera and write for example a python script with OCR which detects the response of the phone. There is also the more technical way: you can either solder the EPROM off that contains the data and hope it's not encrypted or you can see if the microcontroller that contains the authentication logic is protected. If it is, then you can look up on the internet whether there are any exploits to get rid of it. Once you have read and write access to the firmware, you can reverse engineer it and modify the call to the part of assembly code that checks the password to always return "valid password". I assume 4 years should be suffice to learn that Ai's password was 45510 which with a 30 seconds time gap (45510 x 30) is only 16 days. I'm not sure where people are getting these insanely long time from. Its only 15 minutes a day for 4 years. Its like a morning and nightly routine. It does require dedication, but just like brushing your teeth, once its a routine, its not all that annoying to do and it comes naturally after awhile like a habit. The following is a reply generally and not to you specifically, but having dabbed a little into the various subjects that would be required... I can give my two cents. As you already are aware, he's a doctor not a hacker. I'm also not a hacker, and I wouldn't even know where to start especially for a old flip phone. While i have used flip phones before I didn't know about the SIM card stuff that others have mentioned. Nor am I aware of any other methods listed here. My first intuition is also to likely just brute force it. Albeit I would have done the math above to make sure its worthwhile(it is) before attempting. One alternate option mentioned is to go to a professional but as others have mentioned, a toddler trotting into their shop and handing them a phone of a FAMOUS IDOL is just asking for trouble. Especially when he wants to hide the fact Ai had kids, and wouldn't want strangers seeing contents in Ai's phone anyways. Only after reading this thread, did I learn of some methods. But they are non-specific so impossible to recreate if i were to try that now. I also did some quick google searches and no good resource immediately came up either. I'm sure it exists but it would take me hours of digging, asking questions online, waiting a response, before properly learning those methods with unclear results. I would then have to reenact that methodology without messing up in order to not brick the phone or cause memory loss. The 3rd option is learning it via traditional education pipeline, which as a baby is not possible. I guess you'll just have to learn how flip phones work via online resource(rather than skipping to learn how to hack one which as said didn't have any immediate resources pop up) and then learn to code. I did one semester of coding and I'll just say that I can only do really basic stuff with high-level language (like java and python). I can't even imagine trying to do low-level like machine code which is WAAAY harder. I basically had to spend a quarter of a year just to learn really basic stuff let alone trying to access a flip phone's ROM or something of that nature. Sure, you might be able to learn faster on your own by dedicating more time than traditional university courses allot you, but also risk learning the wrong things due to lack of feedback from a instructor. But not only that, you also need to learn how to connect that ROM to a computer, and download the necessary program to read/write said code. Maybe you can find some open-source code, which I'm also sure exist but coding isn't something you just slap on and run. You need to set it up for your specific application. Which obviously isn't so straight forward either. Regarding learning how to connect the ROM to a computer, you'll probably have to solder the proper connections, which you will have to find out the exact model so you know the pins to solder wires on, but also the voltage and current. It didn't take me very long to learn how to solder, but to do it well, it did take me at least several hours a day for several days to be sufficiently proficient that I'm not worried about damaging anything and doing it well. The hardest part is learning to unsolder something which is just a huge mess and easily burn stuff. Usually superficial damage but makes working on it harder after the fact. I worked mostly on larger PCBs, but industrial grade stuff are made with automation and are absolutely tiny even with flip phones. To solder with that level of precision actually requires a lot of skill. This comes from first hand experience. But perhaps the riskiest part is providing the necessary power via a power supply and transformer. One wrong move and you fry the thing. I don't do this for a living but I also had 1 semester on this subject along with my father teaching me(with decades of experience in the field). It requires quite a bit of technical and theoretical knowledge. Not engineering level, but you still need to know what Ohm's law or Kirchhoff's rules are etc. And then know how it applies in a practical sense. I did pretty well in school and in these courses. Its one thing knowing the theory and how that applies to a simple breadboard set up and another thing trying to work on a phone. I would still be pretty clueless on trying to pull this off. I worked on a radio kit before but without understanding all the intricacies, I was mostly just following instructions. Which in my short googling attempt, it isn't readily available without some digging and that assumes its complete from start to finish. More likely than not, you'll have to find several different discussions on forums and use your own existing knowledge to piece those together. Ofc, I might just be dumb but there's no indication Aqua is exceptionally smart either. He only appear smart because he has 30 years of extra life experience compared to his peers and having gone to medical school. You have to be smart no doubt to pass medical school, but this is a field he has no experience in and being an adult doesn't mean you are a genius that can pick things up on a whim. Heck, being a doctor doesn't mean you are necessarily "smart." There are plenty of experts in one area saying some of the absolutely dumbest things in regards to another field. Just go online and one will see this everywhere. I know adults that don't know which continent the 'middle east' is in but is insanely knowledgeable in another area. I'm not sure why people think this is easy. Most smart/cellphone technician spend 2-4 years in higher education or in trade school to do this stuff. Those that are self taught unsurprisingly also spend a similar amount of time. And anyone that went to higher education knows that you aren't even truly ready immediately out of school. What you learn in school isn't really representative of what you do on the job. Keep in mind full time higher education is about 6 hours every day of the week. You are actually putting in MORE time learning the software and electrical engineering tech than just brute forcing. |
zcv45May 3, 2023 11:45 PM
May 4, 2023 12:10 AM
#223
Cneq said: Cheap plot device? Finding the passcode written down somewhere would be a cheap plot device.SomeNewGuy said: Nah it is just a cheap plot device. If the intent was to show how messed up he is then they should of had the attempt end in failure [as it realistically should have] and simply have had some other way of him getting information. Cold storage is quite literally the safest bet so they could've easily made it that he simply discovered a combination to a safe and some written information was in there.I feel like people are missing the point here. The reason why it was written like this is to convey to the audience just how decicated he really is about getting revenge and how far he is willing to go in order to achieve it. While it's true the author could've easily incorporated a "hacking" element here, it wouldn't have had the same impact nor conveyed the same message. As the whole point of this scene is to get the viewer/reader to react and realise just how mentally screwed up Aqua has become due to Ai's passing where he wouldn't mind "wasting" 4 years of his life just to break into a phone that may or may not contain useful information, this is messed up, it doesn't make any sense and that's the whole point. Or heck since AI is kind of portrayed as a ditz why not have him do that for four years only to accidentally find the passcode for the phone written down somewhere? That would also be a better writing move to show how messed up his psyche is that he would rather focus entirely on brute forcing a phone like that instead of considering other options [and yet this would still make a more believable plot device and still highlight that aspect of his character]. I'm sure some people would do it but I'm quite certain most people don't write down their password to their phones. It's a simple string of numbers they get to pick themselves. It's not exactly the hardest thing to remember, who the heck needs to write that down? It would actually be odd that she would write it down and leave it just lying around somewhere considering she's a famous idol that is fairly careful with her personal information. And putting it a safe is even more weird. How many people have a safe just lying around where they put a slip of paper with their phone's PW written down? Sounds more like some dumb fetch quest in a game than anything a normal person would do. Also keep in mind they moved at least 2 times already. Any chance of finding some clues is LONG GONE. Simply put, that phone is older than the kids and weren't used after they were born. No way they would have caught a glimpse of the phone. The alternatives are hours everyday for several years to learn the prerequisite knowledge to hack the phone which may very well take just 10 minutes. But to get to that point take years. vs 15 minutes a day for 4 years for a total of 16 days of brute forcing. Or be a toddler walking into a tech shop and hand over a famous idol's phone while still trying to hide any familial relations and hope the technician doesn't take a peek at the contents inside let alone question the situation as a whole. Brute forcing the passcode is pretty much the first thing any laymen would think about. Perhaps first trying some combinations that they think is likely (birthdays etc.) before resorting to brute forcing. And if he goes sequentially, its not hard to keep track of your progress. |
May 4, 2023 12:13 AM
#224
Did he even have access to the internet? At that age You can still be a doctor still have no clue how hack …. It’s not it’s a requirement to become a doctor now is it. |
Mattinator95May 4, 2023 12:17 AM
May 4, 2023 1:12 AM
#225
SomeNewGuy said: I feel like people are missing the point here. The reason why it was written like this is to convey to the audience just how decicated he really is about getting revenge and how far he is willing to go in order to achieve it. While it's true the author could've easily incorporated a "hacking" element here, it wouldn't have had the same impact nor conveyed the same message. As the whole point of this scene is to get the viewer/reader to react and realise just how mentally screwed up Aqua has become due to Ai's passing where he wouldn't mind "wasting" 4 years of his life just to break into a phone that may or may not contain useful information, this is messed up, it doesn't make any sense and that's the whole point. finally a good answer |
Nov 27, 2024 10:06 AM
#226
Reply to PraxisCat
SquishyPies said:
EDIT: long rant ahead, put it under a spoiler cuz it's long lol
HOWEVER, i do understand that when you are an expert in something, seeing Your Thing depicted unrealistically in a piece of media can really take you out of it. I am a sonographer and the ultrasound images in the first episode kinda took me aback (the images are INSANELY bright, the overall gain needs to be taken waaaaaay down. also, the images are really blurry looking, though that also might just be due to how overgained the images are. the depth seems kind of off as well, too low to capture the images presented, but maybe 8 cm is enough to capture the images in someone small and skinny like Ai. i'm not an OB sonographer so i'm not too sure. on top of that, even though these are what i would assume to be "fun pictures" of the fetuses, there isn't any identifying information on the images given, not even a date or clinic name. finally, the images have this like... brown filter over them? instead of being grayscale? i understand there are color overlays but i haven't seen anyone ever use a brown one, i've only seen the red/blue/green ones used. i did appreciate the inclusion of all the measurements though, like femur length and biparietal diameter). but i got over it quickly and enjoyed the rest of the episode because i recognized that the accuracy of the ultrasound depicted literally didn't matter at all. because the episode wasn't about ultrasound!!!
(also this one is a nitpick of mine that doesn't really apply to Oshi no Ko, but i have to say it anyways to get it off my chest- it frustrates me that sonographers are hardly ever included in media that features medical ultrasound. in countries that have them, professional sonographers are waaaay better at doing ultrasound studies than doctors are. watching doctors in TV shows pull up the ultrasound machine and perform a study like it's nothing drives me insane. like.... your run-of-the-mill family doctor or whatever should not be doing your abdomen complete exam. /endrant)
Probably the smartest comment on this thread that understands how writing works, big ups. SomeNewGuy said:
I feel like people are missing the point here.
The reason why it was written like this is to convey to the audience just how decicated he really is about getting revenge and how far he is willing to go in order to achieve it.
While it's true the author could've easily incorporated a "hacking" element here, it wouldn't have had the same impact nor conveyed the same message.
As the whole point of this scene is to get the viewer/reader to react and realise just how mentally screwed up Aqua has become due to Ai's passing where he wouldn't mind "wasting" 4 years of his life just to break into a phone that may or may not contain useful information, this is messed up, it doesn't make any sense and that's the whole point.
THIS. Folks need to realize that authors often write subjects they are not experts in- not because they are trying to write an accurate portrayal of that subject, but because that subject conveys meaning for the story. of course the author isn't gonna go into minute detail about how this kid hacked into a cell phone. because it literally doesn't matter at all. the purpose is to convey meaning to the viewer- that Aqua is still obsessed with Ai and has literally dedicated his new life to avenging her. he is a messed up man with an unhealthy obsession reinforced by trauma. it doesn't matter that the hacking is "unrealistic," it does what it needs to do.I feel like people are missing the point here.
The reason why it was written like this is to convey to the audience just how decicated he really is about getting revenge and how far he is willing to go in order to achieve it.
While it's true the author could've easily incorporated a "hacking" element here, it wouldn't have had the same impact nor conveyed the same message.
As the whole point of this scene is to get the viewer/reader to react and realise just how mentally screwed up Aqua has become due to Ai's passing where he wouldn't mind "wasting" 4 years of his life just to break into a phone that may or may not contain useful information, this is messed up, it doesn't make any sense and that's the whole point.
EDIT: long rant ahead, put it under a spoiler cuz it's long lol
HOWEVER, i do understand that when you are an expert in something, seeing Your Thing depicted unrealistically in a piece of media can really take you out of it. I am a sonographer and the ultrasound images in the first episode kinda took me aback (the images are INSANELY bright, the overall gain needs to be taken waaaaaay down. also, the images are really blurry looking, though that also might just be due to how overgained the images are. the depth seems kind of off as well, too low to capture the images presented, but maybe 8 cm is enough to capture the images in someone small and skinny like Ai. i'm not an OB sonographer so i'm not too sure. on top of that, even though these are what i would assume to be "fun pictures" of the fetuses, there isn't any identifying information on the images given, not even a date or clinic name. finally, the images have this like... brown filter over them? instead of being grayscale? i understand there are color overlays but i haven't seen anyone ever use a brown one, i've only seen the red/blue/green ones used. i did appreciate the inclusion of all the measurements though, like femur length and biparietal diameter). but i got over it quickly and enjoyed the rest of the episode because i recognized that the accuracy of the ultrasound depicted literally didn't matter at all. because the episode wasn't about ultrasound!!!
(also this one is a nitpick of mine that doesn't really apply to Oshi no Ko, but i have to say it anyways to get it off my chest- it frustrates me that sonographers are hardly ever included in media that features medical ultrasound. in countries that have them, professional sonographers are waaaay better at doing ultrasound studies than doctors are. watching doctors in TV shows pull up the ultrasound machine and perform a study like it's nothing drives me insane. like.... your run-of-the-mill family doctor or whatever should not be doing your abdomen complete exam. /endrant)
I'm a photographer, I don't lose my mind every time there's something technically fucky about taking pictures in an anime or tv show because that would be dumb. What matters is that its emotional core is understandable to the viewer. Writers write things (usually) to convey something, in this case, that Aqua is obsessed and methodical. People are like "there should have been a clue somewhere else that he pieced together!! It would have shown that he was smart!!" except the point wasn't to show that he was smart, and would have changed the tone of his character and the scene writ large. He's not designed to be a sort of super-smart power fantasy you project onto, he's supposed to be a weird, sick and twisted little dude.
I completely agree with you! Sometimes it’s not about perfect technical accuracy but about delivering the emotional essence of a character or scene. Aqua’s portrayal as obsessive and methodical works well—it’s not about showing off intelligence but staying true to his weird, twisted persona. It keeps the tone of the story intact and makes him more compelling. By the way, for anyone curious about how to redeem TM rewards, staying attentive to character-driven storytelling like this could inspire deeper appreciation for creative narratives! |
More topics from this board
Poll: » "Oshi no Ko" Episode 3 Discussion ( 1 2 3 4 5 ... Last Page )Stark700 - Apr 26, 2023 |
481 |
by tonypperhaps1998
»»
5 hours ago |
|
Poll: » "Oshi no Ko" Episode 2 Discussion ( 1 2 3 4 5 ... Last Page )Stark700 - Apr 19, 2023 |
870 |
by tonypperhaps1998
»»
5 hours ago |
|
Poll: » "Oshi no Ko" Episode 1 Discussion ( 1 2 3 4 5 ... Last Page )Usopp8000 - Mar 27, 2023 |
2739 |
by tonypperhaps1998
»»
Jan 7, 2:28 AM |
|
Poll: » "Oshi no Ko" Episode 11 Discussion ( 1 2 3 4 5 ... Last Page )Yuyuichi - Jun 28, 2023 |
708 |
by Cooomer
»»
Jan 5, 6:12 PM |
|
Poll: » "Oshi no Ko" Episode 10 Discussion ( 1 2 3 4 5 ... Last Page )Softhenic03 - Jun 21, 2023 |
284 |
by Cooomer
»»
Jan 5, 5:48 PM |