Forum SettingsEpisode Information
Forums

Manually brute force hacking a cell phone has to be the dumbest thing I have ever seen in anime

[Oshi No Ko]
Available on Manga Store
New
Pages (5) « First ... « 3 4 [5]
May 1, 2023 5:29 AM

Offline
Sep 2014
262
I wonder why no one has made a new thread complaining about how did he know which cigarette butts to take. Slackers.
May 1, 2023 6:40 AM
Offline
Feb 2023
1001
majinale said:
I didn't change your quote on purpose, the forum quote system is confusing i mixed what i wrote with yours (I think it;s fixed now). Anyway you are obsessed with things that make no sense.If fanboyism is bad, reverse fanboyism is even worse.
There is absolutely nothing wrong with that scene, nether technically or storytelling wise.You are stretching even for a nitpick. If you think that there is something irrational about the fandom, you can do better.

“Nothing wrong with that scene, neither technically or storytelling”,

tell me you never used a mobile phone before without telling you never used a mobile phone before.

Edit: Just to reply to fanboyism and reverse fanboyism thing. Fans don’t act like there’s nothing and that it is flawless. Fans criticise to tell author “hey this is wrong because of…, please take care next time to research”. That way he becomes better and understand his weak points. Reverse fanboyism would be to criticise every scene, which isn’t the case here. We are criticising one scene in particular. You want it to open a floodgate. Cool I could do that, if you want but you won’t like it neither will I. So stop acting like this is a bad thing to criticise when you have people criticising other animes for less.
Confused_100May 1, 2023 6:48 AM
May 1, 2023 6:43 AM
Offline
Dec 2021
187
Confused_100 said:
daiotaku said:

> ((15x60)/30)x365x4=43,800 tries. This is less and you want to be so precise and literal in everything you said so let me use that to my advantage.

Lol, this is so ridiculous.  It's 15.5749486653 minutes per day.  If you want to get to that level of pedantry, you forgot to include a leap year.  4 years is (365*4)+1 days. So here, your calculations are wrong.

>  But let me just fill you in quick. How old is Aqua? He starts out 15 btw. Meaning 15 years ago not 20. When was manga released? 2020, this would make the phone model released in 2005.

Another incorrect calculation on your part. Ai had the phone before Aqua was born, in fact before he was conceived.  It's the phone she used to communicate with the father when they were still dating. So at least a year older then Aqua.  And probably a couple years older then that.   So again, incorrect calculations. 

Finally let me add this; give me a link that shows a mobile phone that only locks for 30 seconds. Since you are defending that concept so much.

You're the one making the claim bro. You haven't provided any evidence whatsoever that you're correct.  Not a single link. You can't simply declare something correct and then demand other people google stuff to prove you wrong.

Why do you expect anyone to listen to you about the technical details of 20 year old phones from someone who doesn't even know how to use google? 


A leap year would increase only 30 tries. As it’s only one day increase. Meaning it would be 43,830 which is still less. Thank you for proving that you can’t calculate right and that I was right about you.

Actually we don’t know when she got the phone and if it’s the same model. By using this knowledge we can say the model is around 2005 indefinitely. And that had every information I made. So thank you again. All you do is assumptions. While I do logistic thinking here.

Cool your problem not mine that you don’t believe me but you are saying that there is a phone that locks only for 30 seconds. Give me proof of that. Every information in google shows the lock system I specified. Meaning anyone with google search would see I am right. Thank you again.

Btw you really did prove me right now, if you think about it. Look at your response here.

>  As it’s only one day increase. Meaning it would be 43,830 which is still less.

Lol, now it seems like you can neither calculate nor read. As I said, in the comment which you quoted, it's 15.5749486653 minutes per day.  Again, a complete inability to do basic arithmetic. 

 By using this knowledge we can say the model is around 2005 indefinitely. And that had every information I made. So thank you again. All you do is assumptions. 

No, now you're repeating the same mistake you made earlier, assuming she bought the cellphone when Aqua and Ruby were born, rather then before they were conceived.  Apparently you neither know how to google nor how human reproduction actually works. 

>  you are saying that there is a phone that locks only for 30 seconds. Give me proof of that.

Lol, you're the one who made the initial claim with zero evidence. Apparently still expecting people to take your word on how technology works when you're incapable of using google. It's kind of hilarious. 
May 1, 2023 6:56 AM

Offline
Sep 2014
262
Confused_100 said:
majinale said:
I didn't change your quote on purpose, the forum quote system is confusing i mixed what i wrote with yours (I think it;s fixed now). Anyway you are obsessed with things that make no sense.If fanboyism is bad, reverse fanboyism is even worse.
There is absolutely nothing wrong with that scene, nether technically or storytelling wise.You are stretching even for a nitpick. If you think that there is something irrational about the fandom, you can do better.

“Nothing wrong with that scene, neither technically or storytelling”,

tell me you never used a mobile phone before without telling you never used a mobile phone before.

Edit: Just to reply to fanboyism and reverse fanboyism thing. Fans don’t act like there’s nothing and that it is flawless. Fans criticise to tell author “hey this is wrong because of…, please take care next time to research”. That way he becomes better and understand his weak points. Reverse fanboyism would be to criticise every scene, which isn’t the case here. We are criticising one scene in particular. You want it to open a floodgate. Cool I could do that, if you want but you won’t like it neither will I. So stop acting like this is a bad thing to criticise when you have people criticising other animes for less.
I literally have a working lg A133 flip phone right now in front of me. I used to use it right around the mid 2010s. You can enter UNLIMITED wrong passwords without even a delay in between.

edit: Here i am even kind enough to make a video for you as well https://streamable.com/sep6pm
majinaleMay 1, 2023 7:31 AM
May 1, 2023 7:02 AM
Offline
Feb 2023
1001
daiotaku said:
Confused_100 said:

A leap year would increase only 30 tries. As it’s only one day increase. Meaning it would be 43,830 which is still less. Thank you for proving that you can’t calculate right and that I was right about you.

Actually we don’t know when she got the phone and if it’s the same model. By using this knowledge we can say the model is around 2005 indefinitely. And that had every information I made. So thank you again. All you do is assumptions. While I do logistic thinking here.

Cool your problem not mine that you don’t believe me but you are saying that there is a phone that locks only for 30 seconds. Give me proof of that. Every information in google shows the lock system I specified. Meaning anyone with google search would see I am right. Thank you again.

Btw you really did prove me right now, if you think about it. Look at your response here.

>  As it’s only one day increase. Meaning it would be 43,830 which is still less.

Lol, now it seems like you can neither calculate nor read. As I said, in the comment which you quoted, it's 15.5749486653 minutes per day.  Again, a complete inability to do basic arithmetic. 

 By using this knowledge we can say the model is around 2005 indefinitely. And that had every information I made. So thank you again. All you do is assumptions. 

No, now you're repeating the same mistake you made earlier, assuming she bought the cellphone when Aqua and Ruby were born, rather then before they were conceived.  Apparently you neither know how to google nor how human reproduction actually works. 

>  you are saying that there is a phone that locks only for 30 seconds. Give me proof of that.

Lol, you're the one who made the initial claim with zero evidence. Apparently still expecting people to take your word on how technology works when you're incapable of using google. It's kind of hilarious. 

You said my calculations were wrong and I just proved you wrong as in your calculations were wrong and mine are correct even after applying leap year. I think you really got mad that I just proved you can’t calculate, huh? And what’s with quoting me after quoting me? Lol. Thanks though. You proving that 15 minutes (your assumption not mine) is wrong is enough for me. Now stop projecting.

9 months. And you still didn’t provide any proof of her not getting the phone in 2005. Even if it’s 2004, what I said won’t change. I said “around 2005”, but you don’t read what I say and just assume. You really want me to be wrong. But it’s over already, you were proven wrong not once but twice.

Finally we had this conversation already, google says the lock system as I have provided it. Nothing in google says what you said. You are the one here who should provide proof that there’s a mobile phone which only locks for 30 seconds indefinitely and never increments from that. You won’t find any. And that’s your final wrong. Is this conversation over? You aren’t here to debate, you are here to find anything wrong. You are here to just disagree. You are here to provoke. Now stop replying to me. This whole thing you are doing could have worked with someone else but not me. This wasn’t fun but this conversation lasted for as long as one made a mistake and you did 2 at the same time. So it’s over.
May 1, 2023 7:52 AM

Offline
Sep 2014
262
Confused_100 said:
majinale said:
I didn't change your quote on purpose, the forum quote system is confusing i mixed what i wrote with yours (I think it;s fixed now). Anyway you are obsessed with things that make no sense.If fanboyism is bad, reverse fanboyism is even worse.
There is absolutely nothing wrong with that scene, nether technically or storytelling wise.You are stretching even for a nitpick. If you think that there is something irrational about the fandom, you can do better.

“Nothing wrong with that scene, neither technically or storytelling”,

tell me you never used a mobile phone before without telling you never used a mobile phone before.

Edit: Just to reply to fanboyism and reverse fanboyism thing. Fans don’t act like there’s nothing and that it is flawless. Fans criticise to tell author “hey this is wrong because of…, please take care next time to research”. That way he becomes better and understand his weak points. Reverse fanboyism would be to criticise every scene, which isn’t the case here. We are criticising one scene in particular. You want it to open a floodgate. Cool I could do that, if you want but you won’t like it neither will I. So stop acting like this is a bad thing to criticise when you have people criticising other animes for less.
The problem here is that you are nitpicking the wrong thing. You think that you have some knowledge that you don't actually have (how ALL phones used to work in the 2000-2010 era) and you are being absolute about it as well.

Want to hear an actual valid criticism about the scene? He said that it was his 45510th try, which implies that he started testing with 5 digits from the start, which is irrational since it means he skipped the 10000 4digit codes. Had he said it was his 55510th try, it would have been perfect. But for the context of the scene all of that is forgiven, it works just fine.
May 1, 2023 8:01 AM
Offline
Feb 2023
1001
majinale said:
Confused_100 said:

“Nothing wrong with that scene, neither technically or storytelling”,

tell me you never used a mobile phone before without telling you never used a mobile phone before.

Edit: Just to reply to fanboyism and reverse fanboyism thing. Fans don’t act like there’s nothing and that it is flawless. Fans criticise to tell author “hey this is wrong because of…, please take care next time to research”. That way he becomes better and understand his weak points. Reverse fanboyism would be to criticise every scene, which isn’t the case here. We are criticising one scene in particular. You want it to open a floodgate. Cool I could do that, if you want but you won’t like it neither will I. So stop acting like this is a bad thing to criticise when you have people criticising other animes for less.
The problem here is that you are nitpicking the wrong thing. You think that you have some knowledge that you don't actually have (how ALL phones used to work in the 2000-2010 era) and you are being absolute about it as well.

Want to hear an actual valid criticism about the scene? He said that it was his 45510th try, which implies that he started testing with 5 digits from the start, which is irrational since it means he skipped the 10000 4digit codes. Had he said it was his 55510th try, it would have been perfect. But for the context of the scene all of that is forgiven, it works just fine.

You do know that the phone he is using has a 5 digit passcode most likely. I know this could be a surprise for you but not all phones were 4 digit passcode. What you said talks as if he can start with 4 digits first then try 5 digits which isn’t the case here. If that’s the case, you should add 3 digit possibilities and 2 digit possibilities. He is limited to only 5 digit passcode. But anyways it’s impossible for him to find it.

I know you want to defend objectively bad writing here. It’s okay. But learn how PIN codes work first.

Edit: You really outed yourself with your reply btw. Thank you
Confused_100May 1, 2023 8:05 AM
May 1, 2023 8:07 AM

Offline
Sep 2014
262
Confused_100 said:
majinale said:
The problem here is that you are nitpicking the wrong thing. You think that you have some knowledge that you don't actually have (how ALL phones used to work in the 2000-2010 era) and you are being absolute about it as well.

Want to hear an actual valid criticism about the scene? He said that it was his 45510th try, which implies that he started testing with 5 digits from the start, which is irrational since it means he skipped the 10000 4digit codes. Had he said it was his 55510th try, it would have been perfect. But for the context of the scene all of that is forgiven, it works just fine.

You do know that the phone he is using has a 5 digit passcode most likely. I know this could be a surprise for you but not all phones were 4 digit passcode. What you said talks as if he can start with 4 digits first then try 5 digits which isn’t the case here. If that’s the case, you should add 3 digit possibilities and 2 digit possibilities.

I know you want to defend objectively bad writing here. It’s okay. But learn how PIN codes work first.

Edit: You really outed yourself with this reply btw. Thank you
So i provided video proof that there were phones with similar and even more lax security back in the day, debunking all your silly arguments about inaccuracy. And your new thing is that i don't know how pins work, even though 4 digit pin has been the standard minimum length for literally decades? At this point you are embarrassing yourself.

edit. People have been spelling things out for you in this thread from the first page. You are missing the point, you lack knowledge since you don't seem to know anything about anything, yet you are arguing with confidence. I am even trying to throw you a bone taking as step back, so that we can conclude this discussion as a disagreement but you seem really unhinged. Feel free to continue arguing the same thing in circles with a different person each time. Anyway i am out.
majinaleMay 1, 2023 8:34 AM
May 1, 2023 8:41 AM
Offline
Feb 2023
1001
majinale said:
Confused_100 said:

You do know that the phone he is using has a 5 digit passcode most likely. I know this could be a surprise for you but not all phones were 4 digit passcode. What you said talks as if he can start with 4 digits first then try 5 digits which isn’t the case here. If that’s the case, you should add 3 digit possibilities and 2 digit possibilities.

I know you want to defend objectively bad writing here. It’s okay. But learn how PIN codes work first.

Edit: You really outed yourself with this reply btw. Thank you
So i provided video proof that there were phones with similar and even more lax security back in the day, debunking all your silly arguments about inaccuracy. And your new thing is that i don't know how pins work, even though 4 digit pin has been the standard minimum length for literally decades? At this point you are embarrassing yourself.

edit. People have been spelling things out for you in this thread from the first page. You are missing the point, you lack knowledge since you don't seem to know anything about anything, yet you are arguing with confidence. I am even trying to throw you a bone taking as step back, so that we can conclude this discussion as a disagreement but you seem really unhinged. Feel free to continue arguing the same thing in circles with a different person each time. Anyway i am out.

Dude you said that he can enter a 4 digit passcode in a mobile phone which accepts 5 digits lol. The video you provided proved nothing because you didn’t even show what happened after 5th try. You also didn’t admit that mobile you provided was a 4 digit passcode. The anime has the mobile phone 5 digit.

Finally you didn’t contradict anything I said. You literally proved that there’s no mobile phones that only lock for 30 seconds like anime did. I know you still want to act like you debunked me but you didn’t debunk anything. And who are the people who tried with me? The other guy? Can you open his account and see most of his posts and scores? See what kind of fandom he is in? None tried to debunk except you two but here you are acting like there were “many”. Yes please go out, I am tired talking with people with little knowledge of how mobile phones work.
May 1, 2023 10:56 AM
Offline
Jan 2016
6
My only probem is the author wanted him to be this creepy, super desperate dude, trying day and night to unlock the phone but when you actually calculate it, he spent around 15-16 mind per day. Kinda feels lazy.

We know the following stuff,
-The phone locks itself for 30 seconds after a wrong password attempt.
-It took him 45510 attempts to reach the good combination that was also 45510.
-He didn't know how long the password was, but we know that it can't be less then 4 digits since no password or PIN code can be shorter than that.

Now, we can assume it was a phone without a SIM card and the contacts he found were stored on the internal memory. The reason to this that most if not all SIM cards lock after 3 tries.
However phone passwords are not always do, they usually lock the phone for 10-15 seconds after a few bad tries, however this time usually grows with each wrong attempt, 30 sec, 1 min, 10 min.. ect. until a point where the phone resets and all data is destroyed. But not all phones are like this, its just pretty unlikely that Ai did have a type of phone with unlimited tries cuz they are rare. But I could let it slide if the scene was actually good.
However... If he didn't know how many digits the code was then the code cant be 45510 on the 45510th try, since that would mean he skipped 4 digits and went with the sequence of 00001, 00002, 00003... 00100... reaching 45510 ON the 45510th attempt. That would mean he was trying with 5 digits all along. It would not be impossible for him to know how long the password was since most phones (nowadays at least..) dont require you to press OK, they automatically accept or deny the code when you reach the number of digits the code actually has. So if your password is 123456 and someone tries 676767 it will immediately deny it once you type it in, it wont let you press OK before or after, revealing how long the given password is. We also dont see if Aqua presses ok or the phone automatically accepts the code at 5 digits. So him stating he didnt know the length makes no sense, and has no significance. Since if he just guessed it was 5 digits long then the question is why. Everyone would start with 4 digits for multiple reasons, its the minimum requirement and it also requires way less tries to go trough since it has less possible combinations.
Also a little detail. The 45510th attempt should be 45511 logically since 00000 should be attempt one, not 00001.

Anyways, considering the password was 5 digits long, what has 10x10x10x10x10=100.000 combinations, since we can have 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9 on each spot from the 5 digits. Or in short, he just needs to count from 0 to 99.999 to try each combination. He can do a try each 30 secs (as an increase in this was NOT mentioned, its all the info we have). Meaning 1st try 0 sec, 2nd try 30 sec, 3rd try 60 sec (1 min)... ect. To reach 45510 we just multiply it by 30, 1.365.300 that is how many seconds it took. Then we try to translate it to days . So 1365300/60=22.755 mins, 22.755/60=~379 hours. 379/24=15,802... days non stop. That would be the time it took a script to do it. For a human however, if he sleeps 8-10 hours, goes to school for 6-8 hours (we see he did do it in school too btw) in the worst case he still has 6 hours free time, and while he does need to do homework eat shower ect, it is not an actual activity to try the passwords, it takes 1 sec to try then there is 30 sec downtime, realistically it only takes up 1/30th of his time, if he wants he can do it all day, and still be productive in the downtime. So doing 16 hours a day would make the final results 24 days instead, 24/16=1,5x meaning ofc 16x1,5 will be 24. Doing it for only 6 hours a day will result in 24/6=4x more time, thats 16x4=64 days, two months.
So in order for it to take 4 years, he only had to devote 16 minutes to this activity every day, which gives the complete opposite impression of what the author wanted to portray, which is how desperate Aqua was.
Math: - 365x4/16=91,25
x=hours spent a day with the activity
24/x=91,25
24=91,25x
24/91,25=x
0,263=x
0,263(hours)x60(minutes in hour)=15,78 minutes/day

I don't think any real though was given to this scene and the numbers were just random, especially cuz he just says it took one day to do 100 (50min/day rate) attempts, and one 1 month to do 1000 (17min/day rate). So it seems like at first he was more enthusiastic, but it slowly died down, spending less and less time trying, as it became more and more hopeless to him. However, he should have been way more dedicated in the first days/weeks for him to look more realistic and also act the way the author intended.
If I were in a similar situation I would spend my first day trying then slowly lose interest, probably take large breaks, weeks, moths. And one point I would stop. Thats just human nature. I dont think the 4 years is unrealistic, its plausible considering how many things we need to do in our life and how our interests shift. He could have stopped for years, we dont know.
Its more of a storytelling problem, then a question of realism. He could have finished ways faster if he were truly that determined the author intended. Its not impossible at all, its somewhat realistic and logical, and makes him look as I said, just way more desperate, someone who actually spends day and night on the phone, neglecting sleep, school ect, and finishes in a month or somethin, wouldnt that depict his characterictcs and struggle way more? Or if one month doesnt have enough weight to it, then go with a 6 or 7 digit code, those could take anywhere between 1 to 10 years or more even with serious time investment.
May 1, 2023 7:32 PM
Offline
Dec 2021
187
Confused_100 said:
daiotaku said:

>  As it’s only one day increase. Meaning it would be 43,830 which is still less.

Lol, now it seems like you can neither calculate nor read. As I said, in the comment which you quoted, it's 15.5749486653 minutes per day.  Again, a complete inability to do basic arithmetic. 

 By using this knowledge we can say the model is around 2005 indefinitely. And that had every information I made. So thank you again. All you do is assumptions. 

No, now you're repeating the same mistake you made earlier, assuming she bought the cellphone when Aqua and Ruby were born, rather then before they were conceived.  Apparently you neither know how to google nor how human reproduction actually works. 

>  you are saying that there is a phone that locks only for 30 seconds. Give me proof of that.

Lol, you're the one who made the initial claim with zero evidence. Apparently still expecting people to take your word on how technology works when you're incapable of using google. It's kind of hilarious. 

You said my calculations were wrong and I just proved you wrong as in your calculations were wrong and mine are correct even after applying leap year. I think you really got mad that I just proved you can’t calculate, huh? And what’s with quoting me after quoting me? Lol. Thanks though. You proving that 15 minutes (your assumption not mine) is wrong is enough for me. Now stop projecting.

9 months. And you still didn’t provide any proof of her not getting the phone in 2005. Even if it’s 2004, what I said won’t change. I said “around 2005”, but you don’t read what I say and just assume. You really want me to be wrong. But it’s over already, you were proven wrong not once but twice.

Finally we had this conversation already, google says the lock system as I have provided it. Nothing in google says what you said. You are the one here who should provide proof that there’s a mobile phone which only locks for 30 seconds indefinitely and never increments from that. You won’t find any. And that’s your final wrong. Is this conversation over? You aren’t here to debate, you are here to find anything wrong. You are here to just disagree. You are here to provoke. Now stop replying to me. This whole thing you are doing could have worked with someone else but not me. This wasn’t fun but this conversation lasted for as long as one made a mistake and you did 2 at the same time. So it’s over.

>  You said my calculations were wrong and I just proved you wrong as in your calculations were wrong

I legit have no idea what you're talking about. In the comment you quoted, I said it was  15.5749486653 minutes per day, including leap year - which is correct.  You apparently can't read or something.  Earlier I said "15 minutes" the first time I posted numbers in this thread I said "15 minutes or so" and "15 to 20 minutes"  - see: 

daiotaku
Confused_100

So no incrementation or anything? You are saying Aka never used a phone before?

Have you ever used a flip phone from 20 years ago? 


Confused_100

And I said that he could have shown Aqua’s persistence better. I even said a better example. I also explained why it is almost impossible for him to do it, if we are talking logically and realistically. Like it however you want though.

It's only "impossible" if you don't know the difference between minutes or seconds.  Over 4 years it's literally 15-20 minutes a day, it's easily possible. You just can't do math for some reason. 

Saying "15 minutes or so" instead of "15.5749486653 minutes" is not a "miscalculation."

Here's what you said in your initial comment, by the way - 

>  Also him just doing it with no notepad is concerning. As he would 100% not remember every combination.
...
> However by this logic, 10 tries max per day. Let’s say he tried it every day, he would have tried only 3650 per year. So also by some calculations, this would take him around 27 years max, if he is super unlucky and it was in last combinations. The chances of him getting it in 3 years, is so low which makes zero sense.

First of all you don't seem to understand that you don't need to write down the combinations if you just go through from 0 and increment by one, you only need to remember the last number you entered. Also, you forgot he only needed to enter 45510 numbers total, which would take 12 years at 10 per day (oh sorry 12.4684931507 years, lol).  So again. totally incorrect calculations initially in this thread, and there's no justification for the 10 per day number, other then your weird claim about lockout times increasing on 20 year old phones which you've never provided any evidence for, because you apparently don't know how to google. 

Totally ridiculous. 
May 2, 2023 4:15 AM

Offline
Feb 2021
158
i think i missed the "hacking a fliphpone" part in my gynecology class 
obscure anime for u idiots to watch right NOW
1.Odd Taxi WATCH THIS!!!!!
2.LINK CLICK super underrated!! (chinese, foto-time travelling, emotional stories dope music)
3.Mashiro no Oto if u like traditional jap banger music

please support Cherry&virgin if u can!!
May 2, 2023 1:15 PM

Offline
May 2018
1825
@animeIs4Children, not suprised for papperazi or just hackers in general to do that. Imagine getting millions of cash just for leaking privacy or blackmail

"Don't give up after failing just twice.
We'll be able to do it next time.
Failure is the stepping stone to success."

May 2, 2023 9:43 PM
Offline
Nov 2021
3
majinale said:
Yes yes i agree, the correct move was obviously to remove the eprom memory chip, solder some wires in the correct spots, provide the correct voltage, connect said wires to his computer's serial port then dump the memory, opening it with a hex editor praying that the memory wasn't encrypted. That would make for a much more compelling story. /s
Ok, how could he know this if he was a doctor in his previous life? He could have found it on internet :))? He needs to know perfectly how to do that otherwise he would damage the phone and this is not possible if he only has knowledge in medicine.
Look everyone Aqua is a smart character because he was a doctor in his previous life which is a very hard thing to achieve, but being smart doesn't mean he must knows everything. It is understandable for him not knowing how to hack an old phone, not even the anime told us if he had some little knowledge about hacking so the scene with him brute-forcing his way into Ai's phone is not dumb as others said.
May 2, 2023 9:46 PM
Offline
Nov 2021
3
pedronii said:
It's so funny to me how people say "just hack it" when they themselves don't even know how hacking even works lmao. Yes if we was an expert he could've carefully removed the memory and try to do something in his computer but he's a fucking doctor, the chances of him fucking it up and bricking the memory because he was impatient are high as fuck...

Y'all don't know shit about computers and think hacking is clicking one button and kaboom it's done
Thank you! Someone understands it.
May 2, 2023 9:50 PM
Offline
Nov 2021
3
SomeNewGuy said:
I feel like people are missing the point here. 


The reason why it was written like this is to convey to the audience just how decicated he really is about getting revenge and how far he is willing to go in order to achieve it. 

While it's true the author could've easily incorporated a "hacking" element here, it wouldn't have had the same impact nor conveyed the same message. 

As the whole point of this scene is to get the viewer/reader to react and realise just how mentally screwed up Aqua has become due to Ai's passing where he wouldn't mind "wasting" 4 years of his life just to break into a phone that may or may not contain useful information, this is messed up, it doesn't make any sense and that's the whole point. 
Absolutely correct!
May 3, 2023 3:39 AM

Offline
Sep 2014
262
Absol125 said:
majinale said:
Yes yes i agree, the correct move was obviously to remove the eprom memory chip, solder some wires in the correct spots, provide the correct voltage, connect said wires to his computer's serial port then dump the memory, opening it with a hex editor praying that the memory wasn't encrypted. That would make for a much more compelling story. /s
Ok, how could he know this if he was a doctor in his previous life? He could have found it on internet :))? He needs to know perfectly how to do that otherwise he would damage the phone and this is not possible if he only has knowledge in medicine.
Look everyone Aqua is a smart character because he was a doctor in his previous life which is a very hard thing to achieve, but being smart doesn't mean he must knows everything. It is understandable for him not knowing how to hack an old phone, not even the anime told us if he had some little knowledge about hacking so the scene with him brute-forcing his way into Ai's phone is not dumb as others said.
In case you missed it, i was being sarcastic.
majinaleMay 3, 2023 9:42 AM
May 3, 2023 8:37 AM

Offline
Mar 2020
737
This thread confirms it for me most people who watch anime are stupid in nature.
You're right op. Unfortunately, your words fell on deaf ears
May 3, 2023 9:08 AM

Offline
Aug 2014
39
there are so many things that are off in this anime. i am glad it is not #1 anymore. eagerly waiting for it to drop down slowly. does not deserve this top spot at all
May 3, 2023 6:34 PM
I like water

Offline
Feb 2020
3124
If that's the dumbest thing you saw, it means you didn't see anything.


MALoween candies:

May 3, 2023 6:43 PM
Offline
Jan 2023
1
Ain't no way your name is "animeIs4Children" and you're complaining about this...
May 3, 2023 11:26 PM

Offline
Sep 2015
755
stalkerdeb said:
Tennouji said:
Assuming a normal person has a knowledge about that.

I assume 4 years should be suffice to learn that
This is a gross underestimation of the skills required. Otherwise we wouldn't need specialist to do things like this. And also a gross over-estimation of the time required.
Ai's password was 45510 which with a 30 seconds time gap (45510 x 30) is only 16 days. I'm not sure where people are getting these insanely long time from. Its only 15 minutes a day for 4 years. Its like a morning and nightly routine. It does require dedication, but just like brushing your teeth, once its a routine, its not all that annoying to do and it comes naturally after awhile like a habit.
The following is a reply generally and not to you specifically, but having dabbed a little into the various subjects that would be required... I can give my two cents.

zcv45May 3, 2023 11:45 PM
May 4, 2023 12:10 AM

Offline
Sep 2015
755
Cneq said:
SomeNewGuy said:
I feel like people are missing the point here. 


The reason why it was written like this is to convey to the audience just how decicated he really is about getting revenge and how far he is willing to go in order to achieve it. 

While it's true the author could've easily incorporated a "hacking" element here, it wouldn't have had the same impact nor conveyed the same message. 

As the whole point of this scene is to get the viewer/reader to react and realise just how mentally screwed up Aqua has become due to Ai's passing where he wouldn't mind "wasting" 4 years of his life just to break into a phone that may or may not contain useful information, this is messed up, it doesn't make any sense and that's the whole point. 
Nah it is just a cheap plot device. If the intent was to show how messed up he is then they should of had the attempt end in failure [as it realistically should have] and simply have had some other way of him getting information. Cold storage is quite literally the safest bet so they could've easily made it that he simply discovered a combination to a safe and some written information was in there.

Or heck since AI is kind of portrayed as a ditz why not have him do that for four years only to accidentally find the passcode for the phone written down somewhere? That would also be a better writing move to show how messed up his psyche is that he would rather focus entirely on brute forcing a phone like that instead of considering other options [and yet this would still make a more believable plot device and still highlight that aspect of his character].

Cheap plot device? Finding the passcode written down somewhere would be a cheap plot device.
I'm sure some people would do it but I'm quite certain most people don't write down their password to their phones. It's a simple string of numbers they get to pick themselves. It's not exactly the hardest thing to remember, who the heck needs to write that down? It would actually be odd that she would write it down and leave it just lying around somewhere considering she's a famous idol that is fairly careful with her personal information.
And putting it a safe is even more weird. How many people have a safe just lying around where they put a slip of paper with their phone's PW written down? Sounds more like some dumb fetch quest in a game than anything a normal person would do.
Also keep in mind they moved at least 2 times already. Any chance of finding some clues is LONG GONE.

Simply put, that phone is older than the kids and weren't used after they were born. No way they would have caught a glimpse of the phone.
The alternatives are hours everyday for several years to learn the prerequisite knowledge to hack the phone which may very well take just 10 minutes. But to get to that point take years. vs 15 minutes a day for 4 years for a total of 16 days of brute forcing. Or be a toddler walking into a tech shop and hand over a famous idol's phone while still trying to hide any familial relations and hope the technician doesn't take a peek at the contents inside let alone question the situation as a whole.
Brute forcing the passcode is pretty much the first thing any laymen would think about. Perhaps first trying some combinations that they think is likely (birthdays etc.) before resorting to brute forcing. And if he goes sequentially, its not hard to keep track of your progress.
May 4, 2023 12:13 AM
Offline
Jan 2018
4852
Did he even have access to the internet? At that age

You can still be a doctor still have no clue how hack …. It’s not it’s a requirement to become a doctor now is it.
Mattinator95May 4, 2023 12:17 AM
May 4, 2023 1:12 AM

Offline
Jul 2021
133
SomeNewGuy said:
I feel like people are missing the point here. 


The reason why it was written like this is to convey to the audience just how decicated he really is about getting revenge and how far he is willing to go in order to achieve it. 

While it's true the author could've easily incorporated a "hacking" element here, it wouldn't have had the same impact nor conveyed the same message. 

As the whole point of this scene is to get the viewer/reader to react and realise just how mentally screwed up Aqua has become due to Ai's passing where he wouldn't mind "wasting" 4 years of his life just to break into a phone that may or may not contain useful information, this is messed up, it doesn't make any sense and that's the whole point. 

finally a good answer
Nov 27, 2024 10:06 AM
Offline
Jul 2024
2
Reply to PraxisCat
SquishyPies said:
SomeNewGuy said:
I feel like people are missing the point here. 


The reason why it was written like this is to convey to the audience just how decicated he really is about getting revenge and how far he is willing to go in order to achieve it. 

While it's true the author could've easily incorporated a "hacking" element here, it wouldn't have had the same impact nor conveyed the same message. 

As the whole point of this scene is to get the viewer/reader to react and realise just how mentally screwed up Aqua has become due to Ai's passing where he wouldn't mind "wasting" 4 years of his life just to break into a phone that may or may not contain useful information, this is messed up, it doesn't make any sense and that's the whole point. 
THIS. Folks need to realize that authors often write subjects they are not experts in- not because they are trying to write an accurate portrayal of that subject, but because that subject conveys meaning for the story. of course the author isn't gonna go into minute detail about how this kid hacked into a cell phone. because it literally doesn't matter at all. the purpose is to convey meaning to the viewer- that Aqua is still obsessed with Ai and has literally dedicated his new life to avenging her. he is a messed up man with an unhealthy obsession reinforced by trauma. it doesn't matter that the hacking is "unrealistic," it does what it needs to do.

EDIT: long rant ahead, put it under a spoiler cuz it's long lol

Probably the smartest comment on this thread that understands how writing works, big ups. 
I'm a photographer, I don't lose my mind every time there's something technically fucky about taking pictures in an anime or tv show because that would be dumb. What matters is that its emotional core is understandable to the viewer. Writers write things (usually) to convey something, in this case, that Aqua is obsessed and methodical. People are like "there should have been a clue somewhere else that he pieced together!! It would have shown that he was smart!!" except the point wasn't to show that he was smart, and would have changed the tone of his character and the scene writ large. He's not designed to be a sort of super-smart power fantasy you project onto, he's supposed to be a weird, sick and twisted little dude.
I completely agree with you! Sometimes it’s not about perfect technical accuracy but about delivering the emotional essence of a character or scene. Aqua’s portrayal as obsessive and methodical works well—it’s not about showing off intelligence but staying true to his weird, twisted persona. It keeps the tone of the story intact and makes him more compelling. By the way, for anyone curious about how to redeem TM rewards, staying attentive to character-driven storytelling like this could inspire deeper appreciation for creative narratives!
Pages (5) « First ... « 3 4 [5]

More topics from this board

Poll: » "Oshi no Ko" Episode 3 Discussion ( 1 2 3 4 5 ... Last Page )

Stark700 - Apr 26, 2023

481 by tonypperhaps1998 »»
5 hours ago

Poll: » "Oshi no Ko" Episode 2 Discussion ( 1 2 3 4 5 ... Last Page )

Stark700 - Apr 19, 2023

870 by tonypperhaps1998 »»
5 hours ago

Poll: » "Oshi no Ko" Episode 1 Discussion ( 1 2 3 4 5 ... Last Page )

Usopp8000 - Mar 27, 2023

2739 by tonypperhaps1998 »»
Jan 7, 2:28 AM

Poll: » "Oshi no Ko" Episode 11 Discussion ( 1 2 3 4 5 ... Last Page )

Yuyuichi - Jun 28, 2023

708 by Cooomer »»
Jan 5, 6:12 PM

Poll: » "Oshi no Ko" Episode 10 Discussion ( 1 2 3 4 5 ... Last Page )

Softhenic03 - Jun 21, 2023

284 by Cooomer »»
Jan 5, 5:48 PM

Preview MangaManga Store

It’s time to ditch the text file.
Keep track of your anime easily by creating your own list.
Sign Up Login