Forum SettingsEpisode Information
Forums
New
Oct 7, 7:25 PM
#1

Offline
Aug 2015
7
So I think everyone reading this is well aware of how Uzumaki episode 2 turned out. What I don't think most are aware of is that Jason DeMarco put out an official statement on Bluesky. It was quickly taken down but I've seen another completely different screenshot on Reddit so I don't think this is fake.

He says that people have a right to be annoyed and disappointed, but what happened was that "one or two people screwed them over" (likely investors, we'll probably never find out who) and they were given three choices for how to proceed:

Option A: Cancel all of it.
Option B: Finish episode one, release it, cancel the rest.
Option C: Finish episode one, outsource the rest.

This forum topic is not dedicated to pointing fingers at who to blame for why Uzumaki looks like that, or lament over the quality of the work, there's at least two other topics for people to do that in. I'm asking this question: which option would YOU have chosen? Option A is to scrap everything and put out a statement saying it's cancelled. A friend came up with this idea for Option B which is to finish episode 1 and release it and see if the fan response can get investors to finish episodes 2-4 (though that's a shot in the dark and everyone would go "Wait you only have episode 1 finished after five years" and everyone is actually right).

Personally, I'm happy Option C was chosen. It hurts, but at least each episode still has some good cuts. At least the incredible Colin Stetson score gets released.
Oct 7, 8:19 PM
#2
Offline
Mar 2015
41
I agree with C, it's a damned world this industry, like legit crazy the idea that investors would somehow screw with something as lauded as a Junji Ito adaptation, but that's just how it is. There is always a next time, be it 5 years a decade from now for another crack if the right people come together
Oct 7, 8:42 PM
#3
Offline
Jun 2023
257
0215MADman said:
So I think everyone reading this is well aware of how Uzumaki episode 2 turned out. What I don't think most are aware of is that Jason DeMarco put out an official statement on Bluesky. It was quickly taken down but I've seen another completely different screenshot on Reddit so I don't think this is fake.

He says that people have a right to be annoyed and disappointed, but what happened was that "one or two people screwed them over" (likely investors, we'll probably never find out who) and they were given three choices for how to proceed:

Option A: Cancel all of it.
Option B: Finish episode one, release it, cancel the rest.
Option C: Finish episode one, outsource the rest.

This forum topic is not dedicated to pointing fingers at who to blame for why Uzumaki looks like that, or lament over the quality of the work, there's at least two other topics for people to do that in. I'm asking this question: which option would YOU have chosen? Option A is to scrap everything and put out a statement saying it's cancelled. A friend came up with this idea for Option B which is to finish episode 1 and release it and see if the fan response can get investors to finish episodes 2-4 (though that's a shot in the dark and everyone would go "Wait you only have episode 1 finished after five years" and everyone is actually right).

Personally, I'm happy Option C was chosen. It hurts, but at least each episode still has some good cuts. At least the incredible Colin Stetson score gets released.

I totally agree with option C, it is better to do it this way because we still get to see animations of the gruesome parts that we all went "OH HELL NAH" on.
Oct 7, 9:00 PM
#4
Offline
Feb 2021
178
It’s best that we get it all, even if the remainder of the episodes follow episode 2 in terms of quality. I’d argue an unfinished adaptation is worse than a weak one, and, at the end of it all, we still got one hell of a first episode out of it. If any studios want to take a crack at adapting Junji Ito works in the future, then let this be a sign for the people involved to not give up on it.
Oct 7, 9:17 PM
#5
Offline
Sep 2023
63
No. I'm enjoying this creepy ass show a lot so I'm glad it was not cancelled.
Oct 7, 9:49 PM
#6
Offline
Dec 2022
752
C I guess. they should just fix the fucking episode. that shit almost made me cry.
Oct 7, 11:13 PM
#7
Offline
Nov 2016
11
B and C really seem like the only two options. Even in its unfinished state in episode 2 you can still see Nagahama’s storyboarding and some of the cuts still look good. I would have loved if they could have used the fan response to episode 1 to greenlight more, but it might also be too optimistic to assume that would have worked out. I’m no TV producer, I don’t know how these things really work.
Oct 8, 12:37 AM
#8
Offline
May 2024
61
i don’t mind the drop in quality with the animation. As long as its still adapting the story accurately i will still stay tuned. I’ve seen worse animation from anime, whisper me a love song comes to mind where they said f it and stopped releasing episodes altogether even after the shaky animation
Oct 8, 1:15 AM
#9

Offline
Feb 2019
118
Honestly shouldn't have released this half baked and mismanaged anime at all. It's supposed to utilize its animation and visual storytelling as part of the horror, but that's already down the drain. Ito's work really wouldn't get the proper adaptation it deserved.
Oct 8, 3:56 AM

Offline
Mar 2021
3100
My opinion is that they shouldnt have even announced about this project until they were sure that they were ready to announce it.

Early announcement in 2019 and then multiple delays due to COVID made the fans more and more frustrated, which caused thrm to accelerate the production. It's a shame that some people in the top positions fucked up This could've been a very good horror anime otherwise.
Oct 8, 4:04 AM

Offline
Jan 2009
101017
mismanagement is so common this days the problem is the higher ups incompetence
Oct 8, 8:20 AM

Offline
Aug 2015
7
Reply to V1P3R0P
My opinion is that they shouldnt have even announced about this project until they were sure that they were ready to announce it.

Early announcement in 2019 and then multiple delays due to COVID made the fans more and more frustrated, which caused thrm to accelerate the production. It's a shame that some people in the top positions fucked up This could've been a very good horror anime otherwise.
I completely agree but that wasn't really the question, I'm asking if you think the series is should have been cancelled or if what we have is "better than nothing".
Oct 8, 8:33 AM

Offline
Mar 2021
3100
0215MADman said:
I completely agree but that wasn't really the question, I'm asking if you think the series is should have been cancelled or if what we have is "better than nothing".

I agree with DeMarco. That is go with option C

In my days in uni, I have been in situations where I had to work hard on something and in the end it went to nothing due to the fucking covid, as I got grace points without even submitting my work. Even if I was getting something out of it, it meant my hard work was for nothing, I was beyond disappointed.

Even though this is not the same thing here, It really comes down to wether your hard work meant something or not. After all those hard work, if it all was put into trash, I'd feel real disappointed. People will keep complaining regardless of how this anime looks. Even if the anime looked good, people will complain for using rotoscoping and CGI and now since it looks bad, people. like me are complaining over that.

Publishing this work means, whoever were involved will get some xp in their records. Like their career's portfolio. This will either help them in the future if they were genuine with their works, or will get filtered, if they were not.

Thats how I see it, if that makes any bit of sense.
V1P3R0POct 8, 8:43 AM
Oct 8, 8:45 AM

Offline
Jan 2013
6351
I'm salty, so I say just cancel the whole thing, but unfortunately C is the most practical.
If you reply back to me and I never respond, I lost interest and don't care. Sorry about that.
Oct 8, 2:34 PM
Offline
Jul 2023
16
i think its crazy that ive been waiting for this shit since it was announced in 2019 for it to be this shitty. they had 5 years to make 4 fucking episodes and they somehow messed it up.
Oct 9, 7:21 AM
Offline
Jan 2024
89
honestly it shocks me how they didn't think of Uzumaki as a good enough work to be invested in. I heard that the entire team that made ep 1 was fired cause it was taking alog time and resources.
I'm just sad to see Junji's work being disrespected like this. It would have been better if it did get canceled. but I'll still watch it cause I love junji itou's work. maybe I can hope someone to get a remake later on..
the fact that ep 1 was so good and I thought to myself "I'm so glad someone took the white and black approach for junji's work" and then it all went to waste

More topics from this board

Poll: » Uzumaki Episode 4 Discussion ( 1 2 3 4 )

IzanaSolos - Oct 19

189 by menacce »»
7 hours ago

Poll: » What is Junji Itou's Best Anime Adaptation?

waalex11 - Nov 21

12 by waalex11 »»
Today, 12:29 AM

» I HATE YOU UZUMAKI

Andru230 - Nov 14

31 by Andru230 »»
Yesterday, 5:57 AM

Poll: » Uzumaki Episode 1 Discussion ( 1 2 3 4 5 ... Last Page )

IzanaSolos - Sep 28

393 by menacce »»
Nov 23, 11:05 AM

» As an anime only

TsutanaiFuun - Nov 11

27 by NassaDane »»
Nov 21, 3:19 PM
It’s time to ditch the text file.
Keep track of your anime easily by creating your own list.
Sign Up Login