New
Oct 8, 6:19 PM
#1
He is 13 and she is 10 so age is not the problem here. The problem is CONSENT. Its basically sexual assault. There would be no problem with this if they kiss when she is awake... Also can we talk about how unnecessary the kiss even was? Just pour down from the glass to her mouth π |
Kitsune_089Oct 8, 6:28 PM
Oct 8, 6:49 PM
#2
So you can "legally" assault someone if she's awake? Interesting idea. |
Oct 8, 6:59 PM
#3
ktg said: So you can "legally" assault someone if she's awake? Interesting idea. I meant if she consented nerd, which she *probably* would |
Oct 8, 7:08 PM
#4
So in your ridiculous view, the princess in sleeping beauty would never get woken. Great logic. Modern woke principles are getting out of control. |
Oct 8, 7:14 PM
#5
Kitsune_089 said: ktg said: So you can "legally" assault someone if she's awake? Interesting idea. I meant if she consented nerd, which she *probably* would This is a bad take, because it is also true for couples. You cannot consent because you are asleep, but you would likely consent if you are awake. So if it's not an assault in one of these cases, then it isn't in the other one either. |
Oct 8, 7:15 PM
#6
FutoiOtaku said: So in your ridiculous view, the princess in sleeping beauty would never get woken. Great logic. Modern woke principles are getting out of control. how tf is that related |
Oct 8, 7:15 PM
#7
ktg said: Kitsune_089 said: ktg said: So you can "legally" assault someone if she's awake? Interesting idea. I meant if she consented nerd, which she *probably* would This is a bad take, because it is also true for couples. You cannot consent because you are asleep, but you would likely consent if you are awake. So if it's not an assault in one of these cases, then it isn't in the other one either. But these 2 characters are not couples yet? |
Oct 8, 7:20 PM
#8
Kitsune_089 said: FutoiOtaku said: So in your ridiculous view, the princess in sleeping beauty would never get woken. Great logic. Modern woke principles are getting out of control. how tf is that related You really can’t see it? A sleeping girl can only be woken with a kiss, but in 2024 it has to be consensual so tough shit girlie you’re staying in dreamland! In this a sick girl needs medicine, a guy only 3 years older than her delivers it by mouth because she can’t drink it herself when unconscious. Yes, even I see it as a bit creepy, but in this anime it’s used to move a possible future romance forward. You guys need to stop looking so hard for ethical problems in fiction, it’s ridiculous! |
Oct 8, 7:22 PM
#9
Kitsune_089 said: ktg said: Kitsune_089 said: ktg said: So you can "legally" assault someone if she's awake? Interesting idea. I meant if she consented nerd, which she *probably* would This is a bad take, because it is also true for couples. You cannot consent because you are asleep, but you would likely consent if you are awake. So if it's not an assault in one of these cases, then it isn't in the other one either. But these 2 characters are not couples yet? So? Even if 2 people are a couple, they do not necessarily consent to everything, so it doesn't matter if they are a couple or not. I'm just saying that based on your logic, you cannot do anything to your partner while they are asleep, because they did not consent. |
Oct 8, 7:26 PM
#10
ktg said: Kitsune_089 said: ktg said: Kitsune_089 said: ktg said: So you can "legally" assault someone if she's awake? Interesting idea. I meant if she consented nerd, which she *probably* would This is a bad take, because it is also true for couples. You cannot consent because you are asleep, but you would likely consent if you are awake. So if it's not an assault in one of these cases, then it isn't in the other one either. But these 2 characters are not couples yet? So? Even if 2 people are a couple, they do not necessarily consent to everything, so it doesn't matter if they are a couple or not. I'm just saying that based on your logic, you cannot do anything to your partner while they are asleep, because they did not consent. Well, I’ve been married longer than you’ve been alive and honestly if every time we wanted to do something intimate we needed to ask first, our lives would be dull as fuck. The best way to wake up is with your partner kissing you or better still doing something erotic to you. Permission for every single act would be the best way to kill a healthy relationship. |
Oct 8, 7:30 PM
#11
FutoiOtaku said: ktg said: Kitsune_089 said: ktg said: Kitsune_089 said: ktg said: So you can "legally" assault someone if she's awake? Interesting idea. I meant if she consented nerd, which she *probably* would This is a bad take, because it is also true for couples. You cannot consent because you are asleep, but you would likely consent if you are awake. So if it's not an assault in one of these cases, then it isn't in the other one either. But these 2 characters are not couples yet? So? Even if 2 people are a couple, they do not necessarily consent to everything, so it doesn't matter if they are a couple or not. I'm just saying that based on your logic, you cannot do anything to your partner while they are asleep, because they did not consent. Well, I’ve been married longer than you’ve been alive and honestly if every time we wanted to do something intimate we needed to ask first, our lives would be dull as fuck. The best way to wake up is with your partner kissing you or better still doing something erotic to you. Permission for every single act would be the best way to kill a healthy relationship. Then according to the OP, you assaulted your partner. You should be in jail. |
Oct 8, 7:42 PM
#12
ktg said: FutoiOtaku said: ktg said: Kitsune_089 said: ktg said: Kitsune_089 said: ktg said: So you can "legally" assault someone if she's awake? Interesting idea. I meant if she consented nerd, which she *probably* would This is a bad take, because it is also true for couples. You cannot consent because you are asleep, but you would likely consent if you are awake. So if it's not an assault in one of these cases, then it isn't in the other one either. But these 2 characters are not couples yet? So? Even if 2 people are a couple, they do not necessarily consent to everything, so it doesn't matter if they are a couple or not. I'm just saying that based on your logic, you cannot do anything to your partner while they are asleep, because they did not consent. Well, I’ve been married longer than you’ve been alive and honestly if every time we wanted to do something intimate we needed to ask first, our lives would be dull as fuck. The best way to wake up is with your partner kissing you or better still doing something erotic to you. Permission for every single act would be the best way to kill a healthy relationship. Then according to the OP, you assaulted your partner. You should be in jail. π She assaults me too, we can do time together! How romantic. I’m finding the modern movement towards finding EVERYTHING offensive to be quite amusing, it’s definitely a better method of population control than contraception. OP is probably going to die single and pure. But maybe the human race has been doing it wrong for hundreds of centuries and the gen zero kids are going to make everything right? |
Oct 8, 7:43 PM
#13
FutoiOtaku said: Kitsune_089 said: FutoiOtaku said: So in your ridiculous view, the princess in sleeping beauty would never get woken. Great logic. Modern woke principles are getting out of control. how tf is that related You really can’t see it? A sleeping girl can only be woken with a kiss, but in 2024 it has to be consensual so tough shit girlie you’re staying in dreamland! In this a sick girl needs medicine, a guy only 3 years older than her delivers it by mouth because she can’t drink it herself when unconscious. Yes, even I see it as a bit creepy, but in this anime it’s used to move a possible future romance forward. You guys need to stop looking so hard for ethical problems in fiction, it’s ridiculous! how about just using the glass and pouring the medicine to her mouth? |
Oct 8, 7:44 PM
#14
ktg said: Kitsune_089 said: ktg said: Kitsune_089 said: ktg said: So you can "legally" assault someone if she's awake? Interesting idea. I meant if she consented nerd, which she *probably* would This is a bad take, because it is also true for couples. You cannot consent because you are asleep, but you would likely consent if you are awake. So if it's not an assault in one of these cases, then it isn't in the other one either. But these 2 characters are not couples yet? So? Even if 2 people are a couple, they do not necessarily consent to everything, so it doesn't matter if they are a couple or not. I'm just saying that based on your logic, you cannot do anything to your partner while they are asleep, because they did not consent. being a couple literally means you consent |
Oct 8, 7:50 PM
#15
ofc not a pedo but definitely weird to me, like she's younger and sick and if you help her out of kindness why would u kiss her?? like wtf they are def not close for that to happen, control your impulses buddy |
Oct 8, 8:04 PM
#16
If I remember right if someone can't drink medicine or liquid on their own. You don't want to feed it to them from cup to mouth. They won't drink it or you will just drown them. You have to force it down their throat instead. Still I'll admit that scene was still ridiculous. |
Oct 8, 8:20 PM
#18
Kitsune_089 said: ktg said: Kitsune_089 said: ktg said: Kitsune_089 said: ktg said: So you can "legally" assault someone if she's awake? Interesting idea. I meant if she consented nerd, which she *probably* would This is a bad take, because it is also true for couples. You cannot consent because you are asleep, but you would likely consent if you are awake. So if it's not an assault in one of these cases, then it isn't in the other one either. But these 2 characters are not couples yet? So? Even if 2 people are a couple, they do not necessarily consent to everything, so it doesn't matter if they are a couple or not. I'm just saying that based on your logic, you cannot do anything to your partner while they are asleep, because they did not consent. being a couple literally means you consent Cool, so you think the wife gave her consent to this (and to everything else), because they were married: https://www.theguardian.com/world/article/2024/sep/02/man-accused-of-enlisting-strangers-to-drugged-wife-goes-on-trial-in-france Just so you know, no, fkn no, being a couple doesn't mean that your partner gave their consent to everything. |
Oct 8, 8:31 PM
#19
Kitsune_089 said: FutoiOtaku said: Kitsune_089 said: FutoiOtaku said: So in your ridiculous view, the princess in sleeping beauty would never get woken. Great logic. Modern woke principles are getting out of control. how tf is that related You really can’t see it? A sleeping girl can only be woken with a kiss, but in 2024 it has to be consensual so tough shit girlie you’re staying in dreamland! In this a sick girl needs medicine, a guy only 3 years older than her delivers it by mouth because she can’t drink it herself when unconscious. Yes, even I see it as a bit creepy, but in this anime it’s used to move a possible future romance forward. You guys need to stop looking so hard for ethical problems in fiction, it’s ridiculous! how about just using the glass and pouring the medicine to her mouth? Next time you’re near a sleeping person, try pouring liquid into their mouth, it’ll be educational for you! They won’t swallow, it will go into their lungs because the larynx is set that way for breathing. Good murder technique tho… Also not saying spitting it in there is better, probably will also cause choking. But in case you still haven’t figured, this is an anime not a documentary. Your moral judgement is pointless. |
Oct 8, 8:39 PM
#20
yagxr said: he’s 15+. 1000% a pedo. hes not 15+ did you even read my text |
Oct 8, 8:40 PM
#21
Moppit said: If I remember right if someone can't drink medicine or liquid on their own. You don't want to feed it to them from cup to mouth. They won't drink it or you will just drown them. You have to force it down their throat instead. Still I'll admit that scene was still ridiculous. how is kissing them helping them to not drown this sounds stupid |
Oct 8, 8:42 PM
#22
ktg said: Kitsune_089 said: ktg said: Kitsune_089 said: ktg said: Kitsune_089 said: ktg said: So you can "legally" assault someone if she's awake? Interesting idea. I meant if she consented nerd, which she *probably* would This is a bad take, because it is also true for couples. You cannot consent because you are asleep, but you would likely consent if you are awake. So if it's not an assault in one of these cases, then it isn't in the other one either. But these 2 characters are not couples yet? So? Even if 2 people are a couple, they do not necessarily consent to everything, so it doesn't matter if they are a couple or not. I'm just saying that based on your logic, you cannot do anything to your partner while they are asleep, because they did not consent. being a couple literally means you consent Cool, so you think the wife gave her consent to this (and to everything else), because they were married: https://www.theguardian.com/world/article/2024/sep/02/man-accused-of-enlisting-strangers-to-drugged-wife-goes-on-trial-in-france Just so you know, no, fkn no, being a couple doesn't mean that your partner gave their consent to everything. yeah they arent even a couple so its even less acceptable? |
Oct 8, 8:45 PM
#23
FutoiOtaku said: Kitsune_089 said: FutoiOtaku said: Kitsune_089 said: FutoiOtaku said: So in your ridiculous view, the princess in sleeping beauty would never get woken. Great logic. Modern woke principles are getting out of control. how tf is that related You really can’t see it? A sleeping girl can only be woken with a kiss, but in 2024 it has to be consensual so tough shit girlie you’re staying in dreamland! In this a sick girl needs medicine, a guy only 3 years older than her delivers it by mouth because she can’t drink it herself when unconscious. Yes, even I see it as a bit creepy, but in this anime it’s used to move a possible future romance forward. You guys need to stop looking so hard for ethical problems in fiction, it’s ridiculous! how about just using the glass and pouring the medicine to her mouth? Next time you’re near a sleeping person, try pouring liquid into their mouth, it’ll be educational for you! They won’t swallow, it will go into their lungs because the larynx is set that way for breathing. Good murder technique tho… Also not saying spitting it in there is better, probably will also cause choking. But in case you still haven’t figured, this is an anime not a documentary. Your moral judgement is pointless. if they spent more time on the scene and decided it was a serious sickness and the medicine had to delivered immediately without any other way, sure it could work. At the end of the episode, out of nowhere, before trying to really wake her up; does not work. |
Oct 8, 8:55 PM
#24
Its a 5 year age gap. Story starts with Alicia being ~7 and Duke ~12. As of this episode they are currently Alicia at 10 and Duke at 15/16, it gets worse when you realize the Duke will be 17/18 years old in love with and yearning after a 12 year old. He's the same age as her brothers and the other sons of the major families, who are in school and are age 15, hes not 13. |
My tongue is itchy... |
Oct 8, 10:26 PM
#25
Kitsune_089 said: Moppit said: If I remember right if someone can't drink medicine or liquid on their own. You don't want to feed it to them from cup to mouth. They won't drink it or you will just drown them. You have to force it down their throat instead. Still I'll admit that scene was still ridiculous. how is kissing them helping them to not drown this sounds stupid Don't ask me how because I never try it. There's a way to get medicine or liquid down through mouth to mouth. |
Oct 8, 10:34 PM
#26
Moppit said: Kitsune_089 said: Moppit said: If I remember right if someone can't drink medicine or liquid on their own. You don't want to feed it to them from cup to mouth. They won't drink it or you will just drown them. You have to force it down their throat instead. Still I'll admit that scene was still ridiculous. how is kissing them helping them to not drown this sounds stupid Don't ask me how because I never try it. There's a way to get medicine or liquid down through mouth to mouth. why would that be any different then just using the glass??? |
Oct 8, 11:17 PM
#27
Kitsune_089 said: He is 13 and she is 10 so age is not the problem here. The problem is CONSENT. Its basically sexual assault. There would be no problem with this if they kiss when she is awake... Also can we talk about how unnecessary the kiss even was? Just pour down from the glass to her mouth π yeah the kiss feels off in this scene just use the glass damitπ |
Oct 8, 11:45 PM
#28
Nah it was pretty cute, and she kind of deserved it for neglecting her health and getting into that state to begin with. |
If you reply back to me and I never respond, I lost interest and don't care. Sorry about that. |
Oct 8, 11:49 PM
#29
Reply to EssentialTeacup
Its a 5 year age gap. Story starts with Alicia being ~7 and Duke ~12. As of this episode they are currently Alicia at 10 and Duke at 15/16, it gets worse when you realize the Duke will be 17/18 years old in love with and yearning after a 12 year old. He's the same age as her brothers and the other sons of the major families, who are in school and are age 15, hes not 13.
@EssentialTeacup Should their medieval European society be representative of modern day values or something? |
If you reply back to me and I never respond, I lost interest and don't care. Sorry about that. |
Oct 9, 2:38 AM
#30
Reply to FutoiOtaku
ktg said:
Then according to the OP, you assaulted your partner. You should be in jail.
FutoiOtaku said:
Well, I’ve been married longer than you’ve been alive and honestly if every time we wanted to do something intimate we needed to ask first, our lives would be dull as fuck. The best way to wake up is with your partner kissing you or better still doing something erotic to you. Permission for every single act would be the best way to kill a healthy relationship.
ktg said:
So? Even if 2 people are a couple, they do not necessarily consent to everything, so it doesn't matter if they are a couple or not.
I'm just saying that based on your logic, you cannot do anything to your partner while they are asleep, because they did not consent.
Kitsune_089 said:
But these 2 characters are not couples yet?
ktg said:
This is a bad take, because it is also true for couples. You cannot consent because you are asleep, but you would likely consent if you are awake.
So if it's not an assault in one of these cases, then it isn't in the other one either.
Kitsune_089 said:
I meant if she consented nerd, which she *probably* would
ktg said:
So you can "legally" assault someone if she's awake? Interesting idea.
So you can "legally" assault someone if she's awake? Interesting idea.
I meant if she consented nerd, which she *probably* would
This is a bad take, because it is also true for couples. You cannot consent because you are asleep, but you would likely consent if you are awake.
So if it's not an assault in one of these cases, then it isn't in the other one either.
But these 2 characters are not couples yet?
So? Even if 2 people are a couple, they do not necessarily consent to everything, so it doesn't matter if they are a couple or not.
I'm just saying that based on your logic, you cannot do anything to your partner while they are asleep, because they did not consent.
Well, I’ve been married longer than you’ve been alive and honestly if every time we wanted to do something intimate we needed to ask first, our lives would be dull as fuck. The best way to wake up is with your partner kissing you or better still doing something erotic to you. Permission for every single act would be the best way to kill a healthy relationship.
Then according to the OP, you assaulted your partner. You should be in jail.
π She assaults me too, we can do time together! How romantic.
I’m finding the modern movement towards finding EVERYTHING offensive to be quite amusing, it’s definitely a better method of population control than contraception. OP is probably going to die single and pure. But maybe the human race has been doing it wrong for hundreds of centuries and the gen zero kids are going to make everything right?
@FutoiOtaku To be fair, this is also stupid, but this is the other end of the same stupid take. During those centuries, it would have been unlikely that you could have married your spouse, because they decided based on social standing and not based on love or emotions. So the Gen Z (which does not mean "zero") concept is much more humane than those hundred years old traditions. For example, it was also perfectly normal if you murdered your neighbor in a duel, do you want to implement that tradition as well, because humanity survived? |
Oct 9, 2:40 AM
#31
Reply to Kitsune_089
ktg said:
Cool, so you think the wife gave her consent to this (and to everything else), because they were married: https://www.theguardian.com/world/article/2024/sep/02/man-accused-of-enlisting-strangers-to-drugged-wife-goes-on-trial-in-france
Just so you know, no, fkn no, being a couple doesn't mean that your partner gave their consent to everything.
Kitsune_089 said:
being a couple literally means you consent
ktg said:
So? Even if 2 people are a couple, they do not necessarily consent to everything, so it doesn't matter if they are a couple or not.
I'm just saying that based on your logic, you cannot do anything to your partner while they are asleep, because they did not consent.
Kitsune_089 said:
But these 2 characters are not couples yet?
ktg said:
This is a bad take, because it is also true for couples. You cannot consent because you are asleep, but you would likely consent if you are awake.
So if it's not an assault in one of these cases, then it isn't in the other one either.
Kitsune_089 said:
I meant if she consented nerd, which she *probably* would
ktg said:
So you can "legally" assault someone if she's awake? Interesting idea.
So you can "legally" assault someone if she's awake? Interesting idea.
I meant if she consented nerd, which she *probably* would
This is a bad take, because it is also true for couples. You cannot consent because you are asleep, but you would likely consent if you are awake.
So if it's not an assault in one of these cases, then it isn't in the other one either.
But these 2 characters are not couples yet?
So? Even if 2 people are a couple, they do not necessarily consent to everything, so it doesn't matter if they are a couple or not.
I'm just saying that based on your logic, you cannot do anything to your partner while they are asleep, because they did not consent.
being a couple literally means you consent
Cool, so you think the wife gave her consent to this (and to everything else), because they were married: https://www.theguardian.com/world/article/2024/sep/02/man-accused-of-enlisting-strangers-to-drugged-wife-goes-on-trial-in-france
Just so you know, no, fkn no, being a couple doesn't mean that your partner gave their consent to everything.
yeah they arent even a couple so its even less acceptable?
@Kitsune_089 Ok, so you literally blaming the victim, because you think it was her fault that she got raped. These children nowadays... |
Oct 9, 3:14 AM
#32
ktg said: @Kitsune_089 Ok, so you literally blaming the victim, because you think it was her fault that she got raped. These children nowadays... ??? wtf are you talking about where did i say that |
Oct 9, 6:02 AM
#33
ktg said: @FutoiOtaku To be fair, this is also stupid, but this is the other end of the same stupid take. During those centuries, it would have been unlikely that you could have married your spouse, because they decided based on social standing and not based on love or emotions. So the Gen Z (which does not mean "zero") concept is much more humane than those hundred years old traditions. For example, it was also perfectly normal if you murdered your neighbor in a duel, do you want to implement that tradition as well, because humanity survived? Yes, but why point that out when I did so myself? I’m juxtaposing stupidity with stupidity. Common sense is somewhere in the middle. |
Oct 9, 9:33 AM
#34
The entire thing is just dumb. I can at least think of 3 other animes on top of my head with that scene. |
MoppitOct 9, 10:17 AM
Oct 9, 9:46 AM
#35
Reply to Moppit
The entire thing is just dumb. I can at least think of 3 other animes on top of my head with that scene.
@Moppit Just no. An unconscious person cannot swallow, you're very likely to make them choke by forcing them to drink anything. |
If you reply back to me and I never respond, I lost interest and don't care. Sorry about that. |
Oct 9, 10:28 AM
#36
About the kiss, I do agree it's unnecessary. Honestly, it made me laugh because of how ridiculous it is, but I don't see the problem with it? Especially it being wrong because of "consent". It's fiction. This has been happening in fiction wayyy too long before this. Case in point: Romeo and Juliet and all those Disney shows you probably have seen before. You're watching fiction, arguing about these topics using common sense in real life isn't gonna work, and not to mention a waste of time. |
Oct 9, 12:23 PM
#37
FutoiOtaku said: ktg said: Kitsune_089 said: ktg said: Kitsune_089 said: ktg said: So you can "legally" assault someone if she's awake? Interesting idea. I meant if she consented nerd, which she *probably* would This is a bad take, because it is also true for couples. You cannot consent because you are asleep, but you would likely consent if you are awake. So if it's not an assault in one of these cases, then it isn't in the other one either. But these 2 characters are not couples yet? So? Even if 2 people are a couple, they do not necessarily consent to everything, so it doesn't matter if they are a couple or not. I'm just saying that based on your logic, you cannot do anything to your partner while they are asleep, because they did not consent. Well, I’ve been married longer than you’ve been alive and honestly if every time we wanted to do something intimate we needed to ask first, our lives would be dull as fuck. The best way to wake up is with your partner kissing you or better still doing something erotic to you. Permission for every single act would be the best way to kill a healthy relationship. yikes man that should not be a good thing π |
Oct 9, 12:26 PM
#38
Reply to Aumachi
FutoiOtaku said:
Well, I’ve been married longer than you’ve been alive and honestly if every time we wanted to do something intimate we needed to ask first, our lives would be dull as fuck. The best way to wake up is with your partner kissing you or better still doing something erotic to you. Permission for every single act would be the best way to kill a healthy relationship.
ktg said:
So? Even if 2 people are a couple, they do not necessarily consent to everything, so it doesn't matter if they are a couple or not.
I'm just saying that based on your logic, you cannot do anything to your partner while they are asleep, because they did not consent.
Kitsune_089 said:
But these 2 characters are not couples yet?
ktg said:
This is a bad take, because it is also true for couples. You cannot consent because you are asleep, but you would likely consent if you are awake.
So if it's not an assault in one of these cases, then it isn't in the other one either.
Kitsune_089 said:
I meant if she consented nerd, which she *probably* would
ktg said:
So you can "legally" assault someone if she's awake? Interesting idea.
So you can "legally" assault someone if she's awake? Interesting idea.
I meant if she consented nerd, which she *probably* would
This is a bad take, because it is also true for couples. You cannot consent because you are asleep, but you would likely consent if you are awake.
So if it's not an assault in one of these cases, then it isn't in the other one either.
But these 2 characters are not couples yet?
So? Even if 2 people are a couple, they do not necessarily consent to everything, so it doesn't matter if they are a couple or not.
I'm just saying that based on your logic, you cannot do anything to your partner while they are asleep, because they did not consent.
Well, I’ve been married longer than you’ve been alive and honestly if every time we wanted to do something intimate we needed to ask first, our lives would be dull as fuck. The best way to wake up is with your partner kissing you or better still doing something erotic to you. Permission for every single act would be the best way to kill a healthy relationship.
yikes man that should not be a good thing π
@Aumachi why even talk about established couple's consent in the same discussion with *practically* 2 strangers consent. this is not what we're talking about. Its irrelevant how 2 people in an already established relationship would should or could behave anyway... |
Oct 9, 12:30 PM
#39
didn't they state him to be the same age as her older brother, and at rhe academy now aswell, so he'd be 15 now, wich makes it all significantly worse, that the 15 year old teens, all wanna date a 10 year old kid. |
Oct 9, 12:32 PM
#40
Kitsune_089 said: @Aumachi why even talk about established couple's consent in the same discussion with *practically* 2 strangers consent. this is not what we're talking about. Its irrelevant how 2 people in an already established relationship would should or could behave anyway... alright then π |
Oct 9, 2:44 PM
#41
He's 15. You should not give someone unconscious oral medication as there is a risk of aspiration/choking. In this time period however I can see it being common practice. It was obviously used as an excuse for Duke to steal a kiss. I also don't care because a) it's a fantasy shoujo set in the renaissance and b) it was cute. The real issue is there were no developments between them at all before this and Duke is plain af. ktg said: For example, it was also perfectly normal if you murdered your neighbor in a duel, do you want to implement that tradition as well, because humanity survived? Can't deny life would be much more interesting if duels (and the deaths thereby) were still upheld as fair and legal tradition. Same with trial by combat. |
SawronZXZOct 9, 8:00 PM
Censorship is vandalism. |
Oct 13, 5:43 PM
#42
Reply to Kitsune_089
ktg said:
@Kitsune_089 Ok, so you literally blaming the victim, because you think it was her fault that she got raped.
These children nowadays...
@Kitsune_089 Ok, so you literally blaming the victim, because you think it was her fault that she got raped.
These children nowadays...
??? wtf are you talking about where did i say that
@Kitsune_089 I asked this and linked a raping case where the husband drugged the wife and let other people rape her.: "so you think the wife gave her consent to this" And your answer was: "yeah" So you pretty clearly blamed the victim. |
Oct 13, 5:47 PM
#43
Reply to SawronZXZ
He's 15.
You should not give someone unconscious oral medication as there is a risk of aspiration/choking. In this time period however I can see it being common practice.
It was obviously used as an excuse for Duke to steal a kiss. I also don't care because a) it's a fantasy shoujo set in the renaissance and b) it was cute. The real issue is there were no developments between them at all before this and Duke is plain af.
Can't deny life would be much more interesting if duels (and the deaths thereby) were still upheld as fair and legal tradition. Same with trial by combat.
You should not give someone unconscious oral medication as there is a risk of aspiration/choking. In this time period however I can see it being common practice.
It was obviously used as an excuse for Duke to steal a kiss. I also don't care because a) it's a fantasy shoujo set in the renaissance and b) it was cute. The real issue is there were no developments between them at all before this and Duke is plain af.
ktg said:
For example, it was also perfectly normal if you murdered your neighbor in a duel, do you want to implement that tradition as well, because humanity survived?
For example, it was also perfectly normal if you murdered your neighbor in a duel, do you want to implement that tradition as well, because humanity survived?
Can't deny life would be much more interesting if duels (and the deaths thereby) were still upheld as fair and legal tradition. Same with trial by combat.
@SawronZXZ Sorry, back in the days, there weren't really fair and legal traditions. Especially when the nobility had the judge role as well. |
Oct 13, 7:26 PM
#44
ktg said: @Kitsune_089 I asked this and linked a raping case where the husband drugged the wife and let other people rape her.: "so you think the wife gave her consent to this" And your answer was: "yeah" So you pretty clearly blamed the victim. bait used to bla bla bla |
Oct 15, 12:56 AM
#45
Oct 15, 12:59 AM
#46
Reply to ktg
@Kitsune_089 Ok, so you literally blaming the victim, because you think it was her fault that she got raped.
These children nowadays...
These children nowadays...
@ktg I love Lolis π so it's safe |
Oct 15, 6:58 AM
#47
Reply to Kitsune_089
Moppit said:
Don't ask me how because I never try it. There's a way to get medicine or liquid down through mouth to mouth.
Kitsune_089 said:
how is kissing them helping them to not drown
this sounds stupid
Moppit said:
If I remember right if someone can't drink medicine or liquid on their own. You don't want to feed it to them from cup to mouth. They won't drink it or you will just drown them. You have to force it down their throat instead. Still I'll admit that scene was still ridiculous.
If I remember right if someone can't drink medicine or liquid on their own. You don't want to feed it to them from cup to mouth. They won't drink it or you will just drown them. You have to force it down their throat instead. Still I'll admit that scene was still ridiculous.
how is kissing them helping them to not drown
this sounds stupid
Don't ask me how because I never try it. There's a way to get medicine or liquid down through mouth to mouth.
why would that be any different then just using the glass???
@Kitsune_089 Because of the shape of the cup, it's straight all around, with thin edge or tiny downward curve at the top. The medicine would need to be carefully poured into to her mouth to avoid choking. Yet, trying to do it with the type of cup being using would result in much of the medicine flowing not into her mouth, but flowing down the side of cup and onto her lap or chest. The medicine wouldn't fall straight into her mouth until the cup was at least near a completely horizontal angle, and by then about half the medicine would have spilt onto the bed. If the the "kiss" was something romantic or sexual, then yes it would be disturbing. However, from what I can see of the scene the "kiss" is equivalent to mouth to mouth CPR just with the purpose of giving someone medication. |
Strategist0083Oct 15, 7:19 AM
Oct 15, 8:43 AM
#48
It's a shoujo romance, what do you expect? Lots of females like older guys and fantasize about non-con, get over it. |
ZarutakuOct 15, 10:18 AM
No, this isn't my signature. |
Oct 15, 10:08 AM
#49
Strategist0083 said: @Kitsune_089 Because of the shape of the cup, it's straight all around, with thin edge or tiny downward curve at the top. The medicine would need to be carefully poured into to her mouth to avoid choking. Yet, trying to do it with the type of cup being using would result in much of the medicine flowing not into her mouth, but flowing down the side of cup and onto her lap or chest. The medicine wouldn't fall straight into her mouth until the cup was at least near a completely horizontal angle, and by then about half the medicine would have spilt onto the bed. If the the "kiss" was something romantic or sexual, then yes it would be disturbing. However, from what I can see of the scene the "kiss" is equivalent to mouth to mouth CPR just with the purpose of giving someone medication. https://youtu.be/o048xeNQ3Wo?si=FHub1Ypd4rTqwqqc |
Oct 15, 10:13 AM
#50
This discussion hurts my brain. It pains me to visually see how stupid some people have become and their way of thinking. |
More topics from this board
Poll: » Rekishi ni Nokoru Akujo ni Naru zo Episode 8 Discussion ( 1 2 )Stark700 - Nov 19 |
65 |
by Desi_Nehra
»»
Yesterday, 8:37 PM |
|
» LiziiDavion - Yesterday |
5 |
by ejleon
»»
Yesterday, 3:46 PM |
|
Poll: » Rekishi ni Nokoru Akujo ni Naru zo Episode 7 Discussion ( 1 2 )Stark700 - Nov 12 |
52 |
by Hearts4MyLover
»»
Yesterday, 3:05 PM |
|
Poll: » Rekishi ni Nokoru Akujo ni Naru zo Episode 6 Discussion ( 1 2 )Stark700 - Nov 5 |
87 |
by Magicmist
»»
Nov 19, 3:49 PM |
|
Poll: » Rekishi ni Nokoru Akujo ni Naru zo Episode 5 Discussion ( 1 2 )Stark700 - Oct 29 |
51 |
by Hearts4MyLover
»»
Nov 17, 1:33 PM |