Tokyo Revengers
Well…..I mean ……when I initially repliedβ¬οΈ  |
Thats interesting. How could you not know it would get this far if you participated in continuing it? |
Realicle said: Thats interesting. How could you not know it would get this far if you participated in continuing it? Some people really just like talking I guess, I only responded accordingly  |
INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: Thats interesting. How could you not know it would get this far if you participated in continuing it? Some people really just like talking I guess, I only responded accordingly Right, some people… |
Some peoole just enjoy a good casual convo π |
I got it the first time π |
And I was just agreeing with you π |
I didnt say anything about a “good casual convo”, so im not sure who youre agreeing with π |
Realicle said: I didnt say anything about a “good casual convo”, so im not sure who youre agreeing with π I got that the first time, a good casual convo is what I said because a I was agreeing with you that some people just like talking. |
INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: I didnt say anything about a “good casual convo”, so im not sure who youre agreeing with π I got that the first time, a good casual convo is what I said because a I was agreeing with you that some people just like talking. Except I never said some people just like talking, you did. |
Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: I got that the first time, a good casual convo is what I said because a I was agreeing with you that some people just like talking. Except I never said some people just like talking, you did. Yeah but you said right some people which allowed me to agree with you and mention that someone just enjoy a good casual convo |
INTJ_Ren said: Yeah but you said right some people which allowed me to agree with you and mention that someone just enjoy a good casual convo Except when I said “right some people”, I was already reasserting your statement. So you were really just agreeing with yourself, not me. |
Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Yeah but you said right some people which allowed me to agree with you and mention that someone just enjoy a good casual convo Except when I said “right some people”, I was already reasserting your statement. So you were really just agreeing with yourself, not me. That could go both ways so there really isn’t a one way with that comment especially when it doesn’t directly reassert π |
INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: Except when I said “right some people”, I was already reasserting your statement. So you were really just agreeing with yourself, not me. That could go both ways so there really isn’t a one way with that comment especially when it doesn’t directly reassert π Nope, no it cant. You said something and I responding with a word of agreement: “right”. |
Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: That could go both ways so there really isn’t a one way with that comment especially when it doesn’t directly reassert π Nope, no it cant. You said something and I responding with a word of agreement: “right”. Yes because your interpretation isn’t the only one so that’s just causal convo doing its thing there buddy. |
INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: Nope, no it cant. You said something and I responding with a word of agreement: “right”. Yes because your interpretation isn’t the only one so that’s just causal convo doing its thing there buddy. Yes, and there are still rules to a casual convo. It’s simple really: I made no assertion, therefore, it was impossible for you to agree with anything I had said. |
Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Yes because your interpretation isn’t the only one so that’s just causal convo doing its thing there buddy. Yes, and there are still rules to a casual convo. It’s simple really: I made no assertion, therefore, it was impossible for you to agree with anything I had said. You didn’t need to make an assertion you just said something and I agreed to it, be more direct in what you’re trying to say cause yes there are rules to casual convo. If you say something that can be interpreted different or have double meanings then your intention is null and void. |
INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: Yes, and there are still rules to a casual convo. It’s simple really: I made no assertion, therefore, it was impossible for you to agree with anything I had said. You didn’t need to make an assertion you just said something and I agreed to it, be more direct in what you’re trying to say cause yes there are rules to casual convo. If you say something that can be interpreted different or have double meanings then your intention is null and void. Yes, but you are agreeing with me agreeing to a statement that you made. Thats not a convo anymore, and this is why there are rules to a convo. |
Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: You didn’t need to make an assertion you just said something and I agreed to it, be more direct in what you’re trying to say cause yes there are rules to casual convo. If you say something that can be interpreted different or have double meanings then your intention is null and void. Yes, but you are agreeing with me agreeing to a statement that you made. Thats not a convo anymore, and this is why there are rules to a convo. I also got that the first time, there’s no confusion here. I said something you gave a response and I agreed with said response with my own, that’s a convo, don’t know how else to spell it for ya π |
INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: Yes, but you are agreeing with me agreeing to a statement that you made. Thats not a convo anymore, and this is why there are rules to a convo. I also got that the first time, there’s no confusion here. I said something you gave a response and I agreed with said response with my own, that’s a convo, don’t know how else to spell it for ya π Except you dont get it. If I already agreed with you then why are you agreeing with me agreeing with you? How do you not understand how this makes no sense at all? π |
Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: I also got that the first time, there’s no confusion here. I said something you gave a response and I agreed with said response with my own, that’s a convo, don’t know how else to spell it for ya π Except you dont get it. If I already agreed with you then why are you agreeing with me agreeing with you? How do you not understand how this makes no sense at all? π Oh but you see I do get it, a lot more than you think, you see, when I see we’re on the same page I had one more response and that was to agree with you agree with me, little did I know you weren’t finished and wanted to keep going by not asking the appropriate questions or for me to rephrase, now we’re here because one of us has to clear things up, I mean I don’t have to but aye I’m nice. If this doesn’t make sense then why keep going, if you haven’t figured it out yet and I’m not doing a good enough job at clearing up any misunderstandings then maybe the problem is you? I get what’s going on why don’t you? |
INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: Except you dont get it. If I already agreed with you then why are you agreeing with me agreeing with you? How do you not understand how this makes no sense at all? π Oh but you see I do get it, a lot more than you think, you see, when I see we’re on the same page I had one more response and that was to agree with you agree with me, little did I know you weren’t finished and wanted to keep going by not asking the appropriate questions or for me to rephrase, now we’re here because one of us has to clear things up, I mean I don’t have to but aye I’m nice. If this doesn’t make sense then why keep going, if you haven’t figured it out yet and I’m not doing a good enough job at clearing up any misunderstandings then maybe the problem is you? I get what’s going on why don’t you? Exactly, thank you for admitting it. You were just talking for talkings sake. Only took like 50 replies lol. Oh and by the way, normal convos don’t usually include one long run-on sentence. |
Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Oh but you see I do get it, a lot more than you think, you see, when I see we’re on the same page I had one more response and that was to agree with you agree with me, little did I know you weren’t finished and wanted to keep going by not asking the appropriate questions or for me to rephrase, now we’re here because one of us has to clear things up, I mean I don’t have to but aye I’m nice. If this doesn’t make sense then why keep going, if you haven’t figured it out yet and I’m not doing a good enough job at clearing up any misunderstandings then maybe the problem is you? I get what’s going on why don’t you? Exactly, thank you for admitting it. You were just talking for talkings sake. Only took like 50 replies lol. Oh and by the way, normal convos don’t usually include one long run-on sentence. Word for word did I say I anything about admitting anything or is that an accusation you’re using as a scapegoat? I men’s I was talking just because you kept ing hitting the quote button so I assumed you wanted to keep this up, making a lot of assumptions are we? π€£ a conversation is a conversation, normal complex, are a means to an end. |
INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: Exactly, thank you for admitting it. You were just talking for talkings sake. Only took like 50 replies lol. Oh and by the way, normal convos don’t usually include one long run-on sentence. Word for word did I say I anything about admitting anything or is that an accusation you’re using as a scapegoat? I men’s I was talking just because you kept ing hitting the quote button so I assumed you wanted to keep this up, making a lot of assumptions are we? π€£ a conversation is a conversation, normal complex, are a means to an end. “I was talking just because you kept hitting the quote button”. Lmao you just played yourself. If thats not admitting it then i don’t know what is. π€£ Good try though, you kept it up a long time. |
Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Word for word did I say I anything about admitting anything or is that an accusation you’re using as a scapegoat? I men’s I was talking just because you kept ing hitting the quote button so I assumed you wanted to keep this up, making a lot of assumptions are we? π€£ a conversation is a conversation, normal complex, are a means to an end. “I was talking just because you kept hitting the quote button”. Lmao you just played yourself. If thats not admitting it then i don’t know what is. π€£ Good try though, you kept it up a long time. Well it’s not, you accused me of something I wasn’t doing, and I brought you more close to the actual answer if anything, so please elaborate where did I say anything about admitting anything word for word? It was a good try tho I’ll give you that π you hit the quote button so clearly you want to talk to me, I’m not replying because I genuinely want to. |
INTJ_RenNov 13, 2023 4:47 PM
INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: “I was talking just because you kept hitting the quote button”. Lmao you just played yourself. If thats not admitting it then i don’t know what is. π€£ Good try though, you kept it up a long time. Well it’s not, you accused me of something I wasn’t doing, and I brought you more close to the actual answer if anything, so please elaborate where did I say anything about admitting anything word for word? It was a good try tho I’ll give you that π you hit the quote button so clearly you want to talk to me, I’m not replying because I genuinely want to. Responding just because I am talking to you is the exact definition of talking just for talkings sake. I mean you keep digging yourself a hole, ren. If you don’t want to talk to me and you continue to talk to me, then you are talking for talkings sake. And if that really were true and you didn’t want to respond at all, then you simply wouldn’t. Yes, I hit the quote button no one is disputing that, ren. π If you still don’t understand the term “talking for talkings sake” then I’m afraid I can’t help you anymore. |
Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Well it’s not, you accused me of something I wasn’t doing, and I brought you more close to the actual answer if anything, so please elaborate where did I say anything about admitting anything word for word? It was a good try tho I’ll give you that π you hit the quote button so clearly you want to talk to me, I’m not replying because I genuinely want to. Responding just because I am talking to you is the exact definition of talking just for talkings sake. I mean you keep digging yourself a hole, ren. If you don’t want to talk to me and you continue to talk to me, then you are talking for talkings sake. And if that really were true and you didn’t want to respond at all, then you simply wouldn’t. Yes, I hit the quote button no one is disputing that, ren. π If you still don’t understand the term “talking for talkings sake” then I’m afraid I can’t help you anymore. See you’re doing it again. I’m not talking for the sake of talking, believe me it’s a signature phrase I use often. (especially on MaL) I guess you can’t help me nor do I wish to help you, I gave you everything I got, I don’t know what else you want from me, we discuss things on forums and it takes two to tango so unless the discussion is over then you’re just gonna keep dragging this on till we have 100 replies in this thread, truth be told I was done after the first 3 but I guess you like talking to me. Reality is the only one who’s been talking for the sake of talking is you, you could’ve chose to not hit quote yet here we are, normally I’d say so haha you played yourself but this ain’t one of those moments. I think you genuinely wanted to talk so I kept it up as long as you hit quote, just tryna be nice, and spare some of my time on someone who may or may not need it. |
INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: Responding just because I am talking to you is the exact definition of talking just for talkings sake. I mean you keep digging yourself a hole, ren. If you don’t want to talk to me and you continue to talk to me, then you are talking for talkings sake. And if that really were true and you didn’t want to respond at all, then you simply wouldn’t. Yes, I hit the quote button no one is disputing that, ren. π If you still don’t understand the term “talking for talkings sake” then I’m afraid I can’t help you anymore. See you’re doing it again. I’m not talking for the sake of talking, believe me it’s a signature phrase I use often. (especially on MaL) I guess you can’t help me nor do I wish to help you, I gave you everything I got, I don’t know what else you want from me, we discuss things on forums and it takes two to tango so unless the discussion is over then you’re just gonna keep dragging this on till we have 100 replies in this thread, truth be told I was done after the first 3 but I guess you like talking to me. Reality is the only one who’s been talking for the sake of talking is you, you could’ve chose to not hit quote yet here we are, normally I’d say so haha you played yourself but this ain’t one of those moments. I think you genuinely wanted to talk so I kept it up as long as you hit quote, just tryna be nice, and spare some of my time on someone who may or may not need it. I never wanted anything from you, I’m just telling you how it is and you don’t want to accept it. If you were done after the third reply then you would have stopped. Instead, you are talking for the sake of talking. You claim that you are talking just because you think I need someone to talk to. That is talking for the sake of talking. If anyone needs someone to talk to, it’s the introvert lol. Here’s the deal Ren, I actually want to talk to you and you have indicated that you do not want to talk to me, and thats OK. You continue to blame me for pressing the quote button when you have just as much power as me. This is a lesson for all future interactions, not just this one, Ren. |
Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: See you’re doing it again. I’m not talking for the sake of talking, believe me it’s a signature phrase I use often. (especially on MaL) I guess you can’t help me nor do I wish to help you, I gave you everything I got, I don’t know what else you want from me, we discuss things on forums and it takes two to tango so unless the discussion is over then you’re just gonna keep dragging this on till we have 100 replies in this thread, truth be told I was done after the first 3 but I guess you like talking to me. Reality is the only one who’s been talking for the sake of talking is you, you could’ve chose to not hit quote yet here we are, normally I’d say so haha you played yourself but this ain’t one of those moments. I think you genuinely wanted to talk so I kept it up as long as you hit quote, just tryna be nice, and spare some of my time on someone who may or may not need it. I never wanted anything from you, I’m just telling you how it is and you don’t want to accept it. If you were done after the third reply then you would have stopped. Instead, you are talking for the sake of talking. You claim that you are talking just because you think I need someone to talk to. That is talking for the sake of talking. If anyone needs someone to talk to, it’s the introvert lol. Here’s the deal Ren, I actually want to talk to you and you have indicated that you do not want to talk to me, and thats OK. You continue to blame me for pressing the quote button when you have just as much power as me. This is a lesson for all future interactions, not just this one, Ren. Like you said you had just as much power as me yet kept going so there was no point in you saying that, you quoted me which means you wanted a reply, that’s not talking for the sake of talking, you clearly want something from me which I can’t really give you since this isn’t even anime related. You’re an introvert? Not name calling, cause I’m confused as to who you’re referring to cause I’m an extrovert as you see by my inconsistent replies π I got that the entirety of this interaction, but again I don’t really want to talk to you but you keep quoting me, imma keep quoting you back and if you think I was talking for the sake of talking then, I wasn’t but now I am since I clearly told you I was done and you keep quoting me, if you taught a lesson it fell on deaf ears or I can’t see it cause where’s the lesson π€¨ |
INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: I never wanted anything from you, I’m just telling you how it is and you don’t want to accept it. If you were done after the third reply then you would have stopped. Instead, you are talking for the sake of talking. You claim that you are talking just because you think I need someone to talk to. That is talking for the sake of talking. If anyone needs someone to talk to, it’s the introvert lol. Here’s the deal Ren, I actually want to talk to you and you have indicated that you do not want to talk to me, and thats OK. You continue to blame me for pressing the quote button when you have just as much power as me. This is a lesson for all future interactions, not just this one, Ren. Like you said you had just as much power as me yet kept going so there was no point in you saying that, you quoted me which means you wanted a reply, that’s not talking for the sake of talking, you clearly want something from me which I can’t really give you since this isn’t even anime related. You’re an introvert? Not name calling, cause I’m confused as to who you’re referring to cause I’m an extrovert as you see by my inconsistent replies π I got that the entirety of this interaction, but again I don’t really want to talk to you but you keep quoting me, imma keep quoting you back and if you think I was talking for the sake of talking then, I wasn’t but now I am since I clearly told you I was done and you keep quoting me, if you taught a lesson it fell on deaf ears or I can’t see it cause where’s the lesson π€¨ Yes, I said you have just as much power as me, but you missed the part where I actually want to talk to you. YOU dont. Like I said, I was only trying to help you understand. But like a wise man once said, “You cant get someone to understand something that they dont want to understand”. Oh well. I think we both know youre not the extrovert. It’s in your username lmao. Not that bright I guess. π Again, if you don’t want to talk to me, you don’t have to. I do though, so I will continue to. Not that hard of a concept, but like you said, “deaf ears”. You don’t listen, Ren. |
Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: Like you said you had just as much power as me yet kept going so there was no point in you saying that, you quoted me which means you wanted a reply, that’s not talking for the sake of talking, you clearly want something from me which I can’t really give you since this isn’t even anime related. You’re an introvert? Not name calling, cause I’m confused as to who you’re referring to cause I’m an extrovert as you see by my inconsistent replies π I got that the entirety of this interaction, but again I don’t really want to talk to you but you keep quoting me, imma keep quoting you back and if you think I was talking for the sake of talking then, I wasn’t but now I am since I clearly told you I was done and you keep quoting me, if you taught a lesson it fell on deaf ears or I can’t see it cause where’s the lesson π€¨ Yes, I said you have just as much power as me, but you missed the part where I actually want to talk to you. YOU dont. Like I said, I was only trying to help you understand. But like a wise man once said, “You cant get someone to understand something that they dont want to understand”. Oh well. I think we both know youre not the extrovert. It’s in your username lmao. Not that bright I guess. π Again, if you don’t want to talk to me, you don’t have to. I do though, so I will continue to. Not that hard of a concept, but like you said, “deaf ears”. You don’t listen, Ren. I don’t think I missed anything. As you didn’t want anything from me, I didn’t want anything from you, all you tried to do was say why you’re right and I’m wrong over the tiniest thing that may or may not even be all that much of a big deal to the average Joe, where this help is, well that’s beyond me. I share the same username as my girlfriend I’m more of a EFNJ, try again. We’re still here cause you don’t listen there buddy, I gave you all the info as to why what I said made sense and cleared up the misunderstanding you had which led to the 59 replies you were going on about, we’re still here cause you want to talk to me as you said yourself. It’s exactly as I said, “deaf ears”, I bet you already have a reply already ready since you don’t listen. |
INTJ_Ren said: Realicle said: Yes, I said you have just as much power as me, but you missed the part where I actually want to talk to you. YOU dont. Like I said, I was only trying to help you understand. But like a wise man once said, “You cant get someone to understand something that they dont want to understand”. Oh well. I think we both know youre not the extrovert. It’s in your username lmao. Not that bright I guess. π Again, if you don’t want to talk to me, you don’t have to. I do though, so I will continue to. Not that hard of a concept, but like you said, “deaf ears”. You don’t listen, Ren. I don’t think I missed anything. As you didn’t want anything from me, I didn’t want anything from you, all you tried to do was say why you’re right and I’m wrong over the tiniest thing that may or may not even be all that much of a big deal to the average Joe, where this help is, well that’s beyond me. I share the same username as my girlfriend I’m more of a EFNJ, try again. We’re still here cause you don’t listen there buddy, I gave you all the info as to why what I said made sense and cleared up the misunderstanding you had which led to the 59 replies you were going on about, we’re still here cause you want to talk to me as you said yourself. It’s exactly as I said, “deaf ears”, I bet you already have a reply already ready since you don’t listen. Wrong again, you never cleared anything up. There’s no way you can explain a triple agreement in a two way conversation. Haha, sorry Ren, it’s just not a thing in a normal conversation. A more accurate response would have been, “my bad dude, I meant to add a more logical response to the conversation.” But hey, like you said, “deaf ears”. Do better next time, Ren. Oh and why would you share a MAL account with your girl? Im not really surprised cause you’re not that bright but damn. Unless you’re watching everything together then whats the point? Lol |
Realicle said: INTJ_Ren said: I don’t think I missed anything. As you didn’t want anything from me, I didn’t want anything from you, all you tried to do was say why you’re right and I’m wrong over the tiniest thing that may or may not even be all that much of a big deal to the average Joe, where this help is, well that’s beyond me. I share the same username as my girlfriend I’m more of a EFNJ, try again. We’re still here cause you don’t listen there buddy, I gave you all the info as to why what I said made sense and cleared up the misunderstanding you had which led to the 59 replies you were going on about, we’re still here cause you want to talk to me as you said yourself. It’s exactly as I said, “deaf ears”, I bet you already have a reply already ready since you don’t listen. Wrong again, you never cleared anything up. There’s no way you can explain a triple agreement in a two way conversation. Haha, sorry Ren, it’s just not a thing in a normal conversation. A more accurate response would have been, “my bad dude, I meant to add a more logical response to the conversation.” But hey, like you said, “deaf ears”. Do better next time, Ren. Oh and why would you share a MAL account with your girl? Im not really surprised cause you’re not that bright but damn. Unless you’re watching everything together then whats the point? Lol Wrong again buddy. Normal and complex or whatever word you want to use as a place holder, it’s a means to an end. You’re telling what I can’t do when I just did it, kinda defeats the point there buddyπ there hasn’t been a single logical thing about this interaction so I don’t think I need to do better unless you want to actually throw down some college level responses. Wow the pot calling the kettle black, I think I understand the problem now. You can’t read, and what you’ve been doing this entire time is reading but you’re not reading what you want to hear you’re reading the next thing to counter which I turn tells me you’re not even trying to talk to me but more or less bother me because I share a name, not the account smart one. Again try again. Or don’t cause really that’d be the most logical thing you can do since you wanna talk logic π |
More topics from this board
Poll: » Tokyo Revengers: Seiya Kessen-hen Episode 13 Discussion ( 1 2 3 4 )Stark700 - Apr 1, 2023 |
193 |
by THORFINN_023
»»
Nov 6, 9:56 AM |
|
Poll: » Tokyo Revengers: Seiya Kessen-hen Episode 12 Discussion ( 1 2 3 )Stark700 - Mar 25, 2023 |
129 |
by SanessyAdversary
»»
Nov 1, 4:34 AM |
|
Poll: » Tokyo Revengers: Seiya Kessen-hen Episode 11 Discussion ( 1 2 3 )Stark700 - Mar 18, 2023 |
105 |
by SanessyAdversary
»»
Nov 1, 4:02 AM |
|
Poll: » Tokyo Revengers: Seiya Kessen-hen Episode 10 Discussion ( 1 2 3 )Stark700 - Mar 11, 2023 |
101 |
by SanessyAdversary
»»
Oct 31, 6:45 AM |
|
Poll: » Tokyo Revengers: Seiya Kessen-hen Episode 9 Discussion ( 1 2 3 )Stark700 - Mar 4, 2023 |
114 |
by SanessyAdversary
»»
Oct 31, 6:37 AM |