New
Sep 8, 2022 9:26 PM
#1
I love how biased people are when reviewing series by an author that they liked, this manga used to have a very bad score, and people relegated this as being some convoluted shitfest with lots of edge, but due to chainsaw mans popularity, you got a bunch of bandwagoners who suddenly act like this is the second bible going around. you know what, I've been seeing this phenomenon a lot lately. people not holding authors accountable Or people who change their opinions retroactively due to another work by the same author etc, like the naruto fans giving samurai 8 a massively good reviews or scores, when it doesn't hold up at all (frankly if you asked me I wouldn't say naruto is good ether but its a lot better than samurai 8) or when that assassin isekai anime came out people started giving redo of a healer better scores retroactively due to the author being the same. EDIT: ALSO DISCLAIMER BTW, I actually was one of the people who liked firepunch since the start, it always gave me the vibe of, "so crazy or so bad its good" |
Neostorm-XJan 14, 2023 3:00 PM
Sep 15, 2022 8:53 PM
#2
Wel, I know no one in answering you, but it's funny how this is true, in 2017 (before the manga ended) the score was 6.91 . Funny how also the first review that appears has over 1900 reactions despite... well, having basically nothing there lol. Actually I think the thing with RoH and the assassin isekai is backwards people learned about the autor with RoH so they were expecting stuff with Ansatsu Kizoku. |
Sep 18, 2022 6:20 AM
#3
I think that people reconsidering the quality of a project in retrospect isn't always bandwagoning and it's pretty immature to think so. I read Fire Punch on a whim at a point where I didn't even know much about CSM at all and I loved it. I thought it was so weird it didn't have at least a cult following and how it was scored so low. Clearly the author's new popularity helped this manga, which honestly FP is is a niche nihilistic manga, get past the kneejerk reactions of it just being edgy for edge's sake and I'd help people realize it's much more than how dark it is. It's reached more people which I think is great because I think this manga fits a specific type of reader and needed more popularity to reach those people. Also Majora's Mask, The Thing, The Shining, and many other now popular movies, shows and games have been only appreciated in retrospect and didn't get good praise when they released. |
TodComodSep 18, 2022 6:24 AM
Oct 15, 2022 8:37 PM
#4
It's not even edgy, it's just plain garbage. |
Oct 18, 2022 9:49 AM
#5
Ionliosite2 said: Wel, I know no one in answering you, but it's funny how this is true, in 2017 (before the manga ended) the score was 6.91 . Funny how also the first review that appears has over 1900 reactions despite... well, having basically nothing there lol. Actually I think the thing with RoH and the assassin isekai is backwards people learned about the autor with RoH so they were expecting stuff with Ansatsu Kizoku. EXACTLY thats THE THING, fire punch was one of the series I literally followed FROM THE VERY START LIKE 4 CHAPTERS IN, and i basicly followed it monthly like deadtube, FOR SOME REASON how this series is some how considered magical or deep even though at the time people rightfully dismissed this as convoluted garbage, now i know chainsawman is much better, however its not right to just give the authors previous work a much higher score specificly because of their future work, thats a stupid way to review, at this point ive already lost all faith in MAL reviews (I was already largely skeptical due to bots and brigading) but at this point i might as well install an extension to remove them. |
Oct 18, 2022 9:50 AM
#6
DarkSageRK said: It's not even edgy, it's just plain garbage. lots of people these days conflate edgy with garbage sadly, stuff like gantz and akumetsu are edgy but i disagree that it would make them garbage. and granted im not saying firepunch is complete garbage but im surprised the score went up massively due to chainsawman which shouldn't be the case. thats basicly what happened with samurai 8 with kishimoto, but after people just gave up on that series and stoped hyping it. |
Oct 18, 2022 9:51 AM
#7
Ionliosite2 said: Wel, I know no one in answering you, but it's funny how this is true, in 2017 (before the manga ended) the score was 6.91 . Funny how also the first review that appears has over 1900 reactions despite... well, having basically nothing there lol. Actually I think the thing with RoH and the assassin isekai is backwards people learned about the autor with RoH so they were expecting stuff with Ansatsu Kizoku. yeah its funny, lots of people were giving Ansatsu Kizoku BAD scores at first because of redo (at least the manga or light novel version) but when the first episode came out they were surprised, i've had people reactive very confusedly when finding out the same author wrote these series. |
Oct 18, 2022 11:38 AM
#8
i dunno i found fire punch quite mid |
Dec 26, 2022 3:37 AM
#9
Neostorm-X said: And a lot of people think that calling something "edgy" makes them too cool for school because they don't know any other vocabulary.DarkSageRK said: It's not even edgy, it's just plain garbage. lots of people these days conflate edgy with garbage sadly, stuff like gantz and akumetsu are edgy but i disagree that it would make them garbage. and granted im not saying firepunch is complete garbage but im surprised the score went up massively due to chainsawman which shouldn't be the case. thats basicly what happened with samurai 8 with kishimoto, but after people just gave up on that series and stoped hyping it. I'm not sure how Gantz or Akumetsu qualifies as edgy. Is the word "edgy" just a synonym for gore/violence? |
Dec 26, 2022 4:00 AM
#10
Neostorm-X said: Yeah I think I know what you mean. Did people actually call this manga edgy garbage before csm? o.o What kind of stuff did people say about it? I would also like to know of other series were people have changed their opinions on after time passed. I agree that bandwagoning is definitely very prominent in the manga community, but had no idea Fire Punch had a bad rep before csm.I love how biased people are when reviewing series by an author that they liked, this manga used to have a very bad score, and people relegated this as being some convoluted shitfest with lots of edge, but due to chainsaw mans popularity, you got a bunch of bandwagoners who suddenly act like this is the second bible going around. you know what, I've been seeing this phenomenon a lot lately. people not holding authors accountable Or people who change their opinions retroactively due to another work by the same author etc, like the naruto fans giving samurai 8 a massively good reviews or scores, when it doesn't hold up at all (frankly if you asked me I wouldn't say naruto is good ether but its a lot better than samurai 8) or when that assassin isekai anime came out people started giving redo of a healer better scores retroactively due to the author being the same. |
⚠ This user has received numerous reports of abuse and harassment. Please report any guideline violations to MAL staff. |
Dec 27, 2022 3:40 AM
#11
Emerardo said: Neostorm-X said: Yeah I think I know what you mean. Did people actually call this manga edgy garbage before csm? o.o What kind of stuff did people say about it? I would also like to know of other series were people have changed their opinions on after time passed. I agree that bandwagoning is definitely very prominent in the manga community, but had no idea Fire Punch had a bad rep before csm.I love how biased people are when reviewing series by an author that they liked, this manga used to have a very bad score, and people relegated this as being some convoluted shitfest with lots of edge, but due to chainsaw mans popularity, you got a bunch of bandwagoners who suddenly act like this is the second bible going around. you know what, I've been seeing this phenomenon a lot lately. people not holding authors accountable Or people who change their opinions retroactively due to another work by the same author etc, like the naruto fans giving samurai 8 a massively good reviews or scores, when it doesn't hold up at all (frankly if you asked me I wouldn't say naruto is good ether but its a lot better than samurai 8) or when that assassin isekai anime came out people started giving redo of a healer better scores retroactively due to the author being the same. Emerardo said: man fire punch was fucking notorious, similar to the U12 thingNeostorm-X said: Yeah I think I know what you mean. Did people actually call this manga edgy garbage before csm? o.o What kind of stuff did people say about it? I would also like to know of other series were people have changed their opinions on after time passed. I agree that bandwagoning is definitely very prominent in the manga community, but had no idea Fire Punch had a bad rep before csm.I love how biased people are when reviewing series by an author that they liked, this manga used to have a very bad score, and people relegated this as being some convoluted shitfest with lots of edge, but due to chainsaw mans popularity, you got a bunch of bandwagoners who suddenly act like this is the second bible going around. you know what, I've been seeing this phenomenon a lot lately. people not holding authors accountable Or people who change their opinions retroactively due to another work by the same author etc, like the naruto fans giving samurai 8 a massively good reviews or scores, when it doesn't hold up at all (frankly if you asked me I wouldn't say naruto is good ether but its a lot better than samurai 8) or when that assassin isekai anime came out people started giving redo of a healer better scores retroactively due to the author being the same. the manga about little lolis being hunted or something etc. there was literally a scene where fujimoto literally just wrote the part where the 2 captured orphans were forced to have sex with dogs i can't remember but it was at the start. for literally no reason other than shock value (that is what i define edgy) i don't know whats with fujimoto and dogs, but damn he really likes dogs. apparently at the time i knew a bunch of people and i remember even some anime reviewers who called fire punch edgy garbage, or "its so bad its good" don't get me wrong i enjoyed the shit outta it, but the story writing was fucking horrendous, it was all over the place. everything was basically done for shock value. chainsawman is better because it seems fujimoto took heavy inspiration from ishida sui when writing characters, and fights, and also took heavy inspiration from Q hayashida when designing characters and interactions including the bizzare world of chainsawman etc, fujimoto literally cites dorohedoro was one of his direct inspirations along with jjk actually so this part can be confirmed. could explain why fire punch was so different in quality to chainsawman it seems its also similar to freesia. |
Dec 27, 2022 6:10 AM
#12
damn, must have been some time. because i don't remember this lol. |
Dec 27, 2022 11:46 PM
#13
Neostorm-X said: I can't find much discussion on Fire Punch online, even when I custom search from before CSM releasing. Where exactly was it notorious? Just on mal?Emerardo said: Neostorm-X said: I love how biased people are when reviewing series by an author that they liked, this manga used to have a very bad score, and people relegated this as being some convoluted shitfest with lots of edge, but due to chainsaw mans popularity, you got a bunch of bandwagoners who suddenly act like this is the second bible going around. you know what, I've been seeing this phenomenon a lot lately. people not holding authors accountable Or people who change their opinions retroactively due to another work by the same author etc, like the naruto fans giving samurai 8 a massively good reviews or scores, when it doesn't hold up at all (frankly if you asked me I wouldn't say naruto is good ether but its a lot better than samurai 8) or when that assassin isekai anime came out people started giving redo of a healer better scores retroactively due to the author being the same. Emerardo said: man fire punch was fucking notorious, similar to the U12 thingNeostorm-X said: I love how biased people are when reviewing series by an author that they liked, this manga used to have a very bad score, and people relegated this as being some convoluted shitfest with lots of edge, but due to chainsaw mans popularity, you got a bunch of bandwagoners who suddenly act like this is the second bible going around. you know what, I've been seeing this phenomenon a lot lately. people not holding authors accountable Or people who change their opinions retroactively due to another work by the same author etc, like the naruto fans giving samurai 8 a massively good reviews or scores, when it doesn't hold up at all (frankly if you asked me I wouldn't say naruto is good ether but its a lot better than samurai 8) or when that assassin isekai anime came out people started giving redo of a healer better scores retroactively due to the author being the same. the manga about little lolis being hunted or something etc. there was literally a scene where fujimoto literally just wrote the part where the 2 captured orphans were forced to have sex with dogs i can't remember but it was at the start. for literally no reason other than shock value (that is what i define edgy) i don't know whats with fujimoto and dogs, but damn he really likes dogs. apparently at the time i knew a bunch of people and i remember even some anime reviewers who called fire punch edgy garbage, or "its so bad its good" don't get me wrong i enjoyed the shit outta it, but the story writing was fucking horrendous, it was all over the place. everything was basically done for shock value. chainsawman is better because it seems fujimoto took heavy inspiration from ishida sui when writing characters, and fights, and also took heavy inspiration from Q hayashida when designing characters and interactions including the bizzare world of chainsawman etc, fujimoto literally cites dorohedoro was one of his direct inspirations along with jjk actually so this part can be confirmed. could explain why fire punch was so different in quality to chainsawman it seems its also similar to freesia. |
⚠ This user has received numerous reports of abuse and harassment. Please report any guideline violations to MAL staff. |
Dec 28, 2022 1:48 AM
#14
Neostorm-X said: Emerardo said: Neostorm-X said: I love how biased people are when reviewing series by an author that they liked, this manga used to have a very bad score, and people relegated this as being some convoluted shitfest with lots of edge, but due to chainsaw mans popularity, you got a bunch of bandwagoners who suddenly act like this is the second bible going around. you know what, I've been seeing this phenomenon a lot lately. people not holding authors accountable Or people who change their opinions retroactively due to another work by the same author etc, like the naruto fans giving samurai 8 a massively good reviews or scores, when it doesn't hold up at all (frankly if you asked me I wouldn't say naruto is good ether but its a lot better than samurai 8) or when that assassin isekai anime came out people started giving redo of a healer better scores retroactively due to the author being the same. Emerardo said: man fire punch was fucking notorious, similar to the U12 thingNeostorm-X said: I love how biased people are when reviewing series by an author that they liked, this manga used to have a very bad score, and people relegated this as being some convoluted shitfest with lots of edge, but due to chainsaw mans popularity, you got a bunch of bandwagoners who suddenly act like this is the second bible going around. you know what, I've been seeing this phenomenon a lot lately. people not holding authors accountable Or people who change their opinions retroactively due to another work by the same author etc, like the naruto fans giving samurai 8 a massively good reviews or scores, when it doesn't hold up at all (frankly if you asked me I wouldn't say naruto is good ether but its a lot better than samurai 8) or when that assassin isekai anime came out people started giving redo of a healer better scores retroactively due to the author being the same. the manga about little lolis being hunted or something etc. there was literally a scene where fujimoto literally just wrote the part where the 2 captured orphans were forced to have sex with dogs i can't remember but it was at the start. for literally no reason other than shock value (that is what i define edgy) i don't know whats with fujimoto and dogs, but damn he really likes dogs. apparently at the time i knew a bunch of people and i remember even some anime reviewers who called fire punch edgy garbage, or "its so bad its good" don't get me wrong i enjoyed the shit outta it, but the story writing was fucking horrendous, it was all over the place. everything was basically done for shock value. chainsawman is better because it seems fujimoto took heavy inspiration from ishida sui when writing characters, and fights, and also took heavy inspiration from Q hayashida when designing characters and interactions including the bizzare world of chainsawman etc, fujimoto literally cites dorohedoro was one of his direct inspirations along with jjk actually so this part can be confirmed. could explain why fire punch was so different in quality to chainsawman it seems its also similar to freesia. Emerardo said: In western communities, it gained traction first on 4chan /a/ board, you can just hop on desuarchive.org and search about it. And disregard anyone said that FP is just pointless shock value, when the manga itself is a commentary about how desensitized ourselves are to it. Neostorm-X said: I can't find much discussion on Fire Punch online, even when I custom search from before CSM releasing. Where exactly was it notorious? Just on mal?Emerardo said: Neostorm-X said: Yeah I think I know what you mean. Did people actually call this manga edgy garbage before csm? o.o What kind of stuff did people say about it? I would also like to know of other series were people have changed their opinions on after time passed. I agree that bandwagoning is definitely very prominent in the manga community, but had no idea Fire Punch had a bad rep before csm.I love how biased people are when reviewing series by an author that they liked, this manga used to have a very bad score, and people relegated this as being some convoluted shitfest with lots of edge, but due to chainsaw mans popularity, you got a bunch of bandwagoners who suddenly act like this is the second bible going around. you know what, I've been seeing this phenomenon a lot lately. people not holding authors accountable Or people who change their opinions retroactively due to another work by the same author etc, like the naruto fans giving samurai 8 a massively good reviews or scores, when it doesn't hold up at all (frankly if you asked me I wouldn't say naruto is good ether but its a lot better than samurai 8) or when that assassin isekai anime came out people started giving redo of a healer better scores retroactively due to the author being the same. Emerardo said: Neostorm-X said: Yeah I think I know what you mean. Did people actually call this manga edgy garbage before csm? o.o What kind of stuff did people say about it? I would also like to know of other series were people have changed their opinions on after time passed. I agree that bandwagoning is definitely very prominent in the manga community, but had no idea Fire Punch had a bad rep before csm.I love how biased people are when reviewing series by an author that they liked, this manga used to have a very bad score, and people relegated this as being some convoluted shitfest with lots of edge, but due to chainsaw mans popularity, you got a bunch of bandwagoners who suddenly act like this is the second bible going around. you know what, I've been seeing this phenomenon a lot lately. people not holding authors accountable Or people who change their opinions retroactively due to another work by the same author etc, like the naruto fans giving samurai 8 a massively good reviews or scores, when it doesn't hold up at all (frankly if you asked me I wouldn't say naruto is good ether but its a lot better than samurai 8) or when that assassin isekai anime came out people started giving redo of a healer better scores retroactively due to the author being the same. the manga about little lolis being hunted or something etc. there was literally a scene where fujimoto literally just wrote the part where the 2 captured orphans were forced to have sex with dogs i can't remember but it was at the start. for literally no reason other than shock value (that is what i define edgy) i don't know whats with fujimoto and dogs, but damn he really likes dogs. apparently at the time i knew a bunch of people and i remember even some anime reviewers who called fire punch edgy garbage, or "its so bad its good" don't get me wrong i enjoyed the shit outta it, but the story writing was fucking horrendous, it was all over the place. everything was basically done for shock value. chainsawman is better because it seems fujimoto took heavy inspiration from ishida sui when writing characters, and fights, and also took heavy inspiration from Q hayashida when designing characters and interactions including the bizzare world of chainsawman etc, fujimoto literally cites dorohedoro was one of his direct inspirations along with jjk actually so this part can be confirmed. could explain why fire punch was so different in quality to chainsawman it seems its also similar to freesia. |
Dec 28, 2022 4:59 AM
#15
Isn't this entire topic just basically: "I dislike this series and other people used to dislike it as well, why do other people like this now, they should dislike it?". Admittedly the series was quite a bit less well received back when it solely existed and the current rating is because of bandwagoners, however why would the rating or general reception actually even matter. Sure validation is nice, but it's a bit overrated. . |
Jan 14, 2023 3:02 PM
#16
Kumiveneella said: you have it wrong lmao, I was literally forced to defend fire punch all the time in my friend group lmao.Isn't this entire topic just basically: "I dislike this series and other people used to dislike it as well, why do other people like this now, they should dislike it?". Admittedly the series was quite a bit less well received back when it solely existed and the current rating is because of bandwagoners, however why would the rating or general reception actually even matter. Sure validation is nice, but it's a bit overrated. . I'm more pissed off that people suddenly like this series while hating it most of the time. imagine you being an anime fan in the 90s, every one around you bullied you and made fun of you, suddenly when anime became mainstream, everyone starts jumping on the bandwagon and pretend that liking anime was always cool. also this isn't just fire punch, i want my mal scores to have some semblance of integrity, although at this point i've given up, since there are way to many issues with the scoring system not just limited to bots |
Jan 14, 2023 3:08 PM
#17
Emerardo said: back when k1ssmanga was around, and places like manga dex had huge communities when they still didn't delete comments, also mangafox communities before they completely wiped everything.Neostorm-X said: I can't find much discussion on Fire Punch online, even when I custom search from before CSM releasing. Where exactly was it notorious? Just on mal?Emerardo said: Neostorm-X said: Yeah I think I know what you mean. Did people actually call this manga edgy garbage before csm? o.o What kind of stuff did people say about it? I would also like to know of other series were people have changed their opinions on after time passed. I agree that bandwagoning is definitely very prominent in the manga community, but had no idea Fire Punch had a bad rep before csm.I love how biased people are when reviewing series by an author that they liked, this manga used to have a very bad score, and people relegated this as being some convoluted shitfest with lots of edge, but due to chainsaw mans popularity, you got a bunch of bandwagoners who suddenly act like this is the second bible going around. you know what, I've been seeing this phenomenon a lot lately. people not holding authors accountable Or people who change their opinions retroactively due to another work by the same author etc, like the naruto fans giving samurai 8 a massively good reviews or scores, when it doesn't hold up at all (frankly if you asked me I wouldn't say naruto is good ether but its a lot better than samurai 8) or when that assassin isekai anime came out people started giving redo of a healer better scores retroactively due to the author being the same. Emerardo said: Neostorm-X said: Yeah I think I know what you mean. Did people actually call this manga edgy garbage before csm? o.o What kind of stuff did people say about it? I would also like to know of other series were people have changed their opinions on after time passed. I agree that bandwagoning is definitely very prominent in the manga community, but had no idea Fire Punch had a bad rep before csm.I love how biased people are when reviewing series by an author that they liked, this manga used to have a very bad score, and people relegated this as being some convoluted shitfest with lots of edge, but due to chainsaw mans popularity, you got a bunch of bandwagoners who suddenly act like this is the second bible going around. you know what, I've been seeing this phenomenon a lot lately. people not holding authors accountable Or people who change their opinions retroactively due to another work by the same author etc, like the naruto fans giving samurai 8 a massively good reviews or scores, when it doesn't hold up at all (frankly if you asked me I wouldn't say naruto is good ether but its a lot better than samurai 8) or when that assassin isekai anime came out people started giving redo of a healer better scores retroactively due to the author being the same. the manga about little lolis being hunted or something etc. there was literally a scene where fujimoto literally just wrote the part where the 2 captured orphans were forced to have sex with dogs i can't remember but it was at the start. for literally no reason other than shock value (that is what i define edgy) i don't know whats with fujimoto and dogs, but damn he really likes dogs. apparently at the time i knew a bunch of people and i remember even some anime reviewers who called fire punch edgy garbage, or "its so bad its good" don't get me wrong i enjoyed the shit outta it, but the story writing was fucking horrendous, it was all over the place. everything was basically done for shock value. chainsawman is better because it seems fujimoto took heavy inspiration from ishida sui when writing characters, and fights, and also took heavy inspiration from Q hayashida when designing characters and interactions including the bizzare world of chainsawman etc, fujimoto literally cites dorohedoro was one of his direct inspirations along with jjk actually so this part can be confirmed. could explain why fire punch was so different in quality to chainsawman it seems its also similar to freesia. also it was infamous on 4chan as a meme for edge lord stuff, even more than tokyo ghoul at the time. it was also kinda shit on, on reddit as well, along with some other more obscure forums, and even youtube reviews very early on, kept giving this bad scores. like around 2016 in its starting point especially |
Jan 15, 2023 4:16 AM
#18
Neostorm-X said: Kumiveneella said: you have it wrong lmao, I was literally forced to defend fire punch all the time in my friend group lmao.Isn't this entire topic just basically: "I dislike this series and other people used to dislike it as well, why do other people like this now, they should dislike it?". Admittedly the series was quite a bit less well received back when it solely existed and the current rating is because of bandwagoners, however why would the rating or general reception actually even matter. Sure validation is nice, but it's a bit overrated. . I'm more pissed off that people suddenly like this series while hating it most of the time. imagine you being an anime fan in the 90s, every one around you bullied you and made fun of you, suddenly when anime became mainstream, everyone starts jumping on the bandwagon and pretend that liking anime was always cool. also this isn't just fire punch, i want my mal scores to have some semblance of integrity, although at this point i've given up, since there are way to many issues with the scoring system not just limited to bots Oh it seems as though I had misunderstood, oh well. I guess even then some of the people calling the series edgy trash might've just been the most vocal readers. There's really nothing that can be done about the ratings. |
Jan 15, 2023 10:09 AM
#19
DarkSageRK said: Nice way to say thatIt's not even edgy, it's just plain garbage. 1. you haven't read manga 2. you have kiddo mindset 3. you are too sensitive Well there are only 3 options to be honest |
Jan 18, 2023 11:13 AM
#20
For me I checked out Fire Punch a few months before Chainsaw Man anime and i still found it to be one of my favourite manga series. I know it has a lot of dark themes but I feel that it fleshes out the World that’s been built we’re it feels like the apocalypse has made people be able to go to the parts of the mind we would never want to see and they can do this cause they aren’t restricted. This is what I feel the dark edgey tones achieve. |
Jan 19, 2023 8:22 PM
#21
Kumiveneella said: i mean it was always edgy, but i liked it the same reason why i loved deadtube,Neostorm-X said: Kumiveneella said: Isn't this entire topic just basically: "I dislike this series and other people used to dislike it as well, why do other people like this now, they should dislike it?". Admittedly the series was quite a bit less well received back when it solely existed and the current rating is because of bandwagoners, however why would the rating or general reception actually even matter. Sure validation is nice, but it's a bit overrated. . I'm more pissed off that people suddenly like this series while hating it most of the time. imagine you being an anime fan in the 90s, every one around you bullied you and made fun of you, suddenly when anime became mainstream, everyone starts jumping on the bandwagon and pretend that liking anime was always cool. also this isn't just fire punch, i want my mal scores to have some semblance of integrity, although at this point i've given up, since there are way to many issues with the scoring system not just limited to bots Oh it seems as though I had misunderstood, oh well. I guess even then some of the people calling the series edgy trash might've just been the most vocal readers. There's really nothing that can be done about the ratings. it was completely off the rails and unpredictable i couldn't stop reading even if the over all story structure wasn't good at all. also i don't even think redo of a healer was as bad as people said it was, i used that as an example because of hypocrisy that people use because apparently just like goblin slayer and shield hero it was politically charged. but there are many cases of people retroactively changing the scores of something when it gets popular, even those who hated the thing before |
Jan 20, 2023 12:28 AM
#22
Neostorm-X said: I'd like to at the least say that I thought the "edgy" content in Fire Punch was not without nuance, the same could not be said of some of those other series you mentioned. Although this is just my opinion. Kumiveneella said: i mean it was always edgy, but i liked it the same reason why i loved deadtube,Neostorm-X said: Kumiveneella said: you have it wrong lmao, I was literally forced to defend fire punch all the time in my friend group lmao.Isn't this entire topic just basically: "I dislike this series and other people used to dislike it as well, why do other people like this now, they should dislike it?". Admittedly the series was quite a bit less well received back when it solely existed and the current rating is because of bandwagoners, however why would the rating or general reception actually even matter. Sure validation is nice, but it's a bit overrated. . I'm more pissed off that people suddenly like this series while hating it most of the time. imagine you being an anime fan in the 90s, every one around you bullied you and made fun of you, suddenly when anime became mainstream, everyone starts jumping on the bandwagon and pretend that liking anime was always cool. also this isn't just fire punch, i want my mal scores to have some semblance of integrity, although at this point i've given up, since there are way to many issues with the scoring system not just limited to bots Oh it seems as though I had misunderstood, oh well. I guess even then some of the people calling the series edgy trash might've just been the most vocal readers. There's really nothing that can be done about the ratings. it was completely off the rails and unpredictable i couldn't stop reading even if the over all story structure wasn't good at all. also i don't even think redo of a healer was as bad as people said it was, i used that as an example because of hypocrisy that people use because apparently just like goblin slayer and shield hero it was politically charged. but there are many cases of people retroactively changing the scores of something when it gets popular, even those who hated the thing before Where as something like Redo of the healer for example hides behind the authors mask of apparent "satire", In order to give the most dry and stupid revenge fantasy. It's kind of interesting how most of the series you mentioned are essentially revenge fantasies, they're just a power fantasy for the reader, yet mostly for the author. Like yeah you could argue the same about Fire Punch, yet burning alive all the time is hardly a fantasy. Like the nuance was always there in Fire Punch though, so I'd have to disagree on that front. Yet this is just my opinion. |
Jan 25, 2023 4:06 AM
#23
Jan 26, 2023 12:12 AM
#24
SanessyAdversary said: yeah,I like this manga overall bec i watched a good explanation by few youtubers such as Sufferents and look at the comments for good summary review in the nicest way as possible :3 but this was way before sufferents was even on youtube. i mena like the earlier manga era in the midd 2010s. this was literally considered edgelord manga etc. and i found it cuz i was an edge lord and some one recommended it to me |
Jan 26, 2023 2:12 AM
#25
Neostorm-X said: mhm i understand what you're saying and based take btw abt being an edgelord XDSanessyAdversary said: yeah,I like this manga overall bec i watched a good explanation by few youtubers such as Sufferents and look at the comments for good summary review in the nicest way as possible :3 but this was way before sufferents was even on youtube. i mena like the earlier manga era in the midd 2010s. this was literally considered edgelord manga etc. and i found it cuz i was an edge lord and some one recommended it to me i guess whenever a new edgy manga appears people will just consider it some sort of copy of certain edgy manga without giving it chances like. or maybe they're just trolls idk xd |
SanessyAdversaryJan 26, 2023 2:21 AM
Feb 1, 2023 11:48 PM
#26
It's really ironic how people love Re:ZERO which is way worse than any of those and have the audacity to call other series 'edgy' It's 'Coal' calling both pot and kettle black |
If you want to reply to my posts, come up with valid arguments instead of ad hominem HIGHER LEVEL THINKERS ONLY |
May 21, 2023 9:49 PM
#27
Sad to hear that. Back when this manga was serialized, I didn't know about its existence myself. Only some time later I stumbled upon the famous meme, based on that one famous panel showing grinning Agni (well, back then I didn't know the name of the character on the meme and that it was from a manga called Fire Punch). Few years later, after being really disappointed with Chainsaw Man, I decided to give Fire Punch a try. Its synopsis seemed interesting enough. Post-apo setting, superpowers, unique take on the main character. Luckily for me, the manga was even better than that. It gave me everything I actually liked in Chainsaw Man, but most of all - it gave me everything that I felt Chainsaw Man was lacking. But going back to the topic, I'm surprised that this manga was considered as really edgy one. To me it was not edgy that much. I mean, it was no different in this aspect to many other mangas released before, during, and after its serialization. I guess it's a typical "trends change" moment, haha. |
Feb 28, 9:51 AM
#28
Maybe, people are just starting to get it. But seems weird that people haven't gotten Mirai Nikki, School Days, or Survival Horror manga yet. |
Sep 28, 2:07 PM
#29
Okay so I just binged read it, first 5 volumes are garbage filled with edgy bullshit just like chainsaw man but x10. The last three volumes are a lot better. Despite being how bad it is, I think it's still an insult to compare it with redo of healer. First 5 vols: 5.5, next 3: 7. Overall still 6. |
It is shocking to find how many people do not believe they can learn, and how many more believe learning to be difficult. Dune |
More topics from this board
Poll: » Fire Punch Chapter 53 Discussionremoved-user - May 24, 2017 |
15 |
by Kizuki01
»»
Yesterday, 8:19 PM |
|
Poll: » Fire Punch Chapter 52 DiscussionStark700 - May 17, 2017 |
13 |
by Kizuki01
»»
Nov 21, 7:45 AM |
|
Poll: » Fire Punch Chapter 51 DiscussionStark700 - May 11, 2017 |
9 |
by Kizuki01
»»
Nov 14, 6:52 PM |
|
Poll: » Fire Punch Chapter 50 DiscussionStark700 - May 4, 2017 |
7 |
by Kizuki01
»»
Nov 8, 7:53 PM |
|
Poll: » Fire Punch Chapter 83 Discussion ( 1 2 3 )TaichouSenpai - Jan 5, 2018 |
144 |
by Comander-07
»»
Nov 1, 1:52 PM |